Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > America - USA > California
Reload this Page >

CA State Senate Approves Requiring Lactation Rooms For Mothers In Major Airports

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

CA State Senate Approves Requiring Lactation Rooms For Mothers In Major Airports

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2014, 2:35 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SAN/LAX
Programs: UA Gold, VX Silver, HH Gold, Hyatt Gold, JPM Palladium
Posts: 627
CA State Senate Approves Requiring Lactation Rooms For Mothers In Major Airports

Airports serving more than 1 million passengers a year may soon need to offer nursing mothers dedicated rooms where they will be able to feed their infants.

Under the bill, terminals at existing airports must offer rooms with a chair and an electrical outlet for the pump, while new terminals must include rooms with sinks.
The bill, if signed into law, would not take effect until 2016.

http://www.sacbee.com/2014/08/20/664...ion-rooms.html

Can we please try to keep any discussion PG-13 and on topic?
FTcadence is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2014, 12:46 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sacramento, CA, US
Posts: 2,229
The measure is broadly written and applies to all persons, not just mothers.
Reindeerflame is offline  
Old Aug 22, 2014, 12:54 pm
  #3  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: SAN/LAX
Programs: UA Gold, VX Silver, HH Gold, Hyatt Gold, JPM Palladium
Posts: 627
I know that infants can be found traveling with fathers and other family members (sans their mothers), but in that case wouldn't the child be feeding from a bottle... something that can easily and unobjectionally be done out in public?

Is there a situation that I'm not thinking of?
FTcadence is offline  
Old Aug 25, 2014, 9:15 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,785
Originally Posted by FTcadence
I know that infants can be found traveling with fathers and other family members (sans their mothers), but in that case wouldn't the child be feeding from a bottle... something that can easily and unobjectionally be done out in public?

Is there a situation that I'm not thinking of?
I know that in older Chinese culture, you could hire "milk mother" (loosely translated) to feed your kid. So it may not be the birth mother who breast feed the kid.
Need is offline  
Old Aug 25, 2014, 5:14 pm
  #5  
Moderator: Travel Safety/Security, Travel Tools, California, Los Angeles; FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: LAX
Programs: oneword Emerald
Posts: 20,638
Originally Posted by Need
I know that in older Chinese culture, you could hire "milk mother"...
The English language term is "wet nurse."
TWA884 is offline  
Old Aug 26, 2014, 8:34 am
  #6  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,785
Originally Posted by TWA884
The English language term is "wet nurse."
Ah! And it is not safe for work to google the term.. just in case anyone else is reading this at work.. LOL
Need is offline  
Old Aug 27, 2014, 4:32 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: DCA, lived MCI, SEA/PDX,BUF (born/raised)
Programs: Marriott (Silver/Gold), IHG, Carlson, Best Western, Choice( Gold), AS (MVP), WN, UA
Posts: 8,735
equal protection clause says that you cant descriminate against men...
djp98374 is offline  
Old Aug 28, 2014, 3:23 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Hyatt Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: QLA
Programs: SBUX Gold
Posts: 14,507
Originally Posted by djp98374
equal protection clause says that you cant descriminate against men...
Actually, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment says that "No State shall ... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

What you claim it says is a mere paraphrase and extrapolation. And a poor one at that.
IceTrojan is offline  
Old Sep 8, 2014, 5:03 am
  #9  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA 1K, MM *G for life, BAEC Gold
Posts: 10,225
Originally Posted by djp98374
equal protection clause says that you cant descriminate against men...
Nature discriminated against men in this respect and, however pompous and self-important a judge or senator you are, you cannot change that fact.

As to the proposal, can the State senators not find something more useful to do with their time?
lhrsfo is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.