Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Is Ch11 unavoidable for UA next year?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2013, 3:12 am
  #151  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,169
Originally Posted by Indelaware
Because UA's FF program still gives more award for the mile than others. DL has limited availability and high prices for rewards, neither US nor AA has one-way awards or award stopovers, WN is revenue based...
After 2/1, I can get oneworld F seats to S. Asia for 135K miles, where with UA on any partners it will be 260K.

If you read up on DL mileage burning, the great gap on rates/redemption ability will have narrowed to nil after 2/1.

The days of MP as an industry leading program are over come 2/1.
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 5:00 am
  #152  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
After 2/1, I can get oneworld F seats to S. Asia for 135K miles, where with UA on any partners it will be 260K.

If you read up on DL mileage burning, the great gap on rates/redemption ability will have narrowed to nil after 2/1.
Really? You can now redeem DL miles for F tickets?? Or search most partners online? Or have both a stopover and open jaws on a single award? Or a one-way award?

The field may be a bit more level, but to say that the two are on par remains quite a stretch IMO.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 5:18 am
  #153  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,169
Originally Posted by sbm12
Really? You can now redeem DL miles for F tickets?? Or search most partners online? Or have both a stopover and open jaws on a single award? Or a one-way award?

The field may be a bit more level, but to say that the two are on par remains quite a stretch IMO.
Really. Everyone has made fun of "SkyPesos" for a long time. The joke is now on UA flyers - as of 2/1 the miles will be worth the least of the 3 majors. And the mileage program is no longer the clear differentiator it was.

I'd say they're on par now. DL miles are easier to earn, and will cost you less on the redemption side.
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 5:38 am
  #154  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Programs: DL 1 million, AA 1 mil, HH lapsed Diamond, Marriott Plat
Posts: 28,190
Originally Posted by sbm12
Or have both a stopover and open jaws on a single award? Or a one-way award?
A stopover and an open jaw on an international award, yes. The rules say stopover or open jaw but agents and online search have long priced this to permit both.

One-way pricing at 1/2 of r/t on Delta? No.

Double open jaw at r/t pricing? No.

Delta's award calendar search is utterly insufferable, even for simple DL-only itineraries, but poor search is only one element of the total airline experience.
3Cforme is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 6:23 am
  #155  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,169
Originally Posted by 3Cforme
A stopover and an open jaw on an international award, yes. The rules say stopover or open jaw but agents and online search have long priced this to permit both.
If you want to get technical - the UAL web site lists both 2 OJs and a stopover, but on different lines in the award T&Cs. It's a bit of a gray area on whether they can be used in the same itin...agent YMMV.
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 6:30 am
  #156  
Moderator Hilton Honors, Travel News, West, The Suggestion Box, Smoking Lounge & DiningBuzz
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Programs: Honors Diamond, Hertz Presidents Circle, National Exec Elite
Posts: 36,027
Originally Posted by sbm12
...The field may be a bit more level, but to say that the two are on par remains quite a stretch IMO.
Indeed.

Originally Posted by star_world
Most people seem to disagree with you on that. Just because UA's redemption rates are changing for the worse it doesn't mean they will be worse than the competition (and in most cases, they will not be).
The routes I fly aren't changing at all.
cblaisd is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 6:38 am
  #157  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: NYC
Programs: AADULtArer
Posts: 5,683
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
Really. Everyone has made fun of "SkyPesos" for a long time. The joke is now on UA flyers - as of 2/1 the miles will be worth the least of the 3 majors. And the mileage program is no longer the clear differentiator it was.

I'd say they're on par now. DL miles are easier to earn, and will cost you less on the redemption side.
MP is devalued only for those who seek F on a *A partner as some sort of " life experience"

For the sane world who seek to go to cool places the MP program is still far ahead getting us to the destination.
LaserSailor is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 8:02 am
  #158  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Programs: AA CONCIERGE KEY & 1MM, HILTON DIAMOND
Posts: 11,970
Originally Posted by LaserSailor
MP is devalued only for those who seek F on a *A partner as some sort of " life experience"

For the sane world who seek to go to cool places the MP program is still far ahead getting us to the destination.
That's highly subjective because as another member posted, Star Alliance can't take you to exotic places like Bora Bora and technically neither can Oneworld, but at least AA has partnered with Air Tahiti Nui to get you there.
fly747first is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 8:03 am
  #159  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Programs: United, Marriott
Posts: 57
Originally Posted by LaserSailor
MP is devalued only for those who seek F on a *A partner as some sort of " life experience"

