Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Why so little service NYC-LON?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2017, 2:55 pm
  #46  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LAX
Programs: United Two Million Miler; United 1K, Hilton Lifetime Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 568
Let's also remember that taxes and surcharges in London are higher than elsewhere in Europe. I am happy to find another city to connect in rather than London. I will fly to London only if I plan to stay in England.

Perhaps United is actually doing something smart for a change by focusing only on O/D at LHR.
bloodyeyeballs is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2017, 3:31 pm
  #47  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4éme
Posts: 12,042
Originally Posted by hirohito888


Moreover, flights from US connecting in FRA/MUC do not need to go through security again in FRA/MUC, you leave the plane airside post-security, which saves a lot of time compared to the security nonsense at LHR.
Sounds like you haven't made Z to B connection at FRA.
TomMM is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2017, 4:10 pm
  #48  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dulles, VA
Programs: UA Life Gold, Marriott Life Titanium
Posts: 2,757
Originally Posted by TomMM
Sounds like you haven't made Z to B connection at FRA.
FRA can be a pain to connect due to size, but you don't generally have to go through security theater for a US to non-Schengen connection there. Zurich is really easy, but with a lot less onward flight options. Munich is better than Frankfurt, plus other *A options like Brussels and Copenhagen
catocony is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2017, 4:16 pm
  #49  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4éme
Posts: 12,042
Originally Posted by catocony
FRA can be a pain to connect due to size, but you don't generally have to go through security theater for a US to non-Schengen connection there. Zurich is really easy, but with a lot less onward flight options. Munich is better than Frankfurt, plus other *A options like Brussels and Copenhagen
Sounds like you haven't made many US to non-Schengen connections at FRA.
TomMM is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2017, 4:29 pm
  #50  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,770
Originally Posted by bloodyeyeballs
Let's also remember that taxes and surcharges in London are higher than elsewhere in Europe. I am happy to find another city to connect in rather than London. I will fly to London only if I plan to stay in England.
Your point doesn't make much sense from the tax perspective. The main tax difference between LON and other European gateways is UK APD, which is about $200 for premium class departures ex-LON. However that tax isn't payable if connecting in LON.
Ldnn1 is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2017, 4:34 pm
  #51  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wesseling, NRW, Germany
Programs: UA *S , MR LT Titanium, HH Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,940
Originally Posted by TomMM
Sounds like you haven't made many US to non-Schengen connections at FRA.
While I also have not personally made many of these connections in FRA I know my way around there pretty well, and from that I am pretty certain that there is NO security necessary from Z to B - unless you do not follow the right path.

Coming from non-Schengen B to Z is a different animal, though - this requires an additional security check.

Greetings - Dirk
djohannw is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2017, 6:03 pm
  #52  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA *G 1MM LT United Club & Global Entry
Posts: 2,756
Originally Posted by bloodyeyeballs
Let's also remember that taxes and surcharges in London are higher than elsewhere in Europe. I am happy to find another city to connect in rather than London. I will fly to London only if I plan to stay in England.
With connecting flights at LHR the taxes are only nominally higher when compared to connecting at continental airports like FRA and CDG. When LHR is your departure origin is when the tax burden increases dramatically.

Originally Posted by worldwidedreamer
Plus it must be more biased towards O/D traffic due to the lack of a *A hub at LHR.
Have you been to LHR T2 lately?


SL
SunLover is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2017, 6:41 pm
  #53  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Originally Posted by IggySD
Because UA retreated from this market several years ago. They used to be competitive with AA (several years ago AA and BA flights JFK-LHR were not eligible for code shares / award redemptions on the non metal carrier) and DL was far behind with mostly LGW slots. The other two airlines did what was necessary to increase their presence in the market, UA did not (or was unable to). Although the final JFK surrender occurred during the Smisek regime I do recall this capitulation had its origins prior to the merger.
Good memory; UA abandoned NYC-LON. After emerging from Ch 11, UA lost over $100 million in the first half of 2006. UA was not winning in the JFK-LON market, and thus sold its NYC-LON route to Delta for $21 million in July, 2006.

