Best 2 Class First Class
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: CO Platinum/1K, SPG Platinum/Ambassador
Posts: 1,705
Best 2 Class First Class
What first class is best: A320, 757, 767-2 Class?
I'm more interested in best regarding comfort and features, not upgrade chances.
I'm more interested in best regarding comfort and features, not upgrade chances.
#3
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Reno NV/San Francisco, CA, USA
Posts: 1,168
B777 2 Cabin is my 1st choice.
I actually prefer the 2 cabin 777 1st row...ample leg room, nice BIG overhead bins,much nicer interior than the "Ghetto Bird" 2 cabin B763.
#4
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: MHT/BOS <--> World
Programs: AA Plat 2.8MM
Posts: 4,629
Yes, I can see that. I find service more personal on the smaller planes but nothing wrong with the 777.
Last edited by wanaflyforless; Mar 14, 2011 at 11:49 pm
#5
Moderator: Hawaii-based airlines & Hawai'i forums
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ka ʻĀpala Nui, Nuioka
Programs: NEXUS/Global Entry, Delta, United, Hyatt, IHG, Marriott, and Hertz
Posts: 18,041
IMO, it's easier to say which is the worst, which is the 767 domestic and its narrow seats. The others are all pretty much the same to me, athough the old, worn-out CRT monitors on the 757s and limited amount of audio channels also gets some negative points.
I'd probably go:
777
320/319
757
767
I'd probably go:
777
320/319
757
767
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,606
777 Two-Cabin F is very spacious ^
#7
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Programs: AA PP, Hilton/MR Gold
Posts: 743
2nd row of A319 -- the 2-class F seat is roughly the same across the fleet, so if given the choice, I like the small cabin in the A319. Of course I rarely book A319s as I am much more interested in upgrade chances...
#8
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Portland
Programs: UA 1K, AK Gold 75K, etc. etc.
Posts: 1,660
and I hate to point out, but the biggest difference between economy and FC is on a regional jet.....so I actually appreciate FC on the regional as much as on the bigger planes--but of course I agree with previous posters in general...not so much difference, but I like 777 and 757, then 320, and 767 and 737 least. Rarely does any of this make enough difference to cause me to change my schedule to choose one over the other.
#9
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: ABE/PHL/EWR
Programs: UA Gold
Posts: 396
Out of the narrow body fleet, the 757 is my favorite by far. The fact that UA's 752's board from 2L is the main reason. You can make a late arrival, and while there may be a wait on the jet bridge, you can immediately turn left and settle in. Nobody is constantly banging your elbows or staring at you while you enjoy your predeparture beverage. Oh, and it's a much easier upgrade Obviously 2-class widebodies is an easy pick, 777.
#10
Used to be MBS PremExec
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Saginaw, MI (MBS)
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM, Marriott Titanium w/Lifetime Plat, Hilton LIfetime ♢, National Exec, Amex Plat
Posts: 5,722
IMO, it's easier to say which is the worst, which is the 767 domestic and its narrow seats. The others are all pretty much the same to me, athough the old, worn-out CRT monitors on the 757s and limited amount of audio channels also gets some negative points.
I'd probably go:
777
320/319
757
767
I'd probably go:
777
320/319
757
767
Exactly. Well, almost exactly. I'll put the 319 slightly ahead of the 320; Generally a little better service and row 2 is great. I always like the last row of F, and on the 319, it's only 1 row back!
The 757 isn't bad, but it's such a huge cabin, and sitting in the back, it can be 30-40 minutes getting my meal after row 1 does. Not to mention the old CRT monitors, and those seats just feel more cramped than the Airbus Twins.
#11
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DC|NYC
Programs: UA GS, DL Plat, Marriott Bonvoy LIfetime Titanium/SPG refugee, Hertz Prez, Amtrak Select
Posts: 3,201
#13
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SAN
Programs: UA 1MM/1K, HH Diamond
Posts: 6,832
I don't think you can compare planes without taking specific seats -- and individual tastes -- into account.
For example, in general I would agree with FlyinHawaiian's ranking (i.e., 777 > 320/319 > 757 > 767), but I think 767 bulkhead seats beat everything except the 777's. They feel a lot roomier to be because no one is reclining into your personal space, more than making up for the loss of a few inches of leg room. Moreover, on a redeye, center seats on a 777 or 767 are vastly preferable to anything the narrowbodies have to offer. And let's not forget that 1CD on the 757 are pretty much the worst F seats in the UA fleet.
All of the above, of course, might be different for someone 6'6" than for myself at 5'10". Or if you're traveling with a companion. Or if you want a window seat for the view.
I'm just saying it all kind of depends.
For example, in general I would agree with FlyinHawaiian's ranking (i.e., 777 > 320/319 > 757 > 767), but I think 767 bulkhead seats beat everything except the 777's. They feel a lot roomier to be because no one is reclining into your personal space, more than making up for the loss of a few inches of leg room. Moreover, on a redeye, center seats on a 777 or 767 are vastly preferable to anything the narrowbodies have to offer. And let's not forget that 1CD on the 757 are pretty much the worst F seats in the UA fleet.
All of the above, of course, might be different for someone 6'6" than for myself at 5'10". Or if you're traveling with a companion. Or if you want a window seat for the view.
I'm just saying it all kind of depends.
#15
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Colorado
Programs: UA-GS
Posts: 55
What my 7 year old daughter thinks of B763 First Class
on another note, my kids are going to have an eye-opener when they leave home and learn what E- is all about...