TTN Exec talks about wanting 2nd airline
#16
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 138
It's "Greek" to me...at least when I'm using Internet Explorer. It's okay on Firefox. IE screenshot:
Looking at your code, the problem is (probably) CSS-based. The text in question is set to "font-family: symbol". There appear to be 10 different style sheets attached. Somewhere in there, IE is getting confused.
Looking at your code, the problem is (probably) CSS-based. The text in question is set to "font-family: symbol". There appear to be 10 different style sheets attached. Somewhere in there, IE is getting confused.
Come on, what's with the Greek? Is your site getting a lot of hits from Athens? Or Astoria, Queens?
#17
Original Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: HYI/AUS/SAT originally TTN/EWR/PHL
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards, Jetblue TrueBlue, American Advantage
Posts: 1,190
#18
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,120
Last year it seemed that Frontier added many destinations at TTN to keep the buzz going there. Many were Midwest cities that Frontier already had presence into with DEN based service, but weren't major draws in terms of destinations. Low fares were also found in a few markets (BNA and STL) out of PHL or EWR if Southwest competed there.
Is the build up/growth phase pretty much over for Frontier at TTN? I'd thought it would try out some seasonal domestic destinations like ECP, CHS, SAV, PWM, BUF/IAG that could be popular places for people to explore in the summer time.
Maybe after NAS bookings were a flop, it has decided to go very conservative and go along the lines of "stick with what works" and increases to markets like MCO.
Is the build up/growth phase pretty much over for Frontier at TTN? I'd thought it would try out some seasonal domestic destinations like ECP, CHS, SAV, PWM, BUF/IAG that could be popular places for people to explore in the summer time.
Maybe after NAS bookings were a flop, it has decided to go very conservative and go along the lines of "stick with what works" and increases to markets like MCO.
#19
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: new zealand
Posts: 530
TTN still has three aircraft assigned to it, but rather than "spread it round" with 3 or 4 x weeklies to more cities, they are concentrating on a reduced number of cities, and with daily service - MSP and CLT, e.g. - as well as increases on the prime markets.
The exception at TTN is UST, which continues at 3 x weekly.
Are the glory days off rapid expansion at TTN over? Probably, for a while at least, but that's partly Frontier and its aircraft situation and partly TTN with its terminal situation.
#20
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 138
Last year it seemed that Frontier added many destinations at TTN to keep the buzz going there. Many were Midwest cities that Frontier already had presence into with DEN based service, but weren't major draws in terms of destinations. Low fares were also found in a few markets (BNA and STL) out of PHL or EWR if Southwest competed there.
Is the build up/growth phase pretty much over for Frontier at TTN? I'd thought it would try out some seasonal domestic destinations like ECP, CHS, SAV, PWM, BUF/IAG that could be popular places for people to explore in the summer time.
Maybe after NAS bookings were a flop, it has decided to go very conservative and go along the lines of "stick with what works" and increases to markets like MCO.
Is the build up/growth phase pretty much over for Frontier at TTN? I'd thought it would try out some seasonal domestic destinations like ECP, CHS, SAV, PWM, BUF/IAG that could be popular places for people to explore in the summer time.
Maybe after NAS bookings were a flop, it has decided to go very conservative and go along the lines of "stick with what works" and increases to markets like MCO.
#21
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,120
There is NK's ACY-MYR flight. For some, the flight can be convenient by shaving off many driving hours, than driving all the way down to Myrtle.