Consolidated Global Services Thread: Benefits, Questions, Experiences [2020]
Happy 2020 everyone! Here's the 2020 thread continued from the 2019 thread.
|
Originally Posted by wxguy
(Post 31892664)
Happy 2020 everyone! Here's the 2020 thread continued from the 2019 thread.
|
thanks for taking the lead
|
Was just charged 28k for a (forced) companion FC one way mileage ticket onto a domestic flight I was traveling on in a paid F fare. Never been charged anything other than 25k in the past for this, including one I booked just a few days ago.
|
3 non-status pax waitlisted with GS PP.
J9 Z9 P7 PN0 at T-72. They are on top of the waitlist. Can GS call to manually push through the upgrades? I am still not clear about the T-72 rule. |
Originally Posted by HeadInTheClouds
(Post 31892874)
Was just charged 28k for a (forced) companion FC one way mileage ticket onto a domestic flight I was traveling on in a paid F fare. Never been charged anything other than 25k in the past for this, including one I booked just a few days ago.
|
Originally Posted by wxguy
(Post 31892914)
Sounds like the +3K "close in booking fee" that was instituted a few months ago. Yeah, I know -- GS/1K are supposed to be exempt from CIBFs, but I guess they only mean $ and not miles.
|
Originally Posted by kb1992
(Post 31892912)
3 non-status pax waitlisted with GS PP.
J9 Z9 P7 PN0 at T-72. They are on top of the waitlist. Can GS call to manually push through the upgrades? I am still not clear about the T-72 rule. |
Originally Posted by kb1992
(Post 31892912)
3 non-status pax waitlisted with GS PP.
J9 Z9 P7 PN0 at T-72. They are on top of the waitlist. Can GS call to manually push through the upgrades? I am still not clear about the T-72 rule.
Originally Posted by united 1k flyer
(Post 31893084)
Yes.
|
Originally Posted by npei
(Post 31893757)
GS must be traveling together to force through T-72.
|
Originally Posted by eric.chen3742
(Post 31893979)
not the case, I think some agents are saying that but others are allowing it. If you get one that says no just HUCA
|
Originally Posted by eric.chen3742
(Post 31893979)
not the case, I think some agents are saying that but others are allowing it. If you get one that says no just HUCA
Originally Posted by united 1k flyer
(Post 31893084)
Yes.
Originally Posted by npei
(Post 31893757)
GS must be traveling together to force through T-72.
|
Originally Posted by wxguy
(Post 31892914)
Sounds like the +3K "close in booking fee" that was instituted a few months ago. Yeah, I know -- GS/1K are supposed to be exempt from CIBFs, but I guess they only mean $ and not miles.
Funny how UA was able to announce the at-the-time upcoming "positive" change of dropping in close-in booking fees yet managed to neglect announcing that all MP members would be subject to a mileage surcharge instead. Such a misleading announcement would be no surprise during the Smisek era but it is disappointing to hear it now. |
Originally Posted by HeadInTheClouds
(Post 31892874)
Was just charged 28k for a (forced) companion FC one way mileage ticket onto a domestic flight I was traveling on in a paid F fare. Never been charged anything other than 25k in the past for this, including one I booked just a few days ago.
|
Originally Posted by HeadInTheClouds
(Post 31897104)
Just did another one now that is 17 days out. It came back as 27.5k miles. Not a huge deal at the moment, but clearly the clean “25k” saver first class domestic ticket is no more and some form of dynamic pricing is now at play here.
|
Originally Posted by YumYumcake
(Post 31900752)
Within 30 days or so you will pay a "close in booking fee" in miles. That's the extra 2.5K miles you see over the 25K. Look 30 days out and you should see the 25K awards.
Feels more like “dynamic” pricing. Again, this isn’t a big deal right now, but it’s a scary precedent. |
Just did another companion Polaris saver award to Europe, 120,000 miles. No problem and fairly quick. She kept apologizing for how long it was taking but the entire call was 6 minutes long.
|
Just got off with GS agent after trying to get companion saver first on two non-stop domestic one-way paid first tickets, AAA-BBB & BBB-AAA, separated by three days. After she did AAA-BBB, I gave her the PNR for BBB-AAA & she goes, "Oh, that's the return. As of December 12, we can only force saver for one way of a round-trip." So I said, "That's not a return of a round-trip ticket; it's a distinct one-way flight." So she goes, "I've got to call the global services benefits specialist. Please hold." Ten minutes later she comes back & says, "Even though two one-way tickets, according to GS specialist this is a return trip and only one way can force saver."
