Adding an inflatable mattress pad to a Polaris seat?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SYD
Programs: UA GS, BA Gold, Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, IHG Gold, National Exec Elite, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,419
Adding an inflatable mattress pad to a Polaris seat?
Starting in the United forum since I'm trying to improve my sleep in Polaris business.
I just flew ANA in C on the 787-9 for the first time and had one of the best sleeps in C ever. I generally struggle to sleep on planes, even in C. NH provided a thicker and more comfortable sleeping pad (picture below). Most of my flying is on UA SYD-SFO, currently operated with a 787 in 2-2-2 C configuration. I find the seats too hard to sleep on for a long time. I'm fine for the first few hours, but then I get uncomfortable.
This got me thinking. What if I bring a self inflatable hiking mattress? I quite like the idea of a softer bed to sleep on. I'm mainly a long haul flier and bring a lot of stuff. Adding something bulky to my carry on is fine. These days, hiking mattresses are pretty small and lightweight.
Has anyone else thought of this, or tried it? How do the 2-2-2 and 1-2-1 seats compare for sleeping? According to United, both seats are 6'6" long, but differ in width: 20.6" vs. 23".
ANA sleeping pad.
I just flew ANA in C on the 787-9 for the first time and had one of the best sleeps in C ever. I generally struggle to sleep on planes, even in C. NH provided a thicker and more comfortable sleeping pad (picture below). Most of my flying is on UA SYD-SFO, currently operated with a 787 in 2-2-2 C configuration. I find the seats too hard to sleep on for a long time. I'm fine for the first few hours, but then I get uncomfortable.
This got me thinking. What if I bring a self inflatable hiking mattress? I quite like the idea of a softer bed to sleep on. I'm mainly a long haul flier and bring a lot of stuff. Adding something bulky to my carry on is fine. These days, hiking mattresses are pretty small and lightweight.
Has anyone else thought of this, or tried it? How do the 2-2-2 and 1-2-1 seats compare for sleeping? According to United, both seats are 6'6" long, but differ in width: 20.6" vs. 23".
ANA sleeping pad.
Last edited by flyerbjorn; Jun 3, 2018 at 7:20 pm
#2
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: LAX
Programs: UA MM | BA Silver
Posts: 7,193
#3
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
I also loved the NH mattress pad, wish more airlines provided something similar.
The Polaris seat is better cushioned than the B/E Diamond seat on the 788/9 (but not as well cushioned as the old sUA IPTE seat).
I could see one of the ultralight Thermarests (or similar) improving the cushioning, but note those things can be a little challenging to deflate in a confined space.
The Polaris seat is better cushioned than the B/E Diamond seat on the 788/9 (but not as well cushioned as the old sUA IPTE seat).
I could see one of the ultralight Thermarests (or similar) improving the cushioning, but note those things can be a little challenging to deflate in a confined space.
#4
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
#5
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,854
An older thread from Travel Products forum, Bring your own mattress pad onboard?, also mentions Thermarests
#6
I also loved the NH mattress pad, wish more airlines provided something similar.
The Polaris seat is better cushioned than the B/E Diamond seat on the 788/9 (but not as well cushioned as the old sUA IPTE seat).
I could see one of the ultralight Thermarests (or similar) improving the cushioning, but note those things can be a little challenging to deflate in a confined space.
The Polaris seat is better cushioned than the B/E Diamond seat on the 788/9 (but not as well cushioned as the old sUA IPTE seat).
I could see one of the ultralight Thermarests (or similar) improving the cushioning, but note those things can be a little challenging to deflate in a confined space.
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SYD
Programs: UA GS, BA Gold, Marriott Titanium/LT Plat, IHG Gold, National Exec Elite, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,419
Thanks for all the suggestions. This is starting to sound like a good idea, so I'll stop by a well stocked camping store later in the week. I'll make sure to try inflating and deflating before buying.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,406
You might also want to check with the TSA and ensure that whatever inflation mechanism it uses is allowed past the security checkpoint. Manual pumps are likely OK; compressed gases may not be.
#9
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
These products don't have inflation mechanisms. Lung power.
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,597
I have an Exped and my GF has a Sea to Summit, both are very easy to deflate and you can just stuff them into their tiny stuff sacks without having to roll them like a thermarest that has the internal foam. The Exped has a tiny little plastic stick tethered at the valve that you can use to lodge the valve open while deflating and packing it. They fit approximately into a volume a little larger around than a grande, and maybe a little taller than a grande and shorter than a venti.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11,461
I never felt the seat needed more padding, but especially in the new Polaris cabin, I think deflating is probably not too difficult. The trick is to roll it up, kneel on it, and then cap it. Then it slides back into its sleeve easily, and there is enough space to do that in the new seat. In the old seat, I imagine the legrest must be down to have enough space for that.
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
I think deflating is probably not too difficult. The trick is to roll it up, kneel on it, and then cap it. Then it slides back into its sleeve easily, and there is enough space to do that in the new seat. In the old seat, I imagine the legrest must be down to have enough space for that.
Interested in the pads mentioned by chrisl137, which sound considerably easier.
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 11,461
Don't know about you, but those last 20 minutes before arrival after an overnight, I am not at my best. This is when I leave stuff on airplanes (by mistake). Not sure I'd want to be battling a thermarest.
Interested in the pads mentioned by chrisl137, which sound considerably easier.
Interested in the pads mentioned by chrisl137, which sound considerably easier.
I'm not specifically familiar with the ones chrisl137 mentioned, but they sound similar to the ones REI sells (Airrail?). As long as there is a valve that can be manipulated, I think the packing procedure can be made relatively easy.
#14
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Programs: UA MM 1K, AA MM Gold, Marriott LT Platinum
Posts: 3,236
Just curious - if you use one of these on a seat in a lay-flat, non-Polaris aisle seat next to a window seat (e.g., "B" or "K" seat on a PMCO 772), would this make it harder for the passenger by the window to step over you to get out of their seat while you're sleeping?
Obviously not an issue with Polaris, all-aisle-access, seats.
Obviously not an issue with Polaris, all-aisle-access, seats.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 12,597
ETA: here's an example with stowed and deployed dimensions
Last edited by chrisl137; Jun 4, 2018 at 8:47 am Reason: add link to example pad