Official 2017-19: Which Smartphone Should I Get?
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ORD
Posts: 14,242
Official 2017-19: Which Smartphone Should I Get?
Last edited by gfunkdave; Jan 3, 2017 at 4:19 pm
#2
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Caracas
Programs: Former AA PLT/GLD, A3 *G, Priority Pass
Posts: 1,144
Official 2017: Which Smartphone Should I Get?
I'm loving my iPhone 7 Plus. One thing i miss is the notification light i have in android. I thought i would never ever say this, but i like the LCD screen on the iPhone better than the AMOLED on the S6 Edge. The colors are indeed better calibrated.
Currently i have a LG G3, S6 Edge,Note 7 and an iPhone 7 Plus brand new in my stable. The Note 7 i never did use or turn on but here is a photo of both of them before i turned in my Note 7.
The only thing i don't like about the iPhone 7 Plus is that it might be too heavy for me. My hands strain after holding it for a while, but my hands are female and teenage tiny. I like the phone with the bigger screen but i might say that it was too heavy but is fine.
I use the S6 Edge and the 7+ vis a vis, but sometimes find myself seeking for the S6 to chat (whatsapp,bbm) instead of the 7 Plus, because the size is friendlier to my hands.
Built quality wise i compared both Note 7 and iPhone and even if the Note 7 was very high, the iPhone does indeed feel more premium. This coming from an android user, that her last iPhone was the original iPhone in 2007, then when android launched i changed all of my stuff to android. Now switched back to iOS because of the Note 7 fiasco.
Currently i have a LG G3, S6 Edge,Note 7 and an iPhone 7 Plus brand new in my stable. The Note 7 i never did use or turn on but here is a photo of both of them before i turned in my Note 7.
The only thing i don't like about the iPhone 7 Plus is that it might be too heavy for me. My hands strain after holding it for a while, but my hands are female and teenage tiny. I like the phone with the bigger screen but i might say that it was too heavy but is fine.
I use the S6 Edge and the 7+ vis a vis, but sometimes find myself seeking for the S6 to chat (whatsapp,bbm) instead of the 7 Plus, because the size is friendlier to my hands.
Built quality wise i compared both Note 7 and iPhone and even if the Note 7 was very high, the iPhone does indeed feel more premium. This coming from an android user, that her last iPhone was the original iPhone in 2007, then when android launched i changed all of my stuff to android. Now switched back to iOS because of the Note 7 fiasco.
#3
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 916
What price point do you think a good modern smart phone should be ?
I know iphone 6 - 7s and the top Samsungs are over $500 , but then there are a lot of very nice phones in the $200 range,
I know most people do not buy their phones directly but you still pay a lot for them month to month ,
What do you get extra from a $500+ phone compared to the $200 phones ?
I know iphone 6 - 7s and the top Samsungs are over $500 , but then there are a lot of very nice phones in the $200 range,
I know most people do not buy their phones directly but you still pay a lot for them month to month ,
What do you get extra from a $500+ phone compared to the $200 phones ?
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2006
Location: SEA or BGR, Lower Earth Orbit
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 17,217
I'm loving my iPhone 7 Plus. One thing i miss is the notification light i have in android. I thought i would never ever say this, but i like the LCD screen on the iPhone better than the AMOLED on the S6 Edge. The colors are indeed better calibrated.
Currently i have a LG G3, S6 Edge,Note 7 and an iPhone 7 Plus brand new in my stable. The Note 7 i never did use or turn on but here is a photo of both of them before i turned in my Note 7.
The only thing i don't like about the iPhone 7 Plus is that it might be too heavy for me. My hands strain after holding it for a while, but my hands are female and teenage tiny. I like the phone with the bigger screen but i might say that it was too heavy but is fine.
I use the S6 Edge and the 7+ vis a vis, but sometimes find myself seeking for the S6 to chat (whatsapp,bbm) instead of the 7 Plus, because the size is friendlier to my hands.
