Community
Wiki Posts
Search

United to "slim" the A320 fleet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2012, 10:42 am
  #1  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
United to "slim" the A320 fleet

Looks like United is following in the path of slimline seats. The A320s will be refit starting in 2013, including adding an extra row of seats to the aircraft according to a report from Apex. These are the Recaro BL3250s, a/k/a NEK on Lufthansa.

http://blog.apex.aero/cabin-interior...boost-revenue/
http://boardingarea.com/blogs/thewan...ir-a320-fleet/

I've flown on these seats with LH a few times. If United doesn't opt for the "comfort" package with better padding then folks are going to be longing for the legacy CO seats before too long.
sbm12 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 10:47 am
  #2  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 2,842
Originally Posted by sbm12
Looks like United is following in the path of slimline seats. The A320s will be refit starting in 2013, including adding an extra row of seats to the aircraft according to a report from Apex. These are the Recaro BL3250s, a/k/a NEK on Lufthansa.

http://blog.apex.aero/cabin-interior...boost-revenue/
http://boardingarea.com/blogs/thewan...ir-a320-fleet/

I've flown on these seats with LH a few times. If United doesn't opt for the "comfort" package with better padding then folks are going to be longing for the legacy CO seats before too long.
One would hope they opt for the AC outlets and whatever IFE option UA goes for (wifi, DTV, or some hybrid seatback tv/personal handheld device). Or I'll have more reasons to avoid the A320s.
nova08 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 10:53 am
  #3  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,185
Too many long routes to choose these now. :/
UnitedFlyGuy is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 10:59 am
  #4  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Programs: UA 1K 1MM (finally!), IHG AMB-Spire, HH Diamond
Posts: 60,174
United to "slim" the A320 fleet

Now that explains the bigger bins when they were already reasonable

And the downgrade of United continues. The current A320 is about the most comfortable domestic narrow body, especially when comparing E+.

More empty seats for them to fly
uastarflyer is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 11:08 am
  #5  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
Originally Posted by uastarflyer
And the downgrade of United continues. The current A320 is about the most comfortable domestic narrow body, especially when comparing E+.
+1

Great seat pitch, width, and comfort. So of course it's got to change.
channa is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 11:10 am
  #6  
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Ugh AS and now UA.

However, it is plausible that UA has a new goal for the A320s where those birds will focus more on the midcons and ~1-3 hour long flights, where the more efficient newer 738s/739s, along with the 757s, will do more transcontinental flying.

The NEK seats were perfectly fine on LH flights for me since it was mostly sub 2 hours, but those seats are not comfortable for longer flights.
golfingboy is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 11:14 am
  #7  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: variously: PVG, SFO, LHR
Programs: AA ExPlat, UA 1MM Gold, Hyatt Glob, Marriott Plat, IHG Plat, HH Gold
Posts: 1,678
Originally Posted by channa
+1

Great seat pitch, width, and comfort. So of course it's got to change.
I'm sure you've realized, if you've sat in LH's version of this seat, that the shortened pitch comes at the expense of seat thickness on LH's planes.

Anyway, this can only be an advantage for us that have access to E+. The exit row seats must remain where they are for evac purposes, so the added extra row has to be behind the exit rows (and not affect the seat pitch of E+).

That means, if they switch to slimline seats, E+ seats should get an extra 1" of legroom over current design.
andrewwm is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 11:19 am
  #8  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SEA
Posts: 12,485
This has been in works for some time in an attempt to improve the horrid economics of the A319 fleet in particular. I've heard a few different rumors, including an added row in Y behind the exit row or an added row of F.
sxf24 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 11:24 am
  #9  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 6,967
Originally Posted by sbm12
Looks like United is following in the path of slimline seats. The A320s will be refit starting in 2013, including adding an extra row of seats to the aircraft according to a report from Apex. These are the Recaro BL3250s, a/k/a NEK on Lufthansa.

http://blog.apex.aero/cabin-interior...boost-revenue/
http://boardingarea.com/blogs/thewan...ir-a320-fleet/

I've flown on these seats with LH a few times. If United doesn't opt for the "comfort" package with better padding then folks are going to be longing for the legacy CO seats before too long.
The post 3/3 UA mess plus NEK is why I have shifted much of my travel to OW.

Those NEK seats are hard and unpleasant. I've flown many km's in them and they haven't gotten any better.
exbayern is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 11:27 am
  #10  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cape Cod MA
Programs: GS, 3 MM, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 752
United to "slim" the A320 fleet

I have sat in those seats on LH and even for short flights they are very very very uncomfortable.
nigos is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 11:37 am
  #11  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SEA
Posts: 12,485
I have tested the comfort package, which AS is installing, and the seat is much better than what is found on LH.
sxf24 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 11:45 am
  #12  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ORD-LAS
Programs: UA MM 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,419
Originally Posted by sxf24
This has been in works for some time in an attempt to improve the horrid economics of the A319 fleet in particular. I've heard a few different rumors, including an added row in Y behind the exit row or an added row of F.
Where is the proof in this? I have not heard about bad econmics on the airbus series. And slimline seats. Awful!
LASUA1K is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 11:45 am
  #13  
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Original Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: PSM
Posts: 69,232
Originally Posted by exbayern
The post 3/3 UA mess plus NEK is why I have shifted much of my travel to OW.
Thank goodness AA isn't installing them in their 777s, too. Oh, wait.

sbm12 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 12:00 pm
  #14  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TUS and any place close to a lav
Programs: UA 1.6MM
Posts: 5,423
The PMUA Airbus fleet need all they help they can get to stay competitive in seat mile costs with the PMCO Boeing NG fleet.

Adding seats to the Airbii will help reduce their seat-mile costs to be inline with the Boeing NG fleet.
warreng24 is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 12:06 pm
  #15  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LGA/JFK/EWR
Programs: UA 1K1.75MM, Hyatt Globalist, abandoned Marriott LTT (RIP SPG), Hertz PC
Posts: 21,170
NEK is brutal. Classic COdbaUA move here. Stay away from any routes over 1,000 miles.
UA-NYC is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.