Trans-Pacific FAs - I just returned on UA 898 (NRT/IAD) and have some observations
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: IAD/DCA
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler; Marriott Lifetime Platinum Premier
Posts: 376
Trans-Pacific FAs - I just returned on UA 898 (NRT/IAD) and have some observations
I just returned on UA 898 (NRT/IAD) today and have some observations. Certainly I understand that the trans-Pacific routes are generally staffed with the most senior FAs but I have noticed over the past year in my Asian travels -- and especially today -- that these aging FAs (most, but not all) are unpleasant, unkempt, and provide minimal service. I can tell you that I did not see one FA smile or show any measure of pleasantness on today's flight. On an even more serious note, I am concerned about their ability to physically deal with a safety issue because of their fragility, and in other cases, their excessive weight. I know that these FAs have many years of experience and I should not be concerned about their abilities to meet both safety and service requirements but after today's flight I am not so sure. With the exception of the purser -- who was excellent -- I cannot find one single positive comment to say about the other other FAs serving the biz class. Skies just weren't friendly on today's flight.
#2
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Programs: DL Diamond, UA 1K MM, SPG Plat For Life, Marriott Plat, Nexus/GlobalEntry
Posts: 9,198
Yet another thread about aging FA's... it comes up here a lot... people say the young FA's on the Asian carriers are so wonderful..etc etc.
UA's FA's meet the FAA physical requirements for the job (whatever those are). What is UA supposed to do? Fire them? Impossible..and illegal in the United States. People over 40 are in a protected class of employees and you absolutely cannot terminate them because of age. Asian carriers have different laws...they can keep their FA's young and sexy. Is that fair to their older FA's who don't want to retire? Or to the woman who gains 20 pounds because of a thyroid condition, or difficulty losing pregnancy weight? No, it isn't.
Termination for bad service? Oh how I wish it were so... but there are plenty of older FA's who give outstanding service. I would fully support UA actively monitoring and rating service by its FA's and terminate those who fall short. But termination should have nothing to do with age or whether someone appears to be frail or overweight.
UA's FA's meet the FAA physical requirements for the job (whatever those are). What is UA supposed to do? Fire them? Impossible..and illegal in the United States. People over 40 are in a protected class of employees and you absolutely cannot terminate them because of age. Asian carriers have different laws...they can keep their FA's young and sexy. Is that fair to their older FA's who don't want to retire? Or to the woman who gains 20 pounds because of a thyroid condition, or difficulty losing pregnancy weight? No, it isn't.
Termination for bad service? Oh how I wish it were so... but there are plenty of older FA's who give outstanding service. I would fully support UA actively monitoring and rating service by its FA's and terminate those who fall short. But termination should have nothing to do with age or whether someone appears to be frail or overweight.
#4
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: iad/dca
Programs: UA Million Mile Gold, Club, AA, Delta, Marriott, Hertz G, A/Club
Posts: 1,106
transpac crews ex dulles
are a surly bunch ime. best of lot is the gang out of sea to nrt.
#6
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: GVA (Greater Vancouver Area)
Programs: DREAD Gold; UA 1.035MM; Bonvoy Au-197; PCC Elite+; CCC Elite+; MSC C-12; CWC Au-197; WoH Dis
Posts: 52,140
Not based on appearance, but if they can't perform their safety duties, they shouldn't have the job. I don't know what FA recertification is like, but I can't believe it's anything close to realistic for what they're supposed to be able to do.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 26,927
I don't know if the FAA has any physical requirements for an FA. There definitely should be, as they are "there primarily for our safety", but there are some (not strictly based on age) who couldn't pass a physical.
Not based on appearance, but if they can't perform their safety duties, they shouldn't have the job. I don't know what FA recertification is like, but I can't believe it's anything close to realistic for what they're supposed to be able to do.
Not based on appearance, but if they can't perform their safety duties, they shouldn't have the job. I don't know what FA recertification is like, but I can't believe it's anything close to realistic for what they're supposed to be able to do.
#9
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: DC|NYC
Programs: UA GS, DL Plat, Marriott Bonvoy LIfetime Titanium/SPG refugee, Hertz Prez, Amtrak Select
Posts: 3,201
+5
On a recent HKG-ORD flight a FA refused to help an older woman with putting her back in the overhead locker because she couldn't lift her arms that high. My immediate thought had nothing to do with her age or her size but how she was suppose to be there for my safety? It gave me zero confidence.
On a recent HKG-ORD flight a FA refused to help an older woman with putting her back in the overhead locker because she couldn't lift her arms that high. My immediate thought had nothing to do with her age or her size but how she was suppose to be there for my safety? It gave me zero confidence.
#10
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: IAD
Programs: Free Agent
Posts: 1,937
United used to have some sort of service director onboard NRT flights to monitor service and quality. When did this stop?
#11
Join Date: Oct 2003
Programs: UA 1K, AA Plat.
Posts: 493
FAs are required to go through Annual Recurrent Training. At that time they have to prove they can successfully conduct all safety related duties including opening doors, window exits, etc. Those who are physically incapable are grounded.
The rude/bitterness? No argument there.
The rude/bitterness? No argument there.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: BOS, PVG
Programs: United 1K and 1MM, Marriott Ambassador
Posts: 10,000
+5
On a recent HKG-ORD flight a FA refused to help an older woman with putting her back in the overhead locker because she couldn't lift her arms that high. My immediate thought had nothing to do with her age or her size but how she was suppose to be there for my safety? It gave me zero confidence.
On a recent HKG-ORD flight a FA refused to help an older woman with putting her back in the overhead locker because she couldn't lift her arms that high. My immediate thought had nothing to do with her age or her size but how she was suppose to be there for my safety? It gave me zero confidence.
I like young, pretty and energetic FAs.
#14
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: IAD/DCA
Programs: UA 1K and Million Miler; Marriott Lifetime Platinum Premier
Posts: 376
#15
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SJC
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 1,628
I don't have a lot of experience flying UA transpac but based on my last trip, we could do without the FA in biz who wanted to get past me as I retrieved something from the overhead and just pushed me out of her way.