Built quality wise i compared both Note 7 and iPhone and even if the Note 7 was very high, the iPhone does indeed feel more premium. This coming from an android user, that her last iPhone was the original iPhone in 2007, then when android launched i changed all of my stuff to android. Now switched back to iOS because of the Note 7 fiasco.
Currently i have a LG G3, S6 Edge,Note 7 and an iPhone 7 Plus brand new in my stable. The Note 7 i never did use or turn on but here is a photo of both of them before i turned in my Note 7.
The only thing i don't like about the iPhone 7 Plus is that it might be too heavy for me. My hands strain after holding it for a while, but my hands are female and teenage tiny. I like the phone with the bigger screen but i might say that it was too heavy but is fine.
I use the S6 Edge and the 7+ vis a vis, but sometimes find myself seeking for the S6 to chat (whatsapp,bbm) instead of the 7 Plus, because the size is friendlier to my hands.
Built quality wise i compared both Note 7 and iPhone and even if the Note 7 was very high, the iPhone does indeed feel more premium. This coming from an android user, that her last iPhone was the original iPhone in 2007, then when android launched i changed all of my stuff to android. Now switched back to iOS because of the Note 7 fiasco.
#5
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,703
I'm loving my iPhone 7 Plus. One thing i miss is the notification light i have in android. I thought i would never ever say this, but i like the LCD screen on the iPhone better than the AMOLED on the S6 Edge. The colors are indeed better calibrated.
Currently i have a LG G3, S6 Edge,Note 7 and an iPhone 7 Plus brand new in my stable. The Note 7 i never did use or turn on but here is a photo of both of them before i turned in my Note 7.
<snip>
Currently i have a LG G3, S6 Edge,Note 7 and an iPhone 7 Plus brand new in my stable. The Note 7 i never did use or turn on but here is a photo of both of them before i turned in my Note 7.
<snip>
#6
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: gggrrrovvveee (ORD)
Programs: UA Pt, Marriott Ti, Hertz PC
Posts: 6,091
What price point do you think a good modern smart phone should be ?
I know iphone 6 - 7s and the top Samsungs are over $500 , but then there are a lot of very nice phones in the $200 range,
I know most people do not buy their phones directly but you still pay a lot for them month to month ,
What do you get extra from a $500+ phone compared to the $200 phones ?
I know iphone 6 - 7s and the top Samsungs are over $500 , but then there are a lot of very nice phones in the $200 range,
I know most people do not buy their phones directly but you still pay a lot for them month to month ,
What do you get extra from a $500+ phone compared to the $200 phones ?
More expensive phones tend to:
- be thinner, lighter
- use more premium materials (i.e., more metal/glass, less plastic)
- have faster processors
- have more memory
- have higher-resolution displays
- have better cameras
- have more built-in storage at the top end
- unique features like Samsung Edge, LG V20 ticker, Apple jackless headphones (zing!)
- some common high end phone features are not ubiquitous among lower-end phones - fingerprint scanner, NFC, wireless charging, fast charging, etc.
- newest features and innovations first; it usually takes at least a couple of generations for some features to trickle down
That said, you can get a perfectly good phone for $200-$300. You just have to realize you won't have the latest and greatest.
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,781
I don't see any reason to go for a "flagship" phone any more -- even more so the inflated $700+ prices for larger phones. My Nexus 6 died recently, and the best replacement I was able to find was an essentially-same generation (and very closely related) Moto X Pure for $279.
If those weren't available as new-surplus, there are a whole passel of nice "midrange" phones in the $200-$350 range with pretty much everything I'd want. The Moto Z Play looks really nice, but not enough better than the G4 Plus to justify being half again more expensive.
#8
Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bay Area
Programs: DL SM, UA MP.
Posts: 12,729
Well if you upgrade more frequently, maybe you don't want to spend top dollar.
But amortized over 2 years vs. 1 year can make a big difference.
That extra $400 over 2 years is like 60 cents a day? If you take a lot of photos, maybe the premium you pay for a better camera module might be worth it.
