Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Travel&Dining > Travel Safety/Security > Checkpoints and Borders Policy Debate
Reload this Page >

FDA Warns Travelers To Tell TSA About Any Prescription Drugs They Have

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

FDA Warns Travelers To Tell TSA About Any Prescription Drugs They Have

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2014, 11:42 am
  #31  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Programs: A3, AA. Plasticy things! That give me, y'know, Stuff!
Posts: 6,293
Originally Posted by pa3lsvt
Officers of the Corps wear uniforms similar to those of the United States Navy with special PHSCC insignia, and the Corps uses the same commissioned officer ranks as the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the Commissioned Officer Corps of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration from ensign to admiral, uniformed services pay grades O-1 through O-10 respectively.
Completely OT, but we're there anyway, but why does the US have to militarize everything?
SeriouslyLost is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 12:01 pm
  #32  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,425
Originally Posted by janetdoe
Off topic: Why do all the FDA employees in the video have military uniforms?

They also say that 'Passengers are allowed to bring medication in tablet or other solid form through security screening checkpoints, as long as they are screened.' No mention of liquids.

It sounds to me like the FDA gets a lot of queries for things they don't enforce, so they tried to make a generic brush off video that they knew had 'safe' answers instead of real ones.
Agreed. The FDA is far too busy approving drugs that kill people and rejecting other drugs that also kill people.
nachtnebel is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 12:42 pm
  #33  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: SEA, or BOS, or MUC, or other places (probably connecting). "Detroit, Michigan is in the Eastern time zone."
Programs: DL PM/1MM, AS 100K, NEXUS/GE, CLEAR, Bonvoy Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 1,201
Originally Posted by SeriouslyLost
Completely OT, but we're there anyway, but why does the US have to militarize everything?
The Marine Hospital Service was reorganized on military lines in the 1870s by its then-head John Maynard Woodworth (who'd served in the Union Army during the Civil War) and was formally created as a uniformed service (the PHSCC) in 1889.

The organization that eventually became the NOAA Corps was created during WWI so that survey personnel wouldn't be shot as spies if captured while surveying a battlefield or other war zone.
CKDGM is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 1:24 pm
  #34  
Company Representative, TSA
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 101
We were unaware of this video and never consulted. Our policies have not changed.
TSAPressSec is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 1:59 pm
  #35  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 729
Originally Posted by RadioGirl
..."What are those pills? I'm glad you asked...
An alternative approach might be to (1) insist on explaining the purpose of each medication to TSA staff at the checkpoint, with each explanation linked to something that can be transmitted through contact or close proximity, and (2) opt for a patdown thereafter. Perhaps wear a surgical mask, too.
Schmurrr is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 2:16 pm
  #36  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,657
Originally Posted by TSAPressSec
We were unaware of this video and never consulted. Our policies have not changed.
Funny how that page still doesn't address nitro pills ...
jkhuggins is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 2:17 pm
  #37  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California. USA
Posts: 1,404
What has TSA even to do wih medication? They are not medical trained. And is not a secuity issue either.Just sound like a really crazzy thing going
tanja is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 2:19 pm
  #38  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,690
Originally Posted by jkhuggins
Funny how that page still doesn't address nitro pills ...
Of course not. Ross clearly says the policies have not changed.
chollie is online now  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 2:54 pm
  #39  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: Choice Hotels/FFOCUS
Posts: 7,256
Originally Posted by InkUnderNails
Article is here.

Taken from this video report.



Well, this should be interesting.

My comment: As for me, it ain't gonna happen.
This ^^
coachrowsey is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 3:36 pm
  #40  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by chollie
Of course not. Ross clearly says the policies have not changed.
But he also said this:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/23096271-post60.html

in response to this:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/23096135-post59.html

and this:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/23096054-post58.html

So, where again are nitroglycerin pills specifically mentioned by the TSA?

Last edited by petaluma1; Aug 28, 2014 at 3:38 pm Reason: now maybe I got it right.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 3:59 pm
  #41  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,690
Originally Posted by petaluma1
But he also said this:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/23096271-post60.html

in response to this:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/23096135-post59.html

and this:

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/23096054-post58.html

So, where again are nitroglycerin pills specifically mentioned by the TSA?

