How many are REALLY leaving UA? [ARCHIVE]
#76
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Frequent flyer status can be obtained now or 10 years later, but time you can't go back and make up. Stick with the airline whose schedule works best for you and offers the convenience you need while getting you from point A to B with minimal inconveniences. The rest should be secondary.
Last edited by golfingboy; Jan 8, 2015 at 12:42 pm
#77
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: LAX
Programs: United Silver, 0.9MM
Posts: 133
You are flying for work aka not having fun.
My miles are all personal so I'm actually happy when I get on a plane regardless of what group I'm in.
In addition, I have the luxury of being able to buy First if I want to or don't think I'll be upgraded depending on where I'm going.
If you're leaving UA shouldn't you be in the new forum at AA or DL?
#79
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,170
Premiers leaving isn't going to magically increase everyone's UG rates. You can't drive ancillary revenue (UA's specialty, easier than growing operating revenue) giving out CPU, but you can by selling TODs to clean up the leftovers.
Last edited by UA-NYC; Jan 8, 2015 at 7:23 pm
#80
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Colorado
Programs: Lifetime UA 1K, Lifetime Hilton Diamond, Lifetime Marriott Bonvoy Titanium
Posts: 1,261
#81
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
#82
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: London; Bangkok; Las Vegas
Programs: AA Exec Plat; UA MM Gold; Marriott Lifetime Titanium; Hilton Diamond
Posts: 8,745
EWR is just so convenient for me as it's less than 45 min away. JFK is just a pain to get to and from. For that reason I just can't see myself ditching UA.
As a silver last year I was 2/3 on CPU (upgraded on IAH - CUN & CUN - EWR). Most of my travel is internationally for work (only in Y), and I at least get E+ aisle/window every time.
I guess my standards are set fairly low! Heh.
As a silver last year I was 2/3 on CPU (upgraded on IAH - CUN & CUN - EWR). Most of my travel is internationally for work (only in Y), and I at least get E+ aisle/window every time.
I guess my standards are set fairly low! Heh.
United is an airline that the courts have found knowingly defrauds its customers (Lagen v. United Cont'l Holdings, Inc., No. 14-1375 (7th Cir. 2014)) and treats those customers with utter disdain. United is an airline only for those locked into fortress hubs, those with corporate contracts (which are diminishing in number), Kayakers, and those who just don't know any better.
You're locked into a fortress hub. United owns you, and they know it. They don't have to give you anything. Where are you going to go?
#83
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SAN
Programs: Current: UA 1K, AA EXP; BA Silver; Former: EK Gold (2004-11), LH SEN (2007-14)
Posts: 275
Should I go cold turkey on United this year?
Happy New Year!
I'm so done with UA/UAX that I changed my FlyerTalk name from UATexasFlyer to ATXflyer.
I'm sticking with AA this year as an ExPlat with 12 SWUs in the bank.
I may do a status match to DL to have a backup airline since I'm hearing good things about them for the first time in over 10 years.
I'm so done with UA/UAX that I changed my FlyerTalk name from UATexasFlyer to ATXflyer.
I'm sticking with AA this year as an ExPlat with 12 SWUs in the bank.
I may do a status match to DL to have a backup airline since I'm hearing good things about them for the first time in over 10 years.
The main reason for keeping both 1K and EXP is the options on any ticket and I have assumed that I'll keep both for the foreseeable future.
But it's becoming increasingly painful to keep the UA part going and I am considering going cold turkey and completely dropping UA this year. The part that hurts me the most is how UA has systematically devalued *A to the point that I am getting less miles on airlines I'd like to fly (SQ to Asia; TK to Africa) AND it's really painful (if not impossible) to ticket these airlines on 016 stock (needed to comfortably meet the PQD requirements).
With AA/OW, I can fly CX, QR, BA, JL, etc and get the full EQM as well as 100% EXP bonuses. The addition of QR has been awesome for Africa travel (and also for India outside BOM/DEL).
Given that a lot of my travel is international to places that AA/UA don't fly to, the *A/OW benefits are quite key and the dilution of *A (especially due to the PQD and lack of elite bonuses except on LH/LX/AC) is really limiting.
