Originally Posted by Duke787
(Post 27240168)
Yeah - I'm glad the food is good on the ground, that's absolutely wonderful. Unfortunately they don't serve the food on the ground so maybe they could do these trial runs you know up in the air where the food is actually served.
EDIT: Looks like they actually did run a trial flight EWR - CDG per AusBT http://www.ausbt.com.au/united-trial...k-paris-flight so I take it back. Glad they are trying food up in the air and not just on the ground (where it tastes nothing like it does up in the air). |
I'm low maintenance & in general just want a comfortable seat & good wine. However removing the hot appetizer really pushed my buttons & it still irritates me.
|
Originally Posted by Duke787
(Post 27240168)
Yeah - I'm glad the food is good on the ground, that's absolutely wonderful. Unfortunately they don't serve the food on the ground so maybe they could do these trial runs you know up in the air where the food is actually served.
EDIT: Looks like they actually did run a trial flight EWR - CDG per AusBT http://www.ausbt.com.au/united-trial...k-paris-flight so I take it back. Glad they are trying food up in the air and not just on the ground (where it tastes nothing like it does up in the air). They did do some in air testing earlier this year / late last year with customers while they were coming up with meal concepts - chartered a 747 from ORD-HNL. |
Originally Posted by cerealmarketer
(Post 27241933)
That publication missed that the 'flight' didn't go anywhere. It was on the ground at EWR with a mock destination.
They did do some in air testing earlier this year / late last year with customers while they were coming up with meal concepts - chartered a 747 from ORD-HNL. |
Originally Posted by AndyInSaigon
(Post 27240679)
+1
I'm low maintenance & in general just want a comfortable seat & good wine. However removing the hot appetizer really pushed my buttons & it still irritates me. Wine list surely has to improve. And, unless the appetizer is a salad, I'd prefer something that is heated. |
Originally Posted by AndyInSaigon
(Post 27240679)
+1
I'm low maintenance & in general just want a comfortable seat & good wine. However removing the hot appetizer really pushed my buttons & it still irritates me. That went away pretty quickly, early 2013 I believe.
Originally Posted by FlightNurse
(Post 27242460)
why would they charter a 747 when they have their own
|
Originally Posted by EWR764
(Post 27242509)
I'm a little more ambivalent on the hot appetizer... if it's along the lines of cheap frozen hors d'oeuvres, like what's served in GF these days, pass. I actually was a fan of the first round of cold appetizers on the sCO flights in 2012 or so, after the international premium cabin service was standardized. As I recall, there were two different cold apps served from trays on the three-tiered cart and plated seat-side. The apps were substantial in portion and reasonably high-quality.
That went away pretty quickly, early 2013 I believe. Not the mandate i would have gone with but explains the hotel passed hor d'oeuvres. Few other Polaris nuggets... EWR lounge attendants say the main C100s club will convert to Polaris next year, using the existing space. A new United Club will also open, not clear if it will be adjacent, above, or somewhere else. LAX attendants say no Polaris for 'a few years.' Saw on Twitter the UA head of rev mgmt. said at a conference the 763s will start converting in May. |
Are you talking about appetizer served just before the main dish or the heated nuts served with the first drinks?
What kind of hot appetizers are we talking about? I guess they have salads with cold deli meats or prawns. |
Originally Posted by wco81
(Post 27245098)
Are you talking about appetizer served just before the main dish or the heated nuts served with the first drinks?
What kind of hot appetizers are we talking about? I guess they have salads with cold deli meats or prawns. Served after the nuts in Global First. Used to be served in Business on CO at the same time. Also in my 763 timing reference above it was the head of network planning, not rev mgmt who say May is when they start. |
Showers
So the Polaris Lounges with have "spa-like showers." There will be one lounge open in 2016 with others to follow in 2017. They took away the arrivals access in Europe now(with the exception of LHR).
So for this year, one lounge and probably one plane with the Polaris seats. Time to shop around for me - likely to end the year at Platinum. On balance, more has been taken away this year than added. The timing is always interesting. Yes, the program can change at any time but so many changes have happened in the middle of a year that there's no reason to trust anything listed as a benefit. |
Originally Posted by FlyfromDenver
(Post 27264700)
They took away the arrivals access in Europe now(with the exception of LHR).
|
Originally Posted by cerealmarketer
(Post 27244593)
Few other Polaris nuggets... EWR lounge attendants say the main C100s club will convert to Polaris next year, using the existing space. A new United Club will also open, not clear if it will be adjacent, above, or somewhere else. LAX attendants say no Polaris for 'a few years.' Saw on Twitter the UA head of rev mgmt. said at a conference the 763s will start converting in May. |
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 27264773)
I was at IAH E club last week, and was told the third floor would be converted to Polaris.
|
Originally Posted by EWR764
(Post 27264893)
Makes sense. Plumbing already in place with the existing shower suites... I'd just be concerned about square footage up there for all Polaris pax.
|
Originally Posted by halls120
(Post 27264963)
Seems like there is a lot of "back office" space on the third floor that could be relocated.
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 pm. |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.