Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

"Horny" Passenger Allegedly Molested Women on UA Flight

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

"Horny" Passenger Allegedly Molested Women on UA Flight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 11, 2018, 12:49 pm
  #46  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: New York NY
Programs: UA Gold, CO Plat, CO Million Miler
Posts: 2,617
Originally Posted by Ditka


she was assaulted three times THEN brought it to the attention of the crew when it was resolved.
its dark, red eye flight at night-how could anyone know until she notified them? Is United now going to be required to do background checks on all the passengers? or have security guards with flash lights patrolling the planes?
The blame falls on FEDEX pilot and nobody else.
Are you serious?....the pilot had already acted inappropriately with a FA. OP says the guy is groping her and worse, and the FA she reported it to just says "talk to him." So she then turned to the purser who did help. But the FA should have acted then and there. And even thought the guy wasn't convicted, there was apparently sufficient evidence for the authorities to bring it to trial. We have FT members complaining that a FA ignores them when they make a request for something, and now we have something serious and the FA's lack of action is just explained away in one way or the other.
chavala and Aussienarelle like this.
hughw is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2018, 1:02 pm
  #47  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Miami, Florida
Programs: AA ExPlat, Hyatt Globalist, IHG Spire, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,009
Originally Posted by MSPeconomist
This wasn't just a "problem" that "was resolved." She was allegedly sexually assaulted three times. It's certainly not true that allowing her to change seats makes it like nothing ever happened.
Originally Posted by Ditka


she was assaulted three times THEN brought it to the attention of the crew when it was resolved.
its dark, red eye flight at night-how could anyone know until she notified them? Is United now going to be required to do background checks on all the passengers? or have security guards with flash lights patrolling the planes?
The blame falls on FEDEX pilot and nobody else.

Indeed. The passenger suffered no further damage after United became aware of the situation. The idea that United should have to pay out big money — or any money — is utterly preposterous.

Last edited by WineCountryUA; Jul 11, 2018 at 11:18 pm Reason: discuss the issue;not the poster(s)
joe_miami is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2018, 1:38 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Programs: SWA CP, UA MP, Hilton G, SPG G
Posts: 69
Originally Posted by hughw
Are you serious?....the pilot had already acted inappropriately with a FA. OP says the guy is groping her and worse, and the FA she reported it to just says "talk to him." So she then turned to the purser who did help. But the FA should have acted then and there. And even thought the guy wasn't convicted, there was apparently sufficient evidence for the authorities to bring it to trial. We have FT members complaining that a FA ignores them when they make a request for something, and now we have something serious and the FA's lack of action is just explained away in one way or the other.
was she attacked again after she brought it to the crew’s attention?
no.

what did she say to the first FA she spoke with? Did she say
”this man is bothering me” or did she say “this man physically assaulted me?” WORDS MATTER.

so tell me, where is United at fault here and when?


Ditka is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2018, 2:10 pm
  #49  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Programs: CO Silver, HHonors Gold, Marriott Silver
Posts: 982
Originally Posted by laxmillenial
So..let me see if I got this straight

July 2016 - Incident "allegedly" occurs
December 2016 - Criminal Lawsuit Filed
June 2017 - "Alleged assailant" acquitted of all charges
And now... July 2018 - Suing United? Sounds like a $$$ grab to me.
Typically in a case like this your lawsuit is to seek "redress" aka compensation for a harm that occurred. It takes time for the full ramifications of an event to be understood, so there's no rush to file a lawsuit until near the end of the statue of limitations, which is likely 2 years.

Think about it in a way where the injuries are more visible. A typical middle class American, with a solid job, is walking down the street and is hit by a car that is traveling at high speeds. The person who was walking sustains serious injuries. Perhaps they're in a coma, could be paralyzed, and might never work again.

At the time of the accident there are tons of things you don't know. How much will the medical bills be? What kind of long term care might you need? Will you be able to work again? Walk again? The idea in a civil suit is to give time, as much as allowed by law, to let as much of the harm be known so you know how much in damages to sue for.

By the way many health plans have subrogation clauses in them. This means that if you're harmed as a result of an accident and win a lawsuit, any costs paid for by the insurance plan must be repaid prior to you collecting any money. So the lawyer will get paid first, then any health insurance spending is recouped, and finally you get whatever's left. It's not an easy thing or for the faint of heart. Plus, you get the joy of reliving what will probably be one of the worst days of your life over and over again.
cmdinnyc is offline  
Old Jul 11, 2018, 2:56 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Programs: SWA CP, UA MP, Hilton G, SPG G
Posts: 69
Originally Posted by cmdinnyc
Typically in a case like this your lawsuit is to seek "redress" aka compensation for a harm that occurred. It takes time for the full ramifications of an event to be understood, so there's no rush to file a lawsuit until near the end of the statue of limitations, which is likely 2 years.

Think about it in a way where the injuries are more visible. A typical middle class American, with a solid job, is walking down the street and is hit by a car that is traveling at high speeds. The person who was walking sustains serious injuries. Perhaps they're in a coma, could be paralyzed, and might never work again.

At the time of the accident there are tons of things you don't know. How much will the medical bills be? What kind of long term care might you need? Will you be able to work again? Walk again? The idea in a civil suit is to give time, as much as allowed by law, to let as much of the harm be known so you know how much in damages to sue for.

By the way many health plans have subrogation clauses in them. This means that if you're harmed as a result of an accident and win a lawsuit, any costs paid for by the insurance plan must be repaid prior to you collecting any money. So the lawyer will get paid first, then any health insurance spending is recouped, and finally you get whatever's left. It's not an easy thing or for the faint of heart. Plus, you get the joy of reliving what will probably be one of the worst days of your life over and over again.
then that redress should be against the individual that harmed her...not united.
joe_miami likes this.
Ditka is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.