Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Credit, Debit and Prepaid Card Programs > Credit Card Programs
Reload this Page >

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old Sep 20, 2013, 11:40 am
FlyerTalk Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by: philemer
Posts from 1/1/16 onward can be found here: http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/credit-card-programs/1739359-2016-onward-usa-emv-cards-availability-q-chip-pin-signature.html

EMV wikipost volunteers: kebosabi

What is EMV?
EMV is a defacto global standard of technology where there is a visible microchip on the front of the card. It looks like this:

Who issues them?
See Google Docs spreadsheet in Post #1

SFOAMS also has created a list of excellent webpage that shows US EMV cards in a more interactive interface

Another site, which lets you narrow the search for an EMV card by various parameters, is http://www.spotterswiki.com/emv/index.php.

Several credit unions issue some form of Chip-and-PIN credit cards or prepaid cards. Prepaid EMV cards however are not recommended due to junk fees. USAA (currently restricted to members of military) used to offer Chip-and-PIN cards, but as late has backtracked to Chip-and-Signature priority.

Hey that's a cool Google Docs list! I know others that aren't on that list. How can I help by adding them to the list?
My bad for not putting this into the wiki sooner. Right now, the Google Docs is locked out of editing and only in "read-only" view because there were instances in the past where people would just delete the rows not thinking that it affects others viewing the list.

If you promise not to delete any rows and input all the pertinent info (annual fee, rewards, FTF, etc.), I can provide you with edit access. Just shoot me a PM to kebosabi with your gmail address and I'll provide you edit access.

Thanks for helping out!


As of October 2014, no USA-based card issuer offers Chip-and-PIN priority cards except for BMO Harris (Diners Club) and UN Federal Credit Union. Other major USA-based banks such as BofA, Chase, Citi, as well as others issue Chip-and-Signature cards which may work at many automated kiosks. However, bear in mind the word may is used above is a context where there is no absolute certainty of success for certain environments such as automated kiosks due to different natures of offline and online transactions. It is highly recommended to read Post #3 which lists real life FTer examples on how Chip-and-Signature worked and did not work at various transaction environments.

Can I upgrade it right now?
If it's listed on that Google Docs spreadsheet or SFOAMS' Silk page, wouldn't hurt to call/twitter them for a free upgrade. If you get the response you don't like, hang up, try again.

What is the difference between Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN?
You insert the chipped card into the slot. The physical contact terminal will read the EMV chip and the terminal will automatically read the preferred cardholder verification methods (called CVM) for that card.

Chip-and-Signature means that the terminal will printout a receipt for you to sign. This is the most prevalent authentication for most US issued EMV cards. Chip-and-Signature helps in a way that it will get through to face-to-face merchant transactions where you and the merchant do not speak the same language.

Chip-and-PIN means that the terminal will prompt you to input a PIN for authentication. Some credit union issued credit cards will have this CVM as secondary if Chip-and-Signature cannot be done. Chip-and-PIN is the more prevalent method of authentication used outside the US, especially in transaction environments where no human interaction is needed (i.e. automated gas pumps, toll roads, train kiosks, etc.).

The Google Docs spreadsheet will list which CVM are used in the EMV cards listed. Some cards can only do Chip-and-Signature. Other cards can do both Chip-and-Signature and Chip-and-PIN. And others might have a third option called No CVM (no authentication needed) which is reserved for low value transactions.

One chip can hold a lot more data, therefore it is capable of doing multiple verification methods. That's one of the great things about EMV over the mag-stripe which can hold very little data.

I want to know for sure what my EMV chip does. Is there anyway I can test out my own EMV card to see what the CVM list is?
alexmt has written up a nice step-by-step procedure on Post #3615.

If most of the EMV cards in the US is the Chip-and-Signature type, doesn't that mean it's still useless abroad?
Depends if you see it as glass half empty or glass half full. See Post #3 for further details on how Chip-and-Signature has worked both successfully and unsuccessfully depending on the merchant transaction environment and use your best judgment whether which one is right for you.

Are there any places in the US that are accepting transactions via the EMV chip?
tmiw has created a dedicated Google maps webpage to show where EMV has been proven to work here: http://emvacceptedhere.com/ Per his Post #4240, feel free to add any places with active EMV terminals if you come across one.

