Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Live 787 Unveiling

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2012, 6:02 pm
  #61  
Moderator: Budget Travel forum & Credit Card Programs, FlyerTalk Evangelist
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: YYJ/YVR and back on Van Isle ....... for now
Programs: UA lifetime MM / *A Gold
Posts: 14,429
Originally Posted by zoegksf
Thanks JOSE! That video answers our question about the bulkheads between Y & C. It goes all the way to the floor.
Thanks for posting JOSE ^

Glad I went for seat 27F for both inaugural int'l and return

I know what my chances of clearing the upgrade on the inaugural are but hoping to clear a week later on return.

EmailKid
EmailKid is online now  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 6:32 pm
  #62  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: DAL
Programs: UA 1K AA EXP
Posts: 632
Well it looks like Continental lives on. Thing looks just like Continental 777. Very nice thou.
CO777DAL is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 7:01 pm
  #63  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: New York, NY
Programs: Hyatt GLOB, Marriott Lifetime PLT, UA 1K 1MM.
Posts: 1,728
i agree, it's kind of a letdown. i mean we all kind of expected it with the press releases and such, but i'm in the camp of being bummed by the fact they had an opportunity to do something different but it just looks like a pmco 777 with bigger windows and bins, which are nice, but that's it. the aisle in the BF cabin definitely looked narrow. i guess i'm just kind of underwhelmed. meanwhile i compare that to AA's announcement of their 773's and the improved J class and, well, yeah. i'm sure there's a whole bunch of technical improvements on the plane and it's efficient and aerodynamic and yadda yadda yadda, but if i'm sitting on it for 14 hours i care about the cabin comfort (and of course what kind of crappy service i can expect).
bob_the_d is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 7:09 pm
  #64  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 141
UA even ruined the dramatic arching entryway by placing a galley there! UA really knows how to make an innovative airplane seem incredibly dull.
JFKflyer26 is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 8:19 pm
  #65  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: ORD-LAS
Programs: UA MM 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Titanium Elite
Posts: 4,419
UA has made this plane ugly. I'd rather fly a 767.

Why oh why choose those CO seats in Business. UA seat is so much better.

9 across! Bad move, wont this hurt range?
LASUA1K is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 9:04 pm
  #66  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,324
one note:

the pre-merger United IPTE cabins had color palets chosen by the design consultancy Pentagram. Always preferred the sophisticated look of the IPTE cabins.

Looks like CO outfitted it with their early 90s generic checkered palet. To be expected as I'd image the seats were ordered before the merger took place, though the seat covers can be easily swapped if need be.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3475/...3e550511cc.jpg
http://www.ausbt.com.au/photos/view/...class-main.jpg

When fying intl, my favorite is still the 763. Right side 1K in F is the best premium travel experience of the entire fleet. I'll trade a larger dimming window and humidity for it, TYVM:

http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onemil...hpbikbwhpm.jpg
tuolumne is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 9:21 pm
  #67  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MEL
Programs: VAG
Posts: 1,865
For what it's worth, an article:

Why it's not United's fault that its new 787 interior looks a tad dated

Which at least explains why it looks a bit 2007, even if it doesn't explain why it looks a bit 1992.

Supposedly at some point they'll switch over to the more modern seats they're sticking in the 764s? Still the blue checkerboard that makes me think "Oh no, my Commodore 64 is broken" though.

Last edited by Jorgen; Aug 2, 2012 at 9:26 pm
Jorgen is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 9:41 pm
  #68  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Our Nation's Capital
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott BonVoy LT Titanium Elite, National Executive Elite
Posts: 832
Originally Posted by tuolumne
one note:

the pre-merger United IPTE cabins had color palets chosen by the design consultancy Pentagram. Always preferred the sophisticated look of the IPTE cabins.