Of course, Delta could not fly to Heathrow (Bermuda ll) and thus UA moved its JFK-LHR slots to other hubs while DL flew to LGW until open skies in early 2008 when it and all other airlines could buy LHR slots.

BA and AA owned the NYC-LON market, and it made sense for UA to reallocate its LHR slots elsewhere. It re-entered the NYC-LHR market with the CO merger, and its current service is probably right-sized for Newark-LHR. BA/AA and DL/VS own the NYC-LON market, so why upsize the capacity when it would probably generate losses?
FWAAA is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2017, 7:08 pm
  #54  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Gold
Posts: 12,693
Originally Posted by Ldnn1
However that tax isn't payable if connecting in LON.
UA isn't the most accurate for calculating the correct APD.
mduell is offline  
Old Aug 1, 2017, 10:25 pm
  #55  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NBO/ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 188
Originally Posted by djohannw
While I also have not personally made many of these connections in FRA I know my way around there pretty well, and from that I am pretty certain that there is NO security necessary from Z to B - unless you do not follow the right path.
Really? I do this all the time and I always have to clear security in B. Can I ask you for more details on the appropriate thread?
symphonicman is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2017, 2:23 am
  #56  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New England
Programs: American Gold, Marriott Gold, Hilton Silver
Posts: 5,640
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the fact that UA is simply not filling their planes.

I flew EWR-LHR in July on the day flight and Y was half full at best. I didn't bother looking into Y+ or any sort of premium cabin option because I knew that I'd have a whole row to myself.
diburning is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2017, 3:22 am
  #57  
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,770
Originally Posted by diburning
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the fact that UA is simply not filling their planes.

I flew EWR-LHR in July on the day flight and Y was half full at best. I didn't bother looking into Y+ or any sort of premium cabin option because I knew that I'd have a whole row to myself.
BA and AA also regularly don't fill their planes in Y on the NYC-LON route. The rationale is that it is better overall to have as much frequency as reasonably manageable on the route to satisfy the business market, than to fill every plane all the time right to the back.

The same rationale applies to UA, for whom even the 5 frequencies is probably more than strictly necessary, but this keeps them competitive.
Ldnn1 is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2017, 7:03 am
  #58  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 573
Originally Posted by Ldnn1
BA and AA also regularly don't fill their planes in Y on the NYC-LON route. The rationale is that it is better overall to have as much frequency as reasonably manageable on the route to satisfy the business market, than to fill every plane all the time right to the back.

The same rationale applies to UA, for whom even the 5 frequencies is probably more than strictly necessary, but this keeps them competitive.
The UA flights leave at good times IMO

EWR-LHR
1-08:20-20:40
2-18:00-06:20
3-18:35-06:55
4-21:00-09:20
5-21:50-10:10

Although I would prefer to have 3 leaving at around 19:20.
EWRMAN is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2017, 10:31 am
  #59  
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP, B6 Mosaic, UA Platinum, others
Posts: 1,270
I'm the OP. Personally, I always found the 3 flights out of IAD (roughly 8am, 6pm, and 10pm) to be sufficient when operated with a sufficiently large aircraft. For much of the post-'06 period this was 747s and 777s, with perhaps a 767 for the AM flight. These days, it's 777 and 787s with a 757 for the AM flight. It does seem to me that United is gradually being driven out of the LHR market by competition.
jmr50 is offline  
Old Aug 5, 2017, 11:08 am
  #60  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Programs: AA CONCIERGE KEY & 1MM, HILTON DIAMOND
Posts: 11,970
Originally Posted by diburning
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the fact that UA is simply not filling their planes.

I flew EWR-LHR in July on the day flight and Y was half full at best. I didn't bother looking into Y+ or any sort of premium cabin option because I knew that I'd have a whole row to myself.
On this market, UA is going head to head with BA and VS--both offer better products and UA has never done well competing against quality airlines.
fly747first is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.