Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > TravelBuzz
Reload this Page >

Airlines lobbying to not list “All in” ticket prices

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Airlines lobbying to not list “All in” ticket prices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2014, 2:16 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Federal Way, WA
Programs: Mileage Plus 2P, Marriott Silver, many others
Posts: 1,307
Originally Posted by javabytes
There's no other business I can think of in the US that is required to advertise prices including all taxes, except maybe gas stations... and I'm not even sure that's required or just the way they do it.
True -- but there also is no other industry where the taxes will vary depending on your purchase. All taxable items in a single city will have the same tax. All hotels in a single city will probably have the same tax.

An airline trip, on the other hand, will have varying taxes depending on the exact route. This will usually be a slight difference in the PFCs (which are taxes without the word "tax" attached), but it's still a difference.

As far as I'm concerned, all add-on costs that are mandatory should be included in a quoted price (this goes for "resort fee" ripoffs at hotels, too). Extra charges that can be avoided are safely omitted. Remember that most travelers aren't as savvy as the average denizen of these forums!
dliesse is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 2:21 pm
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: IND
Programs: DL PM & 2MM™, Lifetime HHonors Diamond
Posts: 20,892
I will join the chorus and agree that this a bad idea. In fact, I think we should go the other way with this and include all taxes and fees on ALL items sold.
indufan is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 2:24 pm
  #18  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Bye Delta
Programs: AA EXP, HH Diamond, IHG Plat, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Plat, Nat'l Exec Elite, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 16,298
Originally Posted by dliesse
True -- but there also is no other industry where the taxes will vary depending on your purchase. All taxable items in a single city will have the same tax. All hotels in a single city will probably have the same tax.

An airline trip, on the other hand, will have varying taxes depending on the exact route. This will usually be a slight difference in the PFCs (which are taxes without the word "tax" attached), but it's still a difference.

As far as I'm concerned, all add-on costs that are mandatory should be included in a quoted price (this goes for "resort fee" ripoffs at hotels, too). Extra charges that can be avoided are safely omitted. Remember that most travelers aren't as savvy as the average denizen of these forums!
Only to a point. All airlines will have more or less the same taxes. With the same origin and destination, any variation in taxes and PFCs will be an immaterial amount. Every fee imposed by the airline, though, I'm fully in favor of requiring be included in the advertised price.
javabytes is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 2:26 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Programs: DL Plat, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat, Hertz Prez Circle, National Exec
Posts: 1,358
Originally Posted by indufan
I will join the chorus and agree that this a bad idea. In fact, I think we should go the other way with this and include all taxes and fees on ALL items sold.
I'd be totally okay with that as well... starting with cell phone and cable bills!
Zeeb is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 2:32 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: HNL
Programs: DL PM/1MM, BW DE (lifetime), HH DE, Marriott PE (lifetime), National Emerald Executive
Posts: 7,217
Originally Posted by javabytes
I don't have an issue with taxes being omitted from advertised prices.
That is a peculiar way of doing business in the US (and Canada) where prices advertised are not the true prices. Practically everywhere else in the world, the advertised price is the price you pay for everything. Instead of going backwards, the US should march forwards and require the real price to be advertised everywhere, from airfare, through gas stations, mobile phone service and to grocery stores (and everything else inbetween).

The gov't taxes and such are, and should be always, displayed on the receipt. So is the case in the rest of the world and it works perfectly fine, and how much you pay is never a surprise. Only in the US and Canada do merchants engage in deceptive practices by not displaying the actual price to the consumer, but rather just the portion that they get to keep of the price.
RealHJ is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 2:34 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: HNL
Programs: DL PM/1MM, BW DE (lifetime), HH DE, Marriott PE (lifetime), National Emerald Executive
Posts: 7,217
Originally Posted by indufan
I will join the chorus and agree that this a bad idea. In fact, I think we should go the other way with this and include all taxes and fees on ALL items sold.
+1000 ^
RealHJ is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 2:51 pm
  #22  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Originally Posted by RealHJ
That is a peculiar way of doing business in the US (and Canada) where prices advertised are not the true prices. Practically everywhere else in the world, the advertised price is the price you pay for everything. Instead of going backwards, the US should march forwards and require the real price to be advertised everywhere, from airfare, through gas stations, mobile phone service and to grocery stores (and everything else inbetween).
How did it come about?
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 3:14 pm
  #23  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Originally Posted by rylan
It was a big problem before for the many pax that use public booking engines such as expedia etc... some airlines would advertise a crazy low 'fare' which ended up being hundreds higher when you got through to almost the end of the booking process, since at that point they would tack on the fuel surcharges, fees, and taxes. Remember seeing crap like $129 tatl fares, but the ticket had another 600 in fuel and taxes on it?
I remember seeing it. I remember it not bothering me. It was what it was, but it added only a minute or so to any search for fares. Sure, in the abstract, I'd say that transparency is better and that they should include everything, but I don't think I was materially harmed before and, accordingly, don't have a particularly strong opinion.
pbarnette is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 3:27 pm
  #24  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Originally Posted by dieuwer2
How did it come about?
How did the US sales tax come about? The same way most sales taxes came about. The US differs in that we didn't switch to a VAT, partly because we did not have the same problems with tax avoidance as other jurisdictions. Additionally, the administrative burden on enterprises is higher for VAT than for sales tax - the payment/reclaim process is, frankly, stupid and serves only to minimize leakage of tax revenue.

