Continuing flight?
#16
FlyerTalk Evangelist


Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Jersey Shore/YYZ
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Plat, Hilton Diamond, Hertz PC
Posts: 12,529
I agree with GoAmtrak because most of us come on FT to learn things, and two different planes with the same flight number causing a change of aircraft at connecting airports is b.s., especially when the ticket is sold as a direct flight.
What's the problem with a discussion of getting from point A to point B without needing to take a hike in between?
What's the problem with a discussion of getting from point A to point B without needing to take a hike in between?
agree with GoAmtrak if you actually read through this thread.
"Well, that's just it - it's not the same flight number. It's the same plane though, according to the info".
And we already have a "direct flight" thread.
#17
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: DAY
Programs: UA 1K 1MM; Marriott LT Titanium; Amex MR; Chase UR; Hertz PC; Global Entry
Posts: 11,450
And could very easily change before you take these flights. "Where is my plane coming from" changes a lot due to irrops, mx needs, etc.
#18
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,092
It's a parallel topic. To get on my favorite hobby horse, I think USDOT should ban direct flight numbers unless it's the same plane on all legs and one is allowed to remain on the aircraft during any stop. This is well within DOT's purview to ensure clean marketing practices.
I don't think that most people realize that they can book a "direct" flight and still misconnect to it.
Anyhow, such legislation would stop this practice quickly.
Really.
#19
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: May 2007
Location: Houston
Programs: UA Plat, Marriott Plat
Posts: 13,345
4k for OAL codeshares, nearly 4k for express, a few hundred for charters, a few hundred for mx and test flights, some reposiitoning, and you're down to the ~1650 used by mainline.
#20




Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: SFO/JFK
Programs: UA 1P MM, AA-PP, AS, DL
Posts: 2,060
I often have taken 1433, which some days starts in MGA-IAH-SFO. Change of gauge at IAH (from 73W to 738-9). I have had a hell of a time getting CO to split the flight into 2 segments, 1) for the mileage, 2) for upgrade reasons. It always costs me an additional $5.50 in taxes.
#21




Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: From: PWM
Programs: United GS, Fairmont Platinum,SPG LTPlat, Hilton Diamond, MarriottGold..like the rest of the world
Posts: 4,401
OP -- I'm gonna guess you're under 30 years old, right?
Not to sound like an old-timer, but gosh, this used to be VERY commonplace on virtually all domestic carriers. Heck, I remember taking the ORD-PVD-PWM flight many a time and didn't think twice about it. Just sat on the plane with the other 60 or so pax while the PVD pax deplaned. It's just how it used to be.
Regional carriers, like Piedmont, could have flights with up to a dozen legs and stage lengths of just 15 minutes. Made for a wild day, but it was a whole lot more fun back then than it is now.
Not to sound like an old-timer, but gosh, this used to be VERY commonplace on virtually all domestic carriers. Heck, I remember taking the ORD-PVD-PWM flight many a time and didn't think twice about it. Just sat on the plane with the other 60 or so pax while the PVD pax deplaned. It's just how it used to be.
Regional carriers, like Piedmont, could have flights with up to a dozen legs and stage lengths of just 15 minutes. Made for a wild day, but it was a whole lot more fun back then than it is now.
#22




Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: UA Platinum/2MM; HH Diamond; GM for everything else
Posts: 548
#23
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: IAD
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott Platinum
Posts: 292
#24

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: UA Gold 1.6 MM
Posts: 240
Upgrade impossible
A couple of months ago I was on UA 860 GIG-GRU-IAD, a one-stop direct flight with the same plane and same flight number. The last day or two of the trip leading up to boarding in GIG was a mess, so I felt lucky to make the flight -- not much opportunity to fine tune the arrangements. I flew in Y on a W fare, and during the 2+ plus hours between the segments at GRU, I verified there were available C seats. I tried to upgrade with a GPU but was told that there was no way the system would allow it because I was a "transit passenger," having joined the flight in GIG. The flight went out with 8 empty C seats.
#25
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: BGM/ PHL
Programs: US (Silver, *A Silver), AA, Starbucks (Gold)
Posts: 2,242
So it was basically like a flying Greyhound, stopping in every city along the way?
#26


Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: LHR (sometimes CLE, SFO, BOS, LAX, SEA)
Programs: Dunkin' Rewards Boosted
Posts: 5,915
A couple of months ago I was on UA 860 GIG-GRU-IAD, a one-stop direct flight with the same plane and same flight number. The last day or two of the trip leading up to boarding in GIG was a mess, so I felt lucky to make the flight -- not much opportunity to fine tune the arrangements. I flew in Y on a W fare, and during the 2+ plus hours between the segments at GRU, I verified there were available C seats. I tried to upgrade with a GPU but was told that there was no way the system would allow it because I was a "transit passenger," having joined the flight in GIG. The flight went out with 8 empty C seats.
#27




Join Date: Jul 2006
Programs: UA Platinum/2MM; HH Diamond; GM for everything else
Posts: 548
In my SFO/HNL/GUM on UA201 in September, the original booking showed as one segment (SFO/GUM) only. I called 1k desk. A nice agent helped to split it into 2. Upgrade for the first leg was successful but not for the 2nd so I ended sitting in F first then moved to Y later.


. Is there some sort of FAA registration they need for additional flight numbers?