As of 2014/05, the EMV terminals in most Walmarts and Sam's Clubs are being turned on. Hence, the best place to try them out would be your local Walmart or Sam's Club. For other merchants, it's slowly being phased in.

I hope people will post them in the Post your receipt of your 1st EMV based transaction in the US thread. cvarming has shown us an EMV transaction receipt from Brooklyn, NY in Post #2380. I myself had my first EMV based (Chip-and-Signature) transaction in two stores in the Los Angeles area, as shown in detail in Post #2705 (courtesy of WhatWhatTech for pointing these two stores out)

I don't want a chip in my card. I heard horror stories all over the media saying hackers can steal my credit card info from a mile away.
There are two types of chips. One is contactless and the other is contact. Cards can be either one or the other, or both.

In the Google Docs spreadsheet, the cards that are capable of contactless payments are listed seperately under the "RFID or NFC contactless chip" column. If it says yes, then that means it has the ability to do contactless payments. If it says no, it doesn't have that feature.

The one that the media has overhyped about hackers "stealing your information wirelessly" was the contactless type like this:

You are worried about this happening, right?

You don't have to worry. EMV is a chip standard that can have both contact and contactless interfaces. With the traditional contact interface, this means you actually have to physically insert the chip into a POS terminal for it to be authorized, like this:

With the contact interface, nothing is wireless. No data is sent out in a stand-alone contact type EMV chip. With the EMV contactless interface, data is sent wirelessly.

Furthermore, contactless chip cards are required to show a symbol (looks like Wi-Fi symbol) somewhere on the card that to denote it's capability as a contactless card. For example, here's an example of a Discover Card with contactless capability (in which Discover calls "Discover ZIP") showing the contactless symbol on the back of the card:

Don't believe everything that the media says. Besides, millions of people all over the world from London to Singapore, uses contactless payments daily in extremely crowded subways and mass transit with nary any problems. There are multiple layers of encrypted securities and keys that are needed to break the code.

Frankly, giving your physical card to a waiter/waitress who takes the card out of your view is much more susceptible to fraud than contactless payments.

Why should I care?
If you are an international traveler, you will want this because majority of the world has or in the process of converting to this payment format.


In fact, in 2012, even North Korea moved to the EMV format, leaving the US as one of the countries in the world that hasn't done so.

In addition, VISA, MC, AMEX, and Discover have all agreed to incentivize the USA shifting to EMV payments by 2015 by shifting liability for fraudulent transactions to merchants if they do not have EMV equipment and the cardholder has an EMV card. So if you travel internationally or would like to get one before the others, you might be interested in getting one.


BS! I had no problems using my card in [insert whereever country], [insert whatever point in time]
If you stick to the tourist path where they have lots of visitors from the US, you should have no problems using your mag-stripe only card in hotels and restaurants, at least for now. But as things can change as things go forward.

However, consider that once you start taking the off-beaten path, go to non-touristy places where they are not familiar with mag-stripes, rent a car and use toll roads, fill up gas, or try to buy train tickets you might end up into a trouble of the machine not recognizing your card because it lacks the chip. Furthermore, a lot of toll roads, gas pumps, and automated ticket machines lack any human assistance to help you when you need it the most.

But [insert credit card company] told me all merchants that display their logo must accept them! All I have to do is report them for violating their agreements, right?
There are several factors against this.

1. You can only speak English. The merchant representative, most likely a part-time clerk earning minimum wage, speaks in a different language, let's say French. If you have no French language skills, how are you going to get your point across? Are you going to whip out your cell phone at exorbitant int'l roaming charges and hope the customer service is going to translate it for you on the spot? Or maybe you might actually know French. But how about Swahili, Farsi, Balinese, or the multiple languages in mainland China?

2. Just like US, the rest of the world's businesses uses part-time minimum wage workers as cashiers to cut down on labor costs. Most of their SOP training manuals are written by MBA types to not to do anything they are not familiar with. Do not expect them to understand the intricate details of credit card mumbo jumbo. You don't expect Taco Bell employees to understand the minute details of Discover-JCB-Union Pay agreements, right? Same thing the other way around: be respectful as a guest in their country, prepare in advance in their ways, avoid being an "ugly American" stereotype.