Now why does the US have the tradition of not including sales taxes? Part of it is retailers wanting to show the best possible price. Part of it is a belief that you should know how much tax you are paying and the much lower levels of consumption taxes in the US suggests that making them clear and obvious has some effect on reducing public acceptance of them. Finally, the sales tax in the US is a hodgepodge of local and state laws and national or even regional advertising would be difficult in an environment of all-in prices.

Honestly, unless you are completely inept at basic arithmetic, I fail to see the big issue with not including taxes in the listed prices.
pbarnette is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 3:39 pm
  #25  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ATL
Programs: DL Scattered Smothered Covered Medallion, Some hotel & car stuff, Kroger Plus Card
Posts: 10,748
Originally Posted by pbarnette
I remember seeing it. I remember it not bothering me. It was what it was, but it added only a minute or so to any search for fares. Sure, in the abstract, I'd say that transparency is better and that they should include everything, but I don't think I was materially harmed before and, accordingly, don't have a particularly strong opinion.
Originally Posted by pbarnette
Honestly, unless you are completely inept at basic arithmetic, I fail to see the big issue with not including taxes in the listed prices.
I don't think this is an issue for most FTers. For the lowest common denominators of US society though...

...I can see Joe Schmoe taking the first flight of his life somehow not noticing that the $29 sale fare he purchased to take the kids to Disneyland ended up pricing to $400/person when he clicked "Purchase", then not noticing it on the credit card bill that he carries $10k of rolling debt on, then being unable to check into their hotel upon arrival because the card is now maxed out, then having their once-in-a-lifetime vacation ruined because of Big Bad Evil Airways, then getting a pity party thrown for him in the next edition of USA Today and the local evening news.

If you live in the US, you can't tell me you haven't shaken your head at some news story similar to that before...
gooselee is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 4:33 pm
  #26  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL Area
Programs: Delta SkySponge ExtraAbsorbent, SPG Gold
Posts: 29,988
Originally Posted by gooselee
I don't think this is an issue for most FTers. For the lowest common denominators of US society though...


If you live in the US, you can't tell me you haven't shaken your head at some news story similar to that before...
Sure, I've seen those stories but I've never had any sympathy for those people either. Anyone who would be that reckless in arranging a vacation is hardly deserving of a pity party.
readywhenyouare is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 4:46 pm
  #27  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ATL
Programs: DL Scattered Smothered Covered Medallion, Some hotel & car stuff, Kroger Plus Card
Posts: 10,748
Originally Posted by readywhenyouare
Sure, I've seen those stories but I've never had any sympathy for those people either. Anyone who would be that reckless in arranging a vacation is hardly deserving of a pity party.
To be clear, I have nearly zero sympathy for them, too. But I think it helps illuminate why all of this is even an issue being debated.

For even the most casual FT'er or anyone with moderate intelligence, changing what prices are or aren't included in an ad won't stop us from being able to shop around, it'll just make it somewhat more or less annoying and time-consuming.

I'm an advocate of the stupid-proof route because a) it'll also make my life easier and b) I'll hopefully have to see less stories like the one I described.
gooselee is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 4:49 pm
  #28  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS
Posts: 15,027
Originally Posted by pbarnette
Now why does the US have the tradition of not including sales taxes? Part of it is retailers wanting to show the best possible price. Part of it is a belief that you should know how much tax you are paying and the much lower levels of consumption taxes in the US suggests that making them clear and obvious has some effect on reducing public acceptance of them. Finally, the sales tax in the US is a hodgepodge of local and state laws and national or even regional advertising would be difficult in an environment of all-in prices.
Then why not display everything at a silly low price and at the registry add a "energy fee", "display fee", "packaging fee", etc. and "sales tax"?

NOW AT THE APPLE STORE, iPAD for only $1!!! Fees and taxes not included
lol
Dieuwer is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 4:54 pm
  #29  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Originally Posted by dieuwer2
Then why not display everything at a silly low price and at the registry add a "energy fee", "display fee", "packaging fee", etc. and "sales tax"?
Is there a particular reason why you are choosing to mix costs of production with costs of taxation? They are quite different things. But I don't, in theory, have a significant problem with further breakdown of the price, as long as the final cost is knowable and fixed.
pbarnette is offline  
Old Apr 16, 2014, 4:57 pm
  #30  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Silver, BA Gold, DL Gold
Posts: 9,779
Originally Posted by gooselee
I don't think this is an issue for most FTers. For the lowest common denominators of US society though...

...I can see Joe Schmoe taking the first flight of his life somehow not noticing that the $29 sale fare he purchased to take the kids to Disneyland ended up pricing to $400/person when he clicked "Purchase", then not noticing it on the credit card bill that he carries $10k of rolling debt on, then being unable to check into their hotel upon arrival because the card is now maxed out, then having their once-in-a-lifetime vacation ruined because of Big Bad Evil Airways, then getting a pity party thrown for him in the next edition of USA Today and the local evening news.

If you live in the US, you can't tell me you haven't shaken your head at some news story similar to that before...
I think that most people are smarter than you give them credit for. With airfares, in particular, most folks have a disproportional obsession with them and I'm always a bit amazed at the lengths folks will go through to save a few dollars. Will some people be surprised? A few, I guess, but I don't think it is a massive issue.

Personally, I don't find the problem much worse than other attempts by airlines to obfuscate prices. For example, WN doesn't make their prices readily available on any comparison shopping sites. I don't believe that benefits consumers, but most consumers adapt anyway.
pbarnette is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.