Last edit by: WineCountryUA
UA has started installing Premium Plus / Premium Economy seats in 772s and 773s. Other long haul aircraft will also be receiving these new seats.
For 77x it is a 2-4-2 (vs economy 3-4-3) with 3 rows - 24 seats
For 76x it is believe it will be 2-2-2 (vs 2-3-2) with 3 rows ( and maybe a partial row) - 22 seats
For 78x it is believed it will be 2-3-2 (vs 3-3-3) with 3 rows - 21 seats
UA has not yet started selling this new cabin but has restructured its fare class -- which appears to be in preparation of selling the new cabin (and removed 3-class F)
In the meantime, the Premium Plus cabin is being treated as an extension of E+ and those with E+ access can select the new seats.
In many cases UA is initially using an interim seat maps, such as https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1926142-interim-772-seat-map-polaris-potentially-premium-economy-2018-a.html
Things start to firm up about 2 days prior but last minute changes can happen
For 77x it is a 2-4-2 (vs economy 3-4-3) with 3 rows - 24 seats
For 76x it is believe it will be 2-2-2 (vs 2-3-2) with 3 rows ( and maybe a partial row) - 22 seats
For 78x it is believed it will be 2-3-2 (vs 3-3-3) with 3 rows - 21 seats
UA has not yet started selling this new cabin but has restructured its fare class -- which appears to be in preparation of selling the new cabin (and removed 3-class F)
In the meantime, the Premium Plus cabin is being treated as an extension of E+ and those with E+ access can select the new seats.
In many cases UA is initially using an interim seat maps, such as https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1926142-interim-772-seat-map-polaris-potentially-premium-economy-2018-a.html
Things start to firm up about 2 days prior but last minute changes can happen
Real Premium Economy is Coming [Update: UA studying "Real" Prem Y in domestic market]
#511
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
If the changes make the company more profits then the work gets done faster. You think they care about customer comfort? Ha!
#513
Formerly known as caveruner17
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: ORD
Posts: 432
Honestly, it should be. The whole Y+ thing is pretty dumb at the moment. My last few UA flights, Y was packed to the gills and Y+ was not even half-full. Heck, I paid like $30 to upgrade to Y+ on a late night DEN-PHX flight and ended up getting the entire row to myself (poor man's flatbed). IMHO, there's too many Y+ seats on a lot of their fleet.
#514
Join Date: Oct 2006
Programs: UA: 1K, Hyatt: Diamond
Posts: 65
"United Continental Holdings Inc. is considering whether to add an upgraded economy section to U.S. flights -- a feature typically reserved for overseas markets."
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...mestic-markets
My guess is this is for the 772-HD going to Hawaii and on PS routes. Makes sense, if it's 10-across in the back.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...mestic-markets
My guess is this is for the 772-HD going to Hawaii and on PS routes. Makes sense, if it's 10-across in the back.
#515
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 215
Honestly, it should be. The whole Y+ thing is pretty dumb at the moment. My last few UA flights, Y was packed to the gills and Y+ was not even half-full. Heck, I paid like $30 to upgrade to Y+ on a late night DEN-PHX flight and ended up getting the entire row to myself (poor man's flatbed). IMHO, there's too many Y+ seats on a lot of their fleet.
#516
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,406
Honestly, it should be. The whole Y+ thing is pretty dumb at the moment. My last few UA flights, Y was packed to the gills and Y+ was not even half-full. Heck, I paid like $30 to upgrade to Y+ on a late night DEN-PHX flight and ended up getting the entire row to myself (poor man's flatbed). IMHO, there's too many Y+ seats on a lot of their fleet.
The ability to select E+ at booking has been a major reason that I've stayed with UA. Going to a DL-style system would make me seriously reconsider that. I'm simply not interested in flying in E- for anything longer than about an hour.
#517
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,452
they are rolling it out on the 787-10 first per earlier reporting. Obviously those come from the factory preconfigured with PE
the debate is about refurbs. Given the IPTE 777s are getting Polaris only this year into 2019, will those ever see PE realistically in their lifetime? Same with the IPTE 767s
perhaps some of the PMCO 772s get PE with Polaris mods. But not beginning before 2019.
the 789s? 2022? 788s never?
the labor may be easy but constructing Polaris lounges is a comparative piece of cake and where are we 21 months post announcement? 1 lounge.
Jamming in more seats on a plane to drive down per seat cost has huge motivation to be done quick. Enhancing the customer experience types of projects much less so.
It's reasonable to be skeptical (jaded, too) about United's ability to execute ANYTHING these days, but the objective facts about the difference between the three programs we discuss make a different outcome a reasonable expectation.