I didn't attempt a legalistic discussion of how to unambiguously define a particular one-way ticket as a "return". If this is really the new rule, it sucks. |
Originally Posted by physioprof
(Post 31915162)
Just got off with GS agent after trying to get companion saver first on two non-stop domestic one-way paid first tickets, AAA-BBB & BBB-AAA, separated by three days. After she did AAA-BBB, I gave her the PNR for BBB-AAA & she goes, "Oh, that's the return. As of December 12, we can only force saver for one way of a round-trip." So I said, "That's not a return of a round-trip ticket; it's a distinct one-way flight." So she goes, "I've got to call the global services benefits specialist. Please hold." Ten minutes later she comes back & says, "Even though two one-way tickets, according to GS specialist this is a return trip and only one way can force saver."
I didn't attempt a legalistic discussion of how to unambiguously define a particular one-way ticket as a "return". If this is really the new rule, it sucks. Or better yet Do each on separate phone calls. |
Originally Posted by Kleinnaf
(Post 31915190)
Huca.
Or better yet Do each on separate phone calls. |
Re-posting this from the 2019 thread - I wrote to GS about the following
Thank you for being a Global Service member and congratulations for your 2020 invite! I'm sorry to hear of the confusion over your benefits. I contacted a representative from the Global Service Department directly. Bullet #1. It is true that you are now limited to just 1 companion when converting T to XN class and you also have to be traveling. Bullet #2. When you purchase a roundtrip business ticket, our guidelines now state that we can "open up" only one segment in IN class. Bullet #3. You were advised correctly. The IN fare class pricing may change. It is part of what we call "dynamic pricing". We quote the amount of miles needed at the time of the request and this is subject to change. Bullet #4. We can process both YN/XN to PN. So, the statement "Saver award XN to PN using plus points has been eliminated" is not correct per 3 different Global Service agents. Bullet #5. Again, pricing may vary due to the dynamic pricing. My apologies again for the lengthy phone calls and possibly conflicting information. We do expect every member of our team to provide professional service and it sounds like we fell short. My apologies. Please let us know if we may be of further assistance. |
Originally Posted by physioprof
(Post 31915162)
Just got off with GS agent after trying to get companion saver first on two non-stop domestic one-way paid first tickets, AAA-BBB & BBB-AAA, separated by three days. After she did AAA-BBB, I gave her the PNR for BBB-AAA & she goes, "Oh, that's the return. As of December 12, we can only force saver for one way of a round-trip." So I said, "That's not a return of a round-trip ticket; it's a distinct one-way flight." So she goes, "I've got to call the global services benefits specialist. Please hold." Ten minutes later she comes back & says, "Even though two one-way tickets, according to GS specialist this is a return trip and only one way can force saver."
I didn't attempt a legalistic discussion of how to unambiguously define a particular one-way ticket as a "return". If this is really the new rule, it sucks. The fact that she said "first class" makes me wonder if this is only for domestic, as I have yet to have any agent give me pushback on international. If this is how it is for domestic, I guess I could live with it, though I'm not happy about it. At risk is just the extra change fees if I have to change them. If this is the case for international as well, then it is a HUGE devaluation of Global Services benefits. I also asked the first agent if it would matter if I did two one-ways instead. She said "I'm not really supposed to answer that". |
Do we know if the difficult responses are coming disproportionately from the ex-Continental agents, or have Detroit and Honolulu agents gone rogue as well? Would be a real shame if we lost those super-helpful agents
|
Originally Posted by chitraveler1975
(Post 31915725)
Do we know if the difficult responses are coming disproportionately from the ex-Continental agents, or have Detroit and Honolulu agents gone rogue as well? Would be a real shame if we lost those super-helpful agents
|
I had a question sent to regular GS-email CS. But answer came back from mileageplus CS, not GS CS as I had always experienced sofar.
A new procedure? |
So if you are flying RT aaa-bbb-ccc where ccc is in europe and all they will upgrade is bbb-ccc one way what happens for the rest? is it charged as a standard award or ?? Europe used to be 120 as a saver Biz. what would it be now?
|
Originally Posted by ua_sp_102366
(Post 31915290)
|
Originally Posted by cesco.g
(Post 31915890)
Many GS flyers are part of a family of 3 or 4, e.g. wife/husband and a couple of kids, so allowing T>XN for two or three pax is really in order. On top IME this happens only once or twice/year anyway on a family vacation. This is a very family-unfriendly policy & huge devaluation.
|
Originally Posted by PBIFLL
(Post 31915819)
So if you are flying RT aaa-bbb-ccc where ccc is in europe and all they will upgrade is bbb-ccc one way what happens for the rest? is it charged as a standard award or ?? Europe used to be 120 as a saver Biz. what would it be now?
