Why Skymiles 2015 looks good to me
#91
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LAX, SFO
Programs: Delta GM, Lifetime Marriott Platinum, Avis Preferred
Posts: 1,634
+1 and very amusing. It is the corporation they work for that is high value. To say that one is of high value when spending someone else's money is beyond humorous. In many households, the owner sends the maid shopping with the owner's money. I guess you could say the maid is of high value. Perhaps there are many maids here and their hubris won't allow them to admit it. And the worst ones are the hub captive maids.
#92
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Minneapolis, originally from Cincinnati
Programs: Diamond with Delta, Hyatt and Hilton. 2 MM and Plat with America (thank you citi:))
Posts: 2,345
That could mean total travel time, which there are some east-coast to west coast routes that could take that long, especially if you have to double connect. MIA-ATL is 2 hours. 2.5 hour layover and then a 5.5 hour flight to SEA is 10 hours. I would hope people aren't purposely booking longer layovers than necessary or booking connections or double connections when nonstops or single connections are available just to get over the 10 hour mark, but there are a handful of reasonable domestic itineraries that could take 10+ hours. Don't forget East Coast - Hawaii/Alaska is easily going to push 10 hours or more as well.
#93
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Huntsville, AL
Programs: DL DM 1.929MM, Hilton Lifetime Diamond, IHG Platinum, Avis CHM, Marriott Titanium (lifetime gold)
Posts: 7,860
In practice, it really means trips to AK and HI and even then from the eastern US. Still, during the summer, if you book shorter connections you can end up in coach to AK if you go to ANC. Somebody did that a couple of years ago, and booked First Class return flights ANC-HSV that were under 10 hours. The ticketing agency caught it and rebooked it into coach, which was a good catch.
But we mostly go to FAI and its always a double connection out of HSV. Well, except during the summer when you can go UA HSV-DEN and F9 DEN-FAI.
David
But we mostly go to FAI and its always a double connection out of HSV. Well, except during the summer when you can go UA HSV-DEN and F9 DEN-FAI.
David
#94
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Twin Cities
Programs: Delta DM MM, IHG Plat, Hilton DM, Marriott SE, Emerald EE, Oakdale Gun Club, NRA & GOA Life Member
Posts: 3,870
#95
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Long Beach, CA
Programs: DL DM
Posts: 5,292
I have a couple issues with FDC. But when Delta is selling first class for so cheap, you can't expect a decent product (I did an 80 minute flight on KLM last month and the portion was covered with the SWU as part of a continuation of a trip and received better service on that short of a flight than I do on Delta on a cross country flight and American provides a meal service on JFK/ORD).
#96
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Anywhere I need to be.
Programs: OW Emerald, *A Gold, NEXUS, GE, ABTC/APEC, South Korea SES, eIACS, PP, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 16,046
#97
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2012
Programs: DL DM, MM
Posts: 2,970
If the vast majority of large firms had such policies, Delta would not be removing BE seats from aircraft.
My company requires 10 hours travel for domestic FC or international BE. Other companies we work with do not pay for FC or BE period.
Government contractors are required to purchase the lowest available fare. Concur is set up for this, and we have to provide justification if we don't pick the lowest fare. For example, we can take a more expensive direct flight over a connecting flight, and we don't have to travel before 7:00 a.m. When the company pays for FC or BE as noted above, it comes out of corporate profits as it is not reimbursed by the federal government. Congress made this change a few years ago, and it is pretty painful. I don't even get credit that I save bag fees on DL and AA for cases when the DL or AA fare is slightly higher than UA. It's got to be the lowest fare period - justify it or pay up.
David
My company requires 10 hours travel for domestic FC or international BE. Other companies we work with do not pay for FC or BE period.
Government contractors are required to purchase the lowest available fare. Concur is set up for this, and we have to provide justification if we don't pick the lowest fare. For example, we can take a more expensive direct flight over a connecting flight, and we don't have to travel before 7:00 a.m. When the company pays for FC or BE as noted above, it comes out of corporate profits as it is not reimbursed by the federal government. Congress made this change a few years ago, and it is pretty painful. I don't even get credit that I save bag fees on DL and AA for cases when the DL or AA fare is slightly higher than UA. It's got to be the lowest fare period - justify it or pay up.
David
So in BK's example, you would be the firm that he would never hire.
Last edited by StuckOnSegments; Apr 23, 2014 at 1:38 pm
#98
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2012
Programs: DL DM, MM
Posts: 2,970
My entire point in posting this was that I would be much better off in the new system. I'm not bragging and I'm not a person who buys the most expensive ticket possible. I'm simply saying that in my situation I will by far prefer the new system.
I think Delta rewards whoever sends them the money, just like companies do to sales people. They don't care where it comes from.
#99
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: ATL
Programs: DL SkyMiles, MR, HH, ICH/PC, Avis Pref., Hertz Gold
Posts: 2,897
+1 and very amusing. It is the corporation they work for that is high value. To say that one is of high value when spending someone else's money is beyond humorous. In many households, the owner sends the maid shopping with the owner's money. I guess you could say the maid is of high value. Perhaps there are many maids here and their hubris won't allow them to admit it. And the worst ones are the hub captive maids.
