Dispute on credit card charge, who to call at United?
#16
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SC USA
Programs: Delta, AA, Hilton, Priority Club, USAir, American Express Membership Rewards, Ultimate Rew, United
Posts: 503
I don't think anyone is arguing that point; I think people are just trying to understand the mechanics that could lead to this type of error occurring. For one thing, I can't figure out what the 10,000 miles were supposed to be for. What class of service were they flying? What airline? The only 10,000 delta I see is from *A business (70K) to UA first (80K), but that doesn't really match the details of the story. I also don't understand the $242. Taxes and fees difference? That's lot of taxes.
No company can stand on a 'no refunds' policy for unauthorized charges. Accidental charges, maybe -- for example, if someone were to go through the purchase process online, not notice that they were being charged, and then complain about it afterwards, they're probably SOL.
UA should do the right thing. Assuming they don't (and it sounds like they haven't / won't), Chase should, because they will require UA to prove that the charge was authorized. If that doesn't I happen, I would file a DOT complaint next -- it falls in the realm of deceptive pricing, if nothing else. And, if that somehow failed to result in an acceptable outcome, I agree with the earlier poster who suggested small claims court.
No company can stand on a 'no refunds' policy for unauthorized charges. Accidental charges, maybe -- for example, if someone were to go through the purchase process online, not notice that they were being charged, and then complain about it afterwards, they're probably SOL.
UA should do the right thing. Assuming they don't (and it sounds like they haven't / won't), Chase should, because they will require UA to prove that the charge was authorized. If that doesn't I happen, I would file a DOT complaint next -- it falls in the realm of deceptive pricing, if nothing else. And, if that somehow failed to result in an acceptable outcome, I agree with the earlier poster who suggested small claims court.
I really appreciate everyones opinions and advice. I really hope and pray that United does the right thing and if they don't, that Chase does, like you said.
#17
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: BOS
Programs: 1MM, UA 1k
Posts: 529
I have a stupid question - if you missed your first flight to London and decide to call from the airport instead of dealing with it in person, aren't you going to have enough time to reconcile with an agent in person before your next flight is scheduled?
This story isn't fully passing the sniff test, either.
This story isn't fully passing the sniff test, either.
#18
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SC USA
Programs: Delta, AA, Hilton, Priority Club, USAir, American Express Membership Rewards, Ultimate Rew, United
Posts: 503
I have a stupid question - if you missed your first flight to London and decide to call from the airport instead of dealing with it in person, aren't you going to have enough time to reconcile with an agent in person before your next flight is scheduled?
This story isn't fully passing the sniff test, either.
This story isn't fully passing the sniff test, either.
The easiest first step is filing a credit card dispute -- that will cause something to happen. UA will need to attest to the credit card company authorization was provided, so likely they will check the audio recordings.
Small claims or other approaches can happen later. DOT isn't going to get in the middle of this as this is a one-off (not a systemic issue) and facts are far from clear.
Small claims or other approaches can happen later. DOT isn't going to get in the middle of this as this is a one-off (not a systemic issue) and facts are far from clear.
Last edited by WineCountryUA; Jul 8, 2017 at 8:04 pm Reason: merging consecutive posts by same member
#19
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: BOS
Programs: 1MM, UA 1k
Posts: 529
Read the post! The airport agent could not reissue the ticket and told him it had to be handled by a customer service agent since it involved a name change.
Thank you! This was my first advise to him. I told him that if he didn't approve the charge, they would have to credit the $4800. I would think that United and most airlines record all phone calls.
Thank you! This was my first advise to him. I told him that if he didn't approve the charge, they would have to credit the $4800. I would think that United and most airlines record all phone calls.
The agent a) purchased 130k miles and b) assigned 70k of them on his/her own, separately from the change fee?
I would file a complaint with chase first - its separate from the change (charged correctly) fee on the CC.
#21
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
#22
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
I believe that the merchant --- UA in this case --- has 45 days to respond to the chargeback dispute.
There should be no prejudice to OP's son from the wait because there is an immediate temporary credit which effectively ends the accumulation of interest and replaces credit limit.
There is no reason to do anything else and doing anything else may well have a negative impact because it's possible that UA dropped the ball. If UA does not respond within 45 days, the temporary credit becomes permanent. Why kick the sleeping dog?
There should be no prejudice to OP's son from the wait because there is an immediate temporary credit which effectively ends the accumulation of interest and replaces credit limit.
There is no reason to do anything else and doing anything else may well have a negative impact because it's possible that UA dropped the ball. If UA does not respond within 45 days, the temporary credit becomes permanent. Why kick the sleeping dog?
#23
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 21,406
130K is exactly enough for two one-way standard awards
70K is exactly the difference between two one-way saver awards and two one-way standard awards.
As for the $242 -- that sounds like the cost for a one-way, non-stop award ticket from LHR to the US, including a $75 close-in booking fee. The taxes on that route are $167.26 at UA's current exchange rate -- plus the $75 is $242.26. The cost of an award ticket from the US to LHR is $5.60 (plus the $75).
