UA CFO Rainey on Bloomberg: Global First "Effectively the Same" as J
#1
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: ORD/MDW
Programs: BA/AA/AS/B6/WN/ UA/HH/MR and more like 'em but most felicitously & importantly MUCCI
Posts: 19,719
UA CFO Rainey on Bloomberg: Global First "Effectively the Same" as J
http://www.bloomberg.com/video/u-s-a...OmRFt_uow.html
Rainey is first asked about the fuel price outlook, but then the anchor asks about UA possibly getting rid of F class like Delta. Answer: "We're moving more toward a two-cabin plane, with Economy Plus."
Rainey does not do much of a job justifying either the existence of GF or paying extra for it:
"It's effectively the same service: you've got essentially the same food... even the seat is very similar."
He concludes by complaining about taxes. "A crushing tax burden.... higher rate than alcohol, tobacco, firearms... we shouldn't be discouraging air travel in our country."
Rainey is first asked about the fuel price outlook, but then the anchor asks about UA possibly getting rid of F class like Delta. Answer: "We're moving more toward a two-cabin plane, with Economy Plus."
Rainey does not do much of a job justifying either the existence of GF or paying extra for it:
"It's effectively the same service: you've got essentially the same food... even the seat is very similar."
He concludes by complaining about taxes. "A crushing tax burden.... higher rate than alcohol, tobacco, firearms... we shouldn't be discouraging air travel in our country."
#2
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: IAD
Programs: UA 1K 2MM, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 565
He is correct. There are a lot of people on FT who remember the old days of international first class and want those days back - but it ain't happening. As a good FTer I would rather have more BF seats on the plane in order to increase my upgrade chances. Screw GF. Anyone who is going to pay for GF isn't going to fly a US airline anyway.
#3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: DL Platinum, AA Lifetime Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Radisson Premium
Posts: 6,638
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 7_1_2 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Mobile/11D257 Safari/9537.53)
He's right . A total embarassment but at least he admits the truth
He's right . A total embarassment but at least he admits the truth
#5
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, NY
Programs: UA, AA, DL, Hertz, Avis, National, Hyatt, Hilton, SPG, Marriott
Posts: 9,454
I think there are certain markets where a three-cabin F product is justified, but the UA fleet as currently composed has too much F capacity to allow the company to truly differentiate the product in a profitable manner. Instead, the company is pursuing the strategy of positioning the product as a sort of super-J, whereby HVFs can upgrade full-fare business class tickets using instruments while capturing some incremental (deliberate) F revenue where such demand exists.
One thing is for sure: the product certainly is not good enough to stimulate demand on the margin. OTOH, if United spent the money to really differentiate F, but did so only in the handful of markets which generate reliable paid F demand, it would really muddy the water with respect to the service quality and perception in markets where UA does not direct that investment. Certainly could be a branding faux pas as well.
On FT, we understandably want to have our cake and eat it too. Unfortunately, a globally-competitive F product in all markets is a non-starter. The best anyone can hope for is a small subfleet of F-equipped airplanes deployed to certain destinations with an improved, all-aisle-access next gen J product everywhere else. Only that sort of arrangement is viable going forward at UA, and even then, it is very much in doubt.
One thing is for sure: the product certainly is not good enough to stimulate demand on the margin. OTOH, if United spent the money to really differentiate F, but did so only in the handful of markets which generate reliable paid F demand, it would really muddy the water with respect to the service quality and perception in markets where UA does not direct that investment. Certainly could be a branding faux pas as well.
On FT, we understandably want to have our cake and eat it too. Unfortunately, a globally-competitive F product in all markets is a non-starter. The best anyone can hope for is a small subfleet of F-equipped airplanes deployed to certain destinations with an improved, all-aisle-access next gen J product everywhere else. Only that sort of arrangement is viable going forward at UA, and even then, it is very much in doubt.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,025
I've been in GF all of one time. One extra entrée. "Better wine", although the Italian FA recommended one of the reds from BF instead of the choices they had in GF. A bit more room. I was under-whelmed and certainly wouldn't cough up $ out of my own pocket to go from BF to GF.
To make GF work, UA'd have to attract people who pay out of their own pocket because most companies say a lie-flat seat in BF is good enough. And UA isn't making the effort and my guess is they won't. Rainey's comments pretty much confirm...
To make GF work, UA'd have to attract people who pay out of their own pocket because most companies say a lie-flat seat in BF is good enough. And UA isn't making the effort and my guess is they won't. Rainey's comments pretty much confirm...
#9
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: What I write is my opinion alone..don't read into it anything not written.
Posts: 9,686
I watched it yesterday and thought that it was a bad piece. He was talking on things of which he personally knew very little of. It's better to not comment on what you don't know than to comment and show the world. At least he admitted to never knowing about the knee defender before last week.
This guy should only be given a mike in response to direct financial questions on earnings day. Needs a few classes in PR presence. Clearly not a good salesman for the brand.
This guy should only be given a mike in response to direct financial questions on earnings day. Needs a few classes in PR presence. Clearly not a good salesman for the brand.
#11
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LAX
Programs: UA Silver, AA, WN, DL
Posts: 4,091
Compare that to international carriers that have a real first class... way different experience and justification of the cost.
Great messaging... maybe they should start selling Global First as Business First while they convert the fleet. Hey, it's the same same.
Last edited by luv2ctheworld; Sep 4, 2014 at 1:03 pm
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,172
#13
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,025
Interesting to see if UA goes w/ the sardine can UA model of BF as they get rid of GF or if they go w/ the less-dense CO model. Can they get 5 across in a 752 w new BF seats ?
My guess is they go with the "stuff as many BF seats as possible in every a/c", therefore becoming the least desirable business product.
My guess is they go with the "stuff as many BF seats as possible in every a/c", therefore becoming the least desirable business product.
#14
Join Date: Feb 2006
Programs: UA, Starwood, Priority Club, Hertz, Starbucks Gold Card
Posts: 3,952
I don't see UA making the effort either.
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Honolulu Harbor
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 15,025
But non-rev employees still get the empty seats? I think that's the biggest knock against "exclusivity". Why does a CEO or self-paying ticket buyer want to pay $14k if he knows a baggage handler is riding free next to him? Nothing against baggage handlers, but employees should pay taxes on the value of tickets they receive. Certainly taints the idea of having to pay $14k.
Last edited by IAH-OIL-TRASH; Sep 4, 2014 at 1:47 pm