Norwegian (DY) to launch LGW to JFK, FLL, LAX in July14
#46
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,737
#47
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Argentina
Posts: 40,211
No it was the other two....purely because they are already well served and low fares out of peak season can already be had anyway.
I seem to remember MOL saying that the price of fuel rocketing had put paid to any notion they might have had of starting long haul services.
I seem to remember MOL saying that the price of fuel rocketing had put paid to any notion they might have had of starting long haul services.
#48
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Gloucestershire
Programs: BA Gold (ex-GGL, maybe future Silver), Hilton Diamond
Posts: 6,201
"Premium" needs to be seriously cheaper unless this is flat pricing or maybe for one-ways.
It's the same price as an ex-AMS business fare and noticeably more than most premium economy except at very high demand periods. I'm sure it's a good product but it's not different enough from premium economy to justify the pricing.
As for not needing a Saturday away - well that is true but this route doesn't fly every day so that makes a difference too.
It's the same price as an ex-AMS business fare and noticeably more than most premium economy except at very high demand periods. I'm sure it's a good product but it's not different enough from premium economy to justify the pricing.
As for not needing a Saturday away - well that is true but this route doesn't fly every day so that makes a difference too.
#49
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Original Poster
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Netherlands
Programs: KL Platinum; A3 Gold
Posts: 28,737
Well...perhaps if LGW was their home base then they may have selected other destinations - but LAX and JFK are already destinations from their Oslo and Stockholm bases.
#50
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Brighton and Hove, UK
Programs: LH FTL, BA Silver, Thameslink Delay Repay
Posts: 1,248
Let me know where you can buy today at those prices - CW to LAX return for £1,509, I think not. A dummy booking for the same dates came to £3,298 in CW. Even out of my mind, I can see that that is more than double. @:-)
Yes, but eastbound with DY is overnight. As for the one way redemption in F, try finding availability. I tried several dates over several months without success. And on the dates with availability, they were connections using flights with AA via BOS or AB via DUS, with interesting turboprop connections in Y to add to the BA F experience.
Yes, but eastbound with DY is overnight. As for the one way redemption in F, try finding availability. I tried several dates over several months without success. And on the dates with availability, they were connections using flights with AA via BOS or AB via DUS, with interesting turboprop connections in Y to add to the BA F experience.
I fares LCY/LHR to JFK/EWR routinely go for ~£1,500 when sales are on, which is even more often than the general "all destinations" premium cabin sales.
#51
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,197
Is it me or have they not included APD in the fares or are they somehow (probably not) exempt from applying it or have they included it in the base fare (unusual if they do)
I was looking at New York and the 'taxes' are described as 'taxes account for' £124.30 and described as 'airport surcharge' with a separate £50 for fuel and these are the same for both Economy and Premium.
Premium should be attracting the higher rate of APD (£135)
I was looking at New York and the 'taxes' are described as 'taxes account for' £124.30 and described as 'airport surcharge' with a separate £50 for fuel and these are the same for both Economy and Premium.
Premium should be attracting the higher rate of APD (£135)
#52
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,379
Ryanair have been talking about it for a long time. O'Leary knows that hot air isn't just essential to airfield operations (the air, not the hotness necessarily) but to free marketing. How many times have we heard about standing room only or toilets that you have to pay for. All free marketing.
Ryanair are nowhere near starting long-haul/tranatlantic flights - they don't have any suitable aircraft on order.
A recent report said they would offer flights to the US for $10 "as soon as 2017".
A recent report said they would offer flights to the US for $10 "as soon as 2017".
Though regardless, as I said, Norwegian's business model is not identical to Ryanair's.
#53
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, IHG Spire Elite
Posts: 1,713
I have used Norwegian twice, once to OSL and once from AES. For a budget airline they're actually quite good. The clean leather seats are comfy, the interior is subtle and unlike most budgets the cabin crew don't continually bother you to either buy stuff or donate to their charity by waving a tin in your face.