I have tried three times, but I cannot conceive of a way to make all of this make sense. The pricing sounds like what it would have cost to buy a new roundtrip ticket, but the 130K sounds like the mileage cost just for the outbound. But if the agent was initiating a change, rather than issuing a new ticket, they should have been using the award change fee chart ($125) instead of the new booking chart, and the system shouldn't have collected the taxes because they'd already been paid. The 70K net debit from the account sounds like they sold him standard awards, and the 130K could be the price of the outbound tickets before redepositing the original saver awards -- but whenever I get the 'you need to buy miles to book this award' screen, it only tries to sell me the difference between my account balance and the award -- so, again, I can't fathom why it would have bought 130K miles.
And none of this leads to 10K miles per ticket. The best that I can come up with is 10K is the difference between the total paid for two saver tickets originally (120K) and the cost of two one-way standard awards (130K). But even if the agent had somehow made that calculation, that's 5K per ticket, not 10K per ticket.
The really frustrating thing is that this kind of simple name change (misspellings, name changes due to marriage / divorce) is common and I'd expect UA to handle it at no charge. This should have been as simple as the ticket agent reissuing the ticket, provided that your daughter-in-law had IDs in both names.
Please keep the board posted on the outcome. This is a great way for an airline to lose two customers for life. :-(
#24
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: LIS/ATL/other
Programs: UA 1K, Avis PC, Hertz PC, Sixt Plat, Marriott Gold, HH Silver
Posts: 1,983
These numbers may make some sense.
Names changes are not allowed. Therefore, the only solution for the Mrs. is to refund the existing ticket and buy a new one under the new name. Redeposit costs $125 fee. Buying a new ticket is $75 close in fee + $25 phone agent fee. We're at $225 already. The additional $17 could be a difference in taxes, probably mostly due to fluctuation of GBP exchange rates affecting the UK taxes, which are set in GBP. Perhaps when they bought the original tickets exchange rate was such that the UK taxes came out to $150, but are now $167. So that would explain the $242 per ticket. Looking at the original e-ticket receipts and comparing to the new ones should clarify this.
Now... canceling and buying new would probably not be needed of the Mr.. but because they were in one PNR a rookie agent would apply the same recipe to both instead of splitting the pax into two PNRs and handling each separately.
The $4800, if truly $4800.00, make little sense. If they had to purchase 130,000 miles, that should have cost $4891.25 after the excise taxes (130 x $35 x 1.075). Was it $4800.00 exactly or $4891.25?
As for the 130000 miles... it could be exactly as jsloan says. They bought new Standard outbounds (2x65000) before the redeposit hit the account, and then the redeposits processed (-2x30000) resulting in a net 70000. This would be a classic mistake by a rookie inexperienced agent, but I can see that happening. Looking at the transaction history of the MP account, which the account owner can do online, should shed some light.
Please keep us posted on what you find.
Names changes are not allowed. Therefore, the only solution for the Mrs. is to refund the existing ticket and buy a new one under the new name. Redeposit costs $125 fee. Buying a new ticket is $75 close in fee + $25 phone agent fee. We're at $225 already. The additional $17 could be a difference in taxes, probably mostly due to fluctuation of GBP exchange rates affecting the UK taxes, which are set in GBP. Perhaps when they bought the original tickets exchange rate was such that the UK taxes came out to $150, but are now $167. So that would explain the $242 per ticket. Looking at the original e-ticket receipts and comparing to the new ones should clarify this.
Now... canceling and buying new would probably not be needed of the Mr.. but because they were in one PNR a rookie agent would apply the same recipe to both instead of splitting the pax into two PNRs and handling each separately.
The $4800, if truly $4800.00, make little sense. If they had to purchase 130,000 miles, that should have cost $4891.25 after the excise taxes (130 x $35 x 1.075). Was it $4800.00 exactly or $4891.25?
As for the 130000 miles... it could be exactly as jsloan says. They bought new Standard outbounds (2x65000) before the redeposit hit the account, and then the redeposits processed (-2x30000) resulting in a net 70000. This would be a classic mistake by a rookie inexperienced agent, but I can see that happening. Looking at the transaction history of the MP account, which the account owner can do online, should shed some light.
Please keep us posted on what you find.
#25
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 100,413
These numbers may make some sense.
Names changes are not allowed. Therefore, the only solution for the Mrs. is to refund the existing ticket and buy a new one under the new name. Redeposit costs $125 fee. Buying a new ticket is $75 close in fee + $25 phone agent fee. We're at $225 already. The additional $17 could be a difference in taxes, probably mostly due to fluctuation of GBP exchange rates affecting the UK taxes, which are set in GBP. Perhaps when they bought the original tickets exchange rate was such that the UK taxes came out to $150, but are now $167. So that would explain the $242 per ticket. Looking at the original e-ticket receipts and comparing to the new ones should clarify this.
Now... canceling and buying new would probably not be needed of the Mr.. but because they were in one PNR a rookie agent would apply the same recipe to both instead of splitting the pax into two PNRs and handling each separately.
