Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Help! Torn between UA and VS

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 12:20 am
  #1  
Original Poster
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SFO
Programs: UA MM Gold, AA Ex Plat, SPG Plat,Hyatt Diamond, Marriott Gold, National Executive Elite
Posts: 1,015
Help! Torn between UA and VS

I am going with my parents to Europe in early June and they want to use combo of miles/paid tixs (thanks mom and dad, they are paying! ^)
So I found an option that would take us on VS from SFO-LHR-SFO in Upper Class and my ticket would be the paid "Z" ticket.
I am a bit torn since I could be taking advantage of 3X EQM if I fly UA to LHR but because of the dep/arrival times I will most likely have to take the N/S on the 777 with old seats. I may be able to go outboud via Ord on 763 but return is for sure on the 777
My quetion I guess is should I just fly VS in Upper and have the miles go into my Continental acct or bite the bullet and fly UA for the EQM?????
Hard decision since I want to hit 1k this year and as of June will have about 50K under my belt.
I flew VS in Upper about 5 years ago and I thought it was pretty nice, even back then
cbrown5294 is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 3:45 am
  #2  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,651
Virgin, definitely.

It's only a matter of time before the UA mileage plus miles are inflated so much to the point of being worthless.
stupidhead is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 6:07 am
  #3  
30 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: exUA1K, UA MM, lifetime UA1P, AA MM, HH Diamond, Marriott Gold
Posts: 3,806
I wouldn't DREAD the UA 777 in old C on the n/s return since it is a daytime flight.

I recently did a roundtrip in that plane's C to/from Europe and it was still tollerable, even though the video screens are pretty tired.
roberto99 is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 6:18 am
  #4  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SNA
Programs: UA 1MM, Hyatt Diamond
Posts: 189
I agree that the new lie flat's are much more important traveling eastbound than westbound. If 1K matters to you, your UA option if lie flat out and non-stop old C back, sounds like a reasonable decision.
mcditolla is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 6:30 am
  #5  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Toronto YYZ UA-1K 1MM,QFgold
Programs: Royal Ambassador/ SPG Platinum 75/Marriott gold
Posts: 14,283
get your 1k
why fly is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 8:39 am
  #6  
30 Countries Visited
3M
100 Nights
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Near SEA
Programs: UA MM, AS MVPG75K, Marriott Lifetime Gold
Posts: 7,990
Why not fly SFO-FRA-LHR-FRA-SFO to take advantage of the 747?
bmvaughn is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 8:46 am
  #7  
3M
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: near to SFO and LHR
Programs: BA Gold, UA 1K (2.9MM), others
Posts: 2,373
If getting some sleep Eastbound is most important, then by all means choose Virgin's Upper Class over the United's "old" C.

I wouldn't add an extra connection in FRA unless your final destination is in mainland Europe - geesh!

But 1K for a whole year is nice too! And even the old C on United is not too bad, especially when you're traveling with others who may think it's luxurious!

What about the possibility of paying a coach fare on United, with a good chance of an upgrade - these flights haven't been too full in C lately. Save several thousand dollars and upgrade your hotel room instead?
StingWest is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 9:25 am
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
60 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ORD, HKG
Programs: UA*G, AA Emerald, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt globalist
Posts: 10,555
Originally Posted by stupidhead
Virgin, definitely.

It's only a matter of time before the UA mileage plus miles are inflated so much to the point of being worthless.
I think OP care for the status rather than miles, the miles may be worthless, but having status, especially being 1K, it does worth a lot when one is a frequent traveller. You do know that being at a higher status, one would still get the meal choice taken in F or C first rather than have to get all the undesirable leftovers right ?
ORDnHKG is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 10:19 am
  #9  
Community Builder
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SEA & RDM
Programs: UA - 1MM, DL Diamond, AS MVP75, Marriott Titanium, Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,034
I would definitely go UA for triple EQMs. Come on..."old" C isn't that bad. There are many more people that will be on that flight stuck in E- and they will survive.
andyh64000 is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 10:51 am
  #10  
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,651
Originally Posted by ORDnHKG
I think OP care for the status rather than miles, the miles may be worthless, but having status, especially being 1K, it does worth a lot when one is a frequent traveller. You do know that being at a higher status, one would still get the meal choice taken in F or C first rather than have to get all the undesirable leftovers right ?
When you choose between disgusting, inedible and ghastly, I don't think it matters.
stupidhead is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 11:34 am
  #11  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: LAX
Posts: 11,601
Originally Posted by stupidhead
When you choose between disgusting, inedible and ghastly, I don't think it matters.
...
It's only a matter of time before the UA mileage plus miles are inflated so much to the point of being worthless.

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/11647530-post5.html

Originally Posted by stupidhead
Ringing from NYU but econ major. I'm not a UA elite, actually not even a member, but almost OZ Club Gold (about 800 miles short ). Considering I fly out of the bay area, my choices are limited to UA....and US Airways.
Perhaps you should consider participating in UA program and experiencing more than GM-level service before offering your advisory opinion.
azepine00 is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 11:46 am
  #12  
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Tucson, AZ
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott LT Titanium, AA LT Gold, Hyatt Exp, HH Gold, Hertz PC, HP Masters emeritus (sigh)
Posts: 453
This would be a no-brainer for me: Get 1K, if you expect to be traveling at all in 2010. You'll get more out of that than any short-term enjoyment on VS.
DesertRat is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 11:53 am
  #13  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
1M
60 Nights
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: ORD, HKG
Programs: UA*G, AA Emerald, HHonors Diamond, Hyatt globalist
Posts: 10,555
Originally Posted by stupidhead
When you choose between disgusting, inedible and ghastly, I don't think it matters.
Oh btw, UA MP miles maybe worthless to you compare with OZ, but do you know OZ has a much higher mileage requirement than others for awards, plus miles expire for a period of time no matter you fly or not, therefore it is basically meaningless to accure miles with OZ other than to gain status.
ORDnHKG is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 12:17 pm
  #14  
30 Countries Visited1M15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: DFW
Programs: UA MM, QF Plat, Hilton, Hyatt, Marriott
Posts: 2,570
If all prices were the same I would choose United for the TEQM. However do some searching and try to work out the return bit better over what you have. Something such as routing through IAD or ORD on a 763, or also try for a return via FRA on a 747. The UA new C looks to be on par or better than VS in every aspect except food, lounges, and seat width. However with TEQM, I would overlook those two items. If your only option is a 777 instead of VS, I'd suggest breaking down the benefits carefully.

Though the 777 C is comfortable on a day flight, would you like TEQM or a nicer seat?
bschaff1 is offline  
Old Apr 27, 2009 | 12:18 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,019
My 2c,

OP, IF (and that is a big IF) you will be flying a lot of UA metal next year I would credit to UA. If not, I would sign up for a BD (British Midland) account, fly VS and credit the miles to BD. You will get RDM's only, but should get enough to get at least a one-way cash and miles *A award.

The other big plus of VS would be the Clubhouse at LHR. Possibly the best lounge in the world.
gbsfo is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.