Community
Wiki Posts
Search

News Article - Interview with Parker about 1549

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2009, 9:49 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London, UK
Programs: BAEC Gold, AA Plat, Starwood Gold, AX Plat, Hertz Gold, Avis Preferred, Star Alliance Gold
Posts: 1,381
News Article - Interview with Parker about 1549

http://www.azcentral.com/business/ar...rways0128.html

This was posted on our local news site this evening. It gives a limited view into what actually happens at the corporate office during one of these incidents.

Two questions come to mind in reading this.

1) Does US own any 'business jets' for executive use? Like a Gulfstream or similar? Do other airlines?

2) I assume they took a standard aircraft to LGA. They cannot fly from PHX? Perimeter rule?
Nicksta is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009, 9:57 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Commuting around the mid-atlantic and rust-belt on any number of RJs
Programs: TSA Random Selectee Platinum, * Gold, SPG/HH/MR mid-tier, and a tiny bag of pretzels.
Posts: 9,255
Originally Posted by Nicksta
http://www.azcentral.com/business/ar...rways0128.html

This was posted on our local news site this evening. It gives a limited view into what actually happens at the corporate office during one of these incidents.

Two questions come to mind in reading this.

1) Does US own any 'business jets' for executive use? Like a Gulfstream or similar? Do other airlines?

2) I assume they took a standard aircraft to LGA. They cannot fly from PHX? Perimeter rule?
According to usaviation and flightaware, they took a 757 to LGA. Never got a real good answer, but I'm assuming the Port waived the perimeter rule for a nonrevenue flight.

And I wondered the same thing--I have to believe chartering a G-V is cheaper than running a 757 PHX-LGA and back.
ClueByFour is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009, 10:33 pm
  #3  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The best state in the USA - Florida!
Programs: Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, AS MVP75K, AA PlatPro, UA Premier, Disney AP
Posts: 14,497
Originally Posted by ClueByFour
According to usaviation and flightaware, they took a 757 to LGA. Never got a real good answer, but I'm assuming the Port waived the perimeter rule for a nonrevenue flight.

And I wondered the same thing--I have to believe chartering a G-V is cheaper than running a 757 PHX-LGA and back.
I don't believe the perimeter rule applies to non-scheduled (charter) operations. The Yankees have flown SEA-LGA before on a Continental 757 returning from a West Coast road trip.

As for chartering a G-V vs running a 757 PHX-LGA and back, a couple of things to consider. First is the cost for simply being able to use the aircraft - the companies that own the G-V (or whatever plane would be used) earn a pretty penny from having someone use that plane. US Airways wouldn't be paying a penny of those costs. Secondly, US has much more availability using their own plane - they can be much more in tune with when they want the plane to go than having to rely on a third party, where they might have to fly the plane in from it's base city (US has plenty of planes based in PHX), deal with more crew rest requirements (not hard to get a fresh 757 crew to NYC), etc.

For most companies, chartering a G-V would most likely be cheaper than a 757. The lone exception to that would be the airline industry.
mersk862 is offline  
Old Jan 27, 2009, 10:52 pm
  #4  
PHL
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,072
A few follow on points...

1.) Part 121 scheduled air carrier ops are affected by the perimeter rule at LGA. Part 91 (general aviation/non charter/non scheduled) and Part 135 (On-demand/air taxi/charter) are free to fly into LGA from any domestic US destination. It is much simpler to slap a 9xxx flight number onto one of their own aircraft and fly it under part 91 rules when not flying any revenue passengers. It would be no different than me or you living in PHX, owning our own private 757, and flying it to LGA. If it flew under their normal part 121, I would suspect an emergency FAA waiver was granted with little dispute.

2.) The team that US took from PHX was likely rather large. Most G-V's are outfitted with a comfortable number of seats (like maybe 14 at most). There really aren't many other business jets with more seats unless you count the Boeing BBJ (i.e a 737 variant) or a modified 727, DC 9, etc. None of those would make sense, given the likely costs when they could fly their own and even turn it around in LGA for a revenue flight. Of course, they'd need to commandeer a subsequent aircraft when they were ready to fly back to PHX. Or, the team could fly back to PHX as dead heads on normally scheduled flights (with a connection, of course). This might even be likely if they were all returning at different times. The key was getting them there quickly. There are many more options to get the team back home.
PHL is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2009, 6:24 am
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: HH Silver, MR Plat Prem & LT Plat, Hyatt Plat,SPG Plat, Hertz PC, National EE, UA 1K
Posts: 3,407
Wonder if the drinks were free?
PhillyPhlyer40 is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2009, 9:00 am
  #6  
Moderator: American AAdvantage & Marriott Bonvoy
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: PHX
Programs: American ExPlat; Marriott/SPG Lifetime Plat; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 8,116
Originally Posted by ClueByFour
And I wondered the same thing--I have to believe chartering a G-V is cheaper than running a 757 PHX-LGA and back.
The article said the emergency response 'care team' that accompanied Parker on the flight consisted of approximately four dozen people, so whichever of their own aircraft that they had available would obviously make the most sense.
AZ Travels the World is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2009, 9:21 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The views I express here are not necessarily supported by any airline or codeshare partners, nor do I represent their views and/or opinions. They are my own OPINIONS dont like them dont read them.....
Posts: 1,615
Originally Posted by PhillyPhlyer40
Wonder if the drinks were free?
Heaven flight!! No whiny former US Airways passengers who are obsessed with their hatefest and are mentally ill!
flight62 is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2009, 9:22 am
  #8  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: CLT
Programs: Choice Hotels/FFOCUS
Posts: 7,256
To me the 757 makes the most sense.

On another note Parker heard about this from CNN which is not unusual. I was also working & got a phone call from our very own me4yankees which went to vm & I had to listen 3 times just to grasp what she was saying before I called her back.
coachrowsey is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2009, 9:55 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Programs: UA 1K 1MMer & LT UC (when flying UA); Hyatt Credit Cardist; HHonors Diamond; Marriott Gold via UA 1K
Posts: 6,956
"Executives were without updates during the several-hour flight."

Boy, I'll bet for those few hours Doug Parker was wishing that US had invested in inflight connectivity.
SS255 is offline  
Old Jan 28, 2009, 11:40 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PHL
Programs: AA EXP MM, HHonors Lifetime Diamond, Marriott Lifetime Ti, UA Silver
Posts: 5,037
Originally Posted by SS255
"Executives were without updates during the several-hour flight."

Boy, I'll bet for those few hours Doug Parker was wishing that US had invested in inflight connectivity.
That part of the article really left me curious. The cockpit should be able to contact the USair ops department on the radio. I'm sure the ops folks were keeping up to date and could have relayed info for the care team.
PHLGovFlyer is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.