3. You are a guest in their country. You are a minority. If 99.9% of their country's people and other tourists from around the world uses EMV, do you really think they are going to accomodate the 0.1% of American tourists who only have mag-stripes credit cards?

4. Again, you are a guest in their country. How would you, as an American standing in line, react if a Chinese tourist was clogging up the lines at a local Taco Bell because the clerk doesn't understand the Discover-Union Pay agreement and has trouble communicating between Mandarin spoken by the tourist and English spoken by the Taco Bell clerk? Same way the other way around. You do not want to clog up the lines for everyone. The less hassle, the better.

5. VISA and MC make tons of money from merchants in that country. Say SNCF French Rail. It's a billion dollar company in France. Do you think VISA is going to pull the plug of their relationship with SNCF because SNCF refuses to do mag-stripe processing at their unmanned train station kiosk? Of course not. Be realistic.

6. And lastly, if you're up against an unstaffed toll kiosk, gas pump or train ticket machine, are you going to yell curses at the machine?

But I want my credit card to be able to be used in the US too!
No worries. They have not gotten rid of the mag-stripe on the back of the card for backward compatibility reasons, just like we still have embossed numbers on our cards for backwards compatibility to using those old carbon copy imprinters.

[insert own Hyatt card image front and back together with red arrows pointing to all the backward compatibility features]

You use the chip on the front of the card abroad (for now), and the mag-stripe just like any other card for the US. Basically, you're increasing your credit card's acceptance rate by getting a card that both via the chip and the mag-stripe. You're getting a better deal for free.

And when 2015 comes along and US switches to EMV, you'll be way ahead of everyone else too!


So why did the rest of the world and the US moved/moving toward EMV?
Primarily, due to fraud concerns. You see, the mag-stripe has been with us since the 1950s. It may have been the most high tech thing back in the day, but with the technology that is available today, any shmo can pick up a $100 USB magnetic card skimming device off of eBay and get your credit card info.

And unlike skimming off contactless cards which actually need the person to have l33t programming skills, skimming off a magnetic stripe has become so ubiquitous that nary a day goes about skimming fraud going on somewhere in America, from gas pumps, Michael's stores (2011), Target breaches (2013), restaurant waiters/waitresses, to even McDonald's drive thrus.

https://www.google.com/search?q=skimming+fraud

These type of fraud used to be prevalent in Europe. But once they started switching over to EMV starting over 2 decades ago, this type of fraud went elsewhere. It went over to Asia, Canada and Mexico, Latin America, etc. etc. until they too began implementing EMV to combat skimming fraud. The US is practically the only country left that hasn't done so, therefore all the fraud that used to take place elsewhere is now happening here.


But EMV is old and it's not fool proof. Shouldn't we just skip over it and do something new instead?
Yes, EMV is old. It was developed in the 1990s and its smart card payment predecessor was first introduced in France. But as of today, it has become the defacto global standard of payments.

But then, what else is there? There is no other de facto global standard of payments alternative. For example, if we decide to skip over it and do something new, hypothetically like DNA matching technology, it still means US int'l travelers will continue to have problems abroad with useless plastic acceptance because no other country is using this DNA matching technology except the US.

Besides, nothing is fool proof. You can say that the bank vault isn't fool proof because you can crack it open if enough C4 is used. But your average low-life scumbag isn't likely to get military grade C4 easily either. But the bank vault does make it harder to get the bank's money over say a petty cash box. That's the point here. EMV is akin to a security tight bank vault, the old mag-stripe is akin to a petty cash box lying around inside the drawer.


I'm a business owner and I don't think EMV is going to take off. I'm not going to spend extra hundreds of dollars to upgrade my credit card machine. Convince me other wise why I should.
I can understand the added extra cost to your business once this switchover takes place. But before even saying that, look at your existing POS terminal. Does it have a slot somewhere to insert a card?

Most likely, if you had replaced your POS terminal within the past five years, you already have an EMV capable terminal. EMV is basically just not turned on yet from the processor and acquirer side.

If you have an EMV capable terminal, then a best bet would be to contact your acquirer to have the EMV feature turned on. You did your end of the deal already by having an EMV capable terminal, it is now the acquirers' responsibility to turn it on in accordance to the EMV switchover mandate.

