EOS Experience, the BEST
#31




Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Circle City
Posts: 3,568
Originally Posted by ajinlondon
http://www.eosairlines.com/cgi-bin/f...O&page=P_LHWUK
see above - doesn't appear anywhere else i think.
works out at Ł1,100 p/person. or Ł550 p/person as i'm not sure when the price is reduced.
see above - doesn't appear anywhere else i think.
works out at Ł1,100 p/person. or Ł550 p/person as i'm not sure when the price is reduced.
Interesting trip report. Sounds like a nice experience. If anything, it must be nice not fighting the crowds at LHR and LGW.
#32


Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: LAX and LHR. UA lifetime Gold 1.9MM 1K , DL Gold Medallion, HHonors Gold, Marriott Gold, Avis President's Club
Posts: 3,649
EOS is apparently the best of the LON-NYC carriers at the moment. MaxJet is also in there, and SilverJet is starting up within the next 9 months (and looks set to be considerably cheaper - Ł999 instead of Ł2,000+ - with a better seat than the others).
The thing about all of these carriers is that you pay a reduced business class fare. The American legacy carriers are still offering business class travel (admittedly not so cosseted as this EOS report indicates) for those who can upgrade from coach using miles or systemwides; and this means that BA and VS are still having to work hard. EOS is very good, but at a price. So there is still competition.....
Anyone remember People's Express and their business fares?
The thing about all of these carriers is that you pay a reduced business class fare. The American legacy carriers are still offering business class travel (admittedly not so cosseted as this EOS report indicates) for those who can upgrade from coach using miles or systemwides; and this means that BA and VS are still having to work hard. EOS is very good, but at a price. So there is still competition.....
Anyone remember People's Express and their business fares?
#33
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: May 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,588
Sounds nice, but don't get too used to it.
All premium carriers have been tried many times and they all have one thig in common . . .
. . . THEY FAIL.
All premium carriers have been tried many times and they all have one thig in common . . .
. . . THEY FAIL.
#35
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SAN
Programs: Nothing, nowhere!
Posts: 26,880
Originally Posted by PresRDC
Sounds nice, but don't get too used to it.
All premium carriers have been tried many times and they all have one thig in common . . .
. . . THEY FAIL.
All premium carriers have been tried many times and they all have one thig in common . . .
. . . THEY FAIL.
However, I disagree that ALL three of these carriers will fail.
First off, none of them have the massive pension programs, staff overheads, massive tech groups so they have a huge cost advantage over the traditional carriers.
Secondly, the way we buy travel is vastly different to when MGM and PE were operating. We're no longer dependent on travel agents who recieved big kick backs from the airlines to organise our travel, we use the internet and do it ourselves. We can do our own research into the best airline and best price for our needs and buy accordingly.
Thirdly, because these companies are small they can develop a better relationship with their clients. If people are happy with the service then they're going to keep coming back.
#36

Join Date: Sep 2005
Programs: AA LT PLAT - BONVOY PLAT
Posts: 208
Yes! To India!
Originally Posted by tranmerechris
Let's hope EOS start to fly some more routes - India, UAE? and put some pressure on BA et al.
#37
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: May 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,588
Originally Posted by USA_flyer
Clearly you haven't heard of Privatair.
However, I disagree that ALL three of these carriers will fail.
First off, none of them have the massive pension programs, staff overheads, massive tech groups so they have a huge cost advantage over the traditional carriers.
Secondly, the way we buy travel is vastly different to when MGM and PE were operating. We're no longer dependent on travel agents who recieved big kick backs from the airlines to organise our travel, we use the internet and do it ourselves. We can do our own research into the best airline and best price for our needs and buy accordingly.
Thirdly, because these companies are small they can develop a better relationship with their clients. If people are happy with the service then they're going to keep coming back.
However, I disagree that ALL three of these carriers will fail.
First off, none of them have the massive pension programs, staff overheads, massive tech groups so they have a huge cost advantage over the traditional carriers.
Secondly, the way we buy travel is vastly different to when MGM and PE were operating. We're no longer dependent on travel agents who recieved big kick backs from the airlines to organise our travel, we use the internet and do it ourselves. We can do our own research into the best airline and best price for our needs and buy accordingly.
Thirdly, because these companies are small they can develop a better relationship with their clients. If people are happy with the service then they're going to keep coming back.
Both EOS and MAXjet have low density seating. They need to fill the vast majority of those seats on a nightly basis at high fares to stand a chance at making a profit.
Neither airline offers frequency. Their competitors in the market do.
They only fly to one overseas and two U.S. destinations. That makes it very difficult for them to land corporate accounts, which are what provide a reliable stream of premium fares. Without this, they need to rely on ad-hoc business travelers and price sensitive premium leisure travelers. That's not a reliable base of support.
It would be hard enough for one carrier to succeed here, but there are two going head-to-head.
Fuel prices are high and one of the carriers, MAXjet, is operating particularly old equipment.
#38
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: SAN
Programs: Nothing, nowhere!
Posts: 26,880
Originally Posted by PresRDC
Privatair is a completely different business model than EOS or MAXjet, so it is comparing apples to oranges.
Both EOS and MAXjet have low density seating. They need to fill the vast majority of those seats on a nightly basis at high fares to stand a chance at making a profit.
Neither airline offers frequency. Their competitors in the market do.
They only fly to one overseas and two U.S. destinations. That makes it very difficult for them to land corporate accounts, which are what provide a reliable stream of premium fares. Without this, they need to rely on ad-hoc business travelers and price sensitive premium leisure travelers. That's not a reliable base of support.
It would be hard enough for one carrier to succeed here, but there are two going head-to-head.
Fuel prices are high and one of the carriers, MAXjet, is operating particularly old equipment.
Both EOS and MAXjet have low density seating. They need to fill the vast majority of those seats on a nightly basis at high fares to stand a chance at making a profit.
Neither airline offers frequency. Their competitors in the market do.
They only fly to one overseas and two U.S. destinations. That makes it very difficult for them to land corporate accounts, which are what provide a reliable stream of premium fares. Without this, they need to rely on ad-hoc business travelers and price sensitive premium leisure travelers. That's not a reliable base of support.
It would be hard enough for one carrier to succeed here, but there are two going head-to-head.
Fuel prices are high and one of the carriers, MAXjet, is operating particularly old equipment.
Your assumption that they need high load factor can't be debated as we don't know what load factors they need to make a profit. It might be far lower than we think especially if you consider the low number of first and biz pax on any legacy carrier flights. Also, their fuel burn is going to be lower because they don't have as much weight onboard.
It's quite possible one will exit the market but I maintain that one or two of these airlines can be successful in cherry picking routes and premium pax from the legacy carriers. Personally, if I had the choice between sharing an aircraft with a couple of hundred economy pax with screaming babies and unruly passengers and an airline that is probably out of the reach of most, I know where I'd spend my money.
#40
FlyerTalk Evangelist



