UA 144 (EWR-OPO) always late?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2004
Programs: Continental OnePass
Posts: 848
UA 144 (EWR-OPO) always late?
I'm taking UA 144 EWR-OPO at the end of the week, so I have been following its performance for the past few weeks. More often that not it seems to be delayed leaving EWR, in many cases by several hours. For example, last night it left at 12:19am (scheduled for 9:50pm), Sunday night it left at 11:49pm.
#5
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: No. California
Programs: UA MP HH LTD
Posts: 1,983
#6
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: Alaska 75K, Delta Silver, UA 1K, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 9,596
It also doesn't take 3 hours to turn a plane from B, even accounting for deplaning and other logistics.
United has done a poor job operating its flights timely. Sure, some times it's uncontrollable, but even with no uncontrollable events, we have seen mass delays and cancellations.
Last edited by Repooc17; Aug 8, 23 at 7:49 am
#8
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: PIT
Programs: OZ Diamond, UA Gold
Posts: 9,631
These late night flights are commonly late. I'm flying 161 to EDI next week, its literally UA's last flight of the night, and it has left on time maybe twice in the last three weeks. I'm in for a long night (and the lounge closes at 22:30)!
#10
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: No. California
Programs: UA MP HH LTD
Posts: 1,983
#11
Join Date: Dec 2018
Programs: UA 1K, DL PM, AA Nobody, Marriott Ambassador Elite
Posts: 496
EWR is a crowded, poorly run airport with a badly laid out terminal C. Many employees and crew based there have bad attitudes. Avoid if you can, tolerate it if you can't.
Edit: on the plus side, the newer UC at C123 is pretty nice, I hear the new terminal A is nice.
Edit: on the plus side, the newer UC at C123 is pretty nice, I hear the new terminal A is nice.
#12
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: YYZ
Programs: AC 75k, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 1,020
OPO is a leisure destination with few connecting passengers, the turn around time in OPO is also pretty long such that the return flight still operated on time despite the 2+ hour delay. I would imagine UA would prioritize flights with many connections or to high yield destinations or larger plane with more passengers when there are gate or staff constraints.
#13
Join Date: Aug 2017
Programs: Alaska 75K, Delta Silver, UA 1K, Hilton Diamond, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Platinum + LT Gold
Posts: 9,596
OPO is a leisure destination with few connecting passengers, the turn around time in OPO is also pretty long such that the return flight still operated on time despite the 2+ hour delay. I would imagine UA would prioritize flights with many connections or to high yield destinations when there are gate or staff constraints.
Sadly, EWR can expand as much as they want, there are still effectively only two runways (one for departure and one for arrival). Plenty of airports with less traffic have more than two runways, where you can have concurrent departures and arrivals.
#14
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,470
I was on UA144 last Wednesday and.... IT WAS ON TIME. Even landed early. 😮 😮 😮 😮
No idea why this flight is always late... get's cancelled pretty often as well. And incoming aircraft doesn't seem to matter either.
The Lisbon flight is a little better but not by much.
No idea why this flight is always late... get's cancelled pretty often as well. And incoming aircraft doesn't seem to matter either.
The Lisbon flight is a little better but not by much.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,721
Always is a little exaggerated (though not completely) - per Flightstats - it was on time 28% of the time over June/July. So always, no.
Has to do with a combo of things. Poor ops out of EWR arent out of the norm on any given year, but particularly bad this year. There is some part of that that isnt UAs fault - there has been some weather and there is always airspace issue in the NYC-area. But this year, other factors are definitely present - stress on the current fleet, staffing (both within and outside of UA), excessive fleet utilization beyond what should be acceptable. These flights also wouldnt take as much priority as more important flights - if they have the staffing and can only ensure, say, the LHR or OPO flights get out on time, guess which one takes priority.
Its 2023, and were passed the COVID peak, yes, but the resurgence in demand, without the resurgence in infrastructure is problematic. I suspect this will match will improve over the next 2-3 years, and bring ops more in line with historical trends. But for now, this is what we get.
On another note, Ive always tended to avoid EWR - not a good airport, a whiff of wind will send ATC delays skyrocketing more than anywhere, etc., so my personal guideline is to give a minimum of 2-2.5 hours of connection time to compensate (at ORD, Im happy to book an hour or even slightly less). I guess I can be happy that now Im on the west coast, and while the same issues arent completely non-existent, seems to be way better than on the eastern side of the country.
Has to do with a combo of things. Poor ops out of EWR arent out of the norm on any given year, but particularly bad this year. There is some part of that that isnt UAs fault - there has been some weather and there is always airspace issue in the NYC-area. But this year, other factors are definitely present - stress on the current fleet, staffing (both within and outside of UA), excessive fleet utilization beyond what should be acceptable. These flights also wouldnt take as much priority as more important flights - if they have the staffing and can only ensure, say, the LHR or OPO flights get out on time, guess which one takes priority.
Its 2023, and were passed the COVID peak, yes, but the resurgence in demand, without the resurgence in infrastructure is problematic. I suspect this will match will improve over the next 2-3 years, and bring ops more in line with historical trends. But for now, this is what we get.
On another note, Ive always tended to avoid EWR - not a good airport, a whiff of wind will send ATC delays skyrocketing more than anywhere, etc., so my personal guideline is to give a minimum of 2-2.5 hours of connection time to compensate (at ORD, Im happy to book an hour or even slightly less). I guess I can be happy that now Im on the west coast, and while the same issues arent completely non-existent, seems to be way better than on the eastern side of the country.