And if you don't, you are going to replace your POS terminal anyway from common wear and tear. It isn't a hard switch-over. You can continue to use your POS terminal until it dies out because EMV cardholders will still have the mag-stripe on the back. And by the time your non-EMV capable POS terminal is up for replacement the market will be full with these newer POS terminals that can accept the mag-stripe, EMV, as well as contactless payments.

In addition, you may also want to check with your acquirer or processor about EMV capable terminals. Some of them are willing to replace your terminal for free in preparation for the US EMV switchover. Call and ask for details.


But what's in it for me? I'm the one that has to pay for the upgrade.
All the major card networks have given incentives for merchants for the upcoming EMV switchover.

If 75% or more of your credit card transactions are done on an EMV contact and contactless terminal, they are going to waive your annual PCI-DSS fees, which usually costs you around $5.00-$19.95/month per terminal. The overall long term cost savings of those compliance fees will be larger than the cost of an one time upgrade for the terminal.

The downside is that once EMV switchover happens and if you do not have a POS terminal that is able to accept EMV, the fraud liability shifts over to the merchant.

I own several fast food franchises. If I upgrade my POS terminals at all of my restaurants, it's going to cost me thousands, if not millions. I don't think anyone is going to use a fake credit card to buy $5 burgers. And if they do, wouldn't it be cheaper for me to eat the fraud cost?
Remember also that fraud isn't just committed by dishonest customers using fraudulent cards. Fraud can also happen with dishonest employees skimming off credit card data from the mag-stripe as in the case of a teenage McDonald's drive thru employee skimming off $13,000 of customers' credit cards in Olympia, WA. Consider the public relations fall out that your business may have if this happens (i.e. the big Target breach of 2013, where someone used a mag stripe card to load malware INTO Target's system). Is it worth risking to take such a huge PR disaster?
Print Wikipost

USA EMV cards: Availability, Q&A (Chip & PIN -or- Chip & Signature) [2012-2015]

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2014, 5:25 pm
  #7531  
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 114
New in this forum since I ended up here after having issues using my US issued cc's and ATM/debit card in France and Colombia. My CSP was not accepted because the merchants wanted the PIN. But I guess I did not know about telling the tellers to click the Signature button, so I'm not sure if they would have taken completed the transactions with my signature. I asked them to swipe the cards, but they said it won't go through.

My Schwab ATM/Debit with magnetic stripe worked, but with some issues. It seems the new ATM machines in both FR and CO can read the magnetic stripe. But I had issues in both countries where I basically had to insert the card in just the right angle, and right depth for it to read. Not such a big deal in 1st arrondissement in Paris. But it's scary being in a Colombian ATM taking 10 minutes trying to get the card to read. I received my new EMV ATM/Debit card from Schwab and was successful with it at a BoA EMV ATM.

To contribute to the group, I just wanted to let you know of my experience today. I used my recently reissued AmEx Optima Plat with EMV at Walmart today in Houston. I went through the manned checked out, but my purchase was only 20 something dollars. I did the insert, got prompted to approve the total purchase price, press the Yes button, and it was approved in about 5 seconds. No signature required, of course.
RTWRide is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 5:40 pm
  #7532  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
Let me ask you a question. There are several chip and signature priority cards being issued which have chip and pin capabilities. Arrival+ from Barclay Bank is one such example. Andrews FCU is another. Why wouldn't you want one of those for the RER kiosks; they are reported to work at them as well as automatic fuel pumps. I'm not sure just how completely necessary a priority chip and offline pin card is. I understand the possibility of a merchant refusing to process a chip and signature priority card but while it happens, it is far from an overwhelming number.
Chip and PIN priority is most important for attended kiosks, like self-checkouts.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 5:59 pm
  #7533  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by alexmt
Chip and PIN priority is most important for attended kiosks, like self-checkouts.
Visa as part of its push to use chip and signature on USA issued cards says it will be promulgating new regs prohibiting discrimination against these cards throughout the world. Now I know people are going to say well regs exist now and they haven't been effective and that's true. But just for argument sake let's say they are able to do so i.e. require chip and signature not be discriminated against. If that were to happen, would it matter that much?