I could still keep 1K this year with 2 paid J trips to SIN and DEL and a few trans-cons and 2 trips to Europe. But I am really wondering if it's worth it?
For instance, for SAN-SIN in J next month - I can take a one stop on JAL via NRT (with new J on NRT - SIN) or two-stops via LAX or SFO on United - adding 4 hours of travel time and an extra stop each way. Only reason to take UA is to keep 1K and 20K more RDM.
If you had 200K to fly/year (70% international) - would you keep EXP and 1K (recognizing that the latter requires a fair bit of 'optimizing' and sub-optimal routes over the year) for the options on flying and redemptions (and insurance against AA taking a nose-dive after the merger) or just put all the miles on AA (with enough BA to keep silver and Avios to upgrade BA itineraries)?
Overall, OW clearly works better from SAN (with BA non-stop to LHR and JAL non-stop to NRT) and AA will be my main program. The question is whether it's worth keeping half of my travel on UA to keep 1K (or even a third of travel to keep Gold or Platinum on United).
Thanks for your inputs!
#84
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 187
I fly ~200K BIS miles a year with around ~250 EQM (or EQP on AA) including CoS bonuses. Was mainly a UA/*A flyer with most flights on UA/LH for many years. Since the AA status match to EXP in 2012, I have maintained both EXP and 1K (will drop SEN this year; but should be able to keep BA Silver for AC access).
The main reason for keeping both 1K and EXP is the options on any ticket and I have assumed that I'll keep both for the foreseeable future.
But it's becoming increasingly painful to keep the UA part going ...
The main reason for keeping both 1K and EXP is the options on any ticket and I have assumed that I'll keep both for the foreseeable future.
But it's becoming increasingly painful to keep the UA part going ...
Last edited by Ocn Vw 1K; Jan 9, 2015 at 8:41 am Reason: Combine consecutive posts of same member.
#86
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
Well that was a weird straw....
I'd barely decided to stick with UA for 2015. Chief advantages were service to EAU (15 minutes from my door) and the SDC policy.
Went to start booking airfare for 2015 and see that EAU service has changed from a 6 AM and 3:30 PM departure to ORD to 1:52 PM and 6:30 PM... with a 7:49 PM arrival, meaning virtually no useful connections.
Lacking a morning departure, I'm going to have to drive to MSP for most of my flights, and now AA is on the table.
Funny that with all the changes, it's a flight schedule change at an EAS airport that breaks the camel's back.
Went to start booking airfare for 2015 and see that EAU service has changed from a 6 AM and 3:30 PM departure to ORD to 1:52 PM and 6:30 PM... with a 7:49 PM arrival, meaning virtually no useful connections.
Lacking a morning departure, I'm going to have to drive to MSP for most of my flights, and now AA is on the table.
Funny that with all the changes, it's a flight schedule change at an EAS airport that breaks the camel's back.
#87
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: ORD
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Platinum/LT Platinum, Hilton Gold
Posts: 5,594
Why not DL if MSP is now your airport? Afraid you'll miss connecting at ORD too much?
#88
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: EAU
Programs: UA 1K, CO Plat, NW Plat, Marriott Premiere Plat, SPG Plat, Priority Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 4,712
Once I drive to MSP, I'm game for any airline that serves the airport.
AA has (at least for now) a much better FF program, so once I'm committed to getting to MSP on the ground...
AA has (at least for now) a much better FF program, so once I'm committed to getting to MSP on the ground...
#89
Used to be 'g_leyser'
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brandon Johnson International Airport (expect delays)
Programs: AA PlatPro, HH Gold, Bonvoy Gold, IHG Plat, Reno Air MEGA Platinum
Posts: 10,037
I fly ~200K BIS miles a year with around ~250 EQM (or EQP on AA) including CoS bonuses. Was mainly a UA/*A flyer with most flights on UA/LH for many years. Since the AA status match to EXP in 2012, I have maintained both EXP and 1K (will drop SEN this year; but should be able to keep BA Silver for AC access).
The main reason for keeping both 1K and EXP is the options on any ticket and I have assumed that I'll keep both for the foreseeable future.