Join Date: May 2001
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Programs: AA EXP 3 MM; Marriott Bonvoy Lifetime Titanium Elite
Posts: 18,588
Originally Posted by USA_flyer
The airports served by EOS and MAXjet have huge O&D markets so the connectivity is much less of an issue. I'm also willing to bet both already have some decent corporate accounts from financial institutions that have no interests outside Wall Street or DC.
Competitors include AA, BA, VS, UA, CO, AI and KU.
Your assumption that they need high load factor can't be debated as we don't know what load factors they need to make a profit. It might be far lower than we think especially if you consider the low number of first and biz pax on any legacy carrier flights. Also, their fuel burn is going to be lower because they don't have as much weight onboard.
Even though they are lighter, their engines (well, MAXjet's, at least) are a very old model (JT9Ds) that are not very fuel efficent. That will more than eat-up any weight-related fuel savings.
It's quite possible one will exit the market but I maintain that one or two of these airlines can be successful in cherry picking routes and premium pax from the legacy carriers. Personally, if I had the choice between sharing an aircraft with a couple of hundred economy pax with screaming babies and unruly passengers and an airline that is probably out of the reach of most, I know where I'd spend my money.
#41
FlyerTalk Evangelist




Join Date: Sep 2000
Programs: UA Million Miler (lite). NY Metro area.
Posts: 15,428
Originally Posted by flyingnew
Given that the OP posted notices also in the UA/BA/VS/AA forums
cruisr, thanks for the enjoyable read.
Dan
#42
FlyerTalk Evangelist
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IAD/DCA
Posts: 31,871
http://www.eosairlines.com/travelauction
I'm flying EOS in July, 2 tickets for $3100 and get $800 worth of their FF points. (Which appear to have excellent redemption options)
At $1500pp (Buy 1 get 1 free) I might just have to book another set before the June 30 (travel by December 31) deadline hits. :P
(You have to pay with an AMEX card, I used my SPG one)
I'll certainly post about the experience.
I'm flying EOS in July, 2 tickets for $3100 and get $800 worth of their FF points. (Which appear to have excellent redemption options)
At $1500pp (Buy 1 get 1 free) I might just have to book another set before the June 30 (travel by December 31) deadline hits. :P
(You have to pay with an AMEX card, I used my SPG one)
I'll certainly post about the experience.
#43


Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: London, UK
Programs: Centurion, VS Gold, BA Gold
Posts: 572
Originally Posted by ACfly
EOS has it's seats on display in Terminal 4 at Heathrow - few steps from the BA Pavillion lounge... I must say, they don't look all that great..
#44


Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NYC
Programs: UA 1.5 Million Mile flyer, Hilton Diamond, Bonvoy Gold, Hertz 5* and PC since 1985
Posts: 5,611
I am 6-3, how will I like the beds?
The company I am consulting for wants me to fly Eos, MAXjet or Silverjet.
What does everyone else think?
The company I am consulting for wants me to fly Eos, MAXjet or Silverjet.
What does everyone else think?
#45
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: London, UK
Programs: BA Gold, BD Gold, PC Ambassador, SPG Gold
Posts: 4,001
You can read my trip report on EOS here:
http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/showthread.php?t=745831

