Community
Wiki Posts
Search

The Guardian having a crack this time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 25, 2017, 6:18 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Guinea
Programs: HHonors Gold
Posts: 69
The Guardian having a crack this time

https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ritish-airways

Victoria Cohen Mitchell in Sunday's Guardian picking up the stories we've all heard
goglobalnz is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2017, 6:36 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London
Programs: BA BLUE BADGE
Posts: 1,323
Fair comment
Lioneye is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2017, 6:42 pm
  #3  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: UK, Peak District near MAN
Programs: BA- blue, BD,DL
Posts: 2,027
Sums it up beautifully.
highpeaklad is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2017, 6:56 pm
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
''Race to the bottom''. No prizes for guessing where she's been doing her research.

I like the bit about increasing fares by a few quid to improve overall quality. Eh Victoria....I think Willie Walsh would have sussed that one out by now if it was a banker solution.
HIDDY is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2017, 7:51 pm
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,196
I don't see this as 'having a crack' at BA.

There is nothng in the article that is incorrect or exagerated.
UKtravelbear is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2017, 8:03 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Presently MEL (Base: GLA)
Programs: BA, AA, QF, BD, SQ, EY
Posts: 51
BA can't compete with the no frills airlines or the more luxurious carriers. It squarely sits in the mediocre range. Fly them or don't, there are plenty of other options (internationally at least). There have been enough articles written about the good old days of British Airways for people to know they ain't what they used to be. Try something new!
rgalbr10 is offline  
Old Mar 25, 2017, 8:14 pm
  #7  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 11,582
Originally Posted by goglobalnz
https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...ritish-airways

Victoria Cohen Mitchell in Sunday's Guardian picking up the stories we've all heard
So I guess we can say what will feature on the BBC this week. OP, I take it you're not a subscriber or you would surely know this faux pax...I also hope you're not using an Ad-blocker .

What I don't understand is surely the wealthy VCM would be enjoying the premium delights of the Club Europe cabin. I hope BA can inform her of the latest improvements starting shortly including crockery and (allegedly) premium toasties. Perhaps VCM and her esteemed intellectual-heavyweight colleague Polly Toynbee can start a fund to help those pay for bevvies stuck down the back suffering the plight of the Euro Trash cabin. The struggle is never ending.
hugolover is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017, 2:16 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: London
Posts: 1,546
Pedant alert. There is no Sunday Guardian: walk into a newsagent and what you buy is "The Observer". Though to be fair, they share the same website.
She seems to have touched a nerve - loads of comments pouring into her article.
rcspeirs is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017, 2:24 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: London
Programs: BA Gold, LH Sen, MUCCI, Junior Jet Club.
Posts: 8,101
Originally Posted by HIDDY
''Race to the bottom''. No prizes for guessing where she's been doing her research.

I like the bit about increasing fares by a few quid to improve overall quality. Eh Victoria....I think Willie Walsh would have sussed that one out by now if it was a banker solution.
Seeing as BA fares are already "more than a few quid" more than the competition (and will be forever as a result of the charges from operating at LHR) it's clear BA has no interest in low fares, only low costs.

The result is a very poor value for money product.
BahrainLad is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017, 2:47 am
  #10  
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 15,926
Originally Posted by BahrainLad
Seeing as BA fares are already "more than a few quid" more than the competition (and will be forever as a result of the charges from operating at LHR) it's clear BA has no interest in low fares, only low costs.

The result is a very poor value for money product.
I suppose the real fare comparisons should be made against the markets BA is directly competing - such as from LGW, STN. LHR's fees alone can be more than the whole flight charged by EZY, FR et al and will give a rather warped view.

I have no doubt that BA have pinched too many pennies, and it looks like that approach is not changing anytime soon.

Last edited by Tobias-UK; Mar 26, 2017 at 3:51 am Reason: Fat fingers
Tobias-UK is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017, 3:07 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SE1, London
Posts: 23,435
I think she nails what I and many other actual BA passengers have been saying for a while. Great article.
Swanhunter is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017, 3:09 am
  #12  
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: ±38,000 feet
Programs: LH HON, BA GGL, AF Plat, EK Plat
Posts: 6,428
I wonder what BA PR is going to do with all these articles popping up and complaining about the Ba demise
nufnuf77 is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017, 3:13 am
  #13  
Ambassador, British Airways Executive Club, easyJet and Ryanair
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: UK/Las Vegas
Programs: BA Gold (GGL/CCR)
Posts: 15,926
Originally Posted by Swanhunter
I think she nails what I and many other actual BA passengers have been saying for a while. Great article.
Indeed, I don't think there is anything in that article that one could argue against .. although I'm not entirely certain you can buy toilet rolls airside

I must admit, this made me chuckle:

"... a flight to Barbados was delayed at London Gatwick for nearly six hours while ground crew restocked the plane due to a shortage of toilet roll. Why so long? That hasn’t been made clear, but no doubt you could wipe your arse on the amount of red tape required to re-stock anything at a big company. God forbid someone just nips into Boots at the terminal, back in 10 minutes..."
Tobias-UK is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017, 3:15 am
  #14  
Moderator: British Airways Executive Club, Iberia Airlines, Airport Lounges and Environmentally Friendly Travel
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 22,212
Originally Posted by Swanhunter
I think she nails what I and many other actual BA passengers have been saying for a while. Great article.
I agree
Prospero is offline  
Old Mar 26, 2017, 3:16 am
  #15  
Hilton Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: ±38,000 feet
Programs: LH HON, BA GGL, AF Plat, EK Plat
Posts: 6,428
Originally Posted by Tobias-UK
Indeed, I don't think there is anything in that article that one could argue against .. although I'm not entirely certain you can buy toilet rolls airside

I must admit, this made me chuckle:

"... a flight to Barbados was delayed at London Gatwick for nearly six hours while ground crew restocked the plane due to a shortage of toilet roll. Why so long? That hasn’t been made clear, but no doubt you could wipe your arse on the amount of red tape required to re-stock anything at a big company. God forbid someone just nips into Boots at the terminal, back in 10 minutes..."
I agree! Though I recall, maybe mistakenly, that only particular types of toilet roll are allowed aboard, and certainly not due to cost cutting, and that is why a 3-ply is not supplied in F loos.
nufnuf77 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.