I travel for my company for sure, but I have a choice of what flights I book, pay for them myself and then get reimbursed by the company. I'm sure my situation is not unique. Not only have I steered business to Delta, but my method of payment (DL Amex, vouchers or PWM) have benefited me as well. My expenses are reviewed at three levels before the reimbursement is made and. as long as I follow the rules, no problem. Yes, I am high value to Delta because I am part of the decision process.
To extend your metaphor, if you sent your maid to the store to do shopping and she chooses one brand over the other, then the grocery store will be tracking this (via those "shopper's cards") and courting her to buy their specific brands via coupons, promotions etc.
#100
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ATL
Programs: 4MM/DM, Marriott Lifetime PM, Hilton Diamond, SPG Platinum
Posts: 1,370
Running the numbers for my regular trips to ANC, I'll lose about 5000 miles per RT under the 2015 earning rules. Spending $1400/rt. While it looks good, those that WFBF end up losing in some cases.
#101
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: 대한민국 (South Korea) - ex-PVG (上海)
Programs: UA MM / LT Gold (LT UC), DL SM, AA PLT (AC), OZ, KE; GE and Korean SES (like GE); Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,995
The way it works for the federal government: if there's a YCA fare, you're pretty much required to take (it).
Last edited by relangford; Apr 24, 2014 at 12:23 am
#102
Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2012
Programs: DL FO/KM, AA PLT
Posts: 2,594
From my experience, "CA" fares don't book as a full Y-fare but work fairly similar (can be cancelled and are fully refundable - you may run into issues switching flights, especially day of though). The other difference is Elite Points and miles (which obviously isn't a concern to the government, nor should it be). I flew to SAT back in January from DAY on a GSA City Pair (AA). It was a "CA" and booked into "G" (or maybe it was "S"?), I think, which only earned 0.5 EQPs per mile flown (still earned 1 EQP and 1 AAdvantage mile per mile flown). A year ago I flew on a Capacity Controlled "CA" from IND to SAT and it booked into K on DL (DL was the GSA City Pair carrier for FY13 on IND-SAT).
Last edited by FlyDeltaJets87; Apr 24, 2014 at 12:45 am
#103
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Twin Cities
Programs: Delta DM MM, IHG Plat, Hilton DM, Marriott SE, Emerald EE, Oakdale Gun Club, NRA & GOA Life Member
Posts: 3,870
I hope you aren't referring to me, as the OP.
My entire point in posting this was that I would be much better off in the new system. I'm not bragging and I'm not a person who buys the most expensive ticket possible. I'm simply saying that in my situation I will by far prefer the new system.
I think Delta rewards whoever sends them the money, just like companies do to sales people. They don't care where it comes from.
My entire point in posting this was that I would be much better off in the new system. I'm not bragging and I'm not a person who buys the most expensive ticket possible. I'm simply saying that in my situation I will by far prefer the new system.
I think Delta rewards whoever sends them the money, just like companies do to sales people. They don't care where it comes from.
#104
Original Poster
Join Date: Sep 2012
Programs: DL DM, MM
Posts: 2,970
I guess you don't realize who uncompetitive some routs out of ATL are.
#105
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Minneapolis, originally from Cincinnati
Programs: Diamond with Delta, Hyatt and Hilton. 2 MM and Plat with America (thank you citi:))
Posts: 2,345
Complaints on here seem to be that upgrades are harder to get (IDK because this year, I have bought nothing, but F, P, G, A, and Z). If they are tougher to get, DL is doing a better job at selling it (again an assumption, but I am sure the numbers are out there). They are making small, but noticeable changes to F.....warm options on shorter flights for breakfast, Luvo meals, upgraded catering, etc. Seems to me that when more of the people flying up front are paying, the better the product is getting. It surely isn't the meal quality, etc. as intra-Europe J, but it is a hell of a lot better than domestic UA. I flew them to HI over Christmas....the ORDSFO flight was an embarrassing fail for UA (years ago I had status with UA, but left after the employees sabotaged the airline in the summer of hell).
Couple other reasons besides FCM as to elites not getting upgrades, such as Delta giving out status too easily and too many elites competing for upgrades (another issue I have with FCM, I feel G and A fares should be 100% MQM not 150%, I find it unfair that on a more expensive M fare I am getting fewer MQMs sitting in the back than someone up front on a higher seat, no problem with WFBF but don't be handing out MQMs so freely), and Delta removing a row of first class on some aircraft. My upgrades are still decent as a diamond and I love the new global upgrades. I would rather sit in back on a couple domestic flights due to FCM and be able to sit up front to Australia on a T fare.
I have never sat in United up front but am told domestic it is nothing special. However United makes upgrading on SWU's for their highest elite level easy on international and also give additional SWU's for people that fly a lot of miles. I would rather have a lousy first class domestic product and receive more international upgrades and see Delta eliminate rollovers and give more SWU's to diamonds who fly a lot like united