But it's becoming increasingly painful to keep the UA part going and I am considering going cold turkey and completely dropping UA this year. The part that hurts me the most is how UA has systematically devalued *A to the point that I am getting less miles on airlines I'd like to fly (SQ to Asia; TK to Africa) AND it's really painful (if not impossible) to ticket these airlines on 016 stock (needed to comfortably meet the PQD requirements).
With AA/OW, I can fly CX, QR, BA, JL, etc and get the full EQM as well as 100% EXP bonuses. The addition of QR has been awesome for Africa travel (and also for India outside BOM/DEL).
Given that a lot of my travel is international to places that AA/UA don't fly to, the *A/OW benefits are quite key and the dilution of *A (especially due to the PQD and lack of elite bonuses except on LH/LX/AC) is really limiting.
I could still keep 1K this year with 2 paid J trips to SIN and DEL and a few trans-cons and 2 trips to Europe. But I am really wondering if it's worth it?
For instance, for SAN-SIN in J next month - I can take a one stop on JAL via NRT (with new J on NRT - SIN) or two-stops via LAX or SFO on United - adding 4 hours of travel time and an extra stop each way. Only reason to take UA is to keep 1K and 20K more RDM.
If you had 200K to fly/year (70% international) - would you keep EXP and 1K (recognizing that the latter requires a fair bit of 'optimizing' and sub-optimal routes over the year) for the options on flying and redemptions (and insurance against AA taking a nose-dive after the merger) or just put all the miles on AA (with enough BA to keep silver and Avios to upgrade BA itineraries)?
Overall, OW clearly works better from SAN (with BA non-stop to LHR and JAL non-stop to NRT) and AA will be my main program. The question is whether it's worth keeping half of my travel on UA to keep 1K (or even a third of travel to keep Gold or Platinum on United).
Thanks for your inputs!
The main reason for keeping both 1K and EXP is the options on any ticket and I have assumed that I'll keep both for the foreseeable future.
But it's becoming increasingly painful to keep the UA part going and I am considering going cold turkey and completely dropping UA this year. The part that hurts me the most is how UA has systematically devalued *A to the point that I am getting less miles on airlines I'd like to fly (SQ to Asia; TK to Africa) AND it's really painful (if not impossible) to ticket these airlines on 016 stock (needed to comfortably meet the PQD requirements).
With AA/OW, I can fly CX, QR, BA, JL, etc and get the full EQM as well as 100% EXP bonuses. The addition of QR has been awesome for Africa travel (and also for India outside BOM/DEL).
Given that a lot of my travel is international to places that AA/UA don't fly to, the *A/OW benefits are quite key and the dilution of *A (especially due to the PQD and lack of elite bonuses except on LH/LX/AC) is really limiting.
I could still keep 1K this year with 2 paid J trips to SIN and DEL and a few trans-cons and 2 trips to Europe. But I am really wondering if it's worth it?
For instance, for SAN-SIN in J next month - I can take a one stop on JAL via NRT (with new J on NRT - SIN) or two-stops via LAX or SFO on United - adding 4 hours of travel time and an extra stop each way. Only reason to take UA is to keep 1K and 20K more RDM.
If you had 200K to fly/year (70% international) - would you keep EXP and 1K (recognizing that the latter requires a fair bit of 'optimizing' and sub-optimal routes over the year) for the options on flying and redemptions (and insurance against AA taking a nose-dive after the merger) or just put all the miles on AA (with enough BA to keep silver and Avios to upgrade BA itineraries)?
Overall, OW clearly works better from SAN (with BA non-stop to LHR and JAL non-stop to NRT) and AA will be my main program. The question is whether it's worth keeping half of my travel on UA to keep 1K (or even a third of travel to keep Gold or Platinum on United).
Thanks for your inputs!
Sounds like you are flying paid J for your international flights. Do you use/need you UA SWUs?
If not, you could maintain EXP and just make Gold or Plat on UA so you still have *A lounge access.
Or look at crediting to a different *A program, like Miles & More, TK M&S, etc.
This of course depends on what you want to redeem your miles for too.