I don't have the link, but (probably owing to <deleted>'s efforts), there's a place on the blog to ask if things are allowed. In the past, it didn't recognize 'nitro', 'nitro pills', or 'nitro patch'. It now recognizes these, but the answer is the same boilerplate "Maybe yes, maybe no, it's all up to the screener".

However...this is still treating the pills as medicine. They were NOT confiscated under medical rules (although they could be, because it's always up to the screener). They were confiscated because they contain a zero-tolerance prohibited substance.

It's the same problem that exists with Clearcare contact solution. I'm sure the website says LGA rules apply, contact solutions are OK. The specific brand Clearcare did not get banned under medical rules, it got banned under 'prohibited substance' rules (some kind of peroxide that someone could use as a component in something nasty, IIRC).

Nitro pills and patches are nothing new. TSA knows they are no threat. The fact that TSA has actually updated the website to recognize the terms without bothering to openly say that the pills/patches are allowed tells me all I need to know: the suits I encountered were right, their official SSI SOP does say 'nitro' is not allowed in any form or quantity. Otherwise, TSA wouldn't have a problem with clarifying the matter on the website - or even tweeting it.

Last edited by TWA884; Jun 26, 2017 at 2:55 pm
chollie is online now  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 4:15 pm
  #42  
YKF
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kitchener, Canada
Posts: 164
TSA doesn't have the guts to say nitro pills are allowed. What a bunch of crooks. The TSA reps on this forum are a joke too. They send us to links of websites that we know doesn't specifically spell out that they are allowed.
YKF is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 5:50 pm
  #43  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by chollie
I don't have the link, but (probably owing to <deleted>'s efforts), there's a place on the blog to ask if things are allowed. In the past, it didn't recognize 'nitro', 'nitro pills', or 'nitro patch'. It now recognizes these, but the answer is the same boilerplate "Maybe yes, maybe no, it's all up to the screener".

However...this is still treating the pills as medicine. They were NOT confiscated under medical rules (although they could be, because it's always up to the screener). They were confiscated because they contain a zero-tolerance prohibited substance.

It's the same problem that exists with Clearcare contact solution. I'm sure the website says LGA rules apply, contact solutions are OK. The specific brand Clearcare did not get banned under medical rules, it got banned under 'prohibited substance' rules (some kind of peroxide that someone could use as a component in something nasty, IIRC).

Nitro pills and patches are nothing new. TSA knows they are no threat. The fact that TSA has actually updated the website to recognize the terms without bothering to openly say that the pills/patches are allowed tells me all I need to know: the suits I encountered were right, their official SSI SOP does say 'nitro' is not allowed in any form or quantity. Otherwise, TSA wouldn't have a problem with clarifying the matter on the website - or even tweeting it.
But the website does not address nitroglycerin pills by name, even though it does recognize a query for nitroglycerin pills:

http://www.tsa.gov/

front page, "When I fly, can I bring my...?"

http://apps.tsa.dhs.gov/mytsa/cib_re...ycerin%20pills

However, you get the same result when you query "heart medications"

http://apps.tsa.dhs.gov/mytsa/cib_re...t%20medication

Put in "coumadin" and what do you get?

http://apps.tsa.dhs.gov/mytsa/cib_re...earch=coumadin

Search for "blood thinner" and you get the same result as you get with "heart medication" and "nitroglycerin pills."

Most people are going to enter the name of their pills and they are going to get a result that addresses "medically necessary liquids, gels, and aerosols", which is, just like the TSA, totally useless.

Ross is being totally and completely disingenuous, but what else is new for TSA employees?

BTW, if you search the term "nitroglycerin", you get this result:

http://apps.tsa.dhs.gov/mytsa/cib_re...=nitroglycerin

Last edited by TWA884; Jun 26, 2017 at 2:55 pm Reason: Privacy / Conform to moderator's edit of quoted post
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 5:57 pm
  #44  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by Schmurrr
An alternative approach might be to (1) insist on explaining the purpose of each medication to TSA staff at the checkpoint, with each explanation linked to something that can be transmitted through contact or close proximity, and (2) opt for a patdown thereafter. Perhaps wear a surgical mask, too.
EBOLA!
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 5:59 pm
  #45  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by TSAPressSec
We were unaware of this video and never consulted. Our policies have not changed.
I hope you and those above you took note of the anger so many people harbor about the TSA and expressed in their comments to the article.
petaluma1 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.