If I was going to a destination they serve and there was a reasonable saving over the BA PE fare I'd give it a go. Last time I paid for my own ticket to go trans-Atlantic (Oct '12) I paid £800 return for multi city in PE. The big advantage is that I tend not to take long holidays and therefore have no need for checked luggage, the downside is LGW rather than LHR.
Having already used them I already have a FF account, albeit virtually worthless at present, and given my regular trips to Norway the thought of bagging free flights there on the back of a USA holiday is quite nice!
Overall I think this is good news and I hope it lasts, or even grows.
If I was going to a destination they serve and there was a reasonable saving over the BA PE fare I'd give it a go. Last time I paid for my own ticket to go trans-Atlantic (Oct '12) I paid £800 return for multi city in PE. The big advantage is that I tend not to take long holidays and therefore have no need for checked luggage, the downside is LGW rather than LHR.
Having already used them I already have a FF account, albeit virtually worthless at present, and given my regular trips to Norway the thought of bagging free flights there on the back of a USA holiday is quite nice!
Overall I think this is good news and I hope it lasts, or even grows.
Last edited by BerksFlyer; Oct 17, 2013 at 10:33 am
#54
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,379
Is it me or have they not included APD in the fares or are they somehow (probably not) exempt from applying it or have they included it in the base fare (unusual if they do)
I was looking at New York and the 'taxes' are described as 'taxes account for' £124.30 and described as 'airport surcharge' with a separate £50 for fuel and these are the same for both Economy and Premium.
Premium should be attracting the higher rate of APD (£135)
I was looking at New York and the 'taxes' are described as 'taxes account for' £124.30 and described as 'airport surcharge' with a separate £50 for fuel and these are the same for both Economy and Premium.
Premium should be attracting the higher rate of APD (£135)
#55
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: London, England
Programs: BA Silver
Posts: 3,772
I flew their 787 from OSL-LGW a few months ago in the premium cabin and it wasn't bad and would certainly be ok for a Westbound transatlantic. IFE was every bit as good as BA's. I tried sitting in their Y seat and that was a bit tight but apparently they have the same pitch as BA in the 787 which is also tight.
I think they might struggle on these routes, especially JFK given the huge competition. I wonder if AA might consider a LGW-JFK 757/767 service to wipe Norwegian out? They did this with STN a few years ago to get rid of Maxjet and Eos...
I think they might struggle on these routes, especially JFK given the huge competition. I wonder if AA might consider a LGW-JFK 757/767 service to wipe Norwegian out? They did this with STN a few years ago to get rid of Maxjet and Eos...
#56
Join Date: Aug 2013
Programs: BAEC Gold, IHG Spire Elite
Posts: 1,713
I flew their 787 from OSL-LGW a few months ago in the premium cabin and it wasn't bad and would certainly be ok for a Westbound transatlantic. IFE was every bit as good as BA's. I tried sitting in their Y seat and that was a bit tight but apparently they have the same pitch as BA in the 787 which is also tight.
I think they might struggle on these routes, especially JFK given the huge competition. I wonder if AA might consider a LGW-JFK 757/767 service to wipe Norwegian out? They did this with STN a few years ago to get rid of Maxjet and Eos...
I think they might struggle on these routes, especially JFK given the huge competition. I wonder if AA might consider a LGW-JFK 757/767 service to wipe Norwegian out? They did this with STN a few years ago to get rid of Maxjet and Eos...
#58
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: London-etc
Posts: 3,893
#59
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Brighton. UK
Programs: BA Gold / VS /IHG Diamond & Ambassador
Posts: 14,197
#60
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: somewhere north of London, UK
Programs: HH Gold, BA Silver, Accor Silver
Posts: 15,245
I'm surprised they don't pay people to be on that flight. Norwegians do the Christmas thing on Dec 24th whilst Americans do it on Dec 25th. Mind you, if you do want to miss the whole shebang.....