EWR Pilot base for Boeing 787-10 (under consideration)
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: UA MileagePlus 2MM
Posts: 1,567
EWR Pilot base for Boeing 787-10 (under consideration)
Boeing 787-10 to have an EWR pilot base - sort of makes sense, Remember, the 77W was supposed to be mainly EWR-based until the it was decided that the 744 retirement was moved forward, I believe twice. Newark is bursting at the seams and could definitely use maybe two flight to Frankfurt and maybe just one to CDG, for example. And larger planes to LHR. Whether any of this happens remains to be seen but curious what others think....
#6
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, Marriott Bonvoy Gold; Avis PC
Posts: 9,005
Andrew Nocella said the EWR Polaris club would be open in May, and that turned out to be untrue. Perhaps not worth putting too much stock into what UA execs say - trust in the press releases instead
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: UA MileagePlus 2MM
Posts: 1,567
Well the Polaris Lounge at EWR is opening in June, according to whether you believe UA press releases. So a month late which in annals of NYC/NJ interior contractor work is a bit of a yawn.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Programs: United, American, Delta, Hyatt, Hilton, Hertz, Marriott
Posts: 14,804
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
That's a month late after pushing how far from the original plan? Remember that the 2016 Polaris product launch had multiple lounges (including EWR) in 2017. It is very, very late. And it isn't a NYC construction problem.
#13
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, Marriott Bonvoy Gold; Avis PC
Posts: 9,005
#14
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,453
The United pilot agreement requires the company to issue a Notice of Proposed Decision Making ("NPDM") any time the company intends to make a decision on allocation of flying. The NPDM is an administrative process which gives ALPA the opportunity to review and comment on the company's proposal, based on the issues the company is trying to address. I haven't seen anything personally, but reportedly an NPDM was issued for the opening of a 787 domicile in Newark by Spring 2019, ostensibly for the forthcoming 787-10 fleet, and the closure of the LAX 777 domicile, which will be substantially replaced by additional 787 positions.
EWR 787 seems to be targeted primarily at Europe.
I wouldn't count that out just yet... let's see where we are by the end of May.
EWR 787 seems to be targeted primarily at Europe.
I wouldn't count that out just yet... let's see where we are by the end of May.
Last edited by EWR764; Apr 29, 2018 at 7:07 pm
#15
Original Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Programs: UA MileagePlus 2MM
Posts: 1,567
It is significantly further than the 757 flies. And it is even more significantly larger. The 787-10 is about replacing the 767-400 or 777-200 (non-ER) more than anything else.
That's a month late after pushing how far from the original plan? Remember that the 2016 Polaris product launch had multiple lounges (including EWR) in 2017. It is very, very late. And it isn't a NYC construction problem.
That's a month late after pushing how far from the original plan? Remember that the 2016 Polaris product launch had multiple lounges (including EWR) in 2017. It is very, very late. And it isn't a NYC construction problem.
So ok, we've encountered these delays from over-optimistic initial projections from United. At a certain point we all have to move on and find closure from the disappointments and heart breaks in life. Or do we wish Polaris had never been launched?
Is United perfect? No.
Is Newark perfect? No.
I did say NYC/NJ contractors.
I started this thread about a rumored 787-10 pilot base which appeared on airliners.net and disappeared within 10 minutes - a direct quote from a UA Exec (title I don't remember) but something to do with fleet planning. Although unconfirmed, I thought the possibility of getting the 787-10 into Newark might be a development avgeeks might find positive.
It's a tough crowd.