Just asking.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 6:02 pm
  #7534  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
Visa as part of its push to use chip and signature on USA issued cards says it will be promulgating new regs prohibiting discrimination against these cards throughout the world. Now I know people are going to say well regs exist now and they haven't been effective and that's true. But just for argument sake let's say they are able to do so i.e. require chip and signature not be discriminated against. If that were to happen, would it matter that much?

Just asking.
Yes, because attended kiosks don't prohibit chip and signature, they just require the attendant to verify the signature. Which is easier said than done, so yes, it matters.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 6:22 pm
  #7535  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: San Diego, CA
Programs: GE, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 15,507
Originally Posted by alexmt
Yes, because attended kiosks don't prohibit chip and signature, they just require the attendant to verify the signature. Which is easier said than done, so yes, it matters.
I feel like they could fix the firmware on the self-checkouts to handle VEPS/QPS correctly and trigger no CVM if the transaction's small enough. Wouldn't help for large self-checkout transactions but a fair number of them wouldn't have the signature hassle.
tmiw is online now  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 7:14 pm
  #7536  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
I will say this. The problem with self service checkouts and chip and signature is related to the silly insistance of making a big deal about signatures for small purchases (you can define any way you want what a small purchase is). We all know signature verification is totally useless against credit card fraud. What's the sense of requiring signatures for a purchase of $8.47?
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Oct 22, 2014, 11:21 pm
  #7537  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Originally Posted by reclusive46
That's because Germany uses online PIN (the pin is checked with the bank), whereas the UK generally uses offline PIN (the PIN is stored on the chip), so as UK terminals can't check your pin it drops down to signature.
Does the UK only use offline PIN? I could've sworn I've used my PIN at Tube station for a card that only has an online PIN

Originally Posted by kebosabi
Japanese banks are like that too.

Is that a bank card though? It say "Cash Card" (or is that a prepaid credit card?)

Originally Posted by RTWRide
New in this forum since I ended up here after having issues using my US issued cc's and ATM/debit card in France and Colombia. My CSP was not accepted because the merchants wanted the PIN. But I guess I did not know about telling the tellers to click the Signature button, so I'm not sure if they would have taken completed the transactions with my signature. I asked them to swipe the cards, but they said it won't go through.

My Schwab ATM/Debit with magnetic stripe worked, but with some issues. It seems the new ATM machines in both FR and CO can read the magnetic stripe. But I had issues in both countries where I basically had to insert the card in just the right angle, and right depth for it to read. Not such a big deal in 1st arrondissement in Paris. But it's scary being in a Colombian ATM taking 10 minutes trying to get the card to read. I received my new EMV ATM/Debit card from Schwab and was successful with it at a BoA EMV ATM.

To contribute to the group, I just wanted to let you know of my experience today. I used my recently reissued AmEx Optima Plat with EMV at Walmart today in Houston. I went through the manned checked out, but my purchase was only 20 something dollars. I did the insert, got prompted to approve the total purchase price, press the Yes button, and it was approved in about 5 seconds. No signature required, of course.
Welcome to FT!
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 12:28 am
  #7538  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,537
Originally Posted by reclusive46
That's because Germany uses online PIN (the pin is checked with the bank), whereas the UK generally uses offline PIN (the PIN is stored on the chip), so as UK terminals can't check your pin it drops down to signature.
Good to know! Why, exactly, can't UK terminals verify an online PIN? I thought that was a basic EMV requirement if transactions were being processed online.
AllieKat is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 12:33 am
  #7539  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Programs: HHonors Gold, Marriott Lifetime Gold, IHG Gold, OZ*G, AA Gold, AS MVP
Posts: 1,874
Originally Posted by joshwex90
Safer and fine if chips had universal acceptance (at least in your own travel zone).

For example, I hear that some banks in Switzerland issue, as an option, "bank" cards which are more restrictive than ATM cards (which are more restrictive than debit cards). They can only be used in the banks' ATMs or machine. They come with just EMV - no magnetic stripe at all.
In which case it's going to be a pain for me going forward. UnionPay EMV doesn't seem to be well-supported outside mainland China, and aside from that I was also using my Chinese debit card with my Bluebird as a cheaper alternative to a wire. If that's the case, though, I hope they get on the dual-network cards too.

Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
Let me ask you a question. There are several chip and signature priority cards being issued which have chip and pin capabilities. Arrival+ from Barclay Bank is one such example. Andrews FCU is another. Why wouldn't you want one of those for the RER kiosks; they are reported to work at them as well as automatic fuel pumps. I'm not sure just how completely necessary a priority chip and offline pin card is. I understand the possibility of a merchant refusing to process a chip and signature priority card but while it happens, it is far from an overwhelming number.
If you don't want to wait (or break) the self-checkouts in some places it's pretty handy to have a PIN-priority card. I've taken the 2.5% FX fee on my Canadian debit card a few times because of this (and not just supermarkets- my choice at Versailles this summer was to get our entry tickets instantly or add another hour to our wait time because for some reason they only had 3 cashiers working and over 10 Chip+PIN automatic ticket machines).

Originally Posted by joshwex90
Does the UK only use offline PIN? I could've sworn I've used my PIN at Tube station for a card that only has an online PIN
I've used my chip+sign CSP and my chip-less US Airways card at Tube stations so online transactions are not a problem for those machines, apparently.


Originally Posted by joshwex90
Is that a bank card though? It say "Cash Card" (or is that a prepaid credit card?)
Yep, those are bank cards. Having been to Japan a few times, "cash card" is the term they use for ATM/J-Debit-only cards. (Fun fact: some of them do have a magstripe, but it's on the front of the card, not the back. Tilt one and you'll see that it reflects light differently than the rest of the card.) "Prepaid card" is the term they use to refer to prepaid Visa/MC "credit" cards, which are stripe-only and don't have names on them. I have one of those and it looks different (top-left says "chargeable prepaid card"):



As an aside, this card has worked quite well for online services. I just have to remember not to download too much because if I run out early I can't add more money until I'm in Japan again.

Last edited by jamar; Oct 23, 2014 at 12:53 am
jamar is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 1:00 am
  #7540  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: HaMerkaz/Exit 145
Programs: UA, LY, BA, AA
Posts: 13,167
Originally Posted by alexmt
Good to know! Why, exactly, can't UK terminals verify an online PIN? I thought that was a basic EMV requirement if transactions were being processed online.
I would've thought the same - if it has the ability to check the network, online, for verification, it should in theory be able to check the network for the PIN, even if the majority of UK cards use offline PIN

Originally Posted by jamar
I've used my chip+sign CSP and my chip-less US Airways card at Tube stations so online transactions are not a problem for those machines, apparently.
Interesting - my chip-less CapOne failed. But my BoA chipped card did work, though it sounded like reclusive46 meant the PIN was offline, but the transaction was online
joshwex90 is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 1:06 am
  #7541  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
Originally Posted by jamar
If you don't want to wait (or break) the self-checkouts in some places it's pretty handy to have a PIN-priority card. I've taken the 2.5% FX fee on my Canadian debit card a few times because of this (and not just supermarkets- my choice at Versailles this summer was to get our entry tickets instantly or add another hour to our wait time because for some reason they only had 3 cashiers working and over 10 Chip+PIN automatic ticket machines).
Bear in mind what I said. I don't question as things stand today the advantages of having the ability to do offline pin transactions. The questions were, though, that many cards even though chip and signature priority do have the ability to do offline pin transactions i.e. arrival+, Andrews, even the downgraded USAA world mastercard apparently. Interesting, though, at least the USAA card while it will work in some self service terminals (I tried to use it at one in Boots in London), the terminal which still accepts chip and signature cards doesn't get down to that priority so it defauls to signature and you know how things are in the UK; for the smallest purchase they make a big deal about checking signatures (not that the clerks will be able to recognize a fraudulent signature anyway). I presume all US cards with signature priority will have that problem the way the UK self service kiosks are set up. France? I don't know.

However, as part of this deal, what I said so as not to be misconstrued, is visa (and presumably mastercard, amex, discover) says it will be taking steps to achieve 100% compatability by requiring, for example, that all merchants must take chip and signature cards. Whether that applies to a situation with a kiosk that takes the card but requires a human being to come over to veryify the signature is of course not clear. They (visa) claim they will no longer allow offline pin based kiosks to out of hand reject chip and signature emv compliant cards. Again, good luck with that one in the Netherlands and especially the Dutch National Railroad.

