Removed from flight due to my weight.
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Adelphi, MD
Programs: Korean Air Skypass, ANA Skyweb, Amex Premier Rewards, Chase Sapphire Preferred
Posts: 747
Removed from flight due to my weight.
I was recently removed from a flight out of Dulles to Los Angeles because of my weight. I don't think this is fair. I weigh 278lbs. Https://onemileatatime.com/news/united-airlines-blocking-seats-passenger-weight/
#2
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,116
I was recently removed from a flight out of Dulles to Los Angeles because of my weight. I don't think this is fair. I weigh 278lbs. Https://onemileatatime.com/news/unit...senger-weight/
#3
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NYC / TYO / Up in the Air
Programs: UA GS 1.7MM, AA 2.1MM, EK, BA, SQ, CX, Marriot LT, Accor P
Posts: 6,335
+1 - OP Before we can all offer to help we need much more information on what happened -- I am not a POS but I've been removed for weight and balance issues many times (at least on smaller RJ's) -- and with the new weight standards being implemented for the winter it is affecting airlines in unusual ways...
#4
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: US/TYO/LON
Programs: Marriott Titanium; Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 411
No context to anything seems like it is a bait for the linked article. Surely on a prime IAD-LAX flight, it likely is not a weight and balance issue similar to RJs. If it was a weight issue, I would imagine they'd offload some cargo first. If the OP couldn't fit the standard seatbelt and they ran out of extenders then it is a likely scenario but one that wasn't proposed.
#5
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: BOS/EAP
Programs: UA 1K, MR LTT, HH Dia, Amex Plat
Posts: 32,127
No context to anything seems like it is a bait for the linked article. Surely on a prime IAD-LAX flight, it likely is not a weight and balance issue similar to RJs. If it was a weight issue, I would imagine they'd offload some cargo first. If the OP couldn't fit the standard seatbelt and they ran out of extenders then it is a likely scenario but one that wasn't proposed.
#6
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United, American, Delta, Hyatt, Hilton, Hertz, Marriott
Posts: 14,818
No context to anything seems like it is a bait for the linked article. Surely on a prime IAD-LAX flight, it likely is not a weight and balance issue similar to RJs. If it was a weight issue, I would imagine they'd offload some cargo first. If the OP couldn't fit the standard seatbelt and they ran out of extenders then it is a likely scenario but one that wasn't proposed.
#7
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: SJC / DPS
Programs: AS G75K, UA Silver
Posts: 1,758
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when they offload for weight and balance, airlines don't do it based off of a passenger's actual weight. Instead, they use an established benchmark weight - one for males, and one for females? If that's the case, the OP's actual weight has no bearing here.
#8
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: KEWR
Programs: Marriott Platinum
Posts: 794
Correct me if I'm wrong, but when they offload for weight and balance, airlines don't do it based off of a passenger's actual weight. Instead, they use an established benchmark weight - one for males, and one for females? If that's the case, the OP's actual weight has no bearing here.
The FAA determines the average passenger weight not United. Included in the passenger weight are carryons, personal effects, coats, etc.
Ever wonder why you’re limited to “one carryon and one personal item?” Why heavy bags are considered 50+ pounds. I could keep going, but you get the point. Everything is outlined by the FAA for weight and balance standardization for 121 carriers.
Last year the FAA increased the PAX weight averages and it caused some seats on the 757 to be restricted on some flights to avoid being overweight for taxi and takeoff.
United doesn’t care is someone weights 278 pounds or 110 pounds, if they’re male or female. It’s an average passenger weight for each person and that’s what is recognized by the load planners.
#9
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: LAX
Programs: UA
Posts: 1,539
Unless the gate agents got out scales and were weighing everyone, how would they know how much you (or anyone else) weighed?
#10
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Yorkshire, UK
Programs: A3*G, LH FTL, VS Red, Avis Preferred, Hertz President's Circle, (RIP Diamond Club)
Posts: 2,364
If you're a lone traveller on a low ticket class with no relevant airline status then you're likely to get picked for this sort of thing.
