Is the new UA doing a better job of "protecting" E+ ?
#1
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP, WN A+, Marriott LT
Posts: 893
Is the new UA doing a better job of "protecting" E+ ?
Over the past month or so, I've been on several PMUA flights that weren't particularly full (~70%) and noticed that the majority of empty seats were middles in E+.
I'm comparing these flights to other previous ~70%-filled flights where there were lots of GMs in E+ and the back of the plane was empty.
Has the new UA stopped GAs from assigning people without seat assignments to E+? I know this still happens frequently when loads are high, but I feel in the past even on low load flights it was common to see GMs get put into E+.
Has anyone else noticed the saving of middle seats in E+ when flights aren't full? Or has this always been the case and I'm just noticing a pattern now, since I've been on a lot of low-load flights?
I'm comparing these flights to other previous ~70%-filled flights where there were lots of GMs in E+ and the back of the plane was empty.
Has the new UA stopped GAs from assigning people without seat assignments to E+? I know this still happens frequently when loads are high, but I feel in the past even on low load flights it was common to see GMs get put into E+.
Has anyone else noticed the saving of middle seats in E+ when flights aren't full? Or has this always been the case and I'm just noticing a pattern now, since I've been on a lot of low-load flights?
#2
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MBS/FNT/LAN
Programs: UA 1K, HH Gold, Mariott Gold
Posts: 9,630
IME, Your just noticing it now. I had not seen a GA give a "free" E+ seat in a few years (and I have seen tons of GM's/non UACO elites) ask.
#3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Programs: DL Platinum, AA Lifetime Gold, Hilton Diamond, Marriott Platinum, Radisson Premium
Posts: 6,638
I have seen Continental do head counts on several flights in F and in the "premium" coach seats. Good. It's about time they crack down on poachers. On the rare (and quite pleasant) occasions I have an empty seat next to me in F or E+, I can see eyes wandering and the temptation to sit there. If only they had this kind of aggressive checking at the SFO elite line near the int'l terminal connector!
#5
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Baton Rouge
Programs: Delta,United 1K, SPG Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz #1 Gold, Avis Preferred
Posts: 214
I was actually surprised Sunday night on my UA flight out of MSY - first time on UA metal - that the FA went and got someone who was "unhappy" in back and brought her up to sit in an empty E+ middle.
Funny aside - lady comes up to the row and immediately says to the woman seated on the aisle "Is that your bag under the seat? Because I need to put my stuff away down there!" She was not so much rude as aggresive... but I was thinking she just complained her way into an upgrade and then wants to be picky about it.... What can ya do?
Now I dont know why the woman was allowed to move but it seemed odd to me
Funny aside - lady comes up to the row and immediately says to the woman seated on the aisle "Is that your bag under the seat? Because I need to put my stuff away down there!" She was not so much rude as aggresive... but I was thinking she just complained her way into an upgrade and then wants to be picky about it.... What can ya do?
Now I dont know why the woman was allowed to move but it seemed odd to me
#6
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Denver, CO
Programs: American Airlines Executive Platinum; HHonors Diamond;Emerald Club Executive Elite
Posts: 285
#7
Original Poster
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: DEN
Programs: UA 1K, AA EXP, WN A+, Marriott LT
Posts: 893
I guess I should have stressed the empty middle seats in E+ part more. I've always seen GAs turn down GMs that ask for E+. The empty middles seats I've noticed over the past few weeks have made the E+ cabin ever nicer!
They used to be lazy about giving away E+ seats to GMs that didn't have seat assignments, since it's easy to fill planes from the front backwards.
They used to be lazy about giving away E+ seats to GMs that didn't have seat assignments, since it's easy to fill planes from the front backwards.
#8
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SFO/SJC
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, Hilton Gold
Posts: 14,890
They've been protecting the E+ cabin, but IME, more in the last year - year and a half or so (maybe 2). I've not only seen the FA's doing it, but in some cases, the GA's.
The best example of this was a earlier this year, when one of my two favorite staff at YYZ (they're mostly pretty good though), came on board, did an E+ count, and pulled 2 back into E- (I was turned around and watched from my seat in the F cabin). While I wasn't able to write a GTEM fast enough to give to her (for that, plus just her general friendliness and customer-centric nature), I did leave it for her when I left YYZ the next time.
