Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Discontinued Programs/Partners > United Mileage Plus (Pre-Merger)
Reload this Page >

SAG/AFTRA end first class travel req -- PS F class impact?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SAG/AFTRA end first class travel req -- PS F class impact?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2010, 12:23 pm
  #16  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SEA, but up and down the coast a lot
Programs: Oceanic Airlines Gold Elite
Posts: 20,395
Agree. I think the Asia-route-feeder aspects of both LAX and SFO are much more significant.
Why would you fly JFK-SFO/LAX-Asia in paid UA p.s./intl F instead of an Asian carrier on JFK/EWR-Asia (or even CO)?

I can see why you'd do it on an award redemption, but if I'm spending a bunch of cash for the seat at the front of the plane... I'm adding 6 hours of flying time so you can experience UA p.s. and UA intercontinental F as opposed to NH, OZ or SQ, all of whom are options out of NYC? Or I could fly CO? Or I could even connect at IAD/ORD?

So soon, psF will be exclusively employee class and federal air marshalls!
That is, until the former CO management now in charge of UA goes "Um, wait a minute: we're mostly giving these F seats away? Why exactly?" and redoes the p.s. fleet to be more like DL's 757s on the JFK/SFO route: enhanced F @ 16 seats with 50ish inch pitch and more modern seating + upgraded amenities, Y+ and Y, as entropy suggests.

IMO, this is bad news for people who like being able to fly AA and UA's 3-class service for cheap, though I suspect AA will ditch theirs first: those 762s they fly on AFS routes have to be complete gas hogs and getting close to the end of their usable life, and a lot of that J cabin is upgrading.
eponymous_coward is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2010, 12:29 pm
  #17  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,606
Originally Posted by eponymous_coward
Why would you fly JFK-SFO/LAX-Asia in paid UA p.s./intl F instead of an Asian carrier on JFK/EWR-Asia (or even CO)?

I can see why you'd do it on an award redemption, but if I'm spending a bunch of cash for the seat at the front of the plane... I'm adding 6 hours of flying time so you can experience UA p.s. and UA intercontinental F as opposed to NH, OZ or SQ, all of whom are options out of NYC? Or I could fly CO? Or I could even connect at IAD/ORD?



That is, until the former CO management now in charge of UA goes "Um, wait a minute: we're mostly giving these F seats away? Why exactly?" and redoes the p.s. fleet to be more like DL's 757s on the JFK/SFO route: enhanced F @ 16 seats with 50ish inch pitch and more modern seating + upgraded amenities, Y+ and Y, as entropy suggests.

IMO, this is bad news for people who like being able to fly AA and UA's 3-class service for cheap, though I suspect AA will ditch theirs first: those 762s they fly on AFS routes have to be complete gas hogs and getting close to the end of their usable life, and a lot of that J cabin is upgrading.
On the CNBC program, Inside American Airlines, they said that on a transcon flight, after expenses, they only made $200 from the flight..
FriendlySkies is online now  
Old Nov 10, 2010, 3:41 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 316
It would affect AA more than UA ps

AA has a lot more 3 class F seats LAX-JFK than UA does. I doubt the actor's contract will cause UA to end p.s. service. It is one of the most important business transcon routes in the country and there are a lot of other industries that shuttle between L.A. and New York. NYC is the banking center of the U.S. and the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach receive much of the imports from China, which is just about anything consumers buy in a store these days.

There are not even very many domestic routes with three class service. Aside from JFK-LAX/SFO, the rest are AA and UA hub-to-hub repositioning flights. The number of actors that fly in F only because of the contract are probably fairly small. Most character, unknown or little known actors are local or would fly to location which is rarely in New York. Established actors would be able to demand F and big stars get to use the studio jet.
AADC10 is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2010, 3:50 pm
  #19  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Northern California
Programs: I want to be free! Free!
Posts: 3,455
Quite a bit of paid premium traffic from the financial/biz communities in each of these cities. I wouldn't be opposed to knocking out PS F if they were able to get an extra row of C in, to be honest...

UDU would be nice, but it would definitely be associated with the end of the PS moniker.
aCavalierInCoach is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2010, 4:30 pm
  #20  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC: UA 1K, DL Platinum, AAirpass, Avis PC
Posts: 4,599
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A293 Safari/6531.22.7)

Originally Posted by aCavalierInCoach
Quite a bit of paid premium traffic from the financial/biz communities in each of these cities. I wouldn't be opposed to knocking out PS F if they were able to get an extra row of C in, to be honest...

UDU would be nice, but it would definitely be associated with the end of the PS moniker.
Indeed lots of paid premium from financial services -- at business class fares. F in 3 class is out of policy for many banks now unless J is sold out.

Really hope the new UA doesn't downsize the number of premium seats on the route.

How are paid loads (not upgrade) in UA flyers' estimation on PS C/F?

Coninental out of Newark is so tight you can rarely book a seat last minute let alone change flights -- which inplicitly ruins a key benefit of premium fares -- flexibility.
cerealmarketer is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2010, 4:39 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Programs: MileagePlus, Marriott Rewards
Posts: 344
p.s. SFO-JFK is my favorite domestic flight in the system, so would be sad to see p.s. go away, but I doubt this alone would be the factor to make the business no longer viable.

I think there is enough, shall we say, "money" in the areas to make it work. Around Thanksgiving I shelled out for Z class I had to get because there was no NC space and C was getting filled up and I had to sit next to my companion on an award ticket. So while this isn't the purchase of a 3-class F seat, it's still a Z which you can't get standalone on a 2-class plane. And for reference, that flight had on,y one unsold F seat left, too!
uchuuace is offline  
Old Nov 10, 2010, 5:34 pm
  #22  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: San Francisco/Tel Aviv/YYZ
Programs: CO 1K-MM
Posts: 10,762
Coninental out of Newark is so tight you can rarely book a seat last minute let alone change flights -- which inplicitly ruins a key benefit of premium fares -- flexibility.
CO is very tough to get premium availability inside of 2 weeks on EWR-SFO/LAX, which is part of why I think that PS needs to be expanded to EWR as well. (But CO also charges <half of what UA does for PS..)
entropy is offline  
Old Nov 13, 2010, 2:10 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,686
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
On the CNBC program, Inside American Airlines, they said that on a transcon flight, after expenses, they only made $200 from the flight..
Could be unique to AA with their 762s. Too many coach seats to sell for $200 on a long flight plus a gas guzzler.
SFOtoORD is offline  
Old Dec 5, 2010, 4:26 pm
  #24  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by FriendlySkies
On the CNBC program, Inside American Airlines, they said that on a transcon flight, after expenses, they only made $200 from the flight..
Yes, on that particular flight, on that particular day, AA claimed a mere $200 profit. Many AA 762 transcon flights net much more than that, and others show a net loss.
FWAAA is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.