What Do We Girls Want in Hotel Security?
#47
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lithgow, NSW
Programs: QF Bronze, Velocity
Posts: 1,049
My big one is adjoining rooms. In London last year I asked to be moved OUT of a room because it was adjoining another and there was an access door between them. Front desk in their wisdom moved me into ANOTHER room with TWO adjoining doors. Unfortunately the hotel was sold out so they could not move me again, however these doors felt safer as I could deadbolt them from my side. Didnt stop me putting my umbrella over the one I couldnt see from my bed though!
Other things I like in a hotel room from a female point of view (keeping in mind for many years my motel/hotel stays were dictated by what was avaliable in the small country towns I stayed at) are:
Other things I like in a hotel room from a female point of view (keeping in mind for many years my motel/hotel stays were dictated by what was avaliable in the small country towns I stayed at) are:
- No adjoining rooms if possible
- 1st floor or above
- smaller hotel where the staff know you
- double dead bolts
- decent sized safe
#48
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SPI
Programs: AA Gold, UA LT Plat, Mar LTT
Posts: 18,147
Dave
#49
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Either at the shooting range or anywhere good beer can be found...
Posts: 51,050
Things I'd like:
- a real deadbolt
- a door stop, not to keep the door open, but rather, to allow for extra security by sliding it under the door to make it more difficult to open
- a room that's on at least the 3rd floor
- no exterior entrances
- write my room number on the inside of the key folder, don't tell me the room number
- a very well-lit parking lot
- well-lit entrances
- very little landscaping as far as bushes, shrubs, and trees that would allow for places to hide
- housekeeping that doesn't enter if the dnd sign is on the door, and that if I leave the TV on or lights on when I leave, keeps them on when they're done
- no adjoining rooms
- a peephole in the door, so I can see if someone is out there
- if the room is large, multiple phones, so that if I need the phone in an emergency, I have options on which to grab
- straight corridors, with no recesses for places for people to hide
- well-lit corridors
- well-maintained hotels
- attentive employees, because they're more likely to notice if someone is doing something odd
#50
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New to Texas
Programs: AA Plat Pro
Posts: 894
I always travel with a rubber door stop, but my mom has an electronic one that squeals if someone tries to open the door. Last summer, though I stayed in a place with my boss (separate rooms) that had sliding glass doors leading out to the courtyard outside hallway. Didn't sleep the first night, but once I moved stuff in front of it I felt better. At first she laughed, but then I heard her doing the same thing.
I do like the hidden room number, as well as 3rd floor+. And I do like it when a hotel goes the extra mile for my security. My 6'3" husband is not as likely to be targeted.
I do like the hidden room number, as well as 3rd floor+. And I do like it when a hotel goes the extra mile for my security. My 6'3" husband is not as likely to be targeted.
#51
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: FLL
Programs: AA Gold, DL Gold, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Gold, Starwood Gold, too many cruise programs to list
Posts: 655
#52
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Programs: VA Gold, UA, SPG Gold, HH Diamond, Marriott Gold, IHG Ambassador
Posts: 3,644
I dislike adjoining rooms, but more for noise than security. The two are related though, because I know I feel far more self conscious raising noise issues when I'm travelling on my own.
I would pay extra for a hotel with a "quiet floor", where there were penalties (financial, like the smoking in non-smoking room penalties) for noise. I seem to always get put beside the convention/corporate function groups (or once, in a high end hotel, a juvenile hockey team ).
I would pay extra for a hotel with a "quiet floor", where there were penalties (financial, like the smoking in non-smoking room penalties) for noise. I seem to always get put beside the convention/corporate function groups (or once, in a high end hotel, a juvenile hockey team ).
*I also dont like adjoining rooms and specifically request NO adjoining rooms for noise issues and security issues. 9/10 times my request is honoured.
*I request HIGH floors
*I like to see good, working locks/deadbolts on the door. EEK, Le Meridien SIN had a broken bolt but it was already my 2nd room change .
*I dont like being NEAR the elevators due to noise, but dont want to be at the end of a dingy, dark corridor either. Good lighting is VIP.
*Dont say my room number out loud at reception.
*I ditch the keyholder with room number on it as soon as I have memorised my room no. .
