Community
Wiki Posts
Search

EWR-SFO 3 class service?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2012, 11:52 am
  #16  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,866
Originally Posted by 1KPath
If I were flying on my own dime and not for business 200,000+ BIS a year, I might agree with you...but as some one who lives a good portion of his life on airplanes I value service and am willing to pay more for it!...and as someone who has flown for nearly 60 years...the cuts to service are certainly not minor!
As someone who's flying on their own dime, the ability to fly across the country for less than $400 is amazing.

I think the reality is that the number of people willing to pay for those experiences are dwindling and appear to be best served by the private/fractional jet companies these days.
unavaca is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 1:12 pm
  #17  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 1,309
ummm

they had those flights way after deregulation - through the '90s and early 2000s..


Originally Posted by unavaca
This was also at a time when inflation-adjusted airfare was many times higher than what it is now. It's not particularly fair to compare pre-deregulation service with the service of today.

I, for one, am happy to have affordable airfare at the expense of some minor cuts to service.
jasondc is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 2:32 pm
  #18  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: 6km East of EPAYE
Programs: UA Silver, AA Platinum, AS & DL GM Marriott TE, Hilton Gold
Posts: 9,582
Originally Posted by Aspen
Why then does UA leave a 747 unused for just over 12 hours at LAX?
(The aeroplane from Sydney arrives at LAX ~10.00 next departs after 22.00)

Over a decade ago UAL did actually fly a turn LAX-DEN-LAX with a 747-400 - it seems an achievable turn regarding sufficient time and traffic between two hubs.
Because they clearly arn't thinking of FTers I'd hop on that flight every chance I could.
Madone59 is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 2:46 pm
  #19  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Programs: US CP ; LH FTL ; *G
Posts: 1,630
Originally Posted by 1KPath
. . .I can top that...I remember flying in F from SEA to LAX via SFO on a 747-400 upstairs and having two full multi-course international meals served to me on the flights...on the SFO-LAX segment, they even broke out the caviar! Oh, how have times changed!
What's caviar?
burlax is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 3:32 pm
  #20  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Programs: UA Premier Platinum
Posts: 249
Originally Posted by FlyerChrisK
It is sold as 3-class. It is CPU-eligible (those rules are based on market, not equipment).
What happens when there is a flight change at the last moment from a 2-class to a 3-class plane? In that case how does the CPU work? Are only those who purchased FC tickets eligible for UG to F on the 3-class plane, and premiers who purchased economy tickets get added to the UG list for C?
vnatraj is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 4:46 pm
  #21  
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Originally Posted by vnatraj
What happens when there is a flight change at the last moment from a 2-class to a 3-class plane? In that case how does the CPU work? Are only those who purchased FC tickets eligible for UG to F on the 3-class plane, and premiers who purchased economy tickets get added to the UG list for C?
Yup. Basically, those who purchased F or C will now be eligible to upgrade to F, and premiers in Y who were on the waitlist for F/C will be transferred to the waitlist for the C cabin.
golfingboy is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 7:35 pm
  #22  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California, GVA, SIN, LHR, BRU, CDG
Programs: UA LT GS 4.12MM (4.08MM BIS), AA EXP 1.86MM ,DL DM 1.1MM, HH LT Diamond, SPG Platinum
Posts: 1,182
Originally Posted by unavaca
As someone who's flying on their own dime, the ability to fly across the country for less than $400 is amazing.

I think the reality is that the number of people willing to pay for those experiences are dwindling and appear to be best served by the private/fractional jet companies these days.
I hear what you are saying...I was paying an advanced purchase fare of $375 to $400 from LAX-BOS in 1973!...and just paid $389 on B6 from LGB-BOS for Mrs. 1K and me to attend a wedding next month. But I disagree that the private/fractional jet options are options, especially for small and medium sized businesses...just too rich for our blood...while it is a better option for those businesses that are able to pay for full F fares for their staff, those of us that are limited to pay "only" full fare Y are stuck with the limited service options aimed at the discounted fares of the Kayak flyer! There is too big of a gap between the two levels of service. Fortunately, most of my flying is international these days...usually on foreign carriers, so the service in Y is at least decent compared to the US counterparts!
1KPath is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 9:13 pm
  #23  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: YVR SFO
Programs: UA G
Posts: 4,866
Originally Posted by jasondc
they had those flights way after deregulation - through the '90s and early 2000s..
Yes, and the airlines were losing money hand over fist at the time. They had aligned their prices with the deregulated environment, but they hadn't re-aligned the product.