Make no mistake, PE is not about an 'enhancement' to the customer experience. It's about extracting more revenue from a cohort of travelers who are not revenue business class customers either due to corporate policy or personal discretion. The fact that United largely does not capture this segment at the moment makes an expeditious rollout the product (and thereby being able to sell it on a broader basis) more important. OTOH, a new business class product is more about retaining an existing, profitable segment of customers rather than generating new revenue. On paper, it sounds nice to posit that an improved business class product will lead to a revenue premium, but in reality, that's not often the case. I think a PE product can offer a faster ROI.
Honestly, it should be. The whole Y+ thing is pretty dumb at the moment. My last few UA flights, Y was packed to the gills and Y+ was not even half-full. Heck, I paid like $30 to upgrade to Y+ on a late night DEN-PHX flight and ended up getting the entire row to myself (poor man's flatbed). IMHO, there's too many Y+ seats on a lot of their fleet.
Let's hope he doesn't try to fix what ain't broke...
#518
Join Date: Feb 2015
Programs: united
Posts: 1,636
....? They don't give discounts on upgrades to J. I doubt they'll give discounts on upgrades to P+. Why would that be "fair?" There's nothing in the current elite benefits that promise discounted upgrades. I also doubt it would be smart, because they'd be cannibalizing their own fare structure by discounting the price for exactly the people they expect to buy it. By the same token, there is zero reason to think that it would be free for 1K/GS.
This is a niche product. Where airlines have been successful with it, they've only had a few rows of it. If they're moving a whole bunch of people into the seats for free, they're going to find it unprofitable and rip it back out.
This is a niche product. Where airlines have been successful with it, they've only had a few rows of it. If they're moving a whole bunch of people into the seats for free, they're going to find it unprofitable and rip it back out.
I think you have this backwards. The Polaris business class cabin retrofits and lounge buildouts are completely different animals.
It's reasonable to be skeptical (jaded, too) about United's ability to execute ANYTHING these days, but the objective facts about the difference between the three programs we discuss make a different outcome a reasonable expectation.
Make no mistake, PE is not about an 'enhancement' to the customer experience. It's about extracting more revenue from a cohort of travelers who are not revenue business class customers either due to corporate policy or personal discretion. The fact that United largely does not capture this segment at the moment makes an expeditious rollout the product (and thereby being able to sell it on a broader basis) more important. OTOH, a new business class product is more about retaining an existing, profitable segment of customers rather than generating new revenue. On paper, it sounds nice to posit that an improved business class product will lead to a revenue premium, but in reality, that's not often the case.
It's reasonable to be skeptical (jaded, too) about United's ability to execute ANYTHING these days, but the objective facts about the difference between the three programs we discuss make a different outcome a reasonable expectation.
Make no mistake, PE is not about an 'enhancement' to the customer experience. It's about extracting more revenue from a cohort of travelers who are not revenue business class customers either due to corporate policy or personal discretion. The fact that United largely does not capture this segment at the moment makes an expeditious rollout the product (and thereby being able to sell it on a broader basis) more important. OTOH, a new business class product is more about retaining an existing, profitable segment of customers rather than generating new revenue. On paper, it sounds nice to posit that an improved business class product will lead to a revenue premium, but in reality, that's not often the case.
#519
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ORD
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Platinum/LT Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 5,594
Even if they made it like E+, but only for 1K's, that a HUGE downgrade for Plats and lower, who may very well be sitting in E-. And I'm guessing there are a lot more Plat thru Silver to piss off than there are 1K's and GS.
#520
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,174
I think you have this backwards. The Polaris business class cabin retrofits and lounge buildouts are completely different animals.
It's reasonable to be skeptical (jaded, too) about United's ability to execute ANYTHING these days, but the objective facts about the difference between the three programs we discuss make a different outcome a reasonable expectation.
Make no mistake, PE is not about an 'enhancement' to the customer experience. It's about extracting more revenue from a cohort of travelers who are not revenue business class customers either due to corporate policy or personal discretion. The fact that United largely does not capture this segment at the moment makes an expeditious rollout the product (and thereby being able to sell it on a broader basis) more important. OTOH, a new business class product is more about retaining an existing, profitable segment of customers rather than generating new revenue. On paper, it sounds nice to posit that an improved business class product will lead to a revenue premium, but in reality, that's not often the case. I think a PE product can offer a faster ROI....
It's reasonable to be skeptical (jaded, too) about United's ability to execute ANYTHING these days, but the objective facts about the difference between the three programs we discuss make a different outcome a reasonable expectation.
Make no mistake, PE is not about an 'enhancement' to the customer experience. It's about extracting more revenue from a cohort of travelers who are not revenue business class customers either due to corporate policy or personal discretion. The fact that United largely does not capture this segment at the moment makes an expeditious rollout the product (and thereby being able to sell it on a broader basis) more important. OTOH, a new business class product is more about retaining an existing, profitable segment of customers rather than generating new revenue. On paper, it sounds nice to posit that an improved business class product will lead to a revenue premium, but in reality, that's not often the case. I think a PE product can offer a faster ROI....
