Go Back  FlyerTalk Forums > Miles&Points > Airlines and Mileage Programs > United Airlines | MileagePlus
Reload this Page >

United changed our Itinerary and the time is not acceptable...now what?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

United changed our Itinerary and the time is not acceptable...now what?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 21, 2013, 6:39 am
  #16  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
OP - Don't call until you have the options in front of you. If you want something different, you need to propose it. Don't delay as there are other pax in your position and they are snapping up the better alternatives as time passes.

It's unlikely that UA will book you OA and certainly not on WN, so check out prices on those flights to see if a refund & purchase makes sense.
Often1 is offline  
Old May 21, 2013, 8:27 am
  #17  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 24,153
Originally Posted by njcommodore
color me skeptical, but I don't see UA doing anything here other than offering a different flight or refund, nor should they.
Ive been in the OPs shoes numerous times since 3/3, they were willing to work with me by Refunding the whole tkt, switch me to any other combo of flights on UA or even allow me to switch the dates of flying

The main pt is to remember they dont have to do anything other then Refund the whole tkt!

Highly doubt they'll put the OP or anyone onto another carrier at UAs expense. But Im only a 1K but still doubt theyd do that for even a GS

If a 6pm flight OP is all you will accept Non-stop, then I suggest you workout getting back a new cert and go UA 1 way and AA 1 way
craz is offline  
Old May 21, 2013, 2:59 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: BUR / LAX
Programs: UA MM/Gold; WN A-list; HH something depending; Marriott Gold
Posts: 1,555
Just call and propose alternatives. Make sure you know all the options, including code shares. Personally, I would call ASAP rather than wait for your wife since holiday inventory is disappearing as we type.

Last time this happened to me, the agent let me change to an alternate flight without any question. Time before, they allowed me to stay an extra night since no same day flights worked for me. I was 1K at the time, maybe that matters.

If they make changes, be sure to have them enter notes in your record explaining what they changed and why just in case other glitches come up.
abaheti is offline  
Old May 21, 2013, 5:13 pm
  #19  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles / Basel
Programs: UA 1K MM, AA EXP, Hyatt Globalist
Posts: 26,930
Originally Posted by njcommodore
color me skeptical, but I don't see UA doing anything here other than offering a different flight or refund, nor should they.
Yup, it just sucks for the OP that he happened to make plans around a certain flight time...
MatthewLAX is offline  
Old May 21, 2013, 6:47 pm
  #20  
In Memoriam, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Benicia CA
Programs: Alaska MVP Gold 75K, AA 3.8MM, UA 1.1MM, enjoying the retired life
Posts: 31,849
Originally Posted by bsdstone
I'll let you guys know what they say...just can't believe this flight got scrapped, it appeared to be over 50% sold when we booked it last month?!?!
The AA flight at 1710 looks even worse with 14 of 16 seats open in F and about 85% of Y open. One-way coach fares are as low as $273 for that flight in coach and $603 in F. If you go out on the flight just after midnight coach drops to as low as $184 and F to $573. That 0035 departure gets into ORD at 0555.

I wonder if you have the same risk it will cancel in a schedule revision with such a light load right now.

Tom at SFO on the way to OzFest
tom911 is offline  
Old May 21, 2013, 8:00 pm
  #21  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,933
If I were in the OP's shoes I'd be on the phone getting a flight home on 9/2/13 (Monday) or else stay on the last flight available on Sunday (which is the one he and his wife are on) and get some rays in Chicago when I got home. Cancelling a ticket which I applied vouchers towards would not be an option at this juncture. Buying two tickets on another carrier for a few more hours in Vegas would only happen if I hit it big on the tables!
LilAbner is offline  
Old May 21, 2013, 9:19 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: ORD/EGE
Programs: UA GS/Global Entry
Posts: 191
As I GS- I love schedule changes. In my experience, a schedule change is almost a freebie pass to do whatever I want routing wise. Last month I was scheduled to fly ORD-MUC-BCN on UA connecting to LH. Originally ORD-MUC was a 764 (CO 2 cabin for those who don't know) but was switched to a PMUA 763 (3 cabin). I tend to not like the 763s, the ventilation is horrible and I always feel disgusting after going TATL on them. I gave GS a call and asked politely to be switched to go ORD-SFO-FRA-BCN (I had a whole day to kill in BCN and prefer the 747UD over any other cabin) and sure enough they made the entire change for free. In OP's situation, I would not expect GS to rebook you on AA, but they will certainly refund that portion and probably give you an extra $500 cert or so as a gesture of goodwill.
UAGLOBAL is offline  
Old May 21, 2013, 11:52 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by UAGLOBAL
As I GS- I love schedule changes. In my experience, a schedule change is almost a freebie pass to do whatever I want routing wise. Last month I was scheduled to fly ORD-MUC-BCN on UA connecting to LH. Originally ORD-MUC was a 764 (CO 2 cabin for those who don't know) but was switched to a PMUA 763 (3 cabin). I tend to not like the 763s, the ventilation is horrible and I always feel disgusting after going TATL on them. I gave GS a call and asked politely to be switched to go ORD-SFO-FRA-BCN (I had a whole day to kill in BCN and prefer the 747UD over any other cabin) and sure enough they made the entire change for free. In OP's situation, I would not expect GS to rebook you on AA, but they will certainly refund that portion and probably give you an extra $500 cert or so as a gesture of goodwill.
When I was a GS, in the pre-$mi$ek era, I was once booked SFO-SEA-NRT and a schedule change made the SEA connection nearly impossible. I'd chosen that stupid route because it had R space whereas SFO-NRT did not. I was a new GS and had no idea what the possibilities were, so I politely asked if they could move me to an earlier SFO-NRT flight to have a better connecting time.

