Community
Wiki Posts
Search

FA refuses to give name

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 17, 2012, 6:16 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,686
Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
Not true! I have had very very few altercations w crew members in my life (maybe 2) but I had a knock down drag out fight 15 years ago or so on a flight to TPE w the purser She had security meet the flight and I just tossed my return tkt to the UA mgr and told him to refund / endorse it over to any other carrier. That he didn't have to worry about me flying UA any longer. I won't go into all the details but I was in F as the ONLY pax on Thanksgiving day. The pursers 7 year old daughter was on board sitting as a non rev in C (breaking the rules as children under a certain age can't fly in C unless accompanied. Anyway. F/A in F gave me a bottle of DP to take home (yes, UA used to serve DP in F). The little girl noticed me put it in my bag and when I was sleeping she went into my bag, thru my stuff and took the bottle out. (7 years old!) When I woke I noticed my bag open and the bottle gone, as I went to question the F/A the little girl came up to me and said "I saw you steal that bottle and I told my Mommy and her boyfriend the Captain". Sorry but I lost it. I told the other F/A who was as shocked as I was to "get this little brats mother (who was on break). I lost it and was screaming so loudly at her (I was wrong there) that they called security, blah blah blah. Refused to fly UA home - took SQ instead
how did story end? W me getting a call and a nice gift from Steven Wolfe and this woman lost her flying privileges for her family!!!?
One doesn't lose one's flying benefits for on the job related punishment, they lose them for using them against the terms of their use. The daughter, who was not the purser abused the benefit. As such, that benefit was suspended. A person cannot use their nrsa benefits while on the clock, but others can, and their behavior carries consequences. Apples and oranges. Job related things carry no punishment, abuse of other non performance benefits that are not part of the job/work on the other hand are not the same.
fastair is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2012, 6:54 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Programs: UA Premier 1K: PlAAtinum; DL SM, MM; Marriott Gold; CO Plat Emeritus; NW Plat Emeritus
Posts: 4,776
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
IMO some name tag should be required to be visible whenever they are in uniform, including when walking through airports not on duty, etc.
When you go to and from work to you wear a big name tag? Why could you POSSIBLY need the name of an off-duty airline employee?
Alpha Golf is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2012, 7:00 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,686
Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
If a FA does not wear his/her name tag on EK, it's considered out of uniform and they can be written up for it. Not only does it say first and last name, but the new ones also say what country they are from. That's a little TMI. personally, I don't care if they give there name or not. I can address them. "miss", "hay you", "stewardess" of Just "Yo". But without the name being given on request (or employee #) there is no accountability p.
If a flight attendant on ek does not act like the personal property of the airline, they get in trouble. There are many articles from former ek flight attendants that attest to the fact that they are treated not as humans, but gears owned by the company. Civil rights in the UAE are more than 50 years behind the western world. Maybe the service is good, but the servitude isn't very evolutionary

Last edited by fastair; Jun 18, 2012 at 10:10 am Reason: added words "treated...as"
fastair is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2012, 7:04 pm
  #64  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,421
Originally Posted by Alpha Golf
When you go to and from work to you wear a big name tag? Why could you POSSIBLY need the name of an off-duty airline employee?
Anyone in uniform represents their employer. It reflects badly on the employer if they shove a passenger aside on a public bus, if they sceam and swear, etc. If this bothers them, they can change into the uniform when they arrive at the worksite.
MSPeconomist is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2012, 7:20 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Programs: AA DL BA UA FAIRMONT SPG HILTON MARRIOTT HYATT
Posts: 83
Originally Posted by jbharvey
First off. This is a small nit pick on my side. My general experiences with FAs are usually positive.

On today's UA667 from LAX to LAS was in F on a paid ticket. As he was serving me my pre takeoff beverage I was being friendly and asked, like I do all FAs and he said: I don't give my name. I asked why? He said "I just don't. I've flown international enough to know not to"

What the heck? Common decency?
The FA refused to give his name. Leave him alone. Why do you really want to know? Dude.........It's an hour flight. Give him a break.
Kewldude21 is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2012, 8:02 pm
  #66  
uwr
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold75K
Posts: 850
Originally Posted by fastair
If a flight attendant on ek does not act like the personal property of the airline, they get in trouble. There are many articles from former ek flight attendants that attest to the fact that they are not humans, but gears owned by the company. Civil rights in the UAE are more than 50 years behind the western world. Maybe the service is good, but the servitude isn't very evolutionary
Your hyperbole undermines your point. The FACT is that flight attendants are NOT owned by any company. They are employees, though some airlines may treat them worse than others.

Originally Posted by jbharvey
Woah, wait a minute. If I'm paying $9000, I expect a modicum of service decency in return. Like I said in my original post, it's a little bit nitpicky on my end and I'm not making a Federal case out of it, but if you have the CEO of the airline in the intro video on each flight saying that his business is about "service" and treating people like you want to be treated, then this is a little bit hypocritical.

