Community
Wiki Posts
Search

E-Upgrade Summary Bug?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 5:50 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Diego CA USA
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, & PPO 2025-26; Southwest A-List
Posts: 203
E-Upgrade Summary Bug?

Hi All,

Wondering if this has happened to any of you.

I was just looking at my E-Upgrade Summary, it shows 2 complimentary 500 upgrades expiring 3/2009 (in a few days)...then shows 3 expiring 6/2009.

Should it not read 1 expiring 3/2009, and 4 expiring 6/2009?

I thought that UA always pulled the closest to expiring upgrades when processing an upgrade.
onlyquestions is offline  
Old Mar 27, 2009 | 7:38 pm
  #2  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
You're assuming you always received them in batches of 4.

Look at your deposit summary -- did you by any chance receive 3 in 6/2008? Maybe as a customer service thing for some issue?
channa is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 11:11 am
  #3  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Diego CA USA
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, & PPO 2025-26; Southwest A-List
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by channa
You're assuming you always received them in batches of 4.

Look at your deposit summary -- did you by any chance receive 3 in 6/2008? Maybe as a customer service thing for some issue?
No, I checked, it was indeed a batch of 4 in 6/2008. Very strange.
onlyquestions is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 11:15 am
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
20 Countries Visited
2M
50 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: D.R.E.A.D. Gold card holder
Posts: 53,213
I recall someone else having the same issue a couple of months ago. Have you tried calling to see what the real scoop is?
mahasamatman is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 11:27 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SJC, SFO, YYC
Programs: AA-EXP, AA-0.41MM, UA-Gold, Ex UA-1K (2006 thru 2015), PMUA-0.95MM, COUA-1.5MM-lite, AF-Silver
Posts: 13,436
Originally Posted by onlyquestions
Hi All,

Wondering if this has happened to any of you.

I was just looking at my E-Upgrade Summary, it shows 2 complimentary 500 upgrades expiring 3/2009 (in a few days)...then shows 3 expiring 6/2009.

Should it not read 1 expiring 3/2009, and 4 expiring 6/2009?

I thought that UA always pulled the closest to expiring upgrades when processing an upgrade.
The e-upgrade summary page has an option to show detailed upgrade activity for a given date range. I'd do that and see what was deducted and when.

Possible explanation.

Let's say you had two segments in a trip.

Segment 1 needs two e500s and segment 2 needs one e500. You check in, and segment 1's upgrade clears, but segment 2's does not (or you didn't request an upgrade at check in or before).

So 2 e500s from the 3/2009 pool get deducted first taking you down to zero. There is an irrop on segment 1, and you don't get upgraded on the replacement flight. Segment 1's e500s will eventually be credited back, but likely not that day.

Later that day, you upgrade segment 2, and it requires one e500. It comes from the 6/2009 pool because you are at zero in the 3/2009 pool because M+ upgrade accounting hasn't caught up. So 4 goes down to 3 in the 6/2009 pool.

If something like this happened, you can make the case to M+ that you should get an e500 back; the irrop isn't your fault.
mre5765 is offline  
Old Mar 28, 2009 | 10:06 pm
  #6  
Original Poster
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: San Diego CA USA
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, & PPO 2025-26; Southwest A-List
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by mre5765
The e-upgrade summary page has an option to show detailed upgrade activity for a given date range. I'd do that and see what was deducted and when.

Possible explanation.

Let's say you had two segments in a trip.

Segment 1 needs two e500s and segment 2 needs one e500. You check in, and segment 1's upgrade clears, but segment 2's does not (or you didn't request an upgrade at check in or before).

So 2 e500s from the 3/2009 pool get deducted first taking you down to zero. There is an irrop on segment 1, and you don't get upgraded on the replacement flight. Segment 1's e500s will eventually be credited back, but likely not that day.

Later that day, you upgrade segment 2, and it requires one e500. It comes from the 6/2009 pool because you are at zero in the 3/2009 pool because M+ upgrade accounting hasn't caught up. So 4 goes down to 3 in the 6/2009 pool.

If something like this happened, you can make the case to M+ that you should get an e500 back; the irrop isn't your fault.
Thank you, MRE - you reminded me of something I did, and I think this explains it. My colleague and I were heading back to the Bay Area from MCI via DEN. He was flying to SFO, I was flying SJC. I decided to treat my employee to an upgrade, so I put in for upgrades DEN-Bay Area (waitlisted). His cleared, mine did not. I am thinking that this had something to do with it.
onlyquestions is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.