Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Wedding Bells?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2005, 9:16 am
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Whitehall, PA, USA
Programs: HHonors Gold
Posts: 580
Wedding Bells?

Over on the UAL Board people are discussing that airlines emergence from bankruptcy in Fall. If both airlines are out of bankruptcy are we going to see merger talks part II? I'm sure this time the Feds would bless the marriage but we it be good for US? Is their management better than ours or would it be case of the minnow swallowing the whale with the US management team remaining in place. Don't laugh, I've seen this before. When the Burlington Northern Railway merged with the Santa Fe, more execs from the Santa Fe stayed even though it was the smaller road.
sassamanlaw is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 9:44 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Athens, WV, USA; a US cockroach long before it was in FFOCUS; now a lowly US5 for only the 2nd time in 20 years.
Programs: US5
Posts: 3,050
Reading sassaman's post made me think of the old 5th Dimension song "Wedding Bell Blues".

Last edited by jimcfsus; Jan 23, 2005 at 9:44 am Reason: grammar
jimcfsus is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 10:18 am
  #3  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
Originally Posted by sassamanlaw
Over on the UAL Board people are discussing that airlines emergence from bankruptcy in Fall. If both airlines are out of bankruptcy are we going to see merger talks part II? I'm sure this time the Feds would bless the marriage but we it be good for US? Is their management better than ours or would it be case of the minnow swallowing the whale with the US management team remaining in place. Don't laugh, I've seen this before. When the Burlington Northern Railway merged with the Santa Fe, more execs from the Santa Fe stayed even though it was the smaller road.
I think it would be a beautiful wedding. UA is not the largest airline anymore as they were when they tried this last time. The Feds let AA buy TW to become the largest. Would see no reason why they wouldn't let UA buy US. Everyone knows that there is too much capacity. This way they could great a completely national legacy carrier (with a slightly better route system than AA except in the south-central tier of course) and still cut the excess to create a profitable company.

For US FF though it's could be a mixed blessing. There are some advantage to the UA program, such as SWU's, CR-1's for 1Ks, exit-row blocking for UA 1P's and Economy Plus. But we would loose the unlimited upgrades and the 50% bonus drops to 25%..
sts603 is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 11:32 am
  #4  
Marriott Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MKE
Programs: AA Exec Platinum, SPG Platinum / Ambassador / Lifetime Gold, Avis FIRST
Posts: 3,293
I think if they did merge, they'd probably maintain pretty separate entities. Kinda like what Air France and KLM are doing now.
Jumpgate is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 12:33 pm
  #5  
PHL
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,067
A big problem with the last merger was union coordination. I doubt it will be any easier this time around. The unionzed work force of TWA is still reeling over that merger.
PHL is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 2:49 pm
  #6  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 109
Any two legacy carriers will be more than happy to merge RIGHT NOW if a financier will grant, without expectation of repayment, the $2,000,000,000+ necessary to fully integrate the airlines.

In other words, there probably won't be any wedding bells heard among legacy carriers anytime soon.
UAwatcher is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 3:10 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Programs: US1
Posts: 1,928
Well I for one hope it does not happen. I have never once had a good experience with UAL. And with the huge debt that both UAL and US Airways is in, I really donīt think we will see a merger anytime soon at all. And I hope never.
US AIRWAYS FAN is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 3:11 pm
  #8  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greenfield, NH
Programs: US Airways Chairman's Preferred, NWA Gold, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,199
Everyone does not know that there is "too much capacity". That is a crock being perpetrated by certain airline "executives" who are desperately clinging to the old ways and parroted by utterly clueless "journalists", politicians and union leaders.

There is an excess over priced legacy gouge-o-matic fares and grossly inefficient operations.

There is a shortage of capacity. Demand is strong and growing. Load factors are darned near 80% -- that's a ridiculous number and a major contributing factor to operation snafus such as the Christmas mess.

Any pullback by (or failure of) a legacy airline will be immediately filled by all of the others and by the LCCs. All that will happen is that expensive seats will be replaced by less expensive seats. This has finally sunk in at Delta -- one of the previous champions of "over capacity" and will inevitably sink in at any surviving legacy airline. It is somewhat questionable if US Airways understands this as BloFares are still present in all too many markets... (Although Mr Lakefield did quote me (without attribution of course) on the "excess of over-priced fares" bit a few months ago!)

Last edited by TomBascom; Jan 23, 2005 at 3:15 pm
TomBascom is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 3:13 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greenfield, NH
Programs: US Airways Chairman's Preferred, NWA Gold, Marriott Platinum, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 2,199
BTW -- I think merging with UA would be a huge mistake.

I'd rather see NW or HP or Virgin or even AA.
TomBascom is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 4:46 pm
  #10  
In memoriam
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: IAD, BOS, PVD
Programs: UA, US, AS, Marriott, Radisson, Hilton
Posts: 7,203
Virgin I'd say ok. But ever actually flown HP or NW (not mentioning
the unlikelihood of the latter)?
violist is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 6:23 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Atlanta
Programs: AA Lifetime Gold, Marriott Silver, Starwood Platinum
Posts: 3,656
It would be neat to see US and AS merge. That way AS has the west coast routes while US has the east coast routes.
zsmith2 is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 8:23 pm
  #12  
PHL
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: PHL, NYC
Programs: AA PLT, DL SLV, UA SLV, MR LTT, HH DIA
Posts: 10,067
US did that already and botched it up big time. Read up on how great an airline PSA was before the early 90's when US then-management got it's grubby hands on it and ruined what it was.
PHL is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 8:50 pm
  #13  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
Originally Posted by TomBascom
Everyone does not know that there is "too much capacity". That is a crock being perpetrated by certain airline "executives" who are desperately clinging to the old ways and parroted by utterly clueless "journalists", politicians and union leaders.

There is an excess over priced legacy gouge-o-matic fares and grossly inefficient operations.

There is a shortage of capacity. Demand is strong and growing. Load factors are darned near 80% -- that's a ridiculous number and a major contributing factor to operation snafus such as the Christmas mess.

Any pullback by (or failure of) a legacy airline will be immediately filled by all of the others and by the LCCs. All that will happen is that expensive seats will be replaced by less expensive seats. This has finally sunk in at Delta -- one of the previous champions of "over capacity" and will inevitably sink in at any surviving legacy airline. It is somewhat questionable if US Airways understands this as BloFares are still present in all too many markets... (Although Mr Lakefield did quote me (without attribution of course) on the "excess of over-priced fares" bit a few months ago!)
Well it's been pretty obvious that 70-80% loads are unprofitable for most carriers.
sts603 is offline  
Old Jan 23, 2005, 10:37 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Programs: US1
Posts: 1,928
Originally Posted by PHL
US did that already and botched it up big time. Read up on how great an airline PSA was before the early 90's when US then-management got it's grubby hands on it and ruined what it was.

This is not the same management team from the 90īs. Everyone from that team is gone
US AIRWAYS FAN is offline  
Old Jan 24, 2005, 12:06 am
  #15  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: London
Programs: BA GGL, AA 1MM LT GLD, SPG PLAT, National Exec Selc, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Plat, Marriott Silver
Posts: 8,278
Originally Posted by US AIRWAYS FAN
This is not the same management team from the 90īs. Everyone from that team is gone
I agree. Not to mention, I would hope any management team could learn from previous lessons.
sts603 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.