Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Knowing when to use the upgrade

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 7:11 pm
  #16  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA - 1K 1MM; Hyatt - Explorist; Marriott - Lifetime Titanium
Posts: 1,587
I've been using a lot of e500s back and forth between ORD-SEA. Generally, I'm screaming into ORD for a crack of dawn flight so it's nice to be able to pick up the meal as well as use the larger seat to get some shut eye. Only drawback is the typical 75, which results in not a lot of legroom in F.
vandalby is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 7:42 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Bellingham/Gainesville
Programs: UA-G MM, Priority Club Platinum, Avis First, Hertz 5*, Red Lion
Posts: 2,808
Originally Posted by con brio
Lately I've been flying to MCO quite a bit and have found myself upgrading the ORD-MCO segment with 500-milers to avoid the Mickey Mouse Clubs in Y. I also try to use them on transcon or redeye flights. This got me thinking:

How much do others value their 500-milers? How often do you use them and are there some routes in particular when you make it a point to upgrade?
I'll either use them on shorter (1000 mi. or less) legs or use them when I book a transcon within the 100 hour clearance window when there is no advantage to use a CR1 or miles. I used to think that a short leg flight wasn't worth the UG but after spending several flights sitting on the tarmac for hours with weather delays and the FA kindly opening the bev cart, I rethunk the strategy. Now I only UG the short hops at checkin if available.

ORD-MCO should give a good meal. I've flown several ORD-JAX mainline and had decent food and that segment is longer.
prestonh is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 7:42 pm
  #18  
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Gatwick, UK
Programs: UA *G, BA Silver
Posts: 1,724
Well of course it all depends on your base airport, which in my case is SFO, so SFO-PDX is my favorite upgrade. It would make no sense to upgrade except with 500-miles certs and I am almost always successful.

But my travel is almost all to PDX, YYZ and LHR and so I use e-500's, CR-1s and SWU's in equal proportions!!
SeattleDavid is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 8:01 pm
  #19  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 534
I am sorry to get off topic here a little bit, but gone are the days of warm food in F class on domestic routes on United now? The last few times I upgraded was on a 3-class cabin, and the other was an overnight redeye flight which never served hot/warm food.. but what about lunch and breakfast? no more omelettes for LAX-DEN during breakfast?

-j
jasp25 is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 9:00 pm
  #20  
2M
50 Countries Visited
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: United 1kMM; AA EX Plat, Hilton Diamond and SPG Plat
Posts: 2,040
Anything over 500 miles I will try and upgrade, I can't seem to use them fast enough.

Basically I won't use them on SFO-LAX or short trips like that.
rkaradi is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 10:15 pm
  #21  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,219
Originally Posted by rkaradi
Anything over 500 miles I will try and upgrade, I can't seem to use them fast enough.
Anything over 50 miles for us. Just upgraded SFO-BUR this weekend - F on a CR-7 is really nice.
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 10:56 pm
  #22  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SYD; Central Coast, NSW
Programs: UA, LT Plat 2MM
Posts: 947
Originally Posted by nzpilot
If one is flying sufficient intl routes, it becomes difficult to burn all the e-500s domestically. The test then is simple: is there a higher class of service? Do it. I regularly UG SAN/SFO or LAX/SFO. Why not?....
Right on! Most my flying is International but when I have transcons I try and burn up all the CR-1s and e-500s that I can, no matter what flight it is as long as it has F class I go for it ^, otherwise, UA burns them for me at the end of the year
IainC is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 11:13 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: 1P, AA EXP, SPG Gold
Posts: 1,491
Originally Posted by FormerAmtrakTraveler
For 2Ps/1Ps, I think it's best to use the e500s as much as possible. Before I adopted this approach, those things were expiring all the time because they don't always clear for the big flights I save them for. (Though this year as 2P, I'm 3/3 using them for transcon bos<=>sfo/lax. Way better than expiring! Need to start the "upgrades getting easier" thread.)
Yes, use them before expiring, of course. But SFO-LAX? That all depends on how many e-500s one has. If you're like me and you get maybe 8 to 12 a year (earn a lot of EQMs on non-UA metal), and I can already get an exit row in E+ for short flights in advance, I try to save at least half or more of the e-500s for transcons at off-peak times where there is a pretty good chance of upgrading, e.g., JFK-SFO early morning departures on weekends I've great success upgrading.
SFOTurtle is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 11:32 pm
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: BOS
Programs: UA 2K, BD Gold, DL/NW Gold, SPG Plat, MRW Silver, Hertz PC
Posts: 240
Originally Posted by jasp25
I am sorry to get off topic here a little bit, but gone are the days of warm food in F class on domestic routes on United now? The last few times I upgraded was on a 3-class cabin, and the other was an overnight redeye flight which never served hot/warm food.. but what about lunch and breakfast? no more omelettes for LAX-DEN during breakfast?

-j
With the exception of the late night snack aka deli plate flights, there is still hot food in domestic F. If you were on a 3 cabin plane upgrading from Y then you were in domestic business class which is indeed a downgrade to cold food vs 2 cabin domestic F.
ndot is offline  
Old Jul 19, 2009 | 11:40 pm
  #25  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K+K
Programs: *G
Posts: 5,087
i use them when i fly during "eating hours" and i dont have an opportunity to get food before the flight. ie, 6pm departure on a friday going home.
deniah is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 2:10 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
1M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: London & Sonoma CA
Programs: UA Plat, MM *G for life, AY Plat, BA Silver
Posts: 10,556
Most of my flying is international, so I tend to use CR-1s for my rare domestic flights that have any length to them at all. That leaves e500s for flights where they are pretty well guaranteed to upgrade (ie very short or very bad value). Not had the chance to use any this year, and only one CR-1 so far.
lhrsfo is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 2:16 am
  #27  
Ari
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,681
Originally Posted by FlyinHawaiian
FYI, thorough discussion of this question may be found in the specific aircraft seating threads found in the FAQ as well as sites such as www.seatexpert.com or www.seatguru.com.

I normally won't use an upgrade on a flight that doesn't have meal service or is less than 500 miles in length.
Some of the best upgrades I've done have been on the shorter flights:

ORD-DTW: 3.5 hours
CMH-ORD: 4 hours

and

ORD <--> LGA: up to 5 hours a few times
ORD <--> DCW: 4.5 hours

I'm guessing you fly mostly HI-CA routes, though?
Ari is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 6:58 am
  #28  
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Programs: Marriott Titanium, , Delta 2MM & DM UA Gold
Posts: 299
As a 1k, I try to use 500's on flight requiring 2, serve a meal, and are often on widebodies. SFO-DEN is an example. SFO_MSP always works, and if possible ORD_SFO.

Before 1k, I would try any flight that needed more than 1. Just didnt make sense for a short flight
Fred 3 is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 3:07 pm
  #29  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MCO
Programs: UA
Posts: 109
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; PalmSource/Palm-D060; Blazer/4.5) 16;320x320)

Dumb question: aside from putting the itineraries into .bomb and checking the flight info for each flight, is there an easy way to identify wide-body flights?

ORD-MCO is usually a 320, but sometimes a 763, sometimes a 752...
con brio is offline  
Old Jul 20, 2009 | 3:09 pm
  #30  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,219
Originally Posted by con brio
is there an easy way to identify wide-body flights?
http://www.unitedcargo.com/schedules/Widebody.pdf
mahasamatman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.