Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Destinations > America - USA > USA
Reload this Page >

Chicago or Boston?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Chicago or Boston?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 4:03 pm
  #16  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,784
Isn't going to the US and choosing between Chicago or Boston equivalent to going to the UK and choosing between Slough and Basingstoke?

Neither city really warrants 3 days. Honestly, no city in the US really warrants 3 days.
brendog is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 4:17 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ORD, BOS
Programs: United, Hilton Honors
Posts: 91
Originally Posted by brendog
Neither city really warrants 3 days. Honestly, no city in the US really warrants 3 days.
Curious - what city outside the US would warrant 3 days in your eyes? And why?
benchardf is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 4:19 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,784
Originally Posted by benchardf
Curious - what city outside the US would warrant 3 days in your eyes? And why?
NB: I have lived in both Boston and Chicago...

Worth 3 days, well, London, Paris, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Rome, to name a few. All of these cities have long histories and fascinating cultures. Boston and Chicago are newish and not overly diverse or interesting.
brendog is offline  
Old Sep 9, 2014 | 4:31 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ORD, BOS
Programs: United, Hilton Honors
Posts: 91
Originally Posted by brendog
NB: I have lived in both Boston and Chicago...

Worth 3 days, well, London, Paris, Hong Kong, Tokyo, Rome, to name a few. All of these cities have long histories and fascinating cultures. Boston and Chicago are newish and not overly diverse or interesting.
I've spent time in all these cities and for me a day or two is more than enough. To each his own though. Interest is subjective but saying Chicago is not diverse is grossly inaccurate.
benchardf is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 12:32 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 644
I'd go with Boston. Both have good food, but Boston has more historical sights and better daytrips if one or two days is too much. You can also take a tour to the site of the Salem Witch trials. Chicago seems much more modern.
artemis021 is offline  
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 2:09 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: TPA
Programs: AAdvantage 2 million, Marriott Gold
Posts: 960
Originally Posted by benchardf
I grew up in Boston and now live in Chicago. Love both cities and each have their unique characteristics. Boston is a fraction of the size of Chicago. The upside to this is Boston is very walk-able. If you go there don't rent a car because driving around the city can be an adventure and parking expensive. For history and good seafood, Boston can't be beat. Fall is one of the best times there for the weather and atmosphere.
I agree 100%. More to walk and see in Boston in as all area without just wandering. Michigan Ave can be very crowded and little reason to be there if not shopping. Boston has the Freedom trail, the Esplanade (day times), Commons, easy to walk to see the outside of Fenway. But always found I needed mass transit in Chicago to get to the neighborhoods, not just walk between them. Yes, Boston has ares tourists don't need to be LOL.
FLgrr is offline  
Old Sep 14, 2014 | 1:32 pm
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Klagetoh
Posts: 24,170
Originally Posted by benchardf
For history and good seafood, Boston can't be beat.
While I agree with most of your post and would advise the OP to choose Boston a thousand times over Chicago, New Orleans can certainly give Boston a run for it's money in the history department.

As far as seafood goes: you're kidding, right? I like a good lobster or NE clam chowder as much as the next BC alum, but overall, the Big Easy easily beats Beantown in the seafood department.

Easily. Really, no contest.
kale73 is offline  
Old Sep 15, 2014 | 11:27 am
  #23  
Moderator: Information Desk, Women Travelers, FlyerTalk Evangelist
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Programs: AA Gold
Posts: 16,214
Originally Posted by kale73
While I agree with most of your post and would advise the OP to choose Boston a thousand times over Chicago, New Orleans can certainly give Boston a run for it's money in the history department.

As far as seafood goes: you're kidding, right? I like a good lobster or NE clam chowder as much as the next BC alum, but overall, the Big Easy easily beats Beantown in the seafood department.

Easily. Really, no contest.
All of which would be relevant if the OP even hinted that New Orleans was an option. But as long as we're ignoring her request, I'd suggest Tokyo for seafood and Spain for history. Neither of which will be of any use to the original poster.
chgoeditor is offline  
Old Sep 16, 2014 | 7:04 am
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Active Streak: 60 Days
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Klagetoh
Posts: 24,170
Originally Posted by chgoeditor
All of which would be relevant if the OP even hinted that New Orleans was an option.
I'm assuming that OP (wisely) has MSY on the pre-existing itinerary, not the part "which is still to be decided".
kale73 is offline  
Old Sep 18, 2014 | 3:08 pm
  #25  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: CMH, West Coast
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, oneworld emerald
Posts: 2,741
IMO, Chicago is the best city in the country. Boston... is not.
nineworldseries is offline  
Old Sep 19, 2014 | 4:43 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: MSY, BJX, QRO; previously NYC, BOS, AUH
Programs: AA EXP, 6MM
Posts: 18,361
Originally Posted by nineworldseries
IMO, Chicago is the best city in the country. Boston... is not.
Don't get out of the Midwest much, eh?
Blumie is offline  
Old Sep 20, 2014 | 4:14 pm
  #27  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ORD, BOS
Programs: United, Hilton Honors
Posts: 91
Originally Posted by kale73
While I agree with most of your post and would advise the OP to choose Boston a thousand times over Chicago, New Orleans can certainly give Boston a run for it's money in the history department.

As far as seafood goes: you're kidding, right? I like a good lobster or NE clam chowder as much as the next BC alum, but overall, the Big Easy easily beats Beantown in the seafood department.

Easily. Really, no contest.
Kind of random that New Orleans was brought into this discussion...but I prefer seafood from the Northeast over New Orleans. But again, taste is subjective.
benchardf is offline  
Old Sep 21, 2014 | 5:47 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,098
Chicago hands down. Better food,drink, hotels, musicals...
flyertalker00156 is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2014 | 8:40 am
  #29  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: CMH, West Coast
Programs: AA Executive Platinum, oneworld emerald
Posts: 2,741
Originally Posted by Blumie
Don't get out of the Midwest much, eh?
Why would you draw that mistaken conclusion? I love NYC, SFO, SEA, etc. but Chicago is still a better city.
nineworldseries is offline  
Old Sep 28, 2014 | 8:53 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,667
Describe the distinct character of each city and what each has to offer. There is no need to bash the other, or otherwise indulge in arbitrary negativism, in order to show the supposed superiority of the city you prefer for your personal reasons. And if you choose to use "better", why not give specific examples that could be useful to the OP. "I prefer X, because...." works pretty well.

Last edited by VidaNaPraia; Sep 28, 2014 at 8:58 am
VidaNaPraia is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.