Delayed due to”pressurization”?
#1
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,934
Delayed due to”pressurization”?
UA483. ORD-PHX. That is exactly what the FA said. Crew left so they could pressurize the plane. Exact quote.
Currently 40 minutes at least. Crew left with zero sense of urgency.
Currently 40 minutes at least. Crew left with zero sense of urgency.
Can anyone translate what might be going on? Maybe “testing” the pressurization.
A big sign at our gate says “#1 in on-time departures. We’re so predictable.”
A big sign at our gate says “#1 in on-time departures. We’re so predictable.”
Last edited by milepig; May 9, 2018 at 6:57 pm
#2
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,343
I'd take it at face value, they're doing a pressure test on the plane to diagnose or confirm resolution of a pressurization issue. Probably on the inflow or outflow side, rather than a hull issue.
#3




Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Anchorage, AK
Programs: CO - Onepass Gold--> UA - MileagePlus Gold --> Silver --> AS - MileagePlan MVPGold --> MVPG75k!
Posts: 814
Greetings from a real, live airline mechanic!
When we have to do this at the gate, it's usually the result of a crew writing up a door squeal (air leaking out), or similar thing.
Otherwise, if a component went bad in flight (outflow valve, or control module), it will also require an operational check before flight is allowed.
Fortunately, it doesn't usually take very long. But then there's paperwork, so........
When we have to do this at the gate, it's usually the result of a crew writing up a door squeal (air leaking out), or similar thing.
Otherwise, if a component went bad in flight (outflow valve, or control module), it will also require an operational check before flight is allowed.
Fortunately, it doesn't usually take very long. But then there's paperwork, so........
#4
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,934
Greetings from a real, live airline mechanic!
When we have to do this at the gate, it's usually the result of a crew writing up a door squeal (air leaking out), or similar thing.
Otherwise, if a component went bad in flight (outflow valve, or control module), it will also require an operational check before flight is allowed.
Fortunately, it doesn't usually take very long. But then there's paperwork, so........
When we have to do this at the gate, it's usually the result of a crew writing up a door squeal (air leaking out), or similar thing.
Otherwise, if a component went bad in flight (outflow valve, or control module), it will also require an operational check before flight is allowed.
Fortunately, it doesn't usually take very long. But then there's paperwork, so........
#5




Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 209
#6
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: Mileage Plus 1K; Marriott Platinum; Hilton Gold
Posts: 6,355
Whenever I'm delayed for a mechanical repair, I consider how fortunate I am to have been on an airline that was able to catch any such issue before it blew up into something potentially much worse. Think about the alternative scenario to having waited to fix a mechanical problem at the gate, and you'll soon see the bright side to your delay.
#7
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,253
Better than a permanent delay if the aircraft did in fact have a leaky seal (cockpit window perhaps?) and that caused an inflight emergency which could not be controlled.
The reason why commercial aviation is so safe in this country is that there is zero tolerance for what even remotely might be a problem. I'll take OP's delay any day of the week over a slapdash effort focusing too much on schedule.
The reason why commercial aviation is so safe in this country is that there is zero tolerance for what even remotely might be a problem. I'll take OP's delay any day of the week over a slapdash effort focusing too much on schedule.
#8

Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: LAX/FAO
Posts: 356
Whenever I'm delayed for a mechanical repair, I consider how fortunate I am to have been on an airline that was able to catch any such issue before it blew up into something potentially much worse. Think about the alternative scenario to having waited to fix a mechanical problem at the gate, and you'll soon see the bright side to your delay.
Better than a permanent delay if the aircraft did in fact have a leaky seal (cockpit window perhaps?) and that caused an inflight emergency which could not be controlled.
The reason why commercial aviation is so safe in this country is that there is zero tolerance for what even remotely might be a problem. I'll take OP's delay any day of the week over a slapdash effort focusing too much on schedule.
The reason why commercial aviation is so safe in this country is that there is zero tolerance for what even remotely might be a problem. I'll take OP's delay any day of the week over a slapdash effort focusing too much on schedule.
#9
Original Poster
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 16,934
Less than a month after WN1380, if a crew member mentioned they were checking or fixing the pressurization system, I would expect every passenger to say, “take all the time you need!” Actually I feel that way about any mechanical delay or crew rest issue, no matter how inconvenient.
#10


Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kalispell MT
Programs: UA 4MM, Lifetime GS, Lifetime UC, Lifetime Marriott Platinum, CMEL pilot
Posts: 204
I hope the ORD mechanics fixed it right; I'm flying out of PHX on that bird in the morning...