Looks like CO outfitted it with their early 90s generic checkered palet. To be expected as I'd image the seats were ordered before the merger took place, though the seat covers can be easily swapped if need be.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3475/...3e550511cc.jpg
http://www.ausbt.com.au/photos/view/...class-main.jpg

When fying intl, my favorite is still the 763. Right side 1K in F is the best premium travel experience of the entire fleet. I'll trade a larger dimming window and humidity for it, TYVM:

http://boardingarea.com/blogs/onemil...hpbikbwhpm.jpg
Oddly, the IPTE 763 I was on last month had the old yellow sidewalls/bulkheads and carpeting. Nice ride though.

As for the 787, well, let's just say I didn't expect anything better for the interior.
Sulley is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 9:48 pm
  #69  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: NYC
Programs: AA EXP, Hilton GLD, Marriott Plat, NEXUS/GE
Posts: 2,872
Originally Posted by LASUA1K
Why oh why choose those CO seats in Business. UA seat is so much better.
Agreed, but this COdbaUA, not United Airlines.

Originally Posted by LASUA1K
9 across! Bad move, wont this hurt range?
More sardines!

Originally Posted by tuolumne
Looks like CO outfitted it with their early 90s generic checkered palet. To be expected as I'd image the seats were ordered before the merger took place, though the seat covers can be easily swapped if need be.
I can't imagine that COdbaUA would adopt the PMUA business class color scheme.
FlyerChrisK is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 9:57 pm
  #70  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 814
Boeing and CAL/UAL over-hyped this plane, at least from a non-tech standpoint. Raised too many expectations.

No PSU air vents. (777 ac system too finicky to please all pax)

No way to get from one side of the plane to the other in Y unless you cut in front of the bulkhead row or go to the rear. (767-400)

No space for more than 3 or 4 pax who may want to stand on a 12 hr plus flight.

9 across in Y.

Skinny aisles.

Mediocre and underwhelming at best IMO.
featheroleather is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 10:01 pm
  #71  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Reno NV/San Francisco, CA, USA
Posts: 1,168
United 787 Interior Pics

Hello Everyone,

Here's a good look at the new United 787 interior:

Interior

http://www.gadling.com/photos/united...iner-interior/

Exterior

http://www.gadling.com/photos/united...er-exterior-0/

http://i.gadling.com/2012/08/02/insi...-at-boeing-hq/

Looks ok...

M.

Last edited by SFnFlaGuy; Aug 2, 2012 at 10:09 pm
SFnFlaGuy is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 10:06 pm
  #72  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Our Nation's Capital
Programs: UA 1K, Marriott BonVoy LT Titanium Elite, National Executive Elite
Posts: 832
Originally Posted by featheroleather
Boeing and CAL/UAL over-hyped this plane, at least from a non-tech standpoint. Raised too many expectations.

No PSU air vents. (777 ac system too finicky to please all pax)

No way to get from one side of the plane to the other in Y unless you cut in front of the bulkhead row or go to the rear. (767-400)

No space for more than 3 or 4 pax who may want to stand on a 12 hr plus flight.

9 across in Y.

Skinny aisles.

Mediocre and underwhelming at best IMO.
There are PSU air vents.

Sulley is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 10:07 pm
  #73  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCO
Programs: DL-DM/1MM, HILTON-DIA, .HYATT-DIA/GLOB , IHG-PLT,HERTZ 5*, NATIONAL ES
Posts: 8,691
Originally Posted by SFnFlaGuy
Hello Everyone,

Here's a good look at the new United 787 interior:

http://www.gadling.com/photos/united...iner-interior/

Looks ok...

M.
^. Thanks for posting!
Crazyhotelguy is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 10:19 pm
  #74  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: SFO
Posts: 3,942
Espressos on UA (finally?)
malgudi is offline  
Old Aug 2, 2012, 10:23 pm
  #75  
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boulder
Programs: AA Plat, CX Silver
Posts: 2,361
Originally Posted by malgudi
Espressos on UA (finally?)
PMCO had it in BF on the 767/777. It was disgusting, quite frankly.
txflyer77 is offline  


Contact Us - Manage Preferences - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.