Giving your name if it's asked by a customer, regardless for praise or about regarding an issue, is customer service 101. I can't think of any time that a representative, agent, waiter, civil service worker, or vendor has refused to give me their name.

I'm a weekly flyer on United. I've flown 92k miles this year (not bragging, just trying to credentialize here), and I always ask the FA's name. Why? Because I'm being polite. I'm not stalking them. I'm not in my 40's, 50's or 60's and that guy who thinks if I use their first name, I'll get better service.

I actually value the service contributions that FA's make, and what better way for me to show them gratitude is to say "Thank you John" or "Thank you Sally" when they hand me my drink or if I ask for something. I say please, I say thank you, and I smile because I know more often than not there is some rude person sitting nearby who doesn't take the time and effort to show appreciation.
What is the UA policy? Are customer-facing employees required to give a name when asked?

If so, the FA was out of line. OP was not trying to pick up the FA in a bar. He was asking the FA's name in the FA's workplace.

If not, then UA has bigger problems than I've thought.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Jun 17, 2012 at 10:10 pm Reason: merge
uwr is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2012, 8:29 pm
  #67  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Houston
Programs: AA EXP; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott Titanium, Hilton Diamond, UA 1.56MM (fmr UA1K)
Posts: 5,772
Originally Posted by EmailKid
Whenever I've seen one it's always been on backwards.
This is not by accident. I have seen FAs (mostly on CO) perform a sort of ritual involving taking the tag off and putting it on backwards or hiding it in some fashion.

Most people in their job are not allowed to go 'incongito'. I am not sure why FAs feel entitled to.
Renard is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2012, 8:52 pm
  #68  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,436
Originally Posted by Renard
This is not by accident. I have seen FAs (mostly on CO) perform a sort of ritual involving taking the tag off and putting it on backwards or hiding it in some fashion.
That was my point @:-)

I have not seen them go through the ritual, but there's a reason why they put on the name tag backwards .... allowing bags not just under exit row seats, but actually sticking OUT from under the seat in front And yes, I have the pixs to prove it.

EmailKid
EmailKid is online now  
Old Jun 17, 2012, 9:03 pm
  #69  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,437
Originally Posted by MatthewLAX
Have to disagree with your here. I rarely ask for names, but what's the real harm? At least the FA could have made up a name or borrowed someone else's apron.
First evaluate the benefit. There is no benefit.

Originally Posted by Kewldude21
The FA refused to give his name. Leave him alone. Why do you really want to know? Dude.........It's an hour flight. Give him a break.
Indeed, why does he want to know? Very odd. When odd stuff occurs, volunteer as little info as possible.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2012, 10:59 pm
  #70  
uwr
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: SEA
Programs: AS MVP Gold75K
Posts: 850
Originally Posted by mre5765
First evaluate the benefit. There is no benefit.

Indeed, why does he want to know? Very odd. When odd stuff occurs, volunteer as little info as possible.
I don't think our personal opinions matter. What is the UA policy?
uwr is offline  
Old Jun 17, 2012, 11:02 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: IAD, and sometimes OMNI/PR. Currently: not far from IAD, but home will always be SAN (not far from the "touch my junk and I'll have you arrested" Memorial TSA Check Point) even if I'm not there so much these days.
Programs: UA, CO, Calcifer Award for Mad Haiku Skillz
Posts: 5,076
Originally Posted by controller1
So, when we call the elite line and it is answered "Hello, my name is Peggy" . . .
CLASSIC!
youreadyfreddie is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2012, 12:41 am
  #72  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: London; Bangkok; Las Vegas
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA MM Gold; Marriott Lifetime Titanium; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,750
Originally Posted by Kewldude21
The FA refused to give his name. Leave him alone. Why do you really want to know? Dude.........It's an hour flight. Give him a break.
I doubt the OP's name is "Dude".

Even after the OP gave you a name to use, you don't want to use it. No wonder it is not a big deal to you if a F/A gives a name or not.
Always Flyin is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2012, 2:02 am
  #73  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai / NYC
Programs: EK-IO, UA-1K2MM, ETIHAD-GOLD, SPG-PLAT LIFETIME, JUMEIRAH SERIUS GOLD
Posts: 5,220
Originally Posted by fastair
If a flight attendant on ek does not act like the personal property of the airline, they get in trouble. There are many articles from former ek flight attendants that attest to the fact that they are not humans, but gears owned by the company. Civil rights in the UAE are more than 50 years behind the western world. Maybe the service is good, but the servitude isn't very evolutionary
That's BS, SORRY. I don't know where you get your information but I LIVE WITH ONE and she puts up w crap from NOBODY. Most EK F/A's that have bad things to say about the company or how they are treated I've found are usually ones "not invited to extend there contract". I know "hundreds of them" as both my current GF of 2 years and EX of 5 years are both EK FA's and that is 100% rumor that they are treated w anything but respect from the company. The same company that pays them well, gives them a FREE apartment, one of the most generous lay over plans, CASH per diem, etc. they are also FREE to leave just like a UA F/A, the difference is EK does not allow them to work as F/A's till the age of 60. (but I bet there are more opportunities for EK F/A's to go into mgmnt then there are opportunities for UA F/A's)