But my questions was as many of us here are still hung up on chip and pin good and chip and signature no good (myself to a degree also to be fair), if these promises can be met, would it now matter that much to people.

Of all the things with credit card fraud, and btw apparently Staples has been hacked also as well as K Mart, the most important thing for all of us is to maintain zero liability. I'm a pessimist at heart and quite frankly as I've said what will happen is credit card fraud will shift to other means whether it is online fraud (which is signficant today as it is; just not as significant as the ease of counterfeiting magnetic strip cards with stolen data) or counterfeiting the emv chips. These crooks, let's face it, are good at what they do. To me, the most important issue coming out of all this is not the migration to emv, not chip and signature as opposed to chip and pin but rather the liability issue and if and when my card is hacked the ease of resolving the issue. Right now, leaving aside the issue of notifying the merchants who automatically bill your credit cards and yes that can be a bit of a pain, if your card gets hacked as has become so common, you call the bank, you tell them which charges are not yours and, incidentally the back office operations at most banks ha become so good that while the first fraudulent transaction might slip through, the alarm bells go off quite quickly if charges start popping up from Sri Lanka at the same time you are charging things in Brooklyn, NY, the charges come off the account, a new card is issued with a different number and life goes on. That's what should be most important to all of us and not run into the problem some British cardholders ran into when chip and pin was introduced and at first the banks accused the cardholders of being negligent with their pins and wanted to hold them liable. That simply must not be allowed to happen.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 1:18 am
  #7542  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,762
BTW back to the issue in Paris. As I've said, I find it interesting that US magnetic strip and chip and signature cards will work in machines serviced by RATP which is the local Paris transportation operator but neither will work in the machines operated by SNCF, the French National railroad. At CDG, if you wish to take the RER into centre-ville (downtown), you're stuck as all the ticketing machines are operated by SNCF even though you are using the RER. OTOH if you are at say Paris Disneyland and wish to buy a ticket for RER A4 at the Disneyland RER station, since the machines are operated by RATP, no problem. Very strange.
JEFFJAGUAR is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 2:04 am
  #7543  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 93
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
That's what should be most important to all of us and not run into the problem some British cardholders ran into when chip and pin was introduced and at first the banks accused the cardholders of being negligent with their pins and wanted to hold them liable. That simply must not be allowed to happen.
I'd like to see some sort of numbers on how many people were affected by that "problem". I think it's so insignificant that you can ignore it.

Originally Posted by joshwex90
Safer and fine if chips had universal acceptance (at least in your own travel zone).

For example, I hear that some banks in Switzerland issue, as an option, "bank" cards which are more restrictive than ATM cards (which are more restrictive than debit cards). They can only be used in the banks' ATMs or machine. They come with just EMV - no magnetic stripe at all.
On a similar note, I think that V Pay is worth mentioning.

It's Visa Europe's EMV-only (marketed as PIN-only) debit card.

http://www.vpay.com
Daveoc64 is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 2:07 am
  #7544  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Programs: BA Gold (OWE), Star Alliance Gold, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,194
Originally Posted by alexmt
Good to know! Why, exactly, can't UK terminals verify an online PIN? I thought that was a basic EMV requirement if transactions were being processed online.
I don't know why, most unattended terminals can and so can some attended POS. France is the same. You'll see a lot of Europeans signing at attended POS their.
reclusive46 is offline  
Old Oct 23, 2014, 6:41 am
  #7545  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: NYC
Posts: 538
Originally Posted by JEFFJAGUAR
At CDG, if you wish to take the RER into centre-ville (downtown), you're stuck as all the ticketing machines are operated by SNCF even though you are using the RER. OTOH if you are at say Paris Disneyland and wish to buy a ticket for RER A4 at the Disneyland RER station, since the machines are operated by RATP, no problem. Very strange.
You are the victim of the evolutionary history of Parisian rapid transit. The RER A & B lines are joint RATP-SNCF operations despite the unified branding. As I recall, the RATP operates all the RER B stations south of the Gare du Nord while the others (including the ones at CDG) are SNCF stations. On the contrary, most of the RER A, including the Disneyland branch, is operated by RATP.
st1575 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.