How many pictures will you take with your phone over a year or two years?
But amortized over 2 years vs. 1 year can make a big difference.
That extra $400 over 2 years is like 60 cents a day? If you take a lot of photos, maybe the premium you pay for a better camera module might be worth it.
How many pictures will you take with your phone over a year or two years?
#9
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,781
Well if you upgrade more frequently, maybe you don't want to spend top dollar.
But amortized over 2 years vs. 1 year can make a big difference.
That extra $400 over 2 years is like 60 cents a day? If you take a lot of photos, maybe the premium you pay for a better camera module might be worth it.
How many pictures will you take with your phone over a year or two years?
But amortized over 2 years vs. 1 year can make a big difference.
That extra $400 over 2 years is like 60 cents a day? If you take a lot of photos, maybe the premium you pay for a better camera module might be worth it.
How many pictures will you take with your phone over a year or two years?
Newer ones even have wifi to sync photos to your phone as you go.
If carrying a second device is too inconvenient, in many cases a good new mid-range phone is going to have a better camera than a 2-3 year old flagship. That's especially true for casual users, who don't jump on the flagship model right after release.
A cheaper phone also means insurance is a lot less important, and yes, you can also affordably upgrade sooner. The math may work slightly differently for iOS phones or outside the US, in either case where there is actually a useful secondary market, but Android devices by the time one might actually want to sell them are essentially without resale value, whether high-end or low.
#10
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Caracas
Programs: Former AA PLT/GLD, A3 *G, Priority Pass
Posts: 1,144
I never got the chance to power up my Note 7, and when i was finally there face to face with the Note 7, i still didn't feel brave enough/curious enough to power it on. I kept the S-Pen as a memoir of the phone i wanted to have.
#11
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Caracas
Programs: Former AA PLT/GLD, A3 *G, Priority Pass
Posts: 1,144
Well it all depends, i think now you can get a really good phone for $300 with almost none practical compromise. $200 can work too but it will be felt in the screen quality etc. I think if you're not a fan of technology nor have the need to have the lastest and the greatest a $300 budget will suffice. The phone will do everything you want it to do, and have the same tools as the more expensive one.
You're just paying built quality,processor,features and in some cases brand. For me it's more important processor and ram. A fast phone that i can throw anything at. Camera for me is secondary. I use it a lot because we use our smartphone's camera a lot that is readily available but for that i use a dslr.
I do load very intensive apps,games.. etc. I use the phone as a media consumption..
It is definitely not necessary to spend what i did but i am a fan of gadgets, computers and electronics.
Here is one of the first photos i took with the 7+ ... it does take better night photos than my S6 Edge which will show more noise in the night. I have not edited the pic or added any special setting of the 7+. As i just had it and took the photo with standard setting.
Everyone can note a bit of my finger in the image.I'm sorry... i was not used to the phone size or camera placing that slipped a little bit of human flesh in the photo.
Here is the pic: https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5581/3...ce578b63_h.jpg
I thought it turned nicely
You're just paying built quality,processor,features and in some cases brand. For me it's more important processor and ram. A fast phone that i can throw anything at. Camera for me is secondary. I use it a lot because we use our smartphone's camera a lot that is readily available but for that i use a dslr.
I do load very intensive apps,games.. etc. I use the phone as a media consumption..
It is definitely not necessary to spend what i did but i am a fan of gadgets, computers and electronics.
Here is one of the first photos i took with the 7+ ... it does take better night photos than my S6 Edge which will show more noise in the night. I have not edited the pic or added any special setting of the 7+. As i just had it and took the photo with standard setting.
Everyone can note a bit of my finger in the image.I'm sorry... i was not used to the phone size or camera placing that slipped a little bit of human flesh in the photo.
