Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

UA to launch SFO - HGH service (Hangzhou, China) {Service terminated 14 Oct 2017}

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

UA to launch SFO - HGH service (Hangzhou, China) {Service terminated 14 Oct 2017}

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 17, 2016, 5:54 pm
  #136  
V9
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: IAD/DCA
Programs: UA 1K/MM, Marriott Pltm, Hyatt Diamond, spg Pltm
Posts: 356
UA 's New Flight to HGH

UA flys to Hangzhou starting this 13th.

http://newsroom.united.com/2016-07-1...o-and-Hangzhou

Anyone on these flights?
V9 is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2016, 6:17 pm
  #137  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: NYC (Primarily EWR)
Programs: UA 1K / *G, Marriott Bonvoy Gold; Avis PC
Posts: 9,005
Originally Posted by V9
UA flys to Hangzhou starting this 13th.

http://newsroom.united.com/2016-07-1...o-and-Hangzhou

Anyone on these flights?
Judging by the lack of a report on it in the broader thread...probably not. I do wonder what the loads have been like...
PsiFighter37 is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2016, 6:46 pm
  #138  
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Omaha, NE/New York, NY
Programs: UA MileagePlus Silver
Posts: 81
I would assume just as sparse as UA853 SFO-XIY?
PEKandFRAEnthusiast is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2016, 7:31 pm
  #139  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Programs: UA*Lifetime GS, Hyatt* Lifetime Globalist
Posts: 12,337
Slight of the topic, but want to address the emptiness of the plane issue:

Many moons ago (and some of you might be inside of a school bus instead of in an airplane ;-)), when UA launched the second NRT-LAX-NRT flight (this was when UA was the powerhouse it used to be across the Pacific), I was on the the inaugural NRT-LAX flight on an almost brand new 744 during the peak of summer travel season. The later departure of the second flight worked for me because I had to connect from another East Asia city where UA did not have a direct flight that the time.

There was only 12 passengers on the flight despite marketing it for about 4 months. 2 of us were in in F, and I was the only revenue passenger, the other was an Executive from UA cargo operation. Nevertheless, the second NRT-LAX-NRT service was a success after the initial three months of "emptiness".

I am skeptical of the SFO-HGH service, but probably less than XIY. Time will tell if UA made the right decision.
UA_Flyer is offline  
Old Jul 17, 2016, 8:31 pm
  #140  
Used to be MBS PremExec
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Saginaw, MI (MBS)
Programs: UA 1K 1.9MM, Marriott Titanium w/Lifetime Plat, Hilton LIfetime ♢, National Exec, Amex Plat
Posts: 5,722
I was curious, so I took a look at the seat maps for the past few days. It's weird, HGH-SFO has been and will be mostly full in both cabins, but SFO-HGH has been pretty empty.

In theory, it leads me to believe that the route is being used more by Chinese than by Americans, at least early on. (Surely, there are exceptions with some Americans returning home that started in other cities or otherwise got to Hangzhou).
MBS MillionMiler is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2016, 2:11 am
  #141  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,227
Originally Posted by MBS MillionMiler
I was curious, so I took a look at the seat maps for the past few days. It's weird, HGH-SFO has been and will be mostly full in both cabins, but SFO-HGH has been pretty empty.

In theory, it leads me to believe that the route is being used more by Chinese than by Americans, at least early on. (Surely, there are exceptions with some Americans returning home that started in other cities or otherwise got to Hangzhou).
Chinese students are going to the USA now to start their studies in early August or for summer school sessions. Flights will be packed the other way in May and June for the same reason.
travelinmanS is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2016, 1:34 pm
  #142  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 5280 feet
Programs: UA GS
Posts: 674
Originally Posted by presario1626
I have not flown HGH international terminal, but their CA domestic terminal is quite good compare to a lot of US airports (IAD came to mind first). Given how much their government care about image, would be hard for me to image their international terminal is worse than domestic.
I flew out of HGH in 2014 (Dragonair to HKG) and found the international terminal pretty tidy and pleasant. The premium lounge was nothing special. I would rank HGH higher than many major US airports for cleanliness, roominess and user-friendliness. Checkin areas are (as is the style among major Asian airports) roomy, airy and spacious. Security and immigration were a breeze.

