My first experience with QF in a long while...
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: JAX
Programs: UA-1K >1MM ,QF Platinum,HH-Diamond,Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 105
My first experience with QF in a long while...
As I am currently based in the US --I was looking forward to flying on the A380 back to LAX today---in F.
I had not been on QF for some years as most of my travel has been on UAL.
I was hoping to use more QF for my trips to SYD and planned this.
So far---left my apartment and all looked good on line....no phone calls from QF about any issues.
Arrived at First class check in at SYD---lots of perplexed upset people and we are all told that the A380 is unserviceable and another plane was to be found---given a lunch voucher and told to return.
Eventually a 747 had been located ---no F---just business ---but "new sky beds."--will see!
Many people were upset at the way the delay was handled ---as people were just sitting around with their luggage and information was slow to come.
I wonder if that is the norm for QF ---but really wanted to use them for trips to SYD.
I had not been on QF for some years as most of my travel has been on UAL.
I was hoping to use more QF for my trips to SYD and planned this.
So far---left my apartment and all looked good on line....no phone calls from QF about any issues.
Arrived at First class check in at SYD---lots of perplexed upset people and we are all told that the A380 is unserviceable and another plane was to be found---given a lunch voucher and told to return.
Eventually a 747 had been located ---no F---just business ---but "new sky beds."--will see!
Many people were upset at the way the delay was handled ---as people were just sitting around with their luggage and information was slow to come.
I wonder if that is the norm for QF ---but really wanted to use them for trips to SYD.
#2
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: QF Gold LTG (ow Saph), HHon Silver, Marriot Gold
Posts: 2,927
Planes going unserviceable is an ocassional issue for all airlines. Unfortunately with A380s currently getting a refit one by one there is probably a little less slack (ie spare aircraft in the system).
The new J on the 747 is quite good, and QF has recently upgraded J bedding and plate service.
I would hope however you get a nice refund check for the difference in price between F and J.
I also hope you were enjoying your time in the F Lounge rather than using the voucher.
The new J on the 747 is quite good, and QF has recently upgraded J bedding and plate service.
I would hope however you get a nice refund check for the difference in price between F and J.
I also hope you were enjoying your time in the F Lounge rather than using the voucher.
#3
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,409
...as long as QF doesn't offer the standard pre-determined compensation levels. They are potentially woefully inadequate. To the OP - make sure you do some proper comparisons between the actual cost of a business class ticket and F class ticket before accepting any cash compo!
#5
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Australia and Canada
Programs: Qantas FF Plat; Virgin Aust Plat;
Posts: 799
I think one of the issues identified by OP was the lack of prior advice that the A380 had gone unserviceable. It may have been decided while the OP was in transit to the airport but then again it may have been apparent for some hours.
If the latter, then totally unacceptable for a F pax (and WP1, WP for instance) not to be contacted and advised, even if only by text. Even if nothing can be done, I would expct this courtesy from the airline.
In cases like this (with an undeniable superior experience in A380 F Vs alternative), if the A380 is u/s with plenty of notice resulting in a metal downgrade, F (& WP1, or WP in any cabin) are pax entitled to re-book?
If the latter, then totally unacceptable for a F pax (and WP1, WP for instance) not to be contacted and advised, even if only by text. Even if nothing can be done, I would expct this courtesy from the airline.
In cases like this (with an undeniable superior experience in A380 F Vs alternative), if the A380 is u/s with plenty of notice resulting in a metal downgrade, F (& WP1, or WP in any cabin) are pax entitled to re-book?
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: AU
Programs: former Olympic Airways Gold (yeah - still proud of that!)
Posts: 14,409
I think one of the issues identified by OP was the lack of prior advice that the A380 had gone unserviceable. It may have been decided while the OP was in transit to the airport but then again it may have been apparent for some hours.
If the latter, then totally unacceptable for a F pax (and WP1, WP for instance) not to be contacted and advised, even if only by text. Even if nothing can be done, I would expct this courtesy from the airline.
In cases like this (with an undeniable superior experience in A380 F Vs alternative), if the A380 is u/s with plenty of notice resulting in a metal downgrade, F (& WP1, or WP in any cabin) are pax entitled to re-book?
If the latter, then totally unacceptable for a F pax (and WP1, WP for instance) not to be contacted and advised, even if only by text. Even if nothing can be done, I would expct this courtesy from the airline.