Here is the pic: https://c2.staticflickr.com/6/5581/3...ce578b63_h.jpg
I thought it turned nicely
#12
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: ORF
Programs: Amex Plat, AA, BA Silver, Marriott Plat, Choice Gold, HHonors Gold, IHG Diamond
Posts: 3,749
I'm now on the "buy every year or so" plan with my service through one of the third-party carriers, h2owireless. I buy during the holidays when some crazy deals get offered. Certainly there are use cases that demand more expensive phones than I buy, but I think most of us are looking for a reasonable internet experience, decent texting capabilities, and sharp photos--with individual exceptions, in about that order. I'm stunned to think that in making a recommendation for a phone that the phone abilities seem almost irrelevant.
For $200-250 every year or so, I'm slightly behind the curve of current technology, but I'm still getting a decent sized screen, a processor that handles the demands I place upon the phone, and plenty of storage space. I don't demand photographic precision out of my phone and agree with nkedel that if photo quality with reasonable portability is important, then get a decent point-and-shoot. They're light, they're cheap, and their specs are better than almost any phone with a camera. I don't demand that much from a phone's camera--although I might like some better specs that go well beyond what any phone might offer--but for the cheap price of a refurbed unit, you can get a phone and a small camera for no more than $300 that will last you more than a year.
In fact, the only reason I bought a camera this past year was because a visit to the Augusta National Golf Club for a practice round in April meant that cell phones were prohibited but not cameras. So I bought a refurbed Nikon that would pass inspection and that's likely to be better for photo quality than any but the most expensive cell phones for several years to come. I'm spending a third the cost of the most expensive phones--likely to replaced every year or two anyway, maintaining independence from carriers, and getting decent technology.
For $200-250 every year or so, I'm slightly behind the curve of current technology, but I'm still getting a decent sized screen, a processor that handles the demands I place upon the phone, and plenty of storage space. I don't demand photographic precision out of my phone and agree with nkedel that if photo quality with reasonable portability is important, then get a decent point-and-shoot. They're light, they're cheap, and their specs are better than almost any phone with a camera. I don't demand that much from a phone's camera--although I might like some better specs that go well beyond what any phone might offer--but for the cheap price of a refurbed unit, you can get a phone and a small camera for no more than $300 that will last you more than a year.
In fact, the only reason I bought a camera this past year was because a visit to the Augusta National Golf Club for a practice round in April meant that cell phones were prohibited but not cameras. So I bought a refurbed Nikon that would pass inspection and that's likely to be better for photo quality than any but the most expensive cell phones for several years to come. I'm spending a third the cost of the most expensive phones--likely to replaced every year or two anyway, maintaining independence from carriers, and getting decent technology.
#13
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: RDU
Posts: 19
I've been very happy with my current LG G4. Released in 2015 so might be a bit too old for some. But I find I have the most success picking up the flagship phones a year after release when the price is cut in half. Even with the older age, the specs are comparable to (and often better than) newly released mid-range models.
#14
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,781
For $200-250 every year or so, I'm slightly behind the curve of current technology, but I'm still getting a decent sized screen, a processor that handles the demands I place upon the phone, and plenty of storage space. I don't demand photographic precision out of my phone and agree with nkedel that if photo quality with reasonable portability is important, then get a decent point-and-shoot. They're light, they're cheap, and their specs are better than almost any phone with a camera. I don't demand that much from a phone's camera--although I might like some better specs that go well beyond what any phone might offer--but for the cheap price of a refurbed unit, you can get a phone and a small camera for no more than $300 that will last you more than a year.
I'm still very happy with a 10MP camera with a large sensor (the Canon S95, from 2010.) In really good lighting conditions, the newer 20+ MP cameras may equal it, but in practice, it's generally much better. The video capabilities of a P&S that old are very limited compared to even a cheapie phone these days, though -- I don't take a lot of video, but for many people that would be a good reason not to just spend $50-$65 on eBay on a used S95, but for pure stills it's very hard to beat.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Are there any decent backup phones (Android) to have really as a spare for when something happens to my phone, lend to a friend, etc. that take nano SIM, support micro SD, and support LTE?