Originally Posted by 1KPath
I hear what you are saying...I was paying an advanced purchase fare of $375 to $400 from LAX-BOS in 1973!...and just paid $389 on B6 from LGB-BOS for Mrs. 1K and me to attend a wedding next month.
It is, indeed, amazing. For the curious, $400 in 1973 is equivalent to $1,940 today after accounting for inflation. Truly amazing.

Last edited by iluv2fly; Aug 17, 2012 at 10:00 pm Reason: merge
unavaca is offline  
Old Aug 17, 2012, 9:41 pm
  #24  
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Originally Posted by unavaca
It is, indeed, amazing. For the curious, $400 in 1973 is equivalent to $1,940 today after accounting for inflation. Truly amazing.
That is why we need a time machine. So I can go back to 1950-1960 and I won't have to work
golfingboy is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2012, 9:19 am
  #25  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SFO and OAK
Programs: FAF, Hyatt <>, SPG PLT
Posts: 2,240
Originally Posted by golfingboy
Yup. Basically, those who purchased F or C will now be eligible to upgrade to F, and premiers in Y who were on the waitlist for F/C will be transferred to the waitlist for the C cabin.
This will depend on the F fare purchased. Many F fares (F) will book directly into first on whatever United plane is used - no need to upgrade.

Discounted F fares (P, A) frequently book into business. Before the merger they used to book into D (I think) which could be upgraded but at some point there was a change where they started booking into Z which could not be upgraded.

Given the current state of United it would be a good idea to check the fare rules on any premium fare purchased to see what should happen on a plane swap so you can improve your chances of actually getting what you paid for if there is a swap.
Beerman92 is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2012, 10:40 am
  #26  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Coast
Programs: AA CONCIERGE KEY & 1MM, HILTON DIAMOND
Posts: 11,970
Originally Posted by tuolumne
Believe the plane is doing CDG-ORD-SFO-EWR-SFO-ORD-CDG.

The IPTE 763 F suite on a domestic route is the one thing that still keeps me loving UA. Knowing you're flying in the best seat in the US skies feels quite nice.
Really? I find the F seats on the UA 763s to be more slanted than on the 744 and 772s and thus aren't my favorite.
fly747first is offline  
Old Aug 18, 2012, 11:26 am
  #27  
Ambassador: Alaska Airlines
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: BWI
Posts: 7,390
Originally Posted by Beerman92
This will depend on the F fare purchased. Many F fares (F) will book directly into first on whatever United plane is used - no need to upgrade.

Discounted F fares (P, A) frequently book into business. Before the merger they used to book into D (I think) which could be upgraded but at some point there was a change where they started booking into Z which could not be upgraded.

Given the current state of United it would be a good idea to check the fare rules on any premium fare purchased to see what should happen on a plane swap so you can improve your chances of actually getting what you paid for if there is a swap.
You are right. I think A will book into the front cabin as it is still considered an F fare, at least according to UA.

As for upgrades, Z is eligible for CPU/RPU/GPU on domestic routes.
golfingboy is offline  
Old Aug 19, 2012, 6:26 am
  #28  
FlyerTalk Evangelist
IHG Contributor Badge
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PHX & AGP
Programs: AA Lifetime PLT, Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium, Hilton Gold
Posts: 11,456
Originally Posted by vnatraj
What happens when there is a flight change at the last moment from a 2-class to a 3-class plane? In that case how does the CPU work? Are only those who purchased FC tickets eligible for UG to F on the 3-class plane, and premiers who purchased economy tickets get added to the UG list for C?
Yes, those who paid for the seat get's the FC seats, and of course it goes depending on fare type too, once F is full then those who didn't make it to F go to the J seats, at times and it all depends on the time frame on the swap. if there is time, the flight might be catered as a 3 class flight, but mostly it depends on the notice of the swap. The flight would be catered as a 2 class flight so the people in the J seats would just benefit from the nice seats.. Happened to me a couple of times... On both AA and UA.
FlightNurse is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.