The $4800, if truly $4800.00, make little sense. If they had to purchase 130,000 miles, that should have cost $4891.25 after the excise taxes (130 x $35 x 1.075). Was it $4800.00 exactly or $4891.25?
As for the 130000 miles... it could be exactly as jsloan says. They bought new Standard outbounds (2x65000) before the redeposit hit the account, and then the redeposits processed (-2x30000) resulting in a net 70000. This would be a classic mistake by a rookie inexperienced agent, but I can see that happening. Looking at the transaction history of the MP account, which the account owner can do online, should shed some light.
Please keep us posted on what you find.
Names changes are not allowed. Therefore, the only solution for the Mrs. is to refund the existing ticket and buy a new one under the new name. Redeposit costs $125 fee. Buying a new ticket is $75 close in fee + $25 phone agent fee. We're at $225 already. The additional $17 could be a difference in taxes, probably mostly due to fluctuation of GBP exchange rates affecting the UK taxes, which are set in GBP. Perhaps when they bought the original tickets exchange rate was such that the UK taxes came out to $150, but are now $167. So that would explain the $242 per ticket. Looking at the original e-ticket receipts and comparing to the new ones should clarify this.
Now... canceling and buying new would probably not be needed of the Mr.. but because they were in one PNR a rookie agent would apply the same recipe to both instead of splitting the pax into two PNRs and handling each separately.
The $4800, if truly $4800.00, make little sense. If they had to purchase 130,000 miles, that should have cost $4891.25 after the excise taxes (130 x $35 x 1.075). Was it $4800.00 exactly or $4891.25?
As for the 130000 miles... it could be exactly as jsloan says. They bought new Standard outbounds (2x65000) before the redeposit hit the account, and then the redeposits processed (-2x30000) resulting in a net 70000. This would be a classic mistake by a rookie inexperienced agent, but I can see that happening. Looking at the transaction history of the MP account, which the account owner can do online, should shed some light.
Please keep us posted on what you find.
#26
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
These third-party game-of-telephone threads are always difficult, because the OP only knows what he has been told by someone else and even minor inaccuracies are magnified.
It is unclear to me that UA even denied boarding here. OP states that "they did not board." Ordinarily, that would be an odd word choice but nobody here can tell exactly who said what at the counter.
As an aside for others, the simplest solution to the passport/name change issue is to book travel in the name of the passport, even if it is taking place after the marriage and the name is being changed.
Just make certain that ticket, passport, and KTN (if applicable) all match. Emergencies happen and that may necessitate emergency access to a new passport, but in the predictable situation, if you are traveling close in to the name change, just keep things the same.
It is unclear to me that UA even denied boarding here. OP states that "they did not board." Ordinarily, that would be an odd word choice but nobody here can tell exactly who said what at the counter.
As an aside for others, the simplest solution to the passport/name change issue is to book travel in the name of the passport, even if it is taking place after the marriage and the name is being changed.
Just make certain that ticket, passport, and KTN (if applicable) all match. Emergencies happen and that may necessitate emergency access to a new passport, but in the predictable situation, if you are traveling close in to the name change, just keep things the same.
#27
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: New York, NY
Programs: Hyatt Globalist, Delta GM
Posts: 66
Here's one that happened to me the other day:
Two LH saver J tickets booked with partner's MP account. Called to split reservation, and then called back later (after the website didn't let me make the change) to switch one ticket from I to O. I was told the change fee was $75, and gave my credit card for that amount. At no point was mileage purchase discussed (as I thought the account had the 40k miles to cover it, which was the difference between O at 110k and I at 70k), nor was any charge beyond the $75 discussed. I look at the receipt the next morning, and there was a $1,500 charge for "mileage purchase fee."
I've had further correspondence since then, but nothing satisfactory, and thus resolution is pending.
Two LH saver J tickets booked with partner's MP account. Called to split reservation, and then called back later (after the website didn't let me make the change) to switch one ticket from I to O. I was told the change fee was $75, and gave my credit card for that amount. At no point was mileage purchase discussed (as I thought the account had the 40k miles to cover it, which was the difference between O at 110k and I at 70k), nor was any charge beyond the $75 discussed. I look at the receipt the next morning, and there was a $1,500 charge for "mileage purchase fee."
I've had further correspondence since then, but nothing satisfactory, and thus resolution is pending.
#28
Join Date: Oct 2009
Programs: All of them, UA-Plat, 1MM*G
Posts: 881
Did the account actually have the 40k miles to cover the difference? Or not? The difference is whether your dispute is that the $1500 charge is entirely wrong, or whether your complaint is that you were just never told about the $1500 so it was not distinctly authorized by you.
#30
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Francisco/Sydney
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Something, IHG Gold, Hertz PC, Avis PC
Posts: 8,156
Did the account actually have the 40k miles to cover the difference? Or not? The difference is whether your dispute is that the $1500 charge is entirely wrong, or whether your complaint is that you were just never told about the $1500 so it was not distinctly authorized by you.