FlyerTalk Forums

FlyerTalk Forums (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
-   United Airlines | MileagePlus (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
-   -   E+ free for all (https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/1616141-e-free-all.html)

LaserSailor Sep 29, 2014 8:12 am


And if I had paid for E+, I'd demand a refund if UA gave it away for free.
By extension, we should all get our Y fares refunded if lower fare buckets are opened at T-24 then, no?

Bonehead Sep 29, 2014 8:26 am


Originally Posted by LaserSailor (Post 23597884)
By extension, we should all get our Y fares refunded if lower fare buckets are opened at T-24 then, no?

The buckets may be opened (to facilitate SDC), but fare rules (e.g., advance-purchase requirements) usually prevent new purchases in most of those buckets.

JBord Sep 29, 2014 8:28 am


Originally Posted by Mike Jacoubowsky (Post 23596006)
I think I can explain how it's different. I, as an individual, am a subset of "everyone." And I was asked to pay for that E+ seat. And then they included the superset of "everyone" as a group that did not need to pay for an E+ seat.

If they had kept to subsets, with at least some people denied free E+, then paying for E+ would retain value in the eyes of the person who purchased it.

Yeah, I get it. We're just looking at it from two different angles. I agree it's not a great move from a business perspective.

As others have said though, you're really just paying to reserve a better seat in advance. So that's the value...no one else was guaranteed E+, in fact this situation is rare. Here's another way to look at it: what if This was UA policy? If policy were that anyone can get E+ at the gate for free, based on availability, would the person who paid be entitled to a refund then?

I realize I've moved into the theoretical here, but the point is that reserving the seat with $ still has value in that scenario, so why not in this one?

MIT_SBM Sep 29, 2014 9:09 am


Originally Posted by halls120 (Post 23594734)
Fine, don't agree. But if I pay for something that UA publicly gives away, I'm going to complain. And I doubt I'll be the only one complaining.


Originally Posted by iluv2fly (Post 23594807)
It's pretty much the same argument that comes up here about Business Class op-ups v confirmed upgrades.

You guarantee it with miles/GPU/whatever and then you see pax who get it for no charge at the gate.

It happens.


Originally Posted by Mike Jacoubowsky (Post 23596006)
I think I can explain how it's different. I, as an individual, am a subset of "everyone." And I was asked to pay for that E+ seat. And then they included the superset of "everyone" as a group that did not need to pay for an E+ seat.

If they had kept to subsets, with at least some people denied free E+, then paying for E+ would retain value in the eyes of the person who purchased it.

I am in the camp that thinks that no refund is due because the payment is for a guaranteed E+/Y+ seat. However, the airline could/should institute a policy as such:

If a passenger who previously paid for E+/Y+ wishes to get a refund then that passenger would stand in the E+/Y+ refund line to process the refund. Once the refund is processed the subject passenger would then be assigned a regular coach section seat. If E+/Y+ is being "given" away then the subject passenger would be free to join the completely separate queue(s) to compete/take her chances along with everyone else that has a regular coach section seat assignment. [i.e. one does not get to have a refund AND retain a guaranteed E+/Y+ seat assignment.] This policy should result in no complaints because one can either pay for a guaranteed E+/Y+ seat or take one's chances like all the other coach section ticket holders.

LaserSailor Sep 29, 2014 9:11 am


Originally Posted by MIT_SBM (Post 23598224)

If a passenger who previously paid for E+/Y+ wishes to get a refund then that passenger would stand in the E+/Y+ refund line to process the refund.

Shirley you aren't advocating another gate queue? Do you know how stressful those are?

MIT_SBM Sep 29, 2014 9:25 am


Originally Posted by LaserSailor (Post 23598242)
Shirley you aren't advocating another gate queue? Do you know how stressful those are?

Surely, if one wants a refund one does not expect a business to inconvenience other customers as it processes one's refund. Separate refund queues are quite common here in the USA. [at least at the "lower end" (read: economy class) stores] :D

The real point being that one should not be able to game the system by being in line to get a free E+/Y+ seat when one already has paid for an E+/Y+ seat only to cancel the paid reservation to get a refund after obtaining the free seat.