Re PE, the proof will be in the pudding - when will they have PE to SIN (SQ direct compete), HKG (CX direct compete), and LHR (BA direct compete). Perhaps the 787-10 can replace the 789's to SIN, but what about the Polaris infused 77Ws plying SFO-HKG or IPTE 777s running to LHR? Are they going to use a 787-10 for those too?
If they don't have these specific direct compete routes up and running in the fall at launch then everything else ("extracting value...does not capture this segment at the moment") is just blowing smoke. .If you have specifics here please advise.
#521
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: MIA
Programs: AA EXP (AC), DL G (SC), Bonvoy LTP, & IHG AMB
Posts: 1,798
If anything, I suspect UA's Y+ will first start to mimic AA's MCE with AA Golds receiving 50% discount on MCE price at booking. I have to think Kirby is salivating over the prospect of allowing comp Y+ at booking for GS/1K, 75% discount for Plat, 50% for Gold, and 25% for Silver. As for PE, UA will follow DL's lead. As soon as DL makes upgrade instruments from Y book to Comfort Plus, UA will follow.
Race to the top... FOR REVENUE
Race to the top... FOR REVENUE
#522
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,452
I think one reason UA is waiting until fall to officially launch the product is to take advantage of the downtime in the widebody fleet to accomplish the retrofits. Once a STC is achieved, installation of PE cabins takes hours to a few days, not the multiple weeks of a full-gut cabin mod.
Like I said, UA has earned well its reputation as an industry laggard and worked hard for the scorn of its customers. But to extrapolate the Polaris lounge buildout and major cabin mods into an expectation that the PE rollout will ALSO be interminably slow doesn't exactly line up with reality. It's sort of like a gambler's fallacy, but of course, time will tell. What's also a truism is that no matter the pace of retrofits, it will be unacceptably slow for some, especially to the extent the product isn't available on one's route on one's day of travel.
Last edited by EWR764; Mar 13, 2018 at 6:06 pm
#523
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: SFO
Programs: BART Platinum, AA Plat Pro
Posts: 1,158
78J doesn't have the range for SFO-SIN, let alone LAX-SIN. It doesn't even really have the range for SFO-HKG. I guess they could fly via NRT again. The whole point of the 78J is that it trades range for passengers vis a vis the 789 (which itself doesn't even really have the range for SIN).
#524
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,174
I think one reason UA is waiting until fall to officially launch the product is to take advantage of the downtime in the widebody fleet to accomplish the retrofits. Once a STC is achieved, installation of PE cabins takes hours to a few days, not the multiple weeks of a full-gut cabin mod.
But to extrapolate the Polaris lounge buildout and major cabin mods into an expectation that the PE rollout will ALSO be interminably slow doesn't exactly line up with reality.
What's also a truism is that no matter the pace of retrofits, it will be unacceptably slow for some, especially to the extent the product isn't available on one's route on one's day of travel.
#525
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
They are a different reality from what it will take to swap PremY into the planes. AA's J upgrades were slow. Not as slow as Polaris (because they didn't have the same deferred MX issues) but relatively slow. The AA PremY install was smoking fast. It is a different beast of a project. That doesn't guarantee that UA's will be similarly fast, of course, but it can be. Projecting one timeline from the other is not a rational decision.
Those are "your" routes, though.
UA also faces direct competition to CDG with PE. And to FCO. And to NRT. And to SYD. And to ICN. And to TLV. And to lots of other airports. You cherry-picked three but there are dozens of destinations served by PremY today where UA competes directly without it.
The first 4 planes - the 78Js - will go on some routes and they'll bring UA's PremY competition to those routes. I wouldn't be entirely surprised for them to be on JV routes where the partner also has PremY. And then the others will roll out with some pace and eventually the 767s and 777s and other 787s will get them, likely 3 rows each.
If they don't have these specific direct compete routes up and running in the fall at launch then everything else ("extracting value...does not capture this segment at the moment") is just blowing smoke.
UA also faces direct competition to CDG with PE. And to FCO. And to NRT. And to SYD. And to ICN. And to TLV. And to lots of other airports. You cherry-picked three but there are dozens of destinations served by PremY today where UA competes directly without it.
The first 4 planes - the 78Js - will go on some routes and they'll bring UA's PremY competition to those routes. I wouldn't be entirely surprised for them to be on JV routes where the partner also has PremY. And then the others will roll out with some pace and eventually the 767s and 777s and other 787s will get them, likely 3 rows each.