HGH is not SIN or KUL or BKK or PEK, but it is no worse than PVG.
harryhood is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2016, 3:04 pm
  #143  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SFO
Programs: UA GS
Posts: 283
The 7/18 flight's seat map for SFO-HGH shows an extremely open flight. Says only 15 out of 48 BF seats booked. E+ and E- in similar shape.

Hope the loads pick up!
ryder1650 is offline  
Old Jul 18, 2016, 4:57 pm
  #144  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by MBS MillionMiler
I was curious, so I took a look at the seat maps for the past few days. It's weird, HGH-SFO has been and will be mostly full in both cabins, but SFO-HGH has been pretty empty.

In theory, it leads me to believe that the route is being used more by Chinese than by Americans, at least early on. (Surely, there are exceptions with some Americans returning home that started in other cities or otherwise got to Hangzhou).
Originally Posted by travelinmanS
Chinese students are going to the USA now to start their studies in early August or for summer school sessions. Flights will be packed the other way in May and June for the same reason.
Originally Posted by ryder1650
The 7/18 flight's seat map for SFO-HGH shows an extremely open flight. Says only 15 out of 48 BF seats booked. E+ and E- in similar shape.

Hope the loads pick up!
I just check the seat map for today (UA982 SFO-HGH) and it showed, after take off 15J, 23 E+, and Y- about 1/2 full.

If UA is running a bunch of students on the very cheap fares UA is currently offering in Y, great, but it will not make this flight a success. Wednesday's flight (UA983, 7/20) shows 14 J blocked off, but I think its seat blocking given how it looks, not actual seats being taken. Same with E+, it shows 25 seats taken, but a few are middle seats with empty isles on either side, not what I would expect to see. Y- shows as full, but again the map may just be wonky (as it looks in J).

It is worth checking tomorrow to see what it looks like when it actually flies.
spin88 is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 9:22 pm
  #145  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Programs: UA
Posts: 312
Load Factor on Wednesdays

Thinking about taking this flight SFO-HGH on Wednesday 10/26. Load looks empty as of now, but wondering if anybody has experience or knowledge on load factors and when most people will book for this flight. If I can get a row to myself in E+, I don't want to waste the UPG.
pbartp is offline  
Old Aug 20, 2016, 9:54 pm
  #146  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SEA/ORD/ADB
Programs: TK ELPL (*G), AS 100K (OWE), BA Gold (OWE), Hyatt Globalist, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat
Posts: 7,763
It's really hard to estimate loads on China flights because China point-of-sale is very travel agent heavy, and many Chinese agencies heavily utilize blocked space agreements.

In general, it's difficult to differentiate a mostly empty flight and a flight with 10 middle seats left until checkin opens.
PVDtoDEL is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2016, 8:51 am
  #147  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: san antonio, texas
Programs: 3.2MM AA, 1.4MM UA,StwdLftPlt
Posts: 1,586
Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL
It's really hard to estimate loads on China flights because China point-of-sale is very travel agent heavy, and many Chinese agencies heavily utilize blocked space agreements.

In general, it's difficult to differentiate a mostly empty flight and a flight with 10 middle seats left until checkin opens.
Thanks for the observation. Something I tend to forget when trying to make sense out of travel patterns from China.
luckypierre is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2016, 2:00 pm
  #148  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,969
Originally Posted by PVDtoDEL
It's really hard to estimate loads on China flights because China point-of-sale is very travel agent heavy, and many Chinese agencies heavily utilize blocked space agreements.

In general, it's difficult to differentiate a mostly empty flight and a flight with 10 middle seats left until checkin opens.
Do the agencies pay for the blocked seats regardless? If not, does UA penalize them in anyway for not releasing the seats in advance?
username is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2016, 3:18 pm
  #149  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: NYC
Programs: Marriott Platinum Elite, National Executive, United Gold
Posts: 1,181
Why not a 788 on this route? I assume UA has more "spare" 789s?
764toHI is offline  
Old Aug 21, 2016, 11:27 pm
  #150  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: EWR, PHL
Programs: UA1k 3MM, AA Plt, peasant on everybody else, elite something or other at a bunch of hotels.
Posts: 4,637
Originally Posted by username
Do the agencies pay for the blocked seats regardless? If not, does UA penalize them in anyway for not releasing the seats in advance?
I believe that there are some fares that can be refunded if pax are not able to obtain necessary paperwork for travel, i.e. visa for entry into the USA. We have some people from our office in Hangzhou book travel to the US a few years ago but had to cancel due to inability to get visas.
1kBill is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.