For the sane world who seek to go to cool places the MP program is still far ahead getting us to the destination.
Thank you. I use miles for family vacations. We don't plan to sit in 1st and doubt we ever will. Last vacation we all got bumped to business class off award tickets on both legs and my wife and I were both happy and excited. I'm happy with Mileageplus but less so with United as I seem to be flying on less mainline aircraft. Flying from SEA to SFO on an ERJ is just ludicrous. That and the exit of USAir from *A hurts United's offerings from SEA for me. I'm looking at Delta or AA for next year.
gtslow is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 8:46 am
  #160  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,169
Originally Posted by LaserSailor
MP is devalued only for those who seek F on a *A partner as some sort of " life experience"

For the sane world who seek to go to cool places the MP program is still far ahead getting us to the destination.
MP has also been devalued for those who seek C on a *A partner for even just a slightly nicer experience
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 8:54 am
  #161  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
MP has also been devalued for those who seek C on a *A partner for even just a slightly nicer experience
How does this impact the likelihood of a Chapter 11 filing in the coming year?
fly18725 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 9:00 am
  #162  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,169
Originally Posted by fly18725
How does this impact the likelihood of a Chapter 11 filing in the coming year?
The conversation evolved into a broader discussion of the MP program vis-a-vis competitors, as it often does in these threads.

You're free to ignore. Or to defend UA. Your call.
UA-NYC is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 9:19 am
  #163  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Programs: 6 year GS, now 2MM Jeff-ugee, *wood LTPlt, SkyPeso PLT
Posts: 6,526
Originally Posted by LaserSailor
MP is devalued only for those who seek F on a *A partner as some sort of " life experience"

For the sane world who seek to go to cool places the MP program is still far ahead getting us to the destination.
This entirely ignores the reality of redemptions. Now if you want to fly IAH to El Paso, you are correct, you are not impacted. But if I want to fly to anyplace I would typically go (YVR, NRT, PEK, HKG, LHR, spain, Italy) this often does impact me. Why? Because on any given day, probably more than half of the redemption options are on *A, often far more. So its not really a question of "do I fly UAL in C, or pay 2x that to fly *A" its a question of do have a shot at C seats.

At this point, and having recently looked at redemption on each, my miles on AS are far, far more usable and valuable than those on UA. And I might add that I am seeing about as many redemptions on DAL as I am seeing on UAL metal. And keep in mind, this is only part of the "package" - DAL gives more usable SWUs going forward and does not massively sell TODs like UAL does domestically, and has much better quality of service.

For me, this was sort of the final straw. I'll still book *A carriers (where the service is good, just booked ANA to NRT) and credit to my UAL account, but I am only flying UAL when its the only option OR is a lot cheaper, and given that AS is now crediting all partners, I will be willing to fly AS partners which I would not have looked at before rather than *A carriers.
spin88 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 9:22 am
  #164  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 3,361
Originally Posted by UA-NYC
The conversation evolved into a broader discussion of the MP program vis-a-vis competitors, as it often does in these threads.

You're free to ignore. Or to defend UA. Your call.
It is an honest question and I think understanding how the increase in partner redemption rates impacts insolvency is relevant.

I'm not sure why you suggest my only two options are to ignore you or defend UAL.
fly18725 is offline  
Old Dec 17, 2013, 9:24 am
  #165  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: ORD, LGA
Programs: AA EXP 2MM
Posts: 348
Originally Posted by fly747first
Hello everyone. I don't want to start another bashing thread and politely request that we remain objective.

As we know, UA is at an all-time low and continues to make changes that severely hinder its ability to retain loyal flyers. Other than its global network, UA doesn't seem to have anything valuable that AA/US and DL wouldn't offer and even surpass (e.g., better customer service, 1x2x1 J class configuration, etc.).

When UA lost $35 million from my company alone, I thought it would be somewhat rare, but from posts here, Linkedin, Facebook, et al., it seems that UA continues to lose many other contracts.

Thus, my focus of discussion is the following: even if Smisek is replaced, will UA ever be able to recover? Unquestionably, UA will need to spend lots of resources to lure back HV pax and offer competitive premium cabins. So if UA suddenly decided to change and bring back former amenities and services, how successful could the airline be if its actions were quickly matched by AA and DL? As things stand right now, even B6 will have a superior transcon product next year.
You realize UA is profitable, right? Profitable companies don't enter Chapter 11.

My observations are purely anecdotal, but on my ORD-LGA weekly commute, UA planes were routinely full. AA planes seem to have a lot more free seats. It also seemed like there were a lot more 1Ks on UA than EXPs on AA.

For all the bellyaching on this forum, I'd yet to see evidence that there were was a mass exodus of high value flyers from UA. Yeah, I jumped ship because of the M+ devaluation. But it doesn't mean your average business traveler cares enough to jump ship over issues we rant about on FT.
fahrradman is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.