Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Very close call: reported to UA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2022, 2:17 pm
  #1  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: UA 1K MM, HHonors Diamond,PC, Marriott Rewards Gold
Posts: 1,118
Very close call: reported to UA

I experienced a very close call (midair) on a United Express flight and reported it to United. They said they would take it up with The UA partner and determine how it happened. We are talking closing speeds of 900 plus knots at cruising altitude at night. We are talking 150 feet of separation at nearly opposite directions, crossing at 10 degree approximate paths.

Did I do the correct thing here? I will PM details of anyone wants to know them but I don’t want to publicly post.
fightingsioux09 likes this.
tryathlete is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 2:21 pm
  #2  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,607
Are you saying you were a pilot of GA aircraft? Or a passenger? Where did you get the numbers you quote?
zkzkz is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 2:26 pm
  #3  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.997MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,859
Believe pilots are required to report these. Have no fear at least one will. Additionally l believe ATC will auto detect
greg99, renila, adambadam and 5 others like this.
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 3:52 pm
  #4  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: UA 1K MM, HHonors Diamond,PC, Marriott Rewards Gold
Posts: 1,118
Originally Posted by zkzkz
Are you saying you were a pilot of GA aircraft? Or a passenger? Where did you get the numbers you quote?
I’m a non-commercial pilot but was a passenger who saw the near miss out my side window. It was air-show close and we were buffeted by the contrail and wake from the oncoming aircraft which was a private jet—kind of hard to classify more at that closing speed and distance.
renila, SPN Lifer, wrp96 and 1 others like this.
tryathlete is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 4:02 pm
  #5  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Programs: AC SE MM, Marriott Titanium
Posts: 904
Hard to believe the TCAS RA wasn't going off in both aircraft, especially with ADS-B out mandated.
YVRtoYYZ is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 4:05 pm
  #6  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Virtuoso Travel Agent, Commercial Pilot
Posts: 2,117
If neither pilot maneuvered then it definitely wasn’t as close as it seemed. Anything that close would have triggered a TCAS RA. If there was indeed a RA then those are mandatory reports so it would be investigated automatically, and a loss of separation that close would also automatically trigger a mandatory report at the ATC facility.
Sykes is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 4:20 pm
  #7  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: DAL
Posts: 3,400
You can contact the local FSDO office.
ual744777sta is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 4:22 pm
  #8  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,029
Originally Posted by tryathlete
I’m a non-commercial pilot but was a passenger who saw the near miss out my side window. It was air-show close and we were buffeted by the contrail and wake from the oncoming aircraft which was a private jet—kind of hard to classify more at that closing speed and distance.
You can tell the type of a/c 900 closing speed at night, 150' away, at 10 degree path differential? You must have stop-action flash-capable eyeballs because it would be a momentary blurred wingtip light to me. I might feel the wake/turbulence. You must have been looking out the window at the exact second it showed up because you wouldn't see it coming, and even then, I think the moment it would taken to register might have precluded identification. Maybe it was a bit farther away than thought? I thought they stopped giving out doubles

Seriously, I'm doubtless you saw something.
DJ_Iceman, irishguy28, m.y and 5 others like this.

Last edited by IAH-OIL-TRASH; Feb 19, 2022 at 5:16 pm
IAH-OIL-TRASH is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 4:24 pm
  #9  
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,278
I'm sorry, but there is absolutely no way you were within 150ft, nose-to-nose and neither pilot or TCAS did anything to increase the separation.

You were at least 1,000ft (using RVSM) and/or 3nm/5nm unless some sort of visual separation was being applied, but I doubt at night ANY pilot would risk such a thing, or some controller royally messed up and both TCAS' weren't working.

It is amazing how close aircraft appear. I was once on a FAM sitting jump-seat on an AA DC-10 to LAX when a FedEx MD-10 came, what appeared head-on. We saw him from about 15nm out. It looked like he was going to come through the flight deck window......passed directly overhead, 2000ft above us.

