Why so little service NYC-LON?
#46
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: LAX
Programs: United Two Million Miler; United 1K, Hilton Lifetime Diamond, Hyatt Globalist, Bonvoy Platinum
Posts: 568
Let's also remember that taxes and surcharges in London are higher than elsewhere in Europe. I am happy to find another city to connect in rather than London. I will fly to London only if I plan to stay in England.
Perhaps United is actually doing something smart for a change by focusing only on O/D at LHR.
Perhaps United is actually doing something smart for a change by focusing only on O/D at LHR.
#47
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4éme
Posts: 12,042
#48
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Dulles, VA
Programs: UA Life Gold, Marriott Life Titanium
Posts: 2,757
FRA can be a pain to connect due to size, but you don't generally have to go through security theater for a US to non-Schengen connection there. Zurich is really easy, but with a lot less onward flight options. Munich is better than Frankfurt, plus other *A options like Brussels and Copenhagen
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 4éme
Posts: 12,042
FRA can be a pain to connect due to size, but you don't generally have to go through security theater for a US to non-Schengen connection there. Zurich is really easy, but with a lot less onward flight options. Munich is better than Frankfurt, plus other *A options like Brussels and Copenhagen
#50
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,770
Your point doesn't make much sense from the tax perspective. The main tax difference between LON and other European gateways is UK APD, which is about $200 for premium class departures ex-LON. However that tax isn't payable if connecting in LON.
#51
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wesseling, NRW, Germany
Programs: UA *S , MR LT Titanium, HH Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 3,940
While I also have not personally made many of these connections in FRA I know my way around there pretty well, and from that I am pretty certain that there is NO security necessary from Z to B - unless you do not follow the right path.
Coming from non-Schengen B to Z is a different animal, though - this requires an additional security check.
Greetings - Dirk
Coming from non-Schengen B to Z is a different animal, though - this requires an additional security check.
Greetings - Dirk
#52
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA *G 1MM LT United Club & Global Entry
Posts: 2,756
SL
#53
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: May 2001
Location: LAX; AA EXP, MM; HH Gold
Posts: 31,789
Because UA retreated from this market several years ago. They used to be competitive with AA (several years ago AA and BA flights JFK-LHR were not eligible for code shares / award redemptions on the non metal carrier) and DL was far behind with mostly LGW slots. The other two airlines did what was necessary to increase their presence in the market, UA did not (or was unable to). Although the final JFK surrender occurred during the Smisek regime I do recall this capitulation had its origins prior to the merger.
Of course, Delta could not fly to Heathrow (Bermuda ll) and thus UA moved its JFK-LHR slots to other hubs while DL flew to LGW until open skies in early 2008 when it and all other airlines could buy LHR slots.
BA and AA owned the NYC-LON market, and it made sense for UA to reallocate its LHR slots elsewhere. It re-entered the NYC-LHR market with the CO merger, and its current service is probably right-sized for Newark-LHR. BA/AA and DL/VS own the NYC-LON market, so why upsize the capacity when it would probably generate losses?
#55
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NBO/ORD
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 188
#56
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: New England
Programs: American Gold, Marriott Gold, Hilton Silver
Posts: 5,640
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the fact that UA is simply not filling their planes.
I flew EWR-LHR in July on the day flight and Y was half full at best. I didn't bother looking into Y+ or any sort of premium cabin option because I knew that I'd have a whole row to myself.
I flew EWR-LHR in July on the day flight and Y was half full at best. I didn't bother looking into Y+ or any sort of premium cabin option because I knew that I'd have a whole row to myself.
#57
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 8,770
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the fact that UA is simply not filling their planes.
I flew EWR-LHR in July on the day flight and Y was half full at best. I didn't bother looking into Y+ or any sort of premium cabin option because I knew that I'd have a whole row to myself.
I flew EWR-LHR in July on the day flight and Y was half full at best. I didn't bother looking into Y+ or any sort of premium cabin option because I knew that I'd have a whole row to myself.
The same rationale applies to UA, for whom even the 5 frequencies is probably more than strictly necessary, but this keeps them competitive.
#58
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 573
BA and AA also regularly don't fill their planes in Y on the NYC-LON route. The rationale is that it is better overall to have as much frequency as reasonably manageable on the route to satisfy the business market, than to fill every plane all the time right to the back.
The same rationale applies to UA, for whom even the 5 frequencies is probably more than strictly necessary, but this keeps them competitive.
The same rationale applies to UA, for whom even the 5 frequencies is probably more than strictly necessary, but this keeps them competitive.
EWR-LHR
1-08:20-20:40
2-18:00-06:20
3-18:35-06:55
4-21:00-09:20
5-21:50-10:10
Although I would prefer to have 3 leaving at around 19:20.
#59
Original Poster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP, B6 Mosaic, UA Platinum, others
Posts: 1,270
I'm the OP. Personally, I always found the 3 flights out of IAD (roughly 8am, 6pm, and 10pm) to be sufficient when operated with a sufficiently large aircraft. For much of the post-'06 period this was 747s and 777s, with perhaps a 767 for the AM flight. These days, it's 777 and 787s with a 757 for the AM flight. It does seem to me that United is gradually being driven out of the LHR market by competition.
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Programs: AA CONCIERGE KEY & 1MM, HILTON DIAMOND
Posts: 11,970
I'm surprised that no one has mentioned the fact that UA is simply not filling their planes.
I flew EWR-LHR in July on the day flight and Y was half full at best. I didn't bother looking into Y+ or any sort of premium cabin option because I knew that I'd have a whole row to myself.
I flew EWR-LHR in July on the day flight and Y was half full at best. I didn't bother looking into Y+ or any sort of premium cabin option because I knew that I'd have a whole row to myself.