Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Traveling with Nitro Pills

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 25, 2014, 5:07 pm
  #61  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AS, BA, AA
Posts: 3,670
Originally Posted by TSAPressSec
I understand, and I am going to work to make sure that this is updated on our website and conveyed internally as well.
Thanks! This is personally upsetting to me because I took my grandparents to Sydney last month, and my grandfather had to take two of his nitro pills in the SYD airport en route to baggage claim. We would have had to spend a lot of our vacation in the hospital if TSA had seized his pills in LAX, not to mention the nightmare of trying to obtain health care via a travel insurance policy...

Luckily he was carrying them in an unlabeled vial when he went through security, unlike Chollie.
janetdoe is offline  
Old Jun 25, 2014, 6:59 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by TSAPressSec
I understand, and I am going to work to make sure that this is updated on our website and conveyed internally as well.
What's updated on the website? That nitro pills are allowed or that no screener is allowed to ever take someone's prescription meds away?
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2014, 7:08 am
  #63  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: TPA
Programs: AAdvantage 2 million, Marriott Gold
Posts: 960
Originally Posted by petaluma1
The TSA needs to come out with a statement that ALL prescribed meds are allowed on a plane, absolutely no exceptions, and no screener is allowed to deny any passenger his/her medication.
That statement needs to include the procedure/process to prove it is valid. That is where the fight will be.
FLgrr is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2014, 8:03 am
  #64  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: An NPR mind living in a Fox News world
Posts: 14,165
Originally Posted by FLgrr
That statement needs to include the procedure/process to prove it is valid. That is where the fight will be.
No, we shouldn't be "proving" anything to these people. Further, they shouldn't be telling us how much we need for our flight. The next TSA clerk who plays doctor needs to be made an example of.
FliesWay2Much is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2014, 8:39 am
  #65  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,681
Originally Posted by FLgrr
That statement needs to include the procedure/process to prove it is valid. That is where the fight will be.
Medical liquids >3.4 ounce that can be cleared by a strip test.

Medical nitro can't be cleared (I was told) because a more stringent rule applies: nitro is a banned substance in any quantity, any form (like C4).
chollie is online now  
Old Jun 27, 2014, 8:44 am
  #66  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Baltimore, MD USA
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards. Tha... that's about it.
Posts: 4,332
Originally Posted by chollie
Medical liquids >3.4 ounce that can be cleared by a strip test.

Medical nitro can't be cleared (I was told) because a more stringent rule applies: nitro is a banned substance in any quantity, any form (like C4).
Actually, if I recall your story, you said the screener kept telling you "No explosives. No exceptions."

Of course, as we've discussed before, nitro pills, sprays, and patches are not explosive in any way, shape, or form, and so are not banned.
WillCAD is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2014, 8:57 am
  #67  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by FLgrr
That statement needs to include the procedure/process to prove it is valid. That is where the fight will be.
Prove what is valid? The prescription? That's none of the TSA's business. If meds are in a bottle with a prescription affixed, then it flies. Full stop.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2014, 8:57 am
  #68  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by FliesWay2Much
No, we shouldn't be "proving" anything to these people. Further, they shouldn't be telling us how much we need for our flight. The next TSA clerk who plays doctor needs to be made an example of.
^^
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2014, 9:10 am
  #69  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: where the chile is hot
Programs: AA,RR,NW,Delta ,UA,CO
Posts: 41,681
Originally Posted by WillCAD
Actually, if I recall your story, you said the screener kept telling you "No explosives. No exceptions."

Of course, as we've discussed before, nitro pills, sprays, and patches are not explosive in any way, shape, or form, and so are not banned.
Yup. That was the problem: nitro pills fall under two categories. My pills were not denied under a medical rule because of quantity or an unlabelled container or even because a swab test came back positive (it did not). My pills were confiscated because of the zero tolerance rule that applies to explosives, and the fact that in some minds, any and all forms of nitro are a banned explosive substance.

I wonder what would happen if someone brought through a 1-pound-bag of fertilizer that swabbed positive?

I've never heard of someone being challenged about pills, although I'm sure it's happened. ("Can you prove these pills aren't ecstasy? Why do you have so many?") If TSA ever started enforcing a requirement for pills to be in originally labelled containers with a copy of the prescription, there really will be chaos. Older folks who put things in pill keepers, for example, the problem of verifying that what is in the properly labelled pill bottle is what the label says (although some prescription labels now include an image of the pill), the problem that any prescription could be forged - impossible.
chollie is online now  
Old Jun 27, 2014, 9:16 am
  #70  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,526
Originally Posted by chollie
Yup. That was the problem: nitro pills fall under two categories. My pills were not denied under a medical rule because of quantity or an unlabelled container or even because a swab test came back positive (it did not). My pills were confiscated because of the zero tolerance rule that applies to explosives, and the fact that in some minds, any and all forms of nitro are a banned explosive substance.

I wonder what would happen if someone brought through a 1-pound-bag of fertilizer that swabbed positive?

I've never heard of someone being challenged about pills, although I'm sure it's happened. ("Can you prove these pills aren't ecstasy? Why do you have so many?") If TSA ever started enforcing a requirement for pills to be in originally labelled containers with a copy of the prescription, there really will be chaos. Older folks who put things in pill keepers, for example, the problem of verifying that what is in the properly labelled pill bottle is what the label says (although some prescription labels now include an image of the pill), the problem that any prescription could be forged - impossible.
Your pills were confiscated, Chollie, because you ran into a screener who was dumber than a stump with supervisors who were also just as dumb and/or didn't have the cojones to overrule the screener.
petaluma1 is offline  
Old Jun 27, 2014, 1:13 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 506
I have never been challenged about my pills... much less them paying
any attention to them at all.

However, I am sufficiently paranoid now that I leave my pills in the
original containers.

I used to repackage them to save space over those huge honkin'
space wasters the pharmacies sometimes use.

Last week I had to return one of those to the pharmacy for
repackaging into smaller containers... they kindly obliged.

I should note I do not carry nitros, but perhaps the pills I do carry
if broken down by a mortar & pestle and combined would result in
something explosive.

Interestingly enough, when I lookup "mortar and pestle" on the TSA
site it claims we can take them via either carry-on or checked.

TSA might want to give this one a little more thought. LOL
Paul56 is offline  
Old Aug 24, 2014, 7:48 am
  #72  
YKF
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Kitchener, Canada
Posts: 164
Originally Posted by petaluma1
What's updated on the website? That nitro pills are allowed or that no screener is allowed to ever take someone's prescription meds away?
They would never state that a screener is not allowed to take any medication. It would take away from the illusion that TSO's have unquestionable law enforcement power.
YKF is offline  
Old Aug 27, 2014, 6:53 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: DFW
Programs: AS, BA, AA
Posts: 3,670
Originally Posted by chollie
My pills were confiscated because of the zero tolerance rule that applies to explosives, and the fact that in some minds, any and all forms of nitro are a banned explosive substance.
I wonder in that case if you could insist that they call a bomb appraisal officer (BAO) to verify that the pills were indeed explosive? Might be a way to shortcut a chain of idiots and get to someone who is capable of critical thought.

They had to call a BAO once when I had some epsom salts in my carryon. Apparently it color-codes as something scary when it goes through the x-ray machine. I'm guessing the fact that it's mostly water (MgSO4*6H2O) makes it code as a gel, even though it's solid, so it blew their minds. Pun intended.
janetdoe is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.