In cases like this (with an undeniable superior experience in A380 F Vs alternative), if the A380 is u/s with plenty of notice resulting in a metal downgrade, F (& WP1, or WP in any cabin) are pax entitled to re-book?
#7
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: QF Gold LTG (ow Saph), HHon Silver, Marriot Gold
Posts: 2,927
I think one of the issues identified by OP was the lack of prior advice that the A380 had gone unserviceable. It may have been decided while the OP was in transit to the airport but then again it may have been apparent for some hours.
If the latter, then totally unacceptable for a F pax (and WP1, WP for instance) not to be contacted and advised, even if only by text. Even if nothing can be done, I would expct this courtesy from the airline.
If the latter, then totally unacceptable for a F pax (and WP1, WP for instance) not to be contacted and advised, even if only by text. Even if nothing can be done, I would expct this courtesy from the airline.
#8
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 85
Not so sure it is a sudden problem.
Qantas source says:
17/02/2013 QF11 Sydney Los Angeles VH-OQA A380-800 14F/72J/32W/332Y
18/02/2013 QF11 Sydney Los Angeles VH-OJL B747-400 14F/52J/32W/255Y
20/02/2013 QF11 Sydney Los Angeles VH-OQI A380-800 14F/72J/32W/332Y
21/02/2013 QF11 Sydney Los Angeles VH-OJT B747-400 58J/36W/270Y
I am flying tomorrow so hopeful that A380 is back by then.
Qantas source says:
17/02/2013 QF11 Sydney Los Angeles VH-OQA A380-800 14F/72J/32W/332Y
18/02/2013 QF11 Sydney Los Angeles VH-OJL B747-400 14F/52J/32W/255Y
20/02/2013 QF11 Sydney Los Angeles VH-OQI A380-800 14F/72J/32W/332Y
21/02/2013 QF11 Sydney Los Angeles VH-OJT B747-400 58J/36W/270Y
I am flying tomorrow so hopeful that A380 is back by then.
#9
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: JAX
Programs: UA-1K >1MM ,QF Platinum,HH-Diamond,Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 105
The flight left about 4 hours late -it was one with the new lie flat Skybed -so it was certainly comfortable and crew great; although only 3 lavs for 58 passengers caused a rush to change out of the PJs!
Unfortuneately it ended at some distant location requiring a bus to the TBIT what was absolutely saturated with people and long long lines ...where an immigration offical told me we arrived in rush hour.
I wonder if I shall get a reply from QF customer care as I am only bronze (however a potential customer of premium fares) but I wanted to compare it all to United with whom I flew in Global First (who have recently upgraded their GF) .
The situation at check-in was not handled well...as speaking to other passengers who arrived long before me that they were not allowed to check-in and told to take a seat.Many were top level QF members and they were not happy!---and told me so!
If an issue like that happened with UAL---you often received substantial compensation at check in...esp if an international F class passenger...
Unfortuneately it ended at some distant location requiring a bus to the TBIT what was absolutely saturated with people and long long lines ...where an immigration offical told me we arrived in rush hour.
I wonder if I shall get a reply from QF customer care as I am only bronze (however a potential customer of premium fares) but I wanted to compare it all to United with whom I flew in Global First (who have recently upgraded their GF) .
The situation at check-in was not handled well...as speaking to other passengers who arrived long before me that they were not allowed to check-in and told to take a seat.Many were top level QF members and they were not happy!---and told me so!
If an issue like that happened with UAL---you often received substantial compensation at check in...esp if an international F class passenger...
#10
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: ORD
Programs: AA EXP,2MM, DL Gold,Starwood PLT
Posts: 3,876
The flight left about 4 hours late -it was one with the new lie flat Skybed -so it was certainly comfortable and crew great; although only 3 lavs for 58 passengers caused a rush to change out of the PJs!
Unfortuneately it ended at some distant location requiring a bus to the TBIT what was absolutely saturated with people and long long lines ...where an immigration offical told me we arrived in rush hour.
I wonder if I shall get a reply from QF customer care as I am only bronze (however a potential customer of premium fares) but I wanted to compare it all to United with whom I flew in Global First (who have recently upgraded their GF) .
The situation at check-in was not handled well...as speaking to other passengers who arrived long before me that they were not allowed to check-in and told to take a seat.Many were top level QF members and they were not happy!---and told me so!
If an issue like that happened with UAL---you often received substantial compensation at check in...esp if an international F class passenger...