* If I call to advise security that there is domestic violence going on next door and I am feeling unsafe and its disturbing my child (also a girl)....attend immediately, not 1 hr later .
*Regular security staff patrols around the hotel and grounds.
I am a "girl" (just see my handle ) and a woman and either terminology is fine by me.
Thanks for starting this thread, its an interesting one.
#53
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: OKC/DFW
Programs: AA EXP/2 MM
Posts: 9,999
Really?
Again I have to ask, really? My 5'2" daughter has never encountered one she can't use, though sometimes she has to stand on her tip-toes to do so.
It seems to me "average" height is a reasonable compromise. If peepholes were all set to be easily used by my daughter, it would make it tough for my 6' niece to also use them. Surely tall women have as much right to safety from peepholes as short women?
Again I have to ask, really? My 5'2" daughter has never encountered one she can't use, though sometimes she has to stand on her tip-toes to do so.
It seems to me "average" height is a reasonable compromise. If peepholes were all set to be easily used by my daughter, it would make it tough for my 6' niece to also use them. Surely tall women have as much right to safety from peepholes as short women?
#54
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Berlin and Buggenhagen, Germany
Posts: 3,509
Really?
Again I have to ask, really? My 5'2" daughter has never encountered one she can't use, though sometimes she has to stand on her tip-toes to do so.
It seems to me "average" height is a reasonable compromise. If peepholes were all set to be easily used by my daughter, it would make it tough for my 6' niece to also use them. Surely tall women have as much right to safety from peepholes as short women?
Again I have to ask, really? My 5'2" daughter has never encountered one she can't use, though sometimes she has to stand on her tip-toes to do so.
It seems to me "average" height is a reasonable compromise. If peepholes were all set to be easily used by my daughter, it would make it tough for my 6' niece to also use them. Surely tall women have as much right to safety from peepholes as short women?
Dave, bseller, the adjoining room door is ANOTHER entry way into the room. So in principle it is a security risk. It's just as safe or unsafe as the actual corridor door but now you have two access points.
As far as high up rooms go, I think I already said that, it makes sense to choose one not higher than 8th floor because most fire ladders can't reach higher. I regularly don't follow my own advice because the view you can get from a room in a high floor is just too alluring.
Till
#55
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: FLL
Programs: AA Gold, DL Gold, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Gold, Starwood Gold, too many cruise programs to list
Posts: 655
Again I have to ask, really? My 5'2" daughter has never encountered one she can't use, though sometimes she has to stand on her tip-toes to do so.
It seems to me "average" height is a reasonable compromise. If peepholes were all set to be easily used by my daughter, it would make it tough for my 6' niece to also use them. Surely tall women have as much right to safety from peepholes as short women?
It seems to me "average" height is a reasonable compromise. If peepholes were all set to be easily used by my daughter, it would make it tough for my 6' niece to also use them. Surely tall women have as much right to safety from peepholes as short women?
A tall man or woman can always bend down. A short person can only stretch so far. I'm not generally an advocate of lowest common denominator, but in safety and physical restrictions, sometimes you have to bend a bit (pardon the pun).
#57
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: MSY
Programs: BA GfL
Posts: 5,929
I am just under 5' tall and have encountered numerous peep holes I cannot see through standing on the tippiest of tippy toes.
A tall man or woman can always bend down. A short person can only stretch so far. I'm not generally an advocate of lowest common denominator, but in safety and physical restrictions, sometimes you have to bend a bit (pardon the pun).
A tall man or woman can always bend down. A short person can only stretch so far. I'm not generally an advocate of lowest common denominator, but in safety and physical restrictions, sometimes you have to bend a bit (pardon the pun).
It is a hell of a lot easier for a tall person to bend down to a see through a peephole placed at 5'0" than it is for me to drag a chair over to the door so that I can see out of a peephole placed at 5'6". Remember, peoples' eyes are not located at the very tops of their heads...so a 5'6" high peephole is going to be a lot higher than I can see even standing on tiptoes!
#59
Join Date: Jan 2010
Programs: Aeroplan
Posts: 133
You called security and not the Police? It would be unsafe for Security to investigate the situation, since it is clearly a police matter. I'm sure Security probably contacted Police and the delay was likely in the police response.