#90
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Diego, CA/Boston, MA
Programs: United Lifetime Plat 2 million, Starwood Platinum, Alaska MVP Gold 75k
Posts: 143
I fly ~200K BIS miles a year with around ~250 EQM (or EQP on AA) including CoS bonuses. Was mainly a UA/*A flyer with most flights on UA/LH for many years. Since the AA status match to EXP in 2012, I have maintained both EXP and 1K (will drop SEN this year; but should be able to keep BA Silver for AC access).
The main reason for keeping both 1K and EXP is the options on any ticket and I have assumed that I'll keep both for the foreseeable future.
But it's becoming increasingly painful to keep the UA part going and I am considering going cold turkey and completely dropping UA this year. The part that hurts me the most is how UA has systematically devalued *A to the point that I am getting less miles on airlines I'd like to fly (SQ to Asia; TK to Africa) AND it's really painful (if not impossible) to ticket these airlines on 016 stock (needed to comfortably meet the PQD requirements).
With AA/OW, I can fly CX, QR, BA, JL, etc and get the full EQM as well as 100% EXP bonuses. The addition of QR has been awesome for Africa travel (and also for India outside BOM/DEL).
Given that a lot of my travel is international to places that AA/UA don't fly to, the *A/OW benefits are quite key and the dilution of *A (especially due to the PQD and lack of elite bonuses except on LH/LX/AC) is really limiting.
I could still keep 1K this year with 2 paid J trips to SIN and DEL and a few trans-cons and 2 trips to Europe. But I am really wondering if it's worth it?
For instance, for SAN-SIN in J next month - I can take a one stop on JAL via NRT (with new J on NRT - SIN) or two-stops via LAX or SFO on United - adding 4 hours of travel time and an extra stop each way. Only reason to take UA is to keep 1K and 20K more RDM.
If you had 200K to fly/year (70% international) - would you keep EXP and 1K (recognizing that the latter requires a fair bit of 'optimizing' and sub-optimal routes over the year) for the options on flying and redemptions (and insurance against AA taking a nose-dive after the merger) or just put all the miles on AA (with enough BA to keep silver and Avios to upgrade BA itineraries)?
Overall, OW clearly works better from SAN (with BA non-stop to LHR and JAL non-stop to NRT) and AA will be my main program. The question is whether it's worth keeping half of my travel on UA to keep 1K (or even a third of travel to keep Gold or Platinum on United).
Thanks for your inputs!
The main reason for keeping both 1K and EXP is the options on any ticket and I have assumed that I'll keep both for the foreseeable future.
But it's becoming increasingly painful to keep the UA part going and I am considering going cold turkey and completely dropping UA this year. The part that hurts me the most is how UA has systematically devalued *A to the point that I am getting less miles on airlines I'd like to fly (SQ to Asia; TK to Africa) AND it's really painful (if not impossible) to ticket these airlines on 016 stock (needed to comfortably meet the PQD requirements).
With AA/OW, I can fly CX, QR, BA, JL, etc and get the full EQM as well as 100% EXP bonuses. The addition of QR has been awesome for Africa travel (and also for India outside BOM/DEL).
Given that a lot of my travel is international to places that AA/UA don't fly to, the *A/OW benefits are quite key and the dilution of *A (especially due to the PQD and lack of elite bonuses except on LH/LX/AC) is really limiting.
I could still keep 1K this year with 2 paid J trips to SIN and DEL and a few trans-cons and 2 trips to Europe. But I am really wondering if it's worth it?
For instance, for SAN-SIN in J next month - I can take a one stop on JAL via NRT (with new J on NRT - SIN) or two-stops via LAX or SFO on United - adding 4 hours of travel time and an extra stop each way. Only reason to take UA is to keep 1K and 20K more RDM.
If you had 200K to fly/year (70% international) - would you keep EXP and 1K (recognizing that the latter requires a fair bit of 'optimizing' and sub-optimal routes over the year) for the options on flying and redemptions (and insurance against AA taking a nose-dive after the merger) or just put all the miles on AA (with enough BA to keep silver and Avios to upgrade BA itineraries)?
Overall, OW clearly works better from SAN (with BA non-stop to LHR and JAL non-stop to NRT) and AA will be my main program. The question is whether it's worth keeping half of my travel on UA to keep 1K (or even a third of travel to keep Gold or Platinum on United).
Thanks for your inputs!