For example, on a EWR-ATH-EWR trip I have this fall, the pricing for a companion on a paid fare was 120,000 miles. If this rule was enforced, it would have jumped to 215,000 miles (155+60). The standard award for the return is actually showing as 236,000 miles ONE-WAY ATH-EWR, but in this case I'd obviously prefer the cheaper standard award on the outbound and use the "force" for the more expensive return. Again if this holds, it's not only a massive devaluation, but would totally change whether I think fighting so hard for United to keep GS. Maybe united thinks GS will cough up the additional miles for companions, but instead I would just not take the trip in the first place, or fly economy. |
Originally Posted by LIH
(Post 31915901)
How many GS' aren't 1MM flyers though? My wife gets my GS status which usually solves this issue.
|
Originally Posted by villox
(Post 31915911)
This is what they're claiming. You'd either have to do an economy award with a Plus Points waitlist on the other leg, or buy a standard award, which with dynamic pricing...sky's the limit.
For example, on a EWR-ATH-EWR trip I have this fall, the pricing for a companion on a paid fare was 120,000 miles. If this rule was enforced, it would have jumped to 215,000 miles (155+60). The standard award for the return is actually showing as 236,000 miles ONE-WAY ATH-EWR, but in this case I'd obviously prefer the cheaper standard award on the outbound and use the "force" for the more expensive return. Again if this holds, it's not only a massive devaluation, but would totally change whether I think fighting so hard for United to keep GS. Maybe united thinks GS will cough up the additional miles for companions, but instead I would just not take the trip in the first place, or fly economy. |
Originally Posted by Kleinnaf
(Post 31915190)
Huca.
Or better yet Do each on separate phone calls. |
Originally Posted by LIH
(Post 31915901)
How many GS' aren't 1MM flyers though? My wife gets my GS status which usually solves this issue.
now. I only fly domestic routes.
Originally Posted by cesco.g
(Post 31915890)
Many GS flyers are part of a family of 3 or 4, e.g. wife/husband and a couple of kids, so allowing T>XN for two or three pax is really in order. On top IME this happens only once or twice/year anyway on a family vacation. This is a very family-unfriendly policy & huge devaluation.
|
Originally Posted by Chukiechz
(Post 31916186)
I think that’s been the policy for at least a year now. Got lucky with our 2019 summer vacations where savers were available without conversion.
More so, as I had instances where I would go ahead for work, then to be joined by family flying in on their own. MM GS spouse with two kids would not help either, even if spouse had the miles in her own account. |
the GS+1 has been the policy for a bit--its all these other stealth devaluations that are killing me.
When I flip through the 'mystatus' page, its the least descriptive I've found it in years. Stuff like you'll get your first choice meal is now 'When traveling in a premium cabin, our flight attendants will do their best to honor your first meal choice. " I can't find anything on the perk around rebooking when a flight is cancelled. in past years, it was pretty specific. I don't see it all now |
Originally Posted by physioprof
(Post 31916013)
I really like Mileage Plus as a HS. Last thing I want is to be seen as circumventing rules & kicked out. So I'm gonna suck it up & pay Everyday for half of my flights.
|
I have not received any new Pluspoints into my account for 2020. Should these already be posted?
I didn't fly that much in 2019, no need since I have lifetime GS. But in the past I have received 6 GPUs at the start of each year. Has there been any change in GS automatically getting the GPU/PP as part of requalification, regardless of whether you met the 1K requirements? |
Originally Posted by seacarl
(Post 31917432)
I have not received any new Pluspoints into my account for 2020. Should these already be posted?
I didn't fly that much in 2019, no need since I have lifetime GS. But in the past I have received 6 GPUs at the start of each year. Has there been any change in GS automatically getting the GPU/PP as part of requalification, regardless of whether you met the 1K requirements? Have not seen any reports of any Lifetime benefits have yet posted this year. |
Originally Posted by WineCountryUA
(Post 31917659)
Lifetime benefits have posted as late as the 2nd or 3rd week of January.
Have not seen any reports of any Lifetime benefits have yet posted this year. |
Originally Posted by seacarl
(Post 31918019)
Thanks for that information. Seems strange to do it late, given that they know early on that the benefits continue...
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 2:46 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.