Do you and your partner use one Custom form?
#16
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: AA ex-Plat
Posts: 425
We have never yet tried, though we are married (well the UK "everything but the name" civil partnership, to be exact). This is mainly because, to be honest, I would be up for an argument but my husband would rather get to our hotel. I see his point.
can't remember what we did CUN-JFK in april, but MTR-NYP on amtrak in october, we both used one form because we reside at the same address. different last names, different passport countries, different races.
i struck up a conversation with the custom's agent when he asked about carrying food back to the states. i mentioned ketchup chips in my bag, and we chatted for a few minutes, he signed off on the form and went on his way to the next passengers. never mentioned us using the same form. it may be dependent on the agent's discretion and how they feel the paperwork should look ...
#17
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MIA
Programs: AA GLD for life, HH Gold, SPG gold, Hyatt Plat, Avis Select, TSA pfd
Posts: 99
Customs forms
Why do we still have to fill out this form if we have nothing to declare? What do they do with this paper anyways? The form seems like a relic. How embarassing for us that the Canadians and Norwegians are treated this way, first impressions count.
#18
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Motown
Programs: DL, WN, AA, IHG Diamond, Hertz 5*
Posts: 3,409
Not an option for me since I am single, but once on a flight into Canada saw a flight attendant give customs forms to two men sitting next to each other. I thought it was kind of funny that she didn't seem to get it when one of them said he didn't need his own.
#19
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: AVL
Programs: AA, AS, SQ, Hilton Diamond, PC Platinum, National Exec
Posts: 726
The process should be scan passport, fingerprint and photograph if needed and waive on 99% of the time. Then a simple red or green channel for customs with minimal staffing.
#20
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,571
I think it is because they are petrified to give up any little iota of power they have. They know deep down because of technology advancements half of them are redundant.
The process should be scan passport, fingerprint and photograph if needed and waive on 99% of the time. Then a simple red or green channel for customs with minimal staffing.
The process should be scan passport, fingerprint and photograph if needed and waive on 99% of the time. Then a simple red or green channel for customs with minimal staffing.
#21
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: AVL
Programs: AA, AS, SQ, Hilton Diamond, PC Platinum, National Exec
Posts: 726
I think they probably get more people declaring items if they are required to sign forms than if they are not. I would guess that most people do not know what the duty free exemption is and just walk through the green channel thinking that they do not have enough. Requiring everyone to sign a form makes it easier for them to force everyone to think about the issue and add up their purchases. A signed form declaring nothing is also useful for prosecuting those who try to bring in goods without paying duty.
#22
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: JFK/EWR/LGA
Programs: A shadow of my former self
Posts: 928
Quick update on this: We came back in through JFK T1 last night. Maybe the worst experience ever. We walked up together using one form, as always. First agent asked if we had a marriage certificate with us. We said of course not, do straight people carry theirs around? He said he couldn't work with us together, only separately. I asked if we could try another agent -- he said sure, so we walked out the entrance & went to another window. Second agent was very well informed: "the Federal Government doesn't recognize same-sex marriages. I'll process you guys together, but you have to fill out a second form." He was trying his best to be gracious, but had a "the rules are the rules" attitude.
To the people who asked about getting into a fight/arguing with the immigration officer, I think that's missing the point. They have all the power, so it's not an argument. You simply have to do what they say. But there's still value in asserting your rights, even if they're routinely taken away. Besides, the agents don't make the rules, Congress does. Fight with your elected officials, if necessary, or help elect fair-minded candidates.
David
To the people who asked about getting into a fight/arguing with the immigration officer, I think that's missing the point. They have all the power, so it's not an argument. You simply have to do what they say. But there's still value in asserting your rights, even if they're routinely taken away. Besides, the agents don't make the rules, Congress does. Fight with your elected officials, if necessary, or help elect fair-minded candidates.
David
#23
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: YTO
Posts: 594
No clear policy on any of this
Anyone read the thread through to this point? You can see that experiences differ. I'll bet if you got fifty of those US guys in a room they wouldn't agree on what the official policy is. Tonight I discovered, to my surprise, that it's the same with Canada. Returning to YYZ from ACA, we approached the officer together, with separate forms (no legal marriage, different addresses). I asked him cheerfuly "we're travelling together, do you want us together or separately?" and he gave me one of those "technically I shouldn't, but I want to impress you with my unbigoted behaviour and I want you to owe me" speeches. I couldn't help being alarmed, because several trips ago we stood at the red line and when my partner went up alone, the agent summoned me to join him, saying essentially that it was inappropriate (even suspicious) for me to go separately if we're traveling together. So I naturally thought I had been corrected, and that in future I should always join him at the desk when entering Canada.
I frankly don't think there IS a "policy" on this stuff, or if there is I doubt the agents follow it. Or know it. Or care.
Kinda like the security drones who only confiscate the shaving cream when it's l'Occitane.
I frankly don't think there IS a "policy" on this stuff, or if there is I doubt the agents follow it. Or know it. Or care.
Kinda like the security drones who only confiscate the shaving cream when it's l'Occitane.
#24
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 440
We use one form each when arriving in the US. As he is American and I am British, we have to use different lanes and it makes it simpler. Of course when they ask me why I am travelling to the USA, I still stay that it is to stay with family. Occasionally, they'll ask me where the wife is, and usually, I'm able to say "he's over there" and point.
Lately though, CBP seem to be giving him a harder time when he goes back to the US than I.
Mark
Lately though, CBP seem to be giving him a harder time when he goes back to the US than I.
Mark
#25
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tokyo
Programs: NW Diamond, LH SEN, PC Spire - RA, TG PlatHyatt Diamond
Posts: 585
#26
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NYC, FLL
Programs: UA PP 1MM, Marriott Bonvoy LTTE, BA Gold
Posts: 6,324
I liked your comment "he's over there" though ^
#27
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary
Programs: A Few
Posts: 2,339
The policy for entering Canada using one Custom form is simple...you must live at the same address. On Air Canada flights it is even announced that way by the FA's before they hand out the forms. Canada hasn't cared whether you are gay or straight for quite a while now.
#28
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento
Programs: UA 2MM/GS; SPG Lifetime Plat; MHC Lifetime; Tar Heel forever; and I "Dig the Pig" at Piggly Wiggly
Posts: 12,152
Since SSM is not legally recognized by the US federal govt, I have never used a single form. Why confront them....the agents in the booth are not the ones who make the policy.
#29
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Portland
Posts: 11,571
The form is ambiguous, IIRC. It says "one per family" and not "one per married couple and children."
#30
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: BOS
Programs: Marriott LTG, HHonors Diamond, Nat'l Exec
Posts: 3,581
Curious if any (unmarried) couples have had experience with this since the rules changed in 2014?
http://www.cbp.gov/travel/clearing-c...s-declarations
U.S. Customs and Border Protection broadened the definition of “members of a family residing in one household” to include long-term same-sex couples and other domestic relationships.
(...)
“Domestic relationship” would be defined to include...Two adults who are in a committed relationship including, but not limited to, long-term companions and couples in civil unions or domestic partnerships where the partners are financially interdependent, and are not married to, or a partner of, anyone else.
(...)
“Domestic relationship” would be defined to include...Two adults who are in a committed relationship including, but not limited to, long-term companions and couples in civil unions or domestic partnerships where the partners are financially interdependent, and are not married to, or a partner of, anyone else.