Another solution to achieve the same result is to limit a passenger to one transaction at a time in a given queue. Therefore, one could stand in line to refund one's E+/Y+ purchase AND be assigned a regular economy class seat. That person would then have to rejoin the end of the same queue in order to get the free E+/Y+ seat. Therefore, eliminating the need for another queue.

JBord Sep 29, 2014 9:34 am


Originally Posted by MIT_SBM (Post 23598321)
Surely, if one wants a refund one does not expect a business to inconvenience other customers as it processes one's refund. Separate refund queues are quite common here in the USA. [at least at the "lower end" (read: economy class) stores] :D

Yes, the refund queue will be located at the ticketing counter, on the other side of security.

Mike Jacoubowsky Sep 29, 2014 10:14 am


Originally Posted by LaserSailor (Post 23597884)
By extension, we should all get our Y fares refunded if lower fare buckets are opened at T-24 then, no?

Only if the airline is dumb enough to make a public announcement saying so.

Clearly the issue isn't that it was done. It's how. Everybody knows that E+ is given away once the back of the plane is filled. Nothing new about "free" E+ for non-elites. What changed here was telling everyone they could sit in E+ without paying for it via the PA system.

A slightly-better variant of the same thing would have been an offer to move anyone in a middle seat forward.

WineCountryUA Sep 29, 2014 12:53 pm


Originally Posted by Mike Jacoubowsky (Post 23598614)
... Clearly the issue isn't that it was done. It's how. Everybody knows that E+ is given away once the back of the plane is filled. Nothing new about "free" E+ for non-elites. What changed here was telling everyone they could sit in E+ without paying for it via the PA system. ....

by one GA (likely UX) one time .... perhaps it is premature to storm the barricades asking for E+ access refunds (which most here get for free).

Mike Jacoubowsky Sep 29, 2014 1:17 pm


Originally Posted by WineCountryUA (Post 23599556)
by one GA (likely UX) one time .... perhaps it is premature to storm the barricades asking for E+ access refunds (which most here get for free).

And UA insider is passing this thread amongst the higher-ups with everyone having a good laugh about "What's the silliest thing they're complaining about today?"

You're right, it was a one-off, not the norm. Somebody maybe in a bit of a rush and not really thinking it through, just knew that there was a plane to get off the ground and maybe a weight balance issue and the last time that happened they had to rearrange the plane after it had been boarded and it took an extra 30 minutes because nobody wanted to volunteer to give up a nice seat for one with less legroom etc...

TomMM Sep 29, 2014 3:52 pm


Originally Posted by JBord (Post 23597982)
As others have said though, you're really just paying to reserve a better seat in advance. So that's the value...no one else was guaranteed E+, in fact this situation is rare. Here's another way to look at it: what if This was UA policy? If policy were that anyone can get E+ at the gate for free, based on availability, would the person who paid be entitled to a refund then?

I realize I've moved into the theoretical here, but the point is that reserving the seat with $ still has value in that scenario, so why not in this one?

That's close to the situation that Silvers have. They can pay for E+ at booking or wait until T-24 and try to get one for free. While I was a Silver I mostly paid instead of taking a chance and more than a few times I could have gotten E+ for free if I would have waited. But I wasn't willing to take that chance on a flight like ORD-SIN. (And for the record, the thought never occurred to me to ask for a refund)

SunLover Sep 29, 2014 4:14 pm

Well that was easy...
 

Originally Posted by TomMM (Post 23600497)
That's close to the situation that Silvers have. They can pay for E+ at booking or wait until T-24 and try to get one for free. While I was a Silver I mostly paid instead of taking a chance and more than a few times I could have gotten E+ for free if I would have waited. But I wasn't willing to take that chance on a flight like ORD-SIN. (And for the record, the thought never occurred to me to ask for a refund)

Kudos for the simple logic simply stated.


SunLover

tonykline1947 Sep 29, 2014 11:30 pm


Originally Posted by br2k (Post 23590143)
Waiting to board a flight now, which had both business and E+ pretty empty. Everyone with any kind of status got upgraded (all 3 silvers).

Can you share the route? DEN-LAS at 1pm on Wed?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:12 pm.


This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.