Civil rights has nothing to do with anything. Western EXPATS are treated very well in the UAE! Civil Rights? I don't know what your referring to. One of the few places in the region where woman are not 2nd class citizens. Yes, it is very similar to Singapore but if you don't get involved w drugs and don't commit violent crime or theft, it's actually a very very nice place to live (I'm Jewish and born and raised in NYC and Dubai is certainly safer and more civilized. (I've never been discriminated against as a Jew). So civil rights is the wrong argument (especially regarding EXPAT ZFlight attendsnts (if your aPakistani worker?, Another story). Singapore is very similar but the #1 most sought after place to live as an Expat (and "SQ GIRLS" are the highest paid in the industry

There was a girl from New Zealand who it was found out was dealing drugs and running escorts from her apartment. They SHOULD have thrown her little ... in jail but instead deported her on the next flight out to Auckland. She had an article written about her in one of the NZ papers and went on and on how she was treated like a slave (that's where those rumors come from). (how bout her keeping 50% of her escorts pay? That's like owning slaves)

FYI: my GF is not allowed to be rude to a passenger know matter what he/she says to her. She's told to walk away and report the incident to the SD, SM or Purser. However, if a passenger touches her (very common from Saudi men who can't touch girls at home but can't wait to swap a girls ... on a foreign airline). She has all sorts of ways she's allowed to take care of that (including ripping his arm out of it's socket)

There are other Gulf carriers that hire mostly expats and I have heard SOME of them do not treat there girls quite as well (GULF AIR & Etihad both hire mostly Western girls) and I know some are unhappy w GULF AIR and living in Bahrain (never heard anything bad from the girls at Etihad / Abu Dhabi) but then since you bring up civil rights, I guess that makes sense since it is Bahrain that has a PR problem these days. The UAE

I'd much rather be treated like sn EK FA then a UA or AA FA on almost every level by both the company and the passengers (but they do have to wear name tags)

Originally Posted by fastair
One doesn't lose one's flying benefits for on the job related punishment, they lose them for using them against the terms of their use. The daughter, who was not the purser abused the benefit. As such, that benefit was suspended. A person cannot use their nrsa benefits while on the clock, but others can, and their behavior carries consequences. Apples and oranges. Job related things carry no punishment, abuse of other non performance benefits that are not part of the job/work on the other hand are not the same.
As I said. There was more to the story that I could have gone into. However, when Wolfe apologized to me (and sent a hell of a gift). HE told me that his Sr VP, Employee relations had taken her flying privileges away from her entire family (you can't hold a 7 year old responsible for much, especially when her mothers the working purser)

I know it's much rarer then it should be but there ARE things Union and non union employees can lose there job / privileges over. Don't you think the system is screwed when an employee can act w impunity knowing know matter what they do, there job is "almost" impossible to take

Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Jun 18, 2012 at 5:10 am Reason: multi-quote
chinatraderjmr is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2012, 6:30 am
  #74  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,686
Originally Posted by chinatraderjmr
That's BS, SORRY. I don't know where you get your information
The WSJ for one. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122877609256789273.html

"Tough rules are enforced, including some that would be deemed discriminatory in the West, such as weight requirements and a no-pregnancy policy for unwed women."..."Emirates' rules require attendants to politely accept a business card or phone number if it's proffered by a passenger"..."If a single female attendant shows up pregnant, she's fired. Openly gay male attendants need not apply"..."In some countries, applicants are put on a scale and weighed. (The practice is against the law in many Western countries because it's considered discriminatory, according to the company.)"

ALso 1st had discussions with both ex Emirates pilots and ex Emirates flight attendants, who both say that some things about their programs were great, none of them would ever do them again, they are far happier making less $$ at a US airline where they are treated as humans instead of as pieces of flesh for the company to parade or use whenever however they want.

Similar articles exist for Ethiad, in fact more, so I am betting Emirates isn't as bad as Ethiad, but they both are very similar, most likely due to the culture. Now maybe things have changed since the artcle and since I have talked to these former Emirates flight cres have been hired by US carriers, just like WN has a reputation for being on time and inexpensive, a reputation follows you many years later.

Last edited by fastair; Jun 18, 2012 at 6:35 am
fastair is offline  
Old Jun 18, 2012, 7:42 am
  #75  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MEL
Programs: VAG
Posts: 1,865
Incidentally I just dropped in to the AA forum, where they're having this thread's alternative-universe mirror image:

fa calling me by first name

Choice quotes: "I hate it when I get addressed by [legal] name. Why do some FA's insist on it?"
Jorgen is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.