Gate Agents filling E+ before E- with BG5 and Standbys?
#31
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: PDX
Programs: AA LT PLT (3.6+ MM), UA 1K LT Gold, Hilton LT Diamond, Bonvoy Gold.
Posts: 1,662
This is an increasing annoyance, and it drives me crazy. Also it appears that GA's just dump non-revs, BG5's and standby's on a totally random basis. And this is a charitable view, the more cynical side says they do the following on purpose.... For instance, still seats in E-, but let's plop a standby into the first available middle E+ seat, between a 1K and a GS (happened earlier this week, GS is a friend), whilst behind me I can hear 2 people who lucked into E+ from BG5 and the plane went out with an empty seat between those 2 passengers. That just doesn't make any sense to me, and I see variations on this happening more and more often....
#32
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,889
Think of how many people decline even reasonable offers for first class upgrades for the chance of getting CPU when it's good and they don't care. I feel that if there is *ever* a step in which economy plus is offered for free, it'll become well known and people will wait for it instead of buying it. It's like us silvers waiting until T-24 for it.
I believe they don't do this because it gives the GA some flexibility. What if you're on a separate itin than someone and you're both un-assigned because E is full, yet E+ isn't and one of you is *Gold and one of you isn't. Having some seats available gives the GA some leeway. Even if there aren't two seats available, the GA can compromise and say well you're one row behind in a middle seat, etc etc.
Imagine the next headlines "United booked plane so full I couldn't sit next to my grandmother for 4 hours" or "United didn't let me sit next to my wife and instead let this stranger"
Imagine the next headlines "United booked plane so full I couldn't sit next to my grandmother for 4 hours" or "United didn't let me sit next to my wife and instead let this stranger"
As I said in Post #16 (which was in direct response to your previous comment): They Already Do This!
My understanding based on the reports in the BE threads are that they have done this for elites in BE. I'm talking about others - non-elite pax paying the highest fares, or *G pax.
#33
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PWM
Programs: AA Plat
Posts: 1,335
There will be instances where the only seats available for customers who purchased Basic Economy are Economy Plus seats. In order to minimize this occurrence, we are working on a few initiatives that will help to identify high-value customers with a standard Economy ticket. We can then offer a free Economy Plus seat to these customers prior to the check-in window opening in order to free up seats in economy for customers who purchased a Basic Economy ticket.
#34
Moderator: United Airlines
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SFO
Programs: UA Plat 1.995MM, Hyatt Discoverist, Marriott Plat/LT Gold, Hilton Silver, IHG Plat
Posts: 66,854
#35
Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2018
Programs: UA Premier Silver
Posts: 311
Not really like waiting until T-24. I agree folks might decline a paid offer if they think they might get the same thing for free. But chances are that someone will get it for free anyway, so would be better to give to *G or high-fare paying pax then a BE pax who, in many (but I know, not all) cases will just as well fly DL, AA, or even Spirit for their next trip if its $1 cheaper. And it wouldn't be 'well-known' because the offer will be variable based on specific loads, and how many people they need to put there. So one flight might not need anyone, while another could need to make the offer to, say, 20 people.
The other thing to consider is that some premiers book rows in E+ that are unlikely to have a middle seat filled for a reason - they want the middle seat open. If you start giving that seat free to people who haven't earned it in any way other than buying a flexible economy ticket, it devalues premier even more.
edit to make clearer: I don't think people should be given random benefits above and beyond what they earn, at least so long as economy plus is given as one of the few benefits of low level Premier status. I'd rather it be fully random who is assigned to E+ for free (with maybe some targeted offers for Y/B/M fares like AC does) than have non-premiers be getting it simply because they booked a high dollar ticket. You have to also remember that the bar for Premier Silver is pretty low - someone on a high dollar or flexible fare who isn't Premier either just started flying United or (more likely) picks the lowest cost ticket and isn't loyal to United either.
#36
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PWM
Programs: AA Plat
Posts: 1,335
Oh I see. Thought that was assumed (since the whole point is to keep BE people trapped in the back) but I will rephrase:
Currently all RE UA elites get blue seats
The problem is sometimes RE people fill up all the white seats and then BE pax get autofilled into blue seats
UA's current solution is to (occasionally?) offer free blue to seats to non-elite HVCs on full fare tickets
(Personally I think this program should be expanded but who knows the BE loads? It might only be 5 ppl / flight)
The presumed goal is to ensure that BE pax of any status are always seated in white seats (hopefully middles!) and never blue seats
Personally I thought BE was a catastrophically stupid idea from it's inception (well, even prior to) but if you want to punish customers, you better do it fairly!!!
Currently all RE UA elites get blue seats
The problem is sometimes RE people fill up all the white seats and then BE pax get autofilled into blue seats
UA's current solution is to (occasionally?) offer free blue to seats to non-elite HVCs on full fare tickets
(Personally I think this program should be expanded but who knows the BE loads? It might only be 5 ppl / flight)
The presumed goal is to ensure that BE pax of any status are always seated in white seats (hopefully middles!) and never blue seats
Personally I thought BE was a catastrophically stupid idea from it's inception (well, even prior to) but if you want to punish customers, you better do it fairly!!!
#37
Join Date: Jun 2016
Programs: UA 1K, National Executive Elite, Marriott Gold, Hertz President's Circle
Posts: 65
This happens on a lot of leisure routes where a lot of pax buy BE tickets. Case in point, my EWR-LAS on a Saturday a few weeks ago had about a 40% load in economy up until T-24 hours, with about 8 total assigned seats in E+.
By the time of boarding, E- and E+ were almost completely full. I asked the guy sitting next to me, a seat that was empty up until a few hours before boarding, if he was BE. He was.
By the time of boarding, E- and E+ were almost completely full. I asked the guy sitting next to me, a seat that was empty up until a few hours before boarding, if he was BE. He was.
#38
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: CO
Programs: UA OG-1K, Marriott Plat, Hertz PC
Posts: 1,360
It is weird that it seems like UA over-promises and under-delivers for elites (CPU and RPUs come to mind) while for BE they have all kinds of warnings about how it will suck, and they end up under-promising and over-delivering. And actually the standard E- people are the ones that get really screwed- they paid to get a seat and for a percentage of the time it is worse than the BE seat someone gets.
#39
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: PWM
Programs: AA Plat
Posts: 1,335
This happens on a lot of leisure routes where a lot of pax buy BE tickets. Case in point, my EWR-LAS on a Saturday a few weeks ago had about a 40% load in economy up until T-24 hours, with about 8 total assigned seats in E+.
By the time of boarding, E- and E+ were almost completely full. I asked the guy sitting next to me, a seat that was empty up until a few hours before boarding, if he was BE. He was.
By the time of boarding, E- and E+ were almost completely full. I asked the guy sitting next to me, a seat that was empty up until a few hours before boarding, if he was BE. He was.