Last edited by RetiredATLATC; Feb 19, 2022 at 4:30 pm
RetiredATLATC is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 4:58 pm
  #10  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K MM, Accor Plat, Htz PC, Natl ExEm, other random status
Posts: 2,876
Add me to the list of people who believes that you think you saw that, but there's no possible way that you actually could have gauged separation and closing speed from your window at night, and it's almost certainly the case that the aircraft were not as close as you thought they were.

Reporting what you saw to United is the sort of passenger behavior that causes so many UA pilots to turn off Channel 9. Passengers think they hear something wrong and "call it in," resulting in challenging discussions for the pilots involved with their chief pilot (what the British call a "meeting without tea or biscuits").

What is it that you expected to get out of that report?
irishguy28, milski, jtet and 4 others like this.
greg99 is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 5:20 pm
  #11  
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Posts: 178
go to LiveATC.net or other aviation forums and ask those guys if they can find you the air traffic recording for your flight....

if it was really that close, either pilots would have screamed or cursed... or at least the air traffic controller would...
trooper, deek, tryathlete and 2 others like this.
HibernateNow is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 5:23 pm
  #12  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K MM, Accor Plat, Htz PC, Natl ExEm, other random status
Posts: 2,876
Originally Posted by HibernateNow
go to LiveATC.net or other aviation forums and ask those guys if they can find you the air traffic recording for your flight....

if it was really that close, either pilots would have screamed or cursed... or at least the air traffic controller would...
Since they said they were at cruising altitude, unless OP happened to note exactly where they were when it happened, it would be tough to figure out what Center frequency to listen to. If OP knew the time, they might be able to pull the track from Flightradar 24.
nancypants likes this.
greg99 is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 5:25 pm
  #13  
Moderator: United Airlines
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.997MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,859
As a point of reference, 900 mph is a bit over 1,300 fps
WineCountryUA is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 5:30 pm
  #14  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Programs: UA 1K MM, HHonors Diamond,PC, Marriott Rewards Gold
Posts: 1,118
Originally Posted by RetiredATLATC
I'm sorry, but there is absolutely no way you were within 150ft, nose-to-nose and neither pilot or TCAS did anything to increase the separation.

You were at least 1,000ft (using RVSM) and/or 3nm/5nm unless some sort of visual separation was being applied, but I doubt at night ANY pilot would risk such a thing, or some controller royally messed up and both TCAS' weren't working.

judge distance and the distance was definitely no more than 200 feet max from our wing. I was closer to 150.



It is amazing how close aircraft appear. I was once on a FAM sitting jump-seat on an AA DC-10 to LAX when a FedEx MD-10 came, what appeared head-on. We saw him from about 15nm out. It looked like he was going to come through the flight deck window......passed directly overhead, 2000ft above us.
I am a pilot, A&P and have received schooling in aircraft accident investigation. We had a leaking door seal and the pilot flying was descending and while it’s possible ATC allowed these two AC to cross that close, there’s absolutely no way TCAS wasn’t screaming on both aircraft. My boss who was a few rows back saw it too but his eyesight is not as good. I trust my measurements. I was there.

Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
As a point of reference, 900 mph is a bit over 1,300 fps
The other aircraft wend by like a SAM. We crossed his contrail and there was a strong buffet as we did so. It was nuts.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Feb 19, 2022 at 6:06 pm Reason: merging consecutive posts by same member
tryathlete is offline  
Old Feb 19, 2022, 5:33 pm
  #15  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: SF Bay Area
Programs: UA 1K MM, Accor Plat, Htz PC, Natl ExEm, other random status
Posts: 2,876
Originally Posted by tryathlete
I am a pilot, A&P and have received schooling in aircraft accident investigation. We had a leaking door seal and the pilot flying was descending and while it’s possible ATC allowed these two AC to cross that close, there’s absolutely no way TCAS wasn’t screaming on both aircraft. My boss who was a few rows back saw it too but his eyesight is not as good. I trust my measurements. I was there.
OK. I'll take that at face value. If that's the case, presumably both pilots would have called out the RA to ATC, and would have reported it to their dispatchers.

Which brings me back to my question - what exactly were you hoping to accomplish by contacting UA with this information?
nancypants likes this.
greg99 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.