The best example of this was a earlier this year, when one of my two favorite staff at YYZ (they're mostly pretty good though), came on board, did an E+ count, and pulled 2 back into E- (I was turned around and watched from my seat in the F cabin). While I wasn't able to write a GTEM fast enough to give to her (for that, plus just her general friendliness and customer-centric nature), I did leave it for her when I left YYZ the next time.
#9
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: DCA
Programs: UA US CO AA DL FL
Posts: 50,262
I guess I should have stressed the empty middle seats in E+ part more. I've always seen GAs turn down GMs that ask for E+. The empty middles seats I've noticed over the past few weeks have made the E+ cabin ever nicer!
They used to be lazy about giving away E+ seats to GMs that didn't have seat assignments, since it's easy to fill planes from the front backwards.
They used to be lazy about giving away E+ seats to GMs that didn't have seat assignments, since it's easy to fill planes from the front backwards.
E+ actually is within reach for many people and they are willing to pay for it. No reason to give it away.
#11
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Programs: UA Plat 2MM; AS MVP Gold 75K
Posts: 35,068
If E+ is open, it seems small enough to give it away if someone has been inconvenienced or helped out the airline.
#12
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Northeast Kansas | Colorado Native
Programs: Amex Gold/Plat, UA *G, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott LT Gold, NEXUS, TSA Disparager Unobtanium
Posts: 21,605
On my last few flights, the FAs have been very aggressive in announcing that E+ is only for people that have pre-booked it, and if you would like to move into E+, that you'll need to visit UA.com or talk to the GA. SFO-LAX announced it about five times.
#13
formerly known as felinaar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: SEA
Programs: UA Plat, AA Gold, AS MVPG, Hyatt Diamond, Hilton Diamond, SPG Gold
Posts: 612
I was actually surprised Sunday night on my UA flight out of MSY - first time on UA metal - that the FA went and got someone who was "unhappy" in back and brought her up to sit in an empty E+ middle.
Funny aside - lady comes up to the row and immediately says to the woman seated on the aisle "Is that your bag under the seat? Because I need to put my stuff away down there!" She was not so much rude as aggresive... but I was thinking she just complained her way into an upgrade and then wants to be picky about it.... What can ya do?
Now I dont know why the woman was allowed to move but it seemed odd to me
Funny aside - lady comes up to the row and immediately says to the woman seated on the aisle "Is that your bag under the seat? Because I need to put my stuff away down there!" She was not so much rude as aggresive... but I was thinking she just complained her way into an upgrade and then wants to be picky about it.... What can ya do?
Now I dont know why the woman was allowed to move but it seemed odd to me
I've noticed staff being more aggressive about protecting seats in the last year. Everything from GAs telling GMs at the gate that an upgrade to E+ will cost them, to FAs protecting bins and seats, telling potential poachers that pax in E+ have "paid more for their extra space."
#14
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: WAS
Programs: UA Silver, Marriott Gold, IHG Silver, Hilton Silver, Hertz PC, National Exec Elite, Avis PC
Posts: 1,295
On my last UA flight that had empty seats in the exit row, as soon as the cabin door closed and in almost one synchronized motion, every off-duty UA and CO crew member riding in E- jumped up and grabbed those seats.
#15
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Baton Rouge
Programs: Delta,United 1K, SPG Plat, Marriott Gold, Hertz #1 Gold, Avis Preferred
Posts: 214
I was sitting in the row in front of her new seat, and I agree she was a little short, but not rude. Actually, I'm quite surprised to recognize your story since I've never run into another FTer on a flight yet (but I don't look very hard).
I've noticed staff being more aggressive about protecting seats in the last year. Everything from GAs telling GMs at the gate that an upgrade to E+ will cost them, to FAs protecting bins and seats, telling potential poachers that pax in E+ have "paid more for their extra space."
I've noticed staff being more aggressive about protecting seats in the last year. Everything from GAs telling GMs at the gate that an upgrade to E+ will cost them, to FAs protecting bins and seats, telling potential poachers that pax in E+ have "paid more for their extra space."