The response was that, as a GS, I should not have to fly that routing. Not only did they put me on SFO-NRT, but they somehow confirmed me into J even though the seat map was showing that J was booked full.

To recap: They gave me a better (more expensive) routing, and they kept my upgrade on a flight that not only had no R space but didn't appear to have any seats, and they did all of this without me even asking for it.

That's how things used to be. This story explains how UA created value in contrast to $mi$ek's destruction of value. This was a pivotal moment in my experience with UA that cemented my loyalty for a long time following.
FlyWorld is offline  
Old May 22, 2013, 4:00 am
  #24  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: IAD
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Rewards - LTPP
Posts: 4,240
Originally Posted by mitchmu
When I was a GS, in the pre-$mi$ek era, I was once booked SFO-SEA-NRT and a schedule change made the SEA connection nearly impossible. I'd chosen that stupid route because it had R space whereas SFO-NRT did not. I was a new GS and had no idea what the possibilities were, so I politely asked if they could move me to an earlier SFO-NRT flight to have a better connecting time.

The response was that, as a GS, I should not have to fly that routing. Not only did they put me on SFO-NRT, but they somehow confirmed me into J even though the seat map was showing that J was booked full.

To recap: They gave me a better (more expensive) routing, and they kept my upgrade on a flight that not only had no R space but didn't appear to have any seats, and they did all of this without me even asking for it.

That's how things used to be. This story explains how UA created value in contrast to $mi$ek's destruction of value. This was a pivotal moment in my experience with UA that cemented my loyalty for a long time following.
was that pre or po$t bankruptcy?
njcommodore is offline  
Old May 22, 2013, 6:10 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Frozen in Carbonite
Programs: UA Aluminum 0.6MM, Bonvoy Life Sentence, Hyatt Eliteist, AA Super Plutonium
Posts: 2,878
In my experience, a schedule change = a free put. I've never had any issues getting a ticket refunded or changed for a schedule change, even minor ones.
TommyC80 is offline  
Old May 22, 2013, 8:40 am
  #26  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by njcommodore
was that pre or po$t bankruptcy?
Post bankruptcy.

Last edited by iluv2fly; May 22, 2013 at 9:40 am Reason: off-topic
FlyWorld is offline  
Old May 22, 2013, 9:33 am
  #27  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 18
Originally Posted by mitchmu
When I was a GS, in the pre-$mi$ek era, I was once booked SFO-SEA-NRT and a schedule change made the SEA connection nearly impossible. I'd chosen that stupid route because it had R space whereas SFO-NRT did not. I was a new GS and had no idea what the possibilities were, so I politely asked if they could move me to an earlier SFO-NRT flight to have a better connecting time.

The response was that, as a GS, I should not have to fly that routing. Not only did they put me on SFO-NRT, but they somehow confirmed me into J even though the seat map was showing that J was booked full.

To recap: They gave me a better (more expensive) routing, and they kept my upgrade on a flight that not only had no R space but didn't appear to have any seats, and they did all of this without me even asking for it.

That's how things used to be. This story explains how UA created value in contrast to $mi$ek's destruction of value. This was a pivotal moment in my experience with UA that cemented my loyalty for a long time following.
You would think a GS would know that the seat map is not an indicator of available seats.
LoganHero is offline  
Old May 22, 2013, 10:43 am
  #28  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by LoganHero
You would think a GS would know that the seat map is not an indicator of available seats.
I have read others talking about that for many years. I am aware that many on FT have this view. However, it's not something I've ever fully understood.

1. If a seat is full, that means someone is sitting on it, or it's blocked. Blocking of seats is relevant at the margin, but not in aggregate. They might block 2-4 seats, but they're not, typically, going to block 2/3 of the plane for no good reason.

2. If a seat is empty, that means someone is not sitting on it, but there are reservations for which seats have not been assigned, so therefore, some empty seats will be filled with unassigned reservations.

3. Alternate is to look at fare buckets, but that's also imperfect. If all buckets are zero, then we know the plane is probably full, but just as seats are not a source of truth, neither are buckets. They are directional.

My conclusion has been that looking at seats and fare buckets, with a grain of salt added for good measure, is the best available option to estimate loads for someone who doesn't have access to UA's internal systems.

I've never seen an in depth discussion on FT that convinces me there is a better way.
FlyWorld is offline  
Old May 22, 2013, 10:47 am
  #29  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 18
Originally Posted by LoganHero
You would think a GS would know that the seat map is not an indicator of available seats.
Originally Posted by mitchmu

My conclusion has been that looking at seats and fare buckets, with a grain of salt added for good measure, is the best available option to estimate loads for someone who doesn't have access to UA's internal systems.
I'm glad you agree with me.
LoganHero is offline  
Old May 22, 2013, 10:50 am
  #30  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,645
Originally Posted by LoganHero
I'm glad you agree with me.
I am not agreeing with you.

I am saying that seat maps are an indicator of available seats.

But, they are an imperfect indicator.

Back to the example I cited - in response to a schedule change - GS put me on a flight that was more expensive, that had no R space, and for which there were no seats showing as open on the seat map.

And, that was awesome.
FlyWorld is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.