Steak & Potatoes for UA Flight Attendents' crew meal on flight with no passenger meal
#61
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,184
As I said earlier, the metrics for when a crew meal is boarded is different than for passengers. If I was flying EWR-ATL I wouldn't get a meal, either, unless I had flights before/after with less than 90 minutes on the ground. In other words, those F/As didn't get meals because of the EWR-ATL flight, they got meals because the combinations of flights that day.
More likely would be a scheduled crew meal goes uneaten. There's been cases where unwanted passenger meals are eaten by crewmembers but how many chicken and orzo meals does someone want on a four-day trip?
I tend to like the breakfasts more than the lunches or dinners. I tend to get those on my own when the schedule permits.
There is similar wording. I don't remember exactly what it says. The entrée is usually exactly the same as what is, or would be, offered to the passengers. There is some variation based on the catering station but it's still the same as what FC is served. They're not required to offer us anything better and nobody expects them to.
I've always been curious about something, and perhaps you can shed some light on this, if you don't mind. Often because of late dinners, I end up not eating my dinner in F on long flights and I've often heard jokes from those around me that the crew will be happy that they'll get to have my F dinner. Is there any truth to this?
I tend to like the breakfasts more than the lunches or dinners. I tend to get those on my own when the schedule permits.
There is similar wording. I don't remember exactly what it says. The entrée is usually exactly the same as what is, or would be, offered to the passengers. There is some variation based on the catering station but it's still the same as what FC is served. They're not required to offer us anything better and nobody expects them to.
#62
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TOA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott LTPP/Platinum Premier, Hyatt Lame-ist, UA !K
Posts: 20,061
There is similar wording. I don't remember exactly what it says. The entrée is usually exactly the same as what is, or would be, offered to the passengers. There is some variation based on the catering station but it's still the same as what FC is served. They're not required to offer us anything better and nobody expects them to.
David
#63
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2000
Location: TPA for now. Hopefully LIS for retirement
Posts: 13,704
I agree they should not be eating in front of passengers. They should be given a break pre/post flight, or eat away from the passengers. The “don’t have time in between flights” is baloney, many of us have connecting flights without enough time to eat. The company should be giving them adequate time to eat.
Question though, what happens when the inbound is late? Delay the outbound so they can get their break?
And for what it’s worth, the meals for flight attendants and pilots is much better than business class.
ETA - slight correction - the immediately above is for domestic. On int'l flights they will load extra front-cabin meals for the crew in the same location and without labeling anything "Crew." For example if the cabin has 36 seats and is fully booked, and there is a crew of 10, they will load 46 front cabin meals. This gives the passengers more choice because of just having 12 of each of three choices available, there will be more like 15 during order-taking time. The F/As will choose from whatever is left. (At least that is how it used to be done.)
Yes and it is very unfair! Pilots get a nice seat up front with a great view. And passengers can sleep as soon as they board until it is time to deplane, while F/As can't. The injustice of it all!
I've always been curious about something, and perhaps you can shed some light on this, if you don't mind. Often because of late dinners, I end up not eating my dinner in F on long flights and I've often heard jokes from those around me that the crew will be happy that they'll get to have my F dinner. Is there any truth to this?
(Former UA F/A here BTW.)
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Apr 1, 2022 at 11:34 am Reason: merged consecutive posts by same member
#64
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: BNE/OOL temporarily-permanently at CAK/PIT
Programs: UA*1K & UA Club, National Ex. Elite, Hertz Pres. Circ., Amex Plat., CLEAR
Posts: 1,703
If it makes you feel any better, crew have to pay for these meals. I recall prices around $10 10 or so years ago. I would be unhappy if I were paying $15 or $20 for present day United domestic F meals.
#65
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BNA
Programs: HH Gold. (Former) UA PP, DL PM, PC Plat
Posts: 8,184
#67
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PHL
Programs: UA 1K 1MM, Marriott Gold, IHG Platinum, Raddison Platinum, Avis Presidents Club
Posts: 5,271
The same "nice looking steak and potato and salad" served to customers would probably become "dried piece of hockey puck and sad salad. I would rather have something healthy instead".
The bottom line is UA does not serve any food on this flight. There might be a miscatering that caused the lack of 2 snacks and a baby bottle of water, but that would not satiate OP regardless. The flight attendants are entitled to their meal, and OP is envious of what they can't have, and it's ridiculous to suggest that, by policy, UA is making first class passenger to watch FA eating meal while having nothing served to them. Which, of course, is probably another hyperbole.
Or book on an airline that offers food on the route. Which, of course, none does.
The bottom line is UA does not serve any food on this flight. There might be a miscatering that caused the lack of 2 snacks and a baby bottle of water, but that would not satiate OP regardless. The flight attendants are entitled to their meal, and OP is envious of what they can't have, and it's ridiculous to suggest that, by policy, UA is making first class passenger to watch FA eating meal while having nothing served to them. Which, of course, is probably another hyperbole.
Or book on an airline that offers food on the route. Which, of course, none does.
And ofcourse there are other routes where UA's service doesn't compare to its competitors but that's another discussion
#70
Original Member
Join Date: May 1998
Location: CT/NY
Programs: UA 1K/1MM, AA EXP, Marriott LT Titanium, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Plat Amb
Posts: 6,020
I think Delta and Jet Blue are supposed to at least provide a snack (as well as UA). OP indicates he did not even receive a pretzel so it certainly looks bad.
And ofcourse there are other routes where UA's service doesn't compare to its competitors but that's another discussion
And ofcourse there are other routes where UA's service doesn't compare to its competitors but that's another discussion
The boxes taste like cardboard. Also, they are not catered for the short flight, even in coach.
#71
#72
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Global
Programs: United 1K, Qatar Gold, Etihad Gold, Hilton Diamond, InterCon RA, PC Plat, SPG Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 1,454
#73
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TOA
Programs: HH Diamond, Marriott LTPP/Platinum Premier, Hyatt Lame-ist, UA !K
Posts: 20,061
Also, the snack boxes, if catered, are for paying customers. Not sure why they have to eat our food and have to pay for it as well.
David
#74
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,854
#75
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Global
Programs: United 1K, Qatar Gold, Etihad Gold, Hilton Diamond, InterCon RA, PC Plat, SPG Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 1,454