Unfortuneately it ended at some distant location requiring a bus to the TBIT what was absolutely saturated with people and long long lines ...where an immigration offical told me we arrived in rush hour.
I wonder if I shall get a reply from QF customer care as I am only bronze (however a potential customer of premium fares) but I wanted to compare it all to United with whom I flew in Global First (who have recently upgraded their GF) .
The situation at check-in was not handled well...as speaking to other passengers who arrived long before me that they were not allowed to check-in and told to take a seat.Many were top level QF members and they were not happy!---and told me so!
If an issue like that happened with UAL---you often received substantial compensation at check in...esp if an international F class passenger...
#11
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: MEL, PER, PBO, occasionally ships, oil rigs and other places that no sane human being should ever find themselves
Programs: IHG RA, PC Plat, QF Plat/LTS
Posts: 804
I fly QF over 60 times a year and I can tell you that lately, yes, this IS the norm.
#12
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
Thus no lounge access and the need for the dining vouchers (I wondered where QF thought you would get food as good as served in the F lounge). That does make the delay unacceptable. Presumably this is a gov't regulation that requires a valid BP be issued prior to entry airside and would apply to all airlines at SYD and not just QF. If it is a QF specific policy, then it has to be changed! QF has long been good at rubbing salt into wounds, preferably after shooting foot.
#13
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SYD
Programs: QF WP (OWE), VA PLAT, EY GLD, SPG PLAT, Hyatt DIA, Hilton DIA, Hertz PC
Posts: 8,530
SYD/MEL UA flights are know to go unserviceable more often than any other international flight out of SYD.
My father was due to fly to JFK via LAX on UA. Aircraft went unserviceable, placed into the Holiday Inn at SYD, he was rerouted via SFO the next day, but only because I intervened and called UA (no information was given at the hotel).
Perhaps the most ludicrous aspect of this trip was that the outbound sector was marked as a no show, and despite UA's rebooking (this was booked direct and not through a TA) when he checked in at JFK he was told that the ticket had been cancelled. Needless to say more frantic calling was made.
I'll take QF over UA, any day!
#14
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: JAX
Programs: UA-1K >1MM ,QF Platinum,HH-Diamond,Marriott-Titanium
Posts: 105
I think I have been misunderstood.
I was trying QF as I wanted to switch my US-AUS flights to QF.
Delays due to mechanical issues occur---and anyone who travels regularly accepts this.
It was the handling of the issue what was so poor----no one had been contacted,a crowd of QF most important flyers herded into an area of the first class check-in and told to wait(some had been there an hour before I arrived )...unable to leave their baggage and with little information from staff --some becoming upset as they had to be in places like NYC for important meetings.As we all chatted to each other---many were commenting that this is an increasing occurrence.
My only comparison with United was relating to an international first class passenger downgraded was that substantial compensation would have been forthcoming.
I was told --"contact customer care."
As I said earlier the flight in business on QF was excellent---with a comfortable flat bed and a great crew---so I am not going to let one incident totally bias me.
I was trying QF as I wanted to switch my US-AUS flights to QF.
Delays due to mechanical issues occur---and anyone who travels regularly accepts this.
It was the handling of the issue what was so poor----no one had been contacted,a crowd of QF most important flyers herded into an area of the first class check-in and told to wait(some had been there an hour before I arrived )...unable to leave their baggage and with little information from staff --some becoming upset as they had to be in places like NYC for important meetings.As we all chatted to each other---many were commenting that this is an increasing occurrence.
My only comparison with United was relating to an international first class passenger downgraded was that substantial compensation would have been forthcoming.
I was told --"contact customer care."
As I said earlier the flight in business on QF was excellent---with a comfortable flat bed and a great crew---so I am not going to let one incident totally bias me.
#15
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: Portland OR Double Emerald (QF and AA), DL PM/MM, Starwood Plat
Posts: 19,589
Do contact customer care, the times that I have resulted in far better resolution than I have had from UA or AA, for example, so you may yet be pleased. One drawback is that I suspect customer care is heavily CIP oriented, so their evaluation of your commercial importance will affect what you are offered as compensation. Case of Grange, anyone?
Question: why was check-in not allowed? Dropping bags and going on to the F lounge would have satisfied most pax at F check-in, so was this government restricted? I have had several delayed flights at SYD in the past few years, and have always been happy waiting in the F lounge, but I was in transit and not originating in SYD; getting stuck landside is no fun at SYD.