#11
In memoriam
Join Date: Dec 2001
Programs: DL 2MM, AA MM, DL Sky Club Life, AA Admirals Club Life, Hilton Gold Life
Posts: 1,732
Methinks there is play with words.
I also have been asked to be removed from a flight because of weight. In this case it was accumulated aircraft weight vs the needs for rerouting the flight due to storms along the route (small plane). Initially I couldn't understand and refused to identify myself (when I was a SDC) when called by name by the GA who had boarded with the bad news. Fortunately some other poor bloke had the same last name and raised his hand.
I also have been asked to be removed from a flight because of weight. In this case it was accumulated aircraft weight vs the needs for rerouting the flight due to storms along the route (small plane). Initially I couldn't understand and refused to identify myself (when I was a SDC) when called by name by the GA who had boarded with the bad news. Fortunately some other poor bloke had the same last name and raised his hand.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 11,513
I was recently removed from a flight out of Dulles to Los Angeles because of my weight. I don't think this is fair. I weigh 278lbs. Https://onemileatatime.com/news/unit...senger-weight/
Ultimately, the gate agent just followed United's policy of bumping the fewest passengers to do the greatest good for the greatest number. That means eyeing passengers and looking up the weights of any suspiciously-heavy-looking passengers in their PNR's--looking for any weights highlighted in yellow--and bumping those passengers first. It might not seem fair, but there isn't any better way.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MSP
Programs: DL PM, UA Gold, WN, Global Entry; +others wherever miles/points are found
Posts: 14,443
Curious - is it actually possible to be a MTOW issue? Trying to understand in what cases they will offload pax versus just make a fuel stop.
#14
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,195
The only way a passenger is going to be removed for their ACTUAL weight is if you don't meet the requirements for fitting in a single seat and haven't bought an extra seat or been upgraded. The requirements are below. 278 pounds wouldn't normally put someone in that category but, it could, depending on how the weight is carried.
https://www.united.com/ual/en/us/fly...a-seating.html
------------------------------------.
You’ll have to buy an additional seat or upgrade if you don’t meet one of the following criteria:
The 757 issue, from what I understand, has to do with the load limit of the floor in certain sections of the airplane. When the average passenger weights transition to winter weights on November 1st, you can no longer have all seats filled and still comply with that limitation. Depending on the aircraft configuration, either three or six seats, all middle seats, are blocked and unusable on the affected aircraft during the period that winter weights are used. Each blocked seat is marked as unusable and can not be occupied for any reason.
General weight restricted flights have already been discussed. In those cases, the determination is made based on average passenger weights and have nothing to do with a particularly passenger's actual weight.
https://www.united.com/ual/en/us/fly...a-seating.html
------------------------------------.
You’ll have to buy an additional seat or upgrade if you don’t meet one of the following criteria:
- You must be able to properly attach, buckle and wear the seat belt, with one extension if necessary, whenever the seatbelt sign is illuminated or as instructed by a crew member.
- You must be able to stay seated with the seat armrest(s) down for the whole flight.
- You must not significantly encroach upon the adjacent seating space.
The 757 issue, from what I understand, has to do with the load limit of the floor in certain sections of the airplane. When the average passenger weights transition to winter weights on November 1st, you can no longer have all seats filled and still comply with that limitation. Depending on the aircraft configuration, either three or six seats, all middle seats, are blocked and unusable on the affected aircraft during the period that winter weights are used. Each blocked seat is marked as unusable and can not be occupied for any reason.
General weight restricted flights have already been discussed. In those cases, the determination is made based on average passenger weights and have nothing to do with a particularly passenger's actual weight.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11,488
Tangent: reminds me of one time flying a foreign carrier in another country, and in the jet bridge they had some bathroom scales for everyone step up on with bags. They obviously were tallying weights, but I don't know why they weren't using an average, as they apparently did on all the other flights I've had with that carrier.