Special meals discontinued for EWR-LAX/SFO (p.s. Flights Not Impacted)
Mar 18, 2014, 12:28 am
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Programs: AAdvantage, MileagePlus, SkyMiles
Posts: 4,159
Special meals discontinued for EWR-LAX/SFO (p.s. Flights Not Impacted)
Not sure if anyone noticed this nugget, but...
Nice.
*Effective May 1, 2014, we no longer offer special meals on flights between New York/Newark and San Francisco or Los Angeles. Special meal requests will not be accepted after March 13, 2014.
Last edited by FlyinHawaiian; Mar 18, 2014 at 4:21 am Reason: correcting thread title
Mar 18, 2014, 12:54 am
#3
Original Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA
Programs: AAdvantage, MileagePlus, SkyMiles
Posts: 4,159
Mar 18, 2014, 4:21 am
#4
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,813
I never order special meals, so this doesn't affect me either way.
But I wonder why UA and others don't charge for special meals to either cover their added costs or make them a profit source. Sure, nobody likes paying fees, but at least then people who want and/or need special meals can have them. And if UA has an added expense for the meals, surely it isn't that unreasonable for them to charge for them.
But I wonder why UA and others don't charge for special meals to either cover their added costs or make them a profit source. Sure, nobody likes paying fees, but at least then people who want and/or need special meals can have them. And if UA has an added expense for the meals, surely it isn't that unreasonable for them to charge for them.
Mar 18, 2014, 6:11 am
#7
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DAY
Programs: UA 1K 1MM; Marriott LT Titanium; Amex MR; Chase UR; Hertz PC; Global Entry
Posts: 10,159
Since there are plenty of INTL flights out of EWR where they still accept special meal requests, its not like this is going to cut out any major overhead.
Another unfriendly move that will save negligible, if any, money.
Another unfriendly move that will save negligible, if any, money.
Mar 18, 2014, 7:27 am
#10
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,169
Mar 18, 2014, 7:52 am
#11
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Boston, MA (BOS)
Programs: AA PLT Pro 2MM, DL Gold, UA Silver, Marriott Ambassador + LT Plat, COFC Venture X, HHonors Diamond
Posts: 5,587
Seriously if someone needs a Kosher/Gluten Free/Vegan/etc meal UA should offer it. DL offers SPMLs on all domestic flights with meal service, AA does in transcon markets-not just JFK-LAX/SFO but also routes like LAX-BDL/BOS/DCA/EWR/IAD/MIA/PBI/RDU. Of course with the new regime this may all change.
Mar 18, 2014, 8:31 am
#12
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: PHX
Programs: AS 75K; UA 1MM; Hyatt Globalist; Marriott LTP; Hilton Diamond (Aspire)
Posts: 56,455
Mar 18, 2014, 9:01 am
#14
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LHR (sometimes CLE, SFO, BOS, LAX, SEA)
Programs: UA 1K
Posts: 5,893
unavaca is saying that there are people who would buy a plane ticket on a SFO-EWR redeye flight, end up in a cabin where there is a complimentary meal (by purchasing F or by upgrading), and then pre-order a special meal. If I understand correctly, sometimes the special meal would not be catered, and then unavaca is saying that these passengers who did not receive their pre-ordered special meal would ask for compensation (or receive it proactively), resulting in a positive gain of a $100 e-certificate (or whatever). If I understand the implication correctly, this is "abusive" because UA would reliably not cater certain special meals on certain flights which were "supposed" to have them, is that right? I have no firsthand experience.
Is this about right? Were people doing this?
